Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

QinetiQ Group PLC Annual Report 2026

Jun 10, 2026

4849_10-k_2026-06-10_2b479c93-5805-49e4-9003-4e16a6836e68.html

Annual Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

QinetiQ Group Plc

213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-04-01 2026-03-31 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-04-01 2025-03-31 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-03-31 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2026-03-31 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-03-31 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-04-01 2026-03-31 qq:SpecificAdjustingItemsMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-04-01 2026-03-31 qq:UnderlyingMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-04-01 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-04-01 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-04-01 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-04-01 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-04-01 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:CapitalRedemptionReserveMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-04-01 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-04-01 2025-03-31 qq:UnderlyingMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-04-01 2025-03-31 qq:SpecificAdjustingItemsMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-04-01 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-04-01 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-04-01 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-04-01 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-04-01 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:CapitalRedemptionReserveMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-04-01 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:CapitalRedemptionReserveMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2025-03-31 ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:CapitalRedemptionReserveMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2026-03-31 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-03-31 ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-03-31 ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-03-31 ifrs-full:CapitalRedemptionReserveMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-03-31 ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-03-31 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 213800S8OBDOZMCMUW34 2024-03-31 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember iso4217:GBP iso4217:GBP xbrli:shares

Foundations set for

sustainable growth

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report & Accounts 2026

STRATEGIC REPORT

Overview

4

Financial highlights

5

Investment case

6

QinetiQ at a glance

8

Group Chair's statement

10

Group Chief Executive Officer's review

Strategy

14

Our strategic approach

22

Segmental reporting

24

Sector review

32

Group Chief Financial Officer's review

38

Key performance indicators

Sustainability

40

Introduction

43

Environmental

53

Social

60

Governance

63

Non-financial and sustainability

information statement

Risk

65

Risk management

69

Viability statement

Section 172(1) statement

72

Key stakeholder groups and

Section 172 statement

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

78

Corporate Governance statement

78

Group Chair's introduction

to Governance

96

Nominations Commiee Report

104

Audit Commiee Report

110

Risk & Security Commiee Report

115

Directors' Remuneration Report

142

Directors' Report and

statutory information

147

Independent auditor's report

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

156

Consolidated income statement

158

Consolidated balance sheet

159

Consolidated cash flow statement

160

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

212

Company Financial Statements

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

217

Five-year financial summary

218

Additional financial information

219

Glossary

220

Alternative performance measures (APMs)

221

Shareholder information

224

Company information and advisers

2

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

UK MOD © Crown copyright 2026.

Foundations set for

sustainable growth

We have delivered a resilient performance in a challenging

market. Our record order intake and increased backlog

provide clear visibility and confidence in our future.

We remain focused on delivering for our customers,

driving higher-quality earnings and increasing returns

to shareholders.

An embedded, long-term partner on Typhoon,

delivering specialist test and assurance

services across upgrades, sustainment

and capability evolution.

3

Resilient performance in a challenging market

Financial

highlights

1

Organic constant currency.

2

Funded and unfunded.

*

Definitions for the Group's ‘Alternative Performance Measures'

can be found in the glossary. Underlying operating profit refers

to operating profit from segments. See note 2 for details.

** Restated to include exceptional operating cash flows.

Record year end £4.8bn backlog

2

Resilient performance in a challenging market

FY24

FY25

FY26

£3,573m

£1,955m

£1,740m

83%

Orders

£3,573m

FY24

FY25

FY26

£1,923m

£1,932m

£1,912m

Revenue

£1,923m

1.3%

1

FY24

FY25

FY26

£218m

£185m

£215m

18%

Underlying

*

operating profit

£218m

FY24

FY25

FY26

31.5p

26.1p

29.4p

21%

Adjusted basic EPS

31.5p

FY24

FY25

FY26

£159.3m

£112.9m

**

£147.0m

**

42%

Free cash flow

£159.3m

24%

Dividend per share

11.00p

FY24

FY25

FY26

11.00p

8.85p

8.25p

RESILIENT

PERFORMANCE

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

4

STRATEGIC REPORT

Investment

case

Foundations set for sustainable growth

Exposure to structural

defence investment growth

Market-leading positions in

critical defence capabilities

Resilient business model

with strong margins,

ROCE and cash generation

Differentiated positions in engineering,

test and evaluation mission support

and technology roles embedded at the

heart of national defence programmes

Sustained increases in

defence budgets and urgent

readiness requirement

High revenue visibility underpinned

by long-term customer relationships,

multi-year programmes and robust

operational performance

Clear framework balancing investment

for growth with predictable,

strong returns to shareholders

Submarine operations at the British Underwater

Test and Evaluation Centre, a critical sovereign

capability supporting the Royal Navy's acoustic

and weapons testing.

Disciplined capital allocation

with strong shareholder returns

5

Our business

Our locations

Specialist capabilities supporting defence needs

We are a leading provider of mission-critical defence and security solutions to

the UK and its allies, protecting lives by supporting national security priorities.

Our innovative research and development, specialist engineering expertise,

unique test and training facilities and mission support and operations capabilities

deliver sustained warfighting readiness and operational advantage.

7,500

people, with deep defence

and security expertise

4th

largest supplier to the

UK Ministry of Defence

Headquartered in the UK (see box),

our operations extend to Australia,

Canada, Germany and the US, where

we work closely with governments,

industry and academia to deliver

mission-critical solutions.

Headquartered in

Farnborough, our teams are

located at sites across the

UK supporting our customers

and local economies.

QinetiQ

at a glance

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

6

QinetiQ

at a glance

A unique, integrated defence and technology services company

By customer

Ministry of Defence

Government agencies

Defence, other

Department of Defense

Commercial

60%

15%

13%

10%

2%

UK

US

Australia

Other

74%

15%

5%

6%

By destination country

By capability

Engineering Services

Mission Support & Operations

Test & Training

Research & Development

34%

27%

26%

13%

Engineering

Services

High-value engineering

for complex systems,

supporting acquisition

and sustainment

Mission Support

& Operations

Supporting live defence

operations – building

readiness and resilience

Test & Training

Testing and evaluating

defence capabilities

– unique skills and

infrastructure for

national certification

Research &

Development

Developing advanced

technologies for next-

generation capability

Our capabilities

Revenue split

Photo of Typhoon jet, UK MOD © Crown copyright 2026.

7

£134.9m

Cash returned to shareholders via buyback

Maintaining strategic focus

and shareholder returns in

a complex environment.

As we report on the year, the defence and security

environment remains heightened, marked by conflict,

instability and continuing geopolitical uncertainty.

Political change, shifts in the international order and

broader economic pressures are reshaping the operating

context for governments and industry alike. Against this

backdrop, defence and security continue to be a top priority

for our governments, alongside the need to sustain

a strong and resilient defence industrial base.

QinetiQ plays a distinctive role within this ecosystem.

We are different from equipment primes: our strength

lies in deep customer intimacy and in delivering critical

national capability through engineering, testing, training,

mission-led services and market-leading technologies.

Group Chair’s

statement

FY22

FY23

FY24

FY25

FY26

11.0p

8.85p

8.25p

7.7p

7.3p

3.0p

8.0p

6.05p

5.65p

5.3p

5.0p

2.8p

2.6p

2.4p

2.3p

Ordinary dividend per share

11.00p

+2.15p

YoY increase

in FY26

Interim

Final

These capabilities are aligned to long-term structural

growth in defence, particularly across our core markets

for the UK, US and Australia and European NATO allies.

This positions us well to support warfighting readiness

through pace, agility, innovation and efficiency.

I want to recognise the work our people do every day in

support of our customers' missions. Their expertise,

commitment and professionalism underpin our

performance and give the Board confidence in the Group's

ability to deliver sustainable growth and aractive returns.

Performance

The Group delivered a resilient and much improved financial

and operational performance against the backdrop of

near-term budgeting challenges across our core markets.

Following last year's performance, we acted decisively to

strengthen delivery, sharpen strategic focus and improve

our performance. I would like to thank our teams, customers

and partners whose contribution has been instrumental to

the improvement in-year and to positioning the Group for a

return to sustainable growth, higher-quality earnings and

continued strong cash generation in the years ahead.

In the UK, a tough fiscal environment contributed to delays

in contract awards, but our relationship with customers

remains strong and our role as a strategic partner continues

to deepen. We were pleased to secure the Long Term

Partnering Agreement extension and a five-year Typhoon

contract under the Engineering Delivery Partner programme.

We delivered our restructuring programme in the US to

ensure the business is aligned to the national defence and

security priorities of the US administration and the evolving

market landscape. In-year performance was impacted

by disruption including a US Government shutdown and

by programme changes and cancellations, which we

responded to by simplifying the organisation and refocusing

resources. The US business has now stablised, however,

we recognise the need to enhance value for shareholders

with all options under active review.

Looking forward, we have clear growth visibility, supported

by demand in our core markets, the introduction of new

defence platforms and technologies and requirements

to upgrade existing platforms. The fundamentals of the

business remain strong, with a significant order backlog

and forward order pipeline, providing confidence in our

medium-term growth trajectory.

We remain focused on delivering higher-quality, more

predictable earnings and increased returns. QinetiQ is a

highly cash generative business, and the Board continues

to prioritise disciplined capital allocation: investing

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

8

organically where we see strong returns and returning

capital to shareholders. We have introduced a new dividend

policy with a payout ratio target of 35–40% of underlying

earnings per share, as well as extending our share buyback

programme by a further £200m through to March 2029.

Strategy and Board priorities

Our purpose is clear – protecting lives by serving the

national security interests of our customers – and it

continues to guide strategy and decision-making. During

the year, the Board undertook its annual review of strategy

which remains unchanged. To deliver growth, the Company

will sharpen its focus on six core areas of high-value

services and a number of innovative products. Together,

they account for the majority of revenue today and offer

the strongest growth potential over the next five years.

The growth strategy has two clear vectors. First, we will

grow in our core markets, investing in innovative ideas that

strengthen our offering, improve competitiveness and

increase predictability of delivery. Second, we will take

these strengths into new and adjacent markets, with a

strategic focus on European NATO where we see multiple

opportunities for sustainable growth.

The Board's priorities during the year included continued

focus on capital allocation, oversight of performance

against strategic milestones, and support for succession

planning within the senior leadership team. We maintained

strong engagement with strategy and operations through

dedicated sessions and regular operational reporting from

the business. An investor perception audit was conducted

to gain further understanding of shareholder views and

priorities and the Board increased engagement with other

external stakeholders to gain deeper insights into customer

and industry perspectives. This included engagements

with senior military and political leaders as well as dedicated

sessions on the adoption of AI tools and capability, and

climate resilience.

Our people

Employee engagement and a strong performance culture

are central to QinetiQ's long-term success. Over the year,

Board members and I met with many of our highly talented

colleagues across the Group through site visits, leadership

engagements and employee roadshows. We also hold

regular interactions with the Company's Global Employee

Voice, our network of employee volunteers who represent

their colleagues and champion their voices and views.

This provides valuable insight into how strategy is landing,

how we are supporting teams to deliver for customers

and where we must continue to improve.

In a sector of such national importance, we remain focused

on operating responsibly. Safety and the wellbeing of

our people are paramount, and strong governance is

an essential enabler of sustainable performance. Our

sustainability agenda is therefore tightly connected to

how we lead, how we manage risk and how we deliver

for customers and wider society.

Board and governance

The Board continued to strengthen its collective capability

during the year. Our Chief Financial Officer, Martin Cooper,

completed a full year in role, bringing a valuable depth

of experience in the defence sector and in investor

engagement. Ezinne Uzo-Okoro and Roger Krone also

completed their first full year on the Board, adding further

insight and expertise, particularly in relation to the US

market. Dina Knight began her first year as Chair of the

Remuneration Commiee and I would like to thank her for

the leadership and rigour she has brought to the role.

Throughout the year the Board has been involved in

reviewing the Company's risk framework and internal

controls, in response to the upcoming new requirements

under Provision 29 of the revised 2024 UK Corporate

Governance Code. This will give us confidence in the

effectiveness of the policies and processes that underpin it.

In closing, while this has been a challenging year in many

respects, the Board's focus has been on ensuring the

actions were taken to address last year's performance and

positioning the Group for the next phase of growth. We

remain confident in the fundamentals of the business,

the strategic direction we have set, the strength of the

balance sheet and cashflows and the vital role we have in

helping our customers meet their rapidly evolving needs.

While near-term headwinds persist, our services and

technologies are in demand and we expect them to be

increasingly required in the years ahead. Our priorities are

clear: delivering performance, driving sustainable growth,

and generating aractive returns for shareholders.

On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank Steve Wadey,

our Group CEO, the leadership team and all of the

colleagues across QinetiQ for their commitment, energy,

professionalism and contribution over the year.

Neil Johnson

Group Chair

21 May 2026

Group Chair’s

statement

9

Delivering resilient performance in

challenging markets as a trusted partner

providing mission-critical capabilities;

and well positioned to drive aractive,

sustainable shareholder returns.

Against a more challenging market backdrop, we delivered

a resilient financial performance while undertaking

substantial restructuring. Revenue was £1.9 billion, with

operating profit of £218 million and improved margins of

more than 11%. We also delivered significantly stronger cash

generation, with free cash flow of £159 million, reflecting

strong cash conversion and improved operational discipline.

During the year, we executed a comprehensive restructuring

programme, reducing costs, reshaping the portfolio and

simplifying operations, particularly in the US. As a result,

we finished the year as a higher-quality business, with

a lower cost base, an improved contract mix, stronger

cash generation and greater predictability of earnings.

We also continued to build commercial momentum and

forward visibility. Record order intake of £3.6 billion and a

year-end backlog of £4.8 billion, up more than 40%, provide

clear multi-year revenue visibility and underpin improved

earnings quality. With our mission critical capabilities

aligned to the structural trends of modern warfare, we're

confident of delivering growth over the coming years.

We entered the new financial year with a simpler, more

focused platform and strong foundations for sustainable

growth and increased shareholder returns.

Reflecting this confidence in our outlook, we will continue

to invest for organic growth while targeting more than

£550 million of free cash flow over FY27–29, supporting

a significant increase in our dividend payout ratio to

35–40% and a £200 million extension of our share buyback

programme. In total, we expect to return around £0.5 billion

of cash to shareholders over the next three years.

Aligned to the major trends shaping

defence and security

Our strategy is strongly aligned to the structural trends

defining modern defence and security. In an era of renewed

great-power competition, customers are prioritising

sovereign, mission-critical solutions that deliver operational

advantage and decision superiority. QinetiQ's heritage in

science, test and evaluation positions us at the centre

of this demand.

The threat environment continues to intensify,

spanning advanced weapons, drones, cyber and

electronic warfare. Customers are investing to deter

and defeat increasingly sophisticated threats, with

a growing emphasis on rapid innovation, resilience

and adaptability. We support this through our ability

to anticipate emerging risks, test responses and assure

performance in contested environments.

Group Chief Executive

Officer’s review

£134.9m

Cash returned via buyback

1.3%

Organic revenue growth

£4.8bn

Backlog

1

11.3%

Operating margin

34%

ROCE

1

Funded and unfunded.

Overview

This has been a year of significant change for QinetiQ.

We have taken decisive action to strengthen the Group

and have set the foundations for sustainable growth.

I would like to thank our highly skilled employees for their

dedication and hard work throughout the year, and our

customers and partners for their continued support.

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

10

At the same time, autonomy is proliferating across

domains. Demand for uncrewed and autonomous

systems is accelerating, alongside the need to deploy

these capabilities safely, at pace and at scale. We enable

customers to de-risk, integrate and assure autonomous

solutions, supporting faster adoption while maintaining

safety, interoperability and operational effectiveness.

Digital technologies are also transforming defence.

Advances in artificial intelligence, data exploitation and

synthetic environments are reshaping how forces train,

test and operate. We continue to invest in these

capabilities, helping customers build readiness, reduce

cost, compress development timelines and scale.

Together, these trends are driving increased demand

for new platforms and technologies in the near term,

alongside growing demand for engineering, test, mission

assurance and the adoption of new technologies.

Customers are also placing greater emphasis on

interoperability across domains and nations.

These dynamics are driving sustained demand for our

capabilities, anchored in long-term programmes and

national security priorities, providing resilience and visibility.

What QinetiQ does and why it maers

QinetiQ is a unique, integrated defence and technology

services provider, playing a critical role in the modernisation

of defence platforms and technologies. We are not a

platform or hardware manufacturer. Our role is different,

we are a strategic partner to our customers working

across the capability lifecycle, supporting customers in

developing, integrating, testing and supporting defence

systems across all domains.

We provide high-value engineering, supporting

programmes from early design through to acquisition,

integration, and sustainment. Our work spans air, land, sea,

cyber and space domains, ensuring that critical capabilities

are designed, integrated and ready for deployment within

demanding operational environments. These capabilities

are embedded in mission-critical programmes aligned to

long-term defence priorities.

Test and evaluation is central to QinetiQ's proposition.

We operate nationally significant ranges and specialist

infrastructure across live and synthetic environments,

enabling the certification and assurance of defence

systems under realistic conditions. These nationally

significant assets are increasingly critical to assuring

defence capabilities as systems become more complex

and integrated.

QinetiQ also supports live defence operations, working

alongside customers in mission environments to ensure

that capabilities perform effectively in service. Through

the provision of mission data, embedded expertise

and secure communications, we enhance operational

readiness, resilience and decision-making in a heightened

threat environment.

Sustained investment in research and development

underpins long-term innovation in advanced technologies,

including autonomy, data, sensing, electronic warfare,

cyber and directed energy. This ensures our customers are

equipped to meet evolving and next-generation threats.

What differentiates QinetiQ is the combination of these

capabilities. We are embedded across programmes from

concept through to in-service support, helping customers

manage increasing technical complexity. As a result, our

work is mission-critical, high-barrier to entry and closely

aligned to long-term defence priorities, positioning us as

a trusted partner in delivering capabilities that are effective,

integrated and ready for use.

Our “right to win”

QinetiQ's “right to win” is centred on capabilities embedded

in long-term programmes, underpinned by clear competitive

advantages, strong customer positioning and a focused

approach to market opportunities.

Our competitive advantage is built on critical and unique

national infrastructure, deep technical skills and expertise

across domains, and our position as a trusted authority

with governments and industry. These aributes create

significant barriers to entry and support differentiated

delivery in complex, mission-critical environments.

QinetiQ's customer positioning is strengthened by

our ability to reduce customer risk through integrating

delivery across the programme lifecycle. We are a proven

collaborator, working in partnership to build capability

at pace, and we benefit from enduring relationships

developed over decades. This combination supports

consistent delivery and reinforces our role at the heart

of customers' most important missions.

Growth is focused on markets where we are best

positioned to win. In existing markets, particularly the

UK, we are focused on deepening our position through

market penetration and expanding the scope of work with

established customers. At the same time, we are developing

our offerings, including in areas such as the Engineering

Delivery Partner (EDP) programme, and pursuing targeted

market development in priority regions such as Europe.

This approach ensures growth is aligned to customer

demand and leverages existing strengths.

Group Chief Executive

Officer’s review

11

Together, these factors create defensible positions in

markets where QinetiQ can win, supporting repeat awards

and opportunities to expand the scope of work, and

providing strong long-term visibility. In turn, this underpins

sustainable margins, aractive returns and strong

cash generation.

Driving sustainable growth

QinetiQ is embedded in long-term, high-priority

programmes across the UK and allied markets,

providing strong multi-year revenue visibility and

a clear foundation for growth.

The portfolio combines programmes that deliver recurring,

growing revenue and those that will drive faster growth.

Examples of faster growing programmes include mission

data, persistent surveillance and next-generation weapon

technologies such as lasers. Investment in our major

programmes will continue to drive good revenue growth.

The LTPA will be driven by the transformation of testing

and evaluation capabilities and increased utilisation by

UK and NATO allies. The EDP and Space Development

Agency (SDA) programmes will be driven by the introduction

of new platforms and advanced technologies.

Together, these programmes provide strong visibility over

future revenues, with opportunities to expand scope and

deepen customer relationships, supporting both near-term

delivery and longer-term growth.

Significant defence customer

contract awards and extensions

During the year, we secured a number of significant

customer contract awards and extensions across our

defence portfolio. In the UK, a £1.7 billion contract extension

of the LTPA through to 2033 was signed, strengthening our

long-standing partnership with the Ministry of Defence

(MOD) and supporting continued investment in UK

sovereign capabilities. The MOD also awarded a five-year,

£205 million contract extension for critical engineering

services in support of the RAF's Typhoon fleet.

Further customer activity included a £67 million contract

from MBDA to support the production and delivery of the

UK's first laser-directed energy weapons (DragonFire)

for the Royal Navy, and a £70 million two-year OpNet

contract with the UK's Defence Digital to support the

transformation of deployed IT capability. Internationally,

an MoU between the UK and Belgium supports plans for

a new joint programme to establish a sovereign mission

data capability in Belgium.

In Australia, work continued with defence customers

on the development of laser-directed energy weapon

capability, combining DragonFire technology with an

established local partnership with the Defence Science

and Technology Group.

Investing in strategic capabilities

aligned to customer demand

During the year, we continued to invest selectively in

strategically important capabilities, aligned closely to

long-term customer demand. This included ongoing

investment in the LTPA, advanced technologies such

as directed energy weapons, and digital and mission

data capabilities supporting operational effectiveness.

We also continued to invest in next-generation target

systems, supporting the development of more advanced

and representative training environments, alongside

investment in resilient navigation capabilities to address

increasing requirements for assured positioning, navigation

and timing. In addition, we are expanding our capabilities

in artificial intelligence, with investment focused on

enhancing decision advantage, autonomy and data-driven

operational insights across customer missions.

We also made targeted investments to support growth

into Europe, while maintaining a disciplined approach to

capital allocation.

US business

The US defence services market remained challenging

during the year, reflecting a combination of budgetary

pressures, a shift in customer spending towards platform

and hardware programmes and slower contract awards.

These factors impacted performance across the market.

In response, we acted early and decisively to reshape and

stabilise the business. Key actions included the disposal

of the Fed IT business, a significant reduction in the cost

base and the exit of non-core and lower-return contracts.

At the same time, we repositioned the business to align

more closely with evolving US national security priorities

and to be beer positioned to pursue organic growth.

The US business is now a smaller, beer business, aligned to

market demand with current annual revenue approximately

$385 million. However, we recognise the need to deliver

enhanced value for shareholders and are actively assessing

the strategic fit of the US business within the Group,

including a review of all options.

Group Chief Executive

Officer’s review

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

12

Group Chief Executive

Officer’s review

Capital allocation and

shareholder returns

Shareholder returns remain a clear priority. We spent

£134m on share buybacks in FY26, and the Board has

approved a £200 million share buyback programme

extension through FY29, reflecting confidence in the

Group's cash-generative capabilities and outlook. In

addition, the Board is proposing a 24% increase in the

full-year dividend, underlining its confidence in the

Group's medium-term prospects. This increase reflects

the introduction of a new dividend policy, targeting

a 35–40% payout ratio, while maintaining balance sheet

strength and financial flexibility.

Investment case – positioned for

sustainable growth and strong

shareholder returns

QinetiQ is well positioned to deliver sustainable growth

and aractive shareholder returns, supported by exposure

to structural defence investment growth and increasing

readiness requirements. It holds market-leading positions in

critical defence capabilities, with differentiated roles across

engineering, test and evaluation, and mission support

embedded at the heart of national defence programmes.

Our resilient business model delivers strong margins,

returns on capital employed and cash generation. In

addition, we have a clear capital allocation framework

that balances investment for growth with predictable,

strong returns to shareholders.

FY27 outlook and summary

ɰ

Revenue growth 3–5% and operating margin 11.0–11.5%

ɰ

EPS growth 8–10% with cash conversion >90%

ɰ

>£550m of free cash flow targeted over FY27-29

The fundamentals of the Group remain strong, with a clear

strategy to create value across the business, positioning

QinetiQ at the centre of defence innovation for future

warfare. We benefit from a strong order backlog and

a well-developed pipeline of opportunities. This, combined

with the alignment of our mission-critical capabilities to

evolving customer needs, provides confidence and visibility

in delivering sustainable growth and compelling value

creation for shareholders.

Steve Wadey

Chief Executive Officer

21 May 2026

Throughout FY26, we engaged with senior

leaders across the Ministry of Defence and

Frontline Commands, increasing awareness

and understanding of QinetiQ's role delivering

mission critical capabilities.

The expansion of the successful QinetiQ,

AtkinsRéalis and BMT Aurora Engineering

Partnership to include Frazer-Nash

Consultancy combined with investment in

AI technology and a commitment to increase

the role of SMEs strengthens the Engineering

Delivery Partner (EDP) programme, which

provides mission critical engineering to

the Ministry of Defence (MOD).

13

Our strategic approach

Overview

Our strategy

is focused on driving innovation at the forefront of

defence technology, progressing entry into priority new markets

and expanding our service-led capabilities.

Our purpose

is protecting lives by serving the national security

interests of our customers.

Disciplined core business growth

Services & products

Markets

EXISTING

EXISTING

NEW

NEW

Market

penetration

Deepening presence in

core markets (e.g. UK)

Market

development

Targeted entry into priority

new markets (e.g. European

NATO countries)

Offerings

development

Expanding service-led

capabilities (e.g. AI-augmented

engineering)

Innovation, Partnering & Investment underpins sustainable growth

1

4

3

2

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

STRATEGIC REPORT

14

Progress against strategy

Co-creating innovative solutions

ɰ

Advanced technologies

ɰ

Digital transformation

ɰ

New business models

High-value and differentiated

Enabling critical national priorities

ɰ

United Kingdom

ɰ

Australia

ɰ USA

ɰ

Germany

ɰ

Canada

Deep multi-domain expertise

ɰ

Europe and NATO

ɰ

AUKUS partnership

ɰ

Leverage capabilities

Strengthening long-term customer relationships and accelerating innovation

to deliver enhanced defence capability and operational readiness:

ɰ

Secured multi-year technical

and engineering support

contracts with key UK defence

customers, reinforcing embedded,

long-term partnerships

ɰ

Expanded strategic partnerships

to combine cross-sector expertise

and deliver complex, mission-critical

defence capabilities

ɰ

Continued targeted investment

in research, digital and advanced

engineering to support next

generation systems and platforms

Engineering Services

34%

of revenue

Accelerating capability

Test & Training

26%

of revenue

Warfighting Readiness

Mission Support & Operations

27%

of revenue

For National Security

Research & Development

13%

of revenue

For technological superiority

Deepening our role as a leading sovereign partner across priority national

defence programmes:

ɰ

Continued delivery against Global

Combat Air Programme (GCAP)

ɰ

Awarded new and extended UK

Ministry of Defence contracts

supporting secure infrastructure,

testing and mission-critical systems

ɰ

Delivered specialist upgrades

and technical support enhancing

warfighting readiness and

operational assurance

Exporting specialist capabilities to priority allied markets where QinetiQ adds

differentiated value:

ɰ

Progressed delivery across

allied defence programmes

through long-term customer

and partner relationships

ɰ

Secured additional international

contracts for testing, evaluation

and assurance services utilising

QinetiQ’s UK sovereign capabilities

ɰ

Leveraged NATO and allied

defence relationships to

support repeat business and

follow-on opportunities

Our strategic approach

Driving innovation and partnering

Invest in core capabilities

Growing in our core markets

Expand across markets

1

2

3

4

15

Heightened geopolitical tensions and the evolving character of warfare are

reshaping defence priorities, reinforcing the importance of specialist providers.

Market themes

Our strategic approach

Global security volatility is

driving a renewed emphasis on

defence capability, resilience

and long-term preparedness.

For defence customers, this

translates into sustained

demand for specialist skills,

independent assurance and

long-term partnerships that

can support both current

operations and future

capability development.

Greater emphasis on

trusted suppliers with

the scale, expertise

and credentials to

support mission-critical

programmes over the

long term.

The pace of technological

change and the evolution

of modern warfare are

reducing the time available

to develop, test and field

new capabilities. Defence

customers increasingly

require rapid innovation,

safe experimentation and

accelerated transition from

concept to operational use.

Rising demand

for research-led

innovation, test and

evaluation, and the

ability to integrate

new technologies

quickly and safely into

complex systems.

As operational environments

become more complex,

defence organisations

are prioritising readiness,

assurance and sustained

performance across platforms,

systems and domains.

Confidence in capability,

safety and effectiveness is

increasingly critical.

Heightened requirement

for independent expertise,

sovereign test and

training capabilities,

and partners able to

support operational

effectiveness across

the lifecycle.

Sustained focus on defence investment

Compressed innovation timelines

Readiness, assurance and

operational advantage

Defence priorities

are evolving at pace

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

16

Across QinetiQ’s core markets, governments continue to prioritise investment

in sovereign capability, assurance and operational effectiveness.

Trading environment

Our strategic approach

United Kingdom

Australia

Stable underlying demand,

aligned to priority national

programmes, with

short-term budgetary

pressures affecting

the pacing of some

activities and a continued

requirement for trusted

technical partners across

the defence lifecycle.

Growing demand for

sovereign capability

support and specialist

skills, reflecting changes

in defence procurement

and supporting the

development of

longer-term customer

partnerships.

The UK remains QinetiQ’s

largest market, with

defence priorities

focused on sovereign

capability, safety and

operational readiness

across complex,

long-term programmes.

Australia is focused

on strengthening

defence capability,

resilience and domestic

industrial capacity, with

emphasis on assurance,

test and training.

>£7bn

Market opportunity

£1,416m

FY26 revenue

>£0.4bn

Market opportunity

£94m

FY26 revenue

United States

NATO allies and partners

Large, well-funded

programmes with

consistent medium-term

demand for specialist,

independent expertise

and long-term technical

support, with near-term

uncertainty driven primarily

by contract timing.

Expanding opportunity

for specialist capabilities

across NATO and

allied markets, driven

by increased allied

defence investment,

interoperability

requirements and

long-term cooperation.

The US defence market

is characterised by scale,

technical complexity and

sustained investment

across research,

development, testing

and evaluation.

Across NATO and allied

markets, defence

priorities remain

centred on readiness,

interoperability and

operational resilience.

>£24bn

Market opportunity

£288m

FY26 revenue

>£4bn

Market opportunity

£60m

FY26 revenue

Supportive medium-term conditions

across core defence markets

17

Business model

Our strategic approach

We enable defence customers to develop, prove and sustain advanced

capabilities through engineering expertise, sovereign test and evaluation,

digital systems and mission-readiness services.

How we generate returns

C

R

E

A

T

E

I

T

n

T

E

S

T

I

T

U

S

E

I

T

Create it. Test it. Use it.

QinetiQ supports customers across

the full capability lifecycle – from concept

creation and engineering, through rigorous

test and evaluation, to operational use

and assurance.

How QinetiQ is differentiated

We are differentiated from traditional platform

manufacturers by our focus on science-based

insight, specialist engineering and unique test

and evaluation infrastructure. These capabilities

underpin our ability to support customers across

the full lifecycle, from concept through to

in-service assurance.

R

e

s

e

a

r

c

h

&

D

e

v

e

l

o

p

m

e

nt

M

i

ss

i

o

n

S

u

p

p

o

r

t

&

O

p

e

r

a

t

i

o

n

s

T

e

s

t

&

Tra

i

n

i

n

g

E

n

g

i

n

e

e

r

i

n

g

S

e

r

v

i

c

e

s

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

18

Our mission-critical, high-barrier-to-entry capabilities

are embedded in long-term defence programmes.

What we do, and why it maers

High-value engineering

to support acquisition

and sustainment

Unique skills and

infrastructure

for certifying at

a national level

Building readiness and

resilience in a rising

threat environment

Long-term innovation

for next-generation

capability

Recurring revenue

through high-barrier

critical programmes

High-utilisation

specialist facilities with

strong barriers to entry

Stable recurring

revenues from

embedded roles and

ongoing operations

Customer-funded

and internally-funded

R&D transitioned into

defence programmes

Engineering for

complex systems

Test and

evaluate defence

capabilities

Support

live defence

operations

Develop

advanced

technologies

Capability

and examples

Why it

maers

How we

generate

returns

What we do

A key part of modernising

our T&E enterprise, our

Airborne Technology

Demonstrator is an agile,

dependable facility.

Our 5m pressurised,

low-speed wind tunnel

delivers high-quality data

valuable to UK aerospace.

Our specialist marine

infrastructure provides

hydrodynamic testing

for surface and

subsurface vessels.

We are using innovative

lifecycle techniques and

tailored testing to accelerate

weapons development.

Our strategic approach

Business model

Aircraft, ships, vehicles,

sensors, weapons and

mission systems

Land, sea, air, cyber

and space ranges and

virtual environments

Mission data,

embedded specialists,

secure communications

Autonomy, quantum,

AI, electronic warfare,

cyber, laser, simulation

Engineering

Services

Test &

Training

Mission Support &

Operations

Research &

Development

19

What differentiates us from our competitors and allows us to generate returns.

We create long-term value through mission-critical defence capabilities

that support national security and sustainable returns.

Our unique resources

The value we create

Our strategic approach

Business model

Specialist people

and deep defence

engineering expertise

Long-term, trusted

customer and

partner relationships

Sovereign test and

evaluation infrastructure

Secure digital

engineering platforms and

mission-critical tools

Government and society

Strengthening national security

and operational independence

Defence customers

Assured capability, increased

mission readiness, reduced risk

Shareholders

Resilient long-term growing

returns and cash generation

Employees

High-skill careers and

long-term development

Suppliers and partners

Stable, trusted relationships on

secure defence programmes

Environment

Lower-impact operations

30+ years

delivering sovereign

defence capability

Air, Land, Sea, Space

operating across the four domains

25+ years

of resilient cash generation

7,500 people

across engineering, science

and mission-critical roles

£1.0bn+

annual Group supplier spend,

of which £280m+ is with UK SMEs

36% reduction

in annual Scope 1 & 2 greenhouse

gas emissions since FY20

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

20

Financial value drivers

High revenue visibility

Backlog coverage provides strong visibility, with ~75% of

revenue for the next 12 months already under contract.

Margin expansion

Margin expansion from higher asset utilisation, disciplined

cost control and selective product growth, supported

by ongoing operational efficiency improvements.

Strong cash conversion

Consistently strong cash conversion, driven by

customer-funded R&D and capex, and a structurally

favourable (negative) working-capital profile.

Our business model is financially resilient, creating strong margins,

ROCE and cash generation.

High-barrier-to-entry assets

Above-sector-average returns on sales and capital,

supported by a differentiated, high-barrier operating model.

Recurring revenue

High levels of recurring revenue underpinned by multi-year

defence programmes, long-term service contracts and

embedded customer roles.

Structural and cyclical growth

Structural and cyclical growth – reflecting both long-term

funding trends and shorter-term spending cycles –

in government defence spending continues to

underpin multi-year demand for QinetiQ’s capabilities.

Our strategic approach

Business model

Air-deployed underwater sensing operations at

BUTEC, supporting high-barrier test, evaluation

and certification services for UK anti-submarine

warfare programmes.

21

UK Defence

£994m

FY26 revenue

UK Intelligence

£441m

FY26 revenue

Australia

£94m

FY26 revenue

EMEA Services

Overview

EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Australasia) Services

combines world-leading expertise with unique facilities

to generate and assure capability. We do this through

capability integration, operational readiness and threat

representation, underpinned by long-term contracts that

provide good revenue visibility and cash generation.

Financial performance

£1,529m

Total FY26 revenue

FY26

£m

FY25

£m

Order booked, excluding LTPA extension

1,469.6

1,441.7

Total orders booked

3,179.0

1,441.7

Revenue

1,529.2

1,477.7

Underlying operating profit

182.3

169.0

Underlying operating profit margin

11.9%

11.4%

Book-to-bill ratio

1

1.2x

1.2x

Backlog

4,142.3

2,470.6

1

Book-to-bill (B2B) ratio is orders won divided by revenue recognised,

excluding the LTPA non-tasking services revenue of £294m (FY25: £270m).

Financial performance

Total orders of £3,179.0m include the LTPA extension to

2033 which was announced in May 2025. Excluding the LTPA

extension, orders increased by 2%. EDP orders increased

by 20% to over £550m and included the £205m Typhoon

contract. The funded order backlog, excluding LTPA, ended

the year at £1.8bn, with a book-to-bill ratio of 1.2x (FY25: 1.2x).

Revenue increased by 3% to £1,529.2m (FY25: £1,477.7m), on both

a reported and organic basis, as a result of good growth in the UK

Defence sector, where growth was driven by new contracts and

growth in core contracts, including the LTPA and EDP.

As at 31 March 2026, we had £1.1bn of EMEA Services’

FY27 revenue under contract, the same level as for the

FY26 revenue at the equivalent point last year.

Underlying operating profit grew by 8% to £182.3m (FY25: £169.0m)

driven by both the revenue growth and cost efficiencies driving

an improved operating margin of 11.9% (FY25: 11.4%).

Approximately 68% of EMEA Services revenue is derived

from single-source contracts (FY25: approximately 66%).

By investing in our core contracts and extending their

duration, the high proportion of single-source revenue

contracted on a long-term basis provides visibility and

highlights the unique capabilities that we bring and the

quality of earnings within the backlog.

Segmental

reporting

Our UK Defence sector provides test & evaluation,

engineering assurance services, science & technology

solutions, and enables training and mission rehearsal for

our air, maritime and land customers in the UK. It is a trusted

partner throughout the acquisition lifecycle and provides

services to international allies via our UK base capabilities.

The UK Intelligence sector helps government and

commercial customers respond to fast-evolving threats

based on its expertise in data and digital engineering

(including Artificial Intelligence

(AI)/Machine Learning

(ML)

), quantum computing, training and simulation,

secure communication networks and devices, intelligence

gathering, surveillance sensors and cyber security.

Our Australia sector delivers advisory and engineering

services, threat representation and capability assurance

services to customers in Australia and the rest of the world.

This includes target services used for live-fire training and

weapon systems test and evaluation, operational air to air

training and special mission service delivery.

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

22

United States

£291m

FY26 revenue

Global Solutions

Overview

Global Solutions combines our world-leading technology-based

products and services. Our strategy is to focus the portfolio

of solutions in the US to win larger, longer-term programmes

providing good visibility of revenue and cash flows, and to grow

our product offerings in a number of targeted fields.

Financial performance

£393m

Total FY26 revenue

FY26

£m

FY25

£m

Orders booked

394.4

513.1

Revenue

393.4

453.9

Underlying operating profit

35.6

16.4

Underlying operating profit margin

9.0%

3.6%

Book-to-bill ratio

1

1.0x

1.1x

Backlog

279.1

374.6

US unfunded backlog

2

342.1

529.0

1

Book-to-bill (B2B) ratio is orders won divided by revenue recognised.

2

Unfunded orders represents the value of contract awards for which

funding has not yet been appropriated or authorised.

Financial performance

Orders of £394.4m (FY25: £513.1m) reflected a book to bill

of 1.0x. In a challenging US defence services market and

against the backdrop of US restructuring this was a 23%

decrease or 18% organically after adjusting for foreign

exchange and the impact of the US Federal IT disposal.

Revenue reduced 13% on a reported basis to £393.4m

(FY25: £453.9m). On an organic basis, revenue declined 7%,

primarily in the US, as we restructured the business and

exited some low-margin lines of business. Revenue in our

Targets business grew 6% on a constant currency basis.

As at 31 March 2026, we have 59% of Global Solutions’

FY27 revenue under contract, compared to 67% (of the

FY26 revenue) at the same point last year.

Underlying operating profit increased to £35.6m

(FY25: £16.4m), with an increased underlying operating

profit margin of 9.0% (FY25: 3.6%). The US business has

delivered a major restructuring programme and experienced

a more stable year in FY26, which has contributed to the

improved operating result of the Global Solutions segment.

The second half of the year saw no more material charges

in the US operations.

Our US sector provides design, development,

rapid prototyping, systems engineering and

integration and manufacture of speciality defence

mission products and solutions related to robotics,

autonomy, maritime and sensors.

The portfolio of our other Global Solutions products

provides research services and bespoke technological

solutions derived from EMEA Services, and includes

QinetiQ Target Systems (QTS).

Segmental

reporting

UK Defence,

UK Intelligence

and Australia

Products

£103m

FY26 revenue

23

Overview

UK Defence delivered a year of strong

operational progress, characterised by

major programme wins, delivery against

strategic priorities and continued

momentum in our transformation agenda.

The business strengthened its position

as a trusted partner to the UK Ministry

of Defence (MOD) and international

customers, supporting national security

at a time of increasing geopolitical

tension and evolving threats.

During the year, we advanced our role in high-power laser

systems, accelerated innovation in Test & Evaluation

(T&E), deepened collaborations with industry partners

and demonstrated the increasing value of our synthetic,

digital and autonomous capabilities. Our operational

achievements reflect both the breadth of our technical

expertise and our ability to integrate complex technologies

into mission-ready defence solutions.

At the same time, UK Defence made significant strides in

enabling new models of delivery, such as rapid additive

manufacturing, crewed–uncrewed teaming, and synthetic

mission rehearsal environments. These capabilities are

becoming essential across all domains of modern warfare,

and our contributions have helped shape customer thinking

on force structure, readiness and affordability.

Operational and order highlights

Long-Term Partnering Agreement (LTPA)

The £1.7bn five-year extension to the LTPA contract was

signed in H1 and secures our position of partnership with

the MOD and provides a firm foundation to invest in the

transformation of UK sovereign Test, Trials, Training &

Evaluation (T3E) capabilities.

Extension of Typhoon engineering services

We secured a five-year, £205m contract extension to

deliver engineering services for the RAF’s Typhoon fleet.

DroneWorks

Establishment of a sovereign T3E Capability designed

to support UK MOD and industrial partners accelerate

development of uncrewed aerial systems at wartime pace.

DroneWorks will establish QinetiQ as a key partner to

UK industry for uncrewed systems.

T&E Innovation Gateway

The launch of the Testing & Evaluation Innovation Gateway

created a new entry point for small and medium-sized

enterprises into our test facilities, reducing access

costs and increasing uptake.

Advancing laser directed energy weapons

A major highlight of the year was the award of a £67m

contract from MBDA to support the production and delivery

of the UK’s first laser directed energy weapons (DragonFire)

for the Royal Navy.

Royal Navy synthetic training

We won a £25m contract to deliver the Maritime Command

and Staff Trainer, an immersive synthetic environment

replicating complex naval operations.

Sector review

UK Defence

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

24

Outlook

UK Defence activity continues to be influenced in the near

term by uncertainty around levels of the UK MoD budget.

Whilst this affects the timing of some new programme

commitments, defence spending remains directed

towards operational requirements, with sustained

activity across priority capability areas and continued

emphasis on readiness, resilience and integration and we

see good growth again in FY27.

Over the medium term, UK Government policy supports

higher defence investment along with leveraging

capability into Europe. Within this environment, UK

Defence is targeting good, sustained levels of growth

in the medium term, reflecting exposure to areas of

sustained priority and ongoing programme activity.

Sharpshooter:

enhancing NATO readiness

through integrated testing

Challenge

Allied navies needed access to realistic,

high-fidelity test environments to rehearse

defence against complex aerial and maritime

swarm threats.

Solution

QinetiQ delivered Exercise Sharpshooter

from MOD Aberporth, integrating live Banshee

aerial targets, Hammerhead uncrewed

surface vehicles and synthetic threats.

Our T&E specialists designed and controlled

the scenario to safely replicate cruise missile,

drone and swarm behaviours in a single,

coherent environment.

Outcome

The Dutch Navy successfully detected, tracked

and neutralised multiple threats, validating

tactics and enhancing operational readiness.

The exercise marked the first NATO participation

in Sharpshooter and reinforced the UK and

QinetiQ as leading test and evaluation partners.

Sector review

UK Defence

IN ACTION

Pictured above:

Exercise Sharpshooter, delivering live

and synthetic training to the Royal Navy and UK allies for

operational advantage.

25

Overview

UK Intelligence delivered a year of

solid operational performance in FY26,

underpinned by strong order intake,

sustained delivery across critical

programmes, and continued progress

in aligning the business to the UK

Government’s digital modernisation

agenda. The sector supports defence,

national security and homeland security

customers through advanced C5ISTAR

integration, digital platforms, cyber

resilience and mission-critical science

and technology.

During the year, UK Intelligence secured c.£530m of

orders across its distinctive portfolio, reflecting continued

customer demand for capabilities that enable resilient

digital infrastructure, data-driven decision-making

and multi-domain integration. The business continued

to benefit from its strong positioning with key UK customers,

including Defence Equipment & Support, Defence

Digital, Defence Intelligence and Defence Science and

Technology Laboratory (DSTL), supporting long-term

transformation programmes alongside the delivery of

frontline operational capability.

FY26 also saw further progress in building scale and

coherence across the portfolio, with strengthened

collaboration across the Group – particularly with

UK Defence – enabling delivery of complex, integrated

solutions. Continued investment in priority areas, such

as resilient position, navigation and timing capabilities –

ensuring assured navigation in contested environments –

alongside mission data, quantum technologies,

digital intelligence and cyber assurance, reinforces

UK Intelligence’s role as a trusted partner for secure

digital change at pace.

Operational and order highlights

Sustained performance across

Defence Mission Systems

UK Intelligence delivered strongly across core Defence

Mission Systems programmes, securing multi-year

orders that underpin the delivery of critical frontline

capability. This included a £70m two-year OpNet contract

to transform Defence Digital’s deployed IT capability,

alongside a further five-year extension to support the

Typhoon programme, providing integrated avionics,

sensing, software, training and simulation services

essential to operational effectiveness.

Growth in next-generation capability areas

The sector continued to build capability in priority growth

areas, including multi-million-pound Future Combat Air

System support and progress in quantum technologies,

marked by delivery of a first large-scale vessel-based trial.

Resilient Position, Navigation and Timing

A key milestone was the award of the £6m Urgent Compass

contract. Continued development of micro receivers

supported future growth across defence, security and

critical national infrastructure markets.

Expansion of digital and

data-intelligence services

Digital Intelligence performed well, supported by a £34m

enterprise service management platform award and

solid programme delivery. Naimuri also delivered strong

performance, driven by continued demand across

defence, national security and law enforcement.

Mission data, laser and sensing innovation

UK Intelligence sustained momentum in mission

data services with UK and export customers and

achieved record order intake for multi-function laser

technologies supporting communications, sensing

and bale-damage assessment.

Mission cyber and homeland security delivery

The sector expanded its mission cyber role through delivery

of the Emergency Services Mobile Communications

Programme device-certification service, supporting the

Home Office, alongside continued progress in operational

technology delivery at the mission edge.

Sector review

UK Intelligence

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

26

Outlook

Sector demand continues to be underpinned by enduring

national security priorities, ongoing digital modernisation

and the need for assured, integrated capability. While

procurement processes are likely to remain competitive

and subject to affordability discipline, customers are

anticipated to continue to favour partners with a proven

track record of delivery, security and long term support.

Over the medium term, increasing operational complexity

and data intensity are likely to sustain requirements

across intelligence, security and defence domains.

In this context, UK Intelligence is well positioned to

support priority programmes and is aiming to deliver

higher year on year growth in FY27 and improvement

thereafter, while remaining mindful of policy, funding

and execution uncertainties inherent in the market.

Resilient navigation:

maintaining assured positioning

in contested environments

Challenge

Military and security operations rely on precise

location and timing information to operate safely and

effectively. Increasing disruption to satellite-based

navigation systems means these operations cannot

always rely on GPS alone, creating a risk to safety,

coordination and mission success.

Solution

UK Intelligence led delivery of the UK Government’s

Urgent Compass programme, providing an

alternative navigation capability that operates

independently of satellites. The solution uses proven

terrestrial technology to ensure location and timing

information remains available even when satellite

signals are unavailable or degraded.

Outcome

The programme delivered a credible, operationally

relevant back-up capability, strengthening

resilience in complex operating environments.

It also demonstrated QinetiQ’s ability to respond

rapidly to emerging operational risks and to deliver

assured, mission-critical capability at pace in

support of national security priorities.

Sector review

UK Intelligence

IN ACTION

Pictured above:

Defence-grade assured navigation

equipment, supporting resilient positioning and

timing as reliance on satellite navigation becomes

increasingly contested.

27

Overview

Our Australia sector comprises our

specialist advisory and engineering

business and our threat representation

business operating in the Australian

market. The sector operates as two

business units; Mission Support, Research

and Development, which includes flight

operations and threat representation,

and Engineering Services, which includes

our training capabilities.

FY26 was a year of transition and strategic evolution for our

Australian business. We remained focused on deepening

customer intimacy while ensuring our operations are

aligned to evolving Government priorities and budget

environments. This included continued changes to our

operating model to beer match customer ways of working

and to reduce overheads, supporting more agile and

responsive delivery.

Operational and order highlights

Progress on MSP

We are actively shaping the customer’s approach to the

next phase of the Major Service Provider (MSP) programme

– set to operate under a new model – drawing on our strong

experience of the UK Engineering Delivery Partner (EDP)

programme and deep customer engagement. Delivery of

current contracts continues under the existing model.

Advancement of laser weapon capability

Ongoing development of our laser directed energy

weapon capability, leveraging the UK’s DragonFire

technology alongside our established local laser

development partnership with the Defence Science

and Technology Group. This work strengthens our

position in delivering advanced directed-energy

solutions for future defence requirements.

JATTS contract extension

QinetiQ was awarded a two-year extension to the

Joint Adversarial Test and Training contract (JATTS).

This was a major business-winning achievement that

directly reflects customer confidence in QinetiQ’s

threat-representation capability.

Improved delivery model

Enhanced operational alignment with customer ways

of working, refining engagement models and delivery

processes to strengthen responsiveness and support

evolving customer requirements.

Readiness for major programmes

Built operational readiness for a substantial pipeline of

FY27 defence programmes, preparing capability and delivery

teams to support customer priorities across engineering

services, directed energy, makerspace infrastructure and

threat-representation solutions.

Sector review

Australia

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

28

Outlook

Australia’s defence sector is expected to remain in a

period of adjustment as government investment priorities,

processes and delivery timelines continue to evolve.

Changes associated with the National Defence Strategy,

workforce reforms and procurement system updates

support longer-term demand, but may also contribute

to near-term variability in project phasing and awards.

The Australia business is focusing on transitioning

from a subcontractor to a prime contractor and the

speed of that and associated growth will depend on

the timing of customer decisions and execution risk

across major programs.

Delivering efficient, secure

technical support during a

period of evolving priorities

Challenge

With defence organisations navigating

tighter budget seings and evolving programme

timelines, maintaining momentum on critical

sustainment tasks required efficient,

low-friction technical support.

Solution

QinetiQ facilitated the timely and secure

transfer of technical data from the UK to

Australia to support HMS Anson’s maintenance

period, enabling essential information to reach

engineers without delay and minimising the

need for more resource-intensive alternatives.

Outcome

The customer praised the responsiveness and

assurance of the process, which contributed

to maintaining programme progress while

supporting the focus on managing budgets

effectively. The activity also reinforced QinetiQ’s

role as a dependable partner in delivering

efficient, high-assurance technical support.

Sector review

Australia

IN ACTION

Pictured above:

© Commonwealth of Australia,

Department of Defence/The Astute-class submarine

HMS Anson comes alongside at HMAS Stirling in

Western Australia, for a scheduled Submarine

Maintenance Period (SMP).

29

Overview

Our US sector provides specialist

engineering, systems integration

and mission operations support to

defence and homeland security

customers across the United States,

operating across priority mission areas

including space and missile defence,

maritime systems, persistent surveillance,

sensing and autonomy.

FY26 was a year of transition for the US business.

The sector strengthened its position as a mid-tier

provider of differentiated, mission-critical capability,

while taking action to sharpen its portfolio and operating

model to support improved operational focus, financial

discipline and closer alignment with enduring US national

security priorities.

Operational and order highlights

Support to space and missile defence priorities

QinetiQ US continued to scale its support to the Space

Development Agency (SDA). In September 2025, the Agency

successfully launched 21 data-transport satellites for

Tranche 1 of the US Space Force’s Proliferated Warfighter

Space Architecture, supporting the development of

a resilient space-based threat detection capability.

Improved delivery in Defence Services

The Defence Services business delivered stronger

operational performance, underpinned by improved

delivery discipline.

Growth in solutions and sensor modernisation

The solutions business secured and delivered the first

phase of a multi-year acquisition supporting a significant

sensor modernisation programme.

Expansion in homeland security and

border surveillance

QinetiQ US expanded its persistent surveillance footprint

through the integration of two additional sites along

US borders.

Naval capability and autonomy

The sector secured key naval studies focused on

next-generation surface and sub-surface capabilities

and submied a long-term support plan for the future of

US Navy aircraft carriers.

Portfolio focus and discipline

As part of a comprehensive portfolio review, QinetiQ US

reduced exposure to lower-margin and more volatile

activities, including the disposal of its Federal IT

portfolio for approximately $31m in September 2025.

Sector review

United States

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

30

Outlook

Demand for mission-critical capability across the US

defence and homeland security market is expected to

remain supported by enduring national priorities and

long-term modernisation programmes and elevated

US Department of War budgets.

Spending is anticipated to remain aligned with our core

focus areas of space and missile defence, maritime

systems, persistent surveillance, sensing and

autonomy. While near-term outcomes remain subject

to competitive wins, phasing and disciplined delivery on

existing programmes and a selective approach to new

opportunities which support QinetiQ US’s positioning

across priority areas over the medium-term.

Enhancing space-based threat

detection through resilient

mission support

Challenge

The US Space Force required rapid, reliable

mission support to deploy resilient satellite-

based communications and data-transport

capability in a contested environment.

Solution

QinetiQ US supported the Space Development

Agency through specialist engineering and

systems integration activities, contributing

to the successful launch of Tranche 1

data-transport satellites.

Outcome

The successful launch enhanced space-based

threat detection capability and demonstrated

QinetiQ US’s ability to support complex,

mission-critical space programmes at pace.

Sector review

US

IN ACTION

Pictured above:

Continuing support to the Space

Development Agency’s efforts, focusing on developing,

testing and integrating space-related defense systems.

31

Group Chief Financial

Officer's Review

Overview of full-year results

The Group has delivered a resilient and improved financial

performance against the backdrop of near-term geopolitical

and market challenges. Funded order backlog closed at

£4.4bn following the LTPA extension in H1, and we delivered

organic revenue growth at an underlying operating profit

margin of 11.3%. Consistently strong cash generation of

100% has contributed to net debt to EBITDA remaining

consistent at 0.5x (FY25: 0.4x) and enabled us to continue

and extend our share buyback programme, enhancing

returns to shareholders. We have also continued to grow

the dividend to 11.0p per share (FY25: 8.85p). The year end

has seen a significant increase as we changed the dividend

policy to a payout ratio.

The Group achieved a strong order intake totalling

£3,573.2m (FY25: £1,954.8m), including the LTPA five-year

extension order intake of £1.7bn, with particularly strong

performance in EMEA Services, where the prior year

included the 10-year NGGATS contract in Germany.

The book-to-bill was again strong, at 1.1x excluding LTPA

non-tasking revenue. We have secured major orders

across both of our operating segments. Within EMEA

Services we secured £1,469.6m (FY25: £1441.7m) of orders,

representing organic growth of 2%. Within Global Solutions,

FY26 orders were £394.4m (FY25: £513.1m), representing

a book-to-bill of 1.0x and an 18% decrease on an organic

basis after adjusting for foreign exchange and the

disposal of the US Federal IT business.

A year of improved financial and

operational performance and

strong free cash flow.

£m

Underlying* results

Statutory results

FY26

FY25

FY26

FY25

Revenue

1,922.6

1,931.6

1,922.6

1,931.6

Operating profit/(loss)

1

217.9

185.4

169.8

(90.5)

Profit/(loss) after tax

168.5

147.0

107.5

(185.7)

Earnings/(loss) per share (p)

31.5

26.1

20.1

(33.0)

Full year dividend per share (p)

11.0

8.85

11.00

8.85

Funded order backlog

4,421.4

2,845.2

Orders

1,864.0

1,954.8

Net cash inflow from operations

343.2

316.2

291.6

286.7

Net debt

(159.1)

(133.2)

*

Definitions of the Group’s ‘Alternative Performance Measures’ can be found in the glossary.

1

Underlying operating profit relates to operating profit from segments. See note 3 to the financial statements for details.

100%

Operating cash conversion

34%

ROCE

24%

Dividend growth

£135m

Share buyback

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

32

Orders

FY25

FY26

EMEA

Services

1

LTPA

Extension

2

Global

Solutions

FX and

disposal

£m

1,955

33

1,709

3,573

(85)

(39)

85% organic growth

83% total growth

1

Excl. LTPA Extension.

2

£1.54bn LTPA extension plus award of £166m relating

to current investments.

Revenue

FY25

FY26

EMEA

Services

Global

Solutions

FX and

disposal

£m

1,932

55

1,923

(29)

(35)

1.3% organic growth

Operating profit

FY25

FY26

EMEA

Services

Global

Solutions

Foreign

Exchange

£m

185

Margin

11.3%

14

218

20

(1)

18% organic growth

Margin

9.6%

Margin

11.9%

Margin

9.0%

Group Chief Financial

Officer's Review

Funded order backlog has risen to a record high of £4.4bn,

or £4.8bn including US unfunded orders, providing good

visibility going forward:

ɰ

In EMEA Services the total funded order backlog was

£4.1bn (FY25: £2.5bn), with the increase driven by the

five-year LTPA contract extension to 2033. This is a

large multi-year contract and as we deliver, this will

naturally reduce the LTPA order backlog.

ɰ

In Global Solutions the total funded order backlog was

£279.1m (FY25: £374.6m). US unfunded order backlog

reduced from £529.0m to £342.1m as orders were

booked and traded in-year.

On 31 March 2026, approximately 67% (£1.3bn) of the

Group’s FY27 expected revenue was under contract,

compared to 70% (£1.4bn) of the forecast FY26 revenue

at the same point last year.

We delivered organic revenue growth of 1% to £1,922.6m

(FY25: £1,931.6m) in challenging near-term market

conditions. Reported revenue growth, which includes

the impacts of foreign exchange and the US Federal IT

disposal, was flat. We saw a 4% organic revenue increase

to £1,529.2m (FY25: £1,477.7m) in EMEA Services, primarily due

to good growth on UK Defence sector framework contracts.

Global Solutions revenue reduced 7% on an organic basis

to £393.4m (FY25: £453.9m), primarily in the US as we exited

some non-core business lines and were impacted by market

conditions in particular government services lines of work.

Operating profit from segments of £217.9m (FY25: £185.4m)

was up 18%. This represents an 11.3% operating margin

(FY25: 9.6%), consistent with historical levels following

the one-off profit impacts in FY25. EMEA Services

delivered a strong operating margin of 11.9% (FY25: 11.4%)

as we effectively executed on our order backlog and

controlled costs.

Operating margins in Global Solutions increased from 3.6%

in FY25 to 9.0% in FY26, driven by an increase in profitability

in the US and the absence of one-off charges.

The statutory operating result was a profit of £169.8m

(FY25: loss of £90.5m), including the impact of specific

adjusting items and recurring income on Research and

Development Expenditure Credits (RDEC), which was

£29.3m (FY25: £30.0m).

Underlying profit before tax increased 14% to £229.6m

(FY25: £198.6m), in line with the increase in underlying

operating profit, with underlying net finance expense in

line with the prior year at £17.6m (FY25: £16.8m).

33

Group Chief Financial

Officer's Review

Specific adjusting items

The total impact of specific adjusting items (which are

excluded from underlying performance due to their

distorting nature) on operating profit was a cost of

£77.4m (FY25: cost of £305.9m). The improved position

reflects that FY25 included the goodwill impairment

charge of £143.9m relating to the US Sector and acquisition,

disposal and integration costs of £14.9m associated with

integrating the Avantus and Air Affairs acquisitions into

their respective sectors, while this year there are no

charges against these line items.

In FY26 the non-recurring cost of the discrete digital

investment programme is £23.6m (FY25: £20.8m).

We continue to roll out this project to modernise the IT

infrastructure to support our future growth ambitions.

The non-recurring costs are reported as specific adjusting

items in the P&L, with ongoing recurring operating costs

(such as licence costs and overheads) remaining within

underlying operating costs. This year is expected to be

the final year of digital investment.

Restructuring costs and other impacts were £30.2m

(FY25: £64.5m). This includes the costs of efficiency activity

in UK and Australia operations which is nearing completion,

as well as the further non-cash charges in the US. The

majority of these costs were reported within the first half of

FY26 and were a consequence of continued refinement of

the market-facing strategy and ongoing restructuring of

the US Sector against challenging market conditions.

Also included within specific adjusting items are net finance

income from pensions of £2.4m (FY25: £1.0m), amortisation

of acquisition intangibles of £23.1m (FY25: £24.2m) and the

£0.5m gain on disposal of the Federal IT business in the US,

which completed during the first half of the year.

Tax

The total tax charge was £47.6m (FY25: £79.4m). The

underlying tax charge was £61.1m (FY25: £51.6m), on a

higher underlying profit before tax, with an underlying

effective tax rate of 26.6% for the year ending 31 March 2026

(FY25: 26.0%). The underlying effective tax rate is above

the UK statutory rate of 25% (FY25: 25%) primarily as a

result of unrecognised tax deductions and prior year

adjustments to returns.

The underlying effective tax rate is expected to remain

marginally above the UK statutory rate, subject to the

impact of any tax legislation changes and the geographic

mix of profits. The Group has engaged with advisers to

assess any potential impact on the tax charge by the UK’s

enactment of the OECD’s Global Anti-Base Erosion Model

Rules (Pillar Two). The Group performed an assessment of

the potential exposure to Pillar Two income taxes based on

current period data. The Group believes it qualifies for one

of the transitional safe harbours provided in the rules in all

territories in which it operates. The Group has not accrued

a Pillar Two top-up tax charge for FY26. The Group

has applied the temporary exemption issued by the

International Accounting Standards Board from the

accounting for deferred taxes under IAS 12 and neither

recognises nor discloses information about deferred taxes

related to Pillar Two income taxes. The Group does not

anticipate a material quantitative impact from Pillar Two

legislation; however, there are expected to be significant

compliance obligations.

FY26

£m

FY25

£m

Acquisition and disposal costs

(14.9)

Restructuring costs and other impacts

(30.2)

(64.5)

Digital investment

(23.6)

(20.8)

Loss on sale of property

(36.6)

Impairment of property

(0.5)

(1.0)

Impairment of goodwill

(143.9)

Amortisation of acquired intangibles

(23.1)

(24.2)

Disposal of business

0.5

Finance income – pensions

2.4

1.0

Total specific adjusting items loss before tax

(74.5)

(304.9)

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

34

Group Chief Financial

Officer's Review

Cash management and

capital allocation policy

Working capital management and overall cash performance

have remained strong. Underlying net cash flow from

operations was £343.2m (FY25: £316.2m). Our cash

conversion definition reflects our pre-capital expenditure

cash flows as a proportion of EBITDA to demonstrate how we

convert our profit (excluding interest, tax, depreciation and

amortisation) into cash flow. We achieved good underlying

cash conversion of 100% (FY25: 105%).

As at 31 March 2026, the Group had £159.1m net debt,

increased from £133.2m as at 31 March 2025, as the strong

operating cash conversion during the year and the proceeds

from the sale of the US Federal IT business, allowed for

record shareholder returns through £48.7m of dividends

and £146.9m of purchases of own shares (including c.£12.3m

for company share incentive schemes). Leverage remains

consistent at 0.5x (31 March 2025: 0.4x).

Through FY26 we have demonstrated our capital allocation

policy in action:

ɰ

Invested in our organic growth – net capital

expenditure of £72.5m (FY25: £108.4m, which included

one-off spend on aircraft in Germany), focused on

contractual commitments (51% relating to customer

funded contracts, including £37m into the LTPA),

sustainment of the portfolio and investment to

support future growth

ɰ

Provided a progressive dividend to shareholders

and changed the dividend policy to a pay-out ratio –

year-on-year growth rate of 24%

ɰ

Completed sale of the US Federal IT business,

with proceeds of £17.9m, and returned the cash to

shareholders through accelerating the buyback

programme in year

ɰ

Return of excess cash to shareholders – c.£135m share

buyback completed during the year. Approximately half

of the £200m share buyback extension announced in

March 2025 had been completed as at 31 March 2026

The Group is not subject to any externally imposed

capital requirements.

Net debt movements

Underlying

operating

profit from

Segments

Depreciation

&

amortisation

Underlying

EBITDA

Underlying

working

capital

movement

& other

Underlying

net cash

inflow from

operations

Exceptional

operating

cash flows

Net capex

Net interest

& taxation

Free cash

flow

Shareholder

return

Change in

net debt

Other

2

RDEC

1

£m

218

29

344

343

(52)

(72)

(60)

159

(183)

(2)

(26)

1

97

100% cash conversion

Net Debt: £158m

Leverage: 0.5x

1

Research and Development Expenditure Credit.

2

Other includes disposal of business £17.9m, purchase of own shares for incentive arrangements £(12.3)m, foreign exchange and lease related movements.

35

Group Chief Financial

Officer's Review

Commied facilities

The Group has a £333.6m Term Loan split into two tranches:

GBP Term Loan £273m (Tranche A); and, USD Term Loan

$80m (Tranche B), which will mature on 27 September 2027.

Participating banks have lent on a two-tier basis, three

banks at £67m and four banks at £35m. In line with Group

policy, £270m (c.80%) of the floating rate debt has been

fixed using SONIA interest rate swaps at a weighted average

rate of 3.46%, maturing on 27 September 2027.

The Group has a £290m bank revolving credit facility with

an ‘accordion’ facility to increase the limit up to £400m.

The facility, which will mature on 22 April 2029, was undrawn

at 31 March 2026.

We adopt a strict policy on managing counterparty risk

through a combination of diversification of investments and

regular reviews of counterparty limits using credit rating

assessments. Our debt sits with our key relationship banks,

who have strong credit ratings and diverse portfolios.

The banks have been selected for their capabilities in our

home countries to support our business.

Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)

ROCE at a group level uses the calculation of: operating

profit from segments less underlying amortisation/(average

capital employed less net pension asset), where average

capital employed is defined as shareholders’ equity plus

net debt (or minus net cash).

FY26 ROCE was 34% (FY25: 22%) due to the stronger

profitability and the impact of the right-sizing and

restructuring activities across the Group. As we continue

to invest in the business to drive our organic growth

strategy and maintain the disciplined capital allocation

agenda, ROCE is expected to remain high, at or above

the 25-30% range.

Earnings per share

Underlying basic earnings per share increased by 21% to

31.5p (FY25: 26.1p), driven by the higher underlying profit

after tax and acceleration of the share buyback programme.

Basic earnings per share for the total Group (including

specific adjusting items) were 20.1p (FY25: loss of 33.0p).

The improvement is driven by FY25 including the impairment

of goodwill relating to the US, and higher restructuring costs

and other related items.

The average number of shares in issue during the year, net of

treasury shares and as used in the basic earnings per share

calculations, was 535.4m (FY25: 563.4m). There were 522.1m

shares in issue as at 31 March 2026, net of treasury shares,

reduced due to the ongoing share buyback.

Dividend

The Board proposes a final FY26 dividend per share of

8.0p (FY25: 6.05p), making the full-year dividend 11.0p

(FY25: 8.85p). The full-year dividend represents growth

of 24%, with the dividend policy being revised on a payout

ratio basis of c.35%-40% of basic underlying EPS.

Subject to approval at the Annual General Meeting, the final

FY26 dividend will be paid on 20 August 2026 to shareholders

on the register at 24 July 2026.

Pensions

The net pension asset under IAS 19, before adjusting

for deferred tax, was £54.4m (31 March 2025: £39.4m).

The key driver for the increase in the net pension asset

during the year relates to the net actuarial gain on the

net scheme assets.

The key assumptions used in the IAS 19 valuation of the

Scheme are set out in note 27 to the financial statements.

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

36

Group Chief Financial

Officer's Review

Net finance income and expense

The underlying net finance expense was £17.6m

(FY25: £16.8m), increased due to a higher expense

relating to leases following completion of the sale and

leaseback transaction during the prior year. Net finance

income of £2.4m (FY25: £1.0m) in respect of the defined

benefit pension net surplus reduced due to the higher

opening net asset and is reported within specific

adjusting items.

Foreign exchange

The Group’s income and expenditure is largely seled

in the functional currency of the relevant Group entity,

mainly Sterling, US Dollar or Australian Dollar. The Group

has a policy to hedge all material transaction exposure at

the point of commitment to the underlying transaction.

Uncommied future transactions are not routinely hedged.

The Group does not hedge its exposure to translation of

the income statement.

The principal exchange rates affecting the Group were

the Sterling to US Dollar and Sterling to Australian Dollar

exchange rates.

12 months

to 31 March

2026

12 months

to 31 March

2025

£/US$ – opening

1.29

1.26

£/US$ – average

1.34

1.28

£/US$ – closing

1.32

1.29

£/A$ – opening

2.07

1.94

£/A$ – average

2.03

1.96

£/A$ – closing

1.92

2.07

Foreign exchange translation has provided a modest

headwind to revenue and operating profit in the year.

Most significantly, the US Dollar has strengthened,

with the average exchange rate to Sterling increasing

from 1.28 to 1.34. In FY26, 15% of our total Group revenue

was generated in the US. As a result of the strengthening

US Dollar and other FX movements in year, revenue

decreased by £17.8m and operating profit decreased by

£0.6m. For every 1 cent move in the USD FX rate, this would

impact Group revenue by c.£3m.

Martin Cooper

Group Chief Financial Officer

21 May 2026

37

Key performance

indicators

Financial KPIs

Description

This is the level of new orders and amendments

to existing orders, excluding the LTPA contract

extension, booked in the year.

Performance this year

Total orders, including the LTPA extension,

were £3.6bn, creating a record order backlog

as at 31 March 2026. Excluding the LTPA

extension, orders decreased by 4% against

a strong comparator which included the

long-term Germany contract.

Link to strategy

Enables us to assess the execution of our

strategy to grow the Group. Order intake is

used as a metric for the Annual Bonus Plan.

Description

The underlying earnings, net of interest and

tax, excluding all specific adjusting items,

expressed in pence per share.

Performance this year

Underlying basic earnings per share increased

by 21%, driven by the higher underlying profit

after tax and the impact of the ongoing share

buyback programme.

Link to strategy

Provides a measure of the earnings generated

by the Group after deducting tax and interest.

Specific adjusting items are excluded because

their size and nature mask the true underlying

performance year-on-year.

Description

Calculated by taking the increase in revenue over

prior year, at constant exchange rates, excluding

the impact of acquisitions and disposals.

Performance this year

Grew 1% on an organic basis, with a 4%

increase in EMEA Services driven by the

UK Defence sector.

Link to strategy

Demonstrates the Group’s ability to

grow market share within its chosen

markets. Delivering long-term sustainable

growth reflects the successful execution

of our strategy.

Description

This represents net cash flow from operations

before cash flows of specific adjusting items

and capital expenditure.

Performance this year

Remained consistently strong, with an

operating cash conversion of 100%.

Link to strategy

A measure of the ability to generate cash

from operations. Gives an indication of the

ability to make discretionary investments

and pay dividends.

Description

The earnings before interest and tax,

excluding all specific adjusting items.

Performance this year

Profit was up 18%, driven by organic revenue

growth of 1% and a return to 11.3% operating

margin following the reduced profitability

in FY25.

Link to strategy

Used for performance analysis as a measure

of operating profitability. Specific adjusting

items are excluded because their size and

nature mask the true underlying performance.

Description

This represents the total future revenue

currently on contract.

Performance this year

Backlog grew to a record high of £4.4bn as at

31 March 2026, including the LTPA extension

contract to 2033.

Link to strategy

Backlog allows us to assess the effectiveness

and execution of the Group strategy to

move towards larger, longer-term contracts,

increasing confidence in our long-term

revenue guidance.

FY23

FY24

FY25

FY26

£3,573.4m

£1,954.8m

£1,740.4m

Orders

£3,573.4m

FY23

FY24

FY25

FY26

31.5p

26.1p

29.4p

Underlying

earnings per share

31.5p

FY23

FY24

FY25

FY26

1%

2%

14%

Organic

revenue growth

1%

FY24

FY25

FY26

£343.2m

£316.2m

£320.2m

Underlying net cash

flow from operations

£343m

FY24

FY25

FY26

£4,421.4m

£2,845.1m

£2,873.0m

Backlog

£4,421m

FY23

FY24

FY25

FY26

£217.9m

£185.4m

£215.2m

Underlying operating profit

*

£218m

*

Definitions for the Group’s ‘Alternative Performance Measures’ can be found on page 220. Underlying operating profit refers to operating profit

from segments. See note 3 for details.

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

38

Key performance

indicators

Non-financial KPIs

Description

The Lost Time Incident Rate (LTIR) is calculated

using the total number of accidents resulting

in at least one day taken off work, multiplied

by 1,000, divided by the average number of

employees in that year.

Performance this year

Our LTIR increased slightly from 1.45 in FY25 to

1.82 in FY26, (due to the reduction in headcount

and some isolated lost time events) but safety

performance overall remained stable.

Link to strategy

We are commied to the highest level of safety.

This is the right thing to do for our people and

for our customers, who entrust us with safety-

critical work. The safety, health and wellbeing

of our people underpins our business strategy.

Description

We use Workday Peakon to measure employee

engagement and gather regular feedback

on how our people feel about working at

QinetiQ. The engagement score is based on a

10-point scale. Feedback is collected through

four surveys during the year and aggregated

over a six-month period to ensure the score

provides a representative view of employee

engagement across the Group.

Performance this year

Participation rates remain strong across FY26.

In the final survey of the year, the aggregate

engagement score was 6.5, compared with

7.5 at the same time in FY25. The reduction

in engagement reflects the challenging

operating environment and restructuring.

Link to strategy

Employee engagement is a key enabler of our

business strategy. An engaged workforce

supports productivity and the delivery of

long-term performance.

Description

Our Climate Transition Action Plan (CTAP)

includes a near-term target of 50% reduction

of our combined Scope 1 and Scope 2

emissions by 2030, from a base year of FY20.

Near-term and long-term targets are shown

on page 43.

Performance this year

The figures shown above are restated

following the sale and leaseback of our

Farnborough site . We continue our downward

trajectory for our Scope 1 and 2 emissions:

36% since our FY20 baseline.

Link to strategy

Actively reducing our emissions is at the heart

of our CTAP and is a critical part of our wider

Sustainability strategy, which underpins and

supports wider business performance.

Read more on page 53

Read more on page 54

Read more on pages 43-45

FY23

FY24

FY25

FY26

1.82

1.45

1.69

Health and safety

1.82

LTIR

FY24

FY25

FY26

6.5

7.5

7.5

Employee engagement

6.5

Score out of 10

FY23

FY24

FY25

FY26

22,764

26,115

26,592

Greenhouse gas emissions

22,764

Scope 1 and 2, tonnes CO

e

39

Sustainability:

Environmental,

Social & Governance

Additional information is provided in the sustainability

section of our website.

Signposting to ESG across the report

ESG strategy and framework

41

Environmental

43

Social

53

Governance

60

Key ESG disclosures

Taskforce for Climate-related Financial Disclosures

48

Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting

45

ESG across this report

Value creation

20

Non-financial KPIs

39

Risk management

65

Stakeholders/Section 172

72

Non-financial and sustainability information statement

63

Corporate Governance including ESG

78

ESG in leadership remuneration

123

FY26 Highlights

ɰ

AA rating from MSCI (Morgan Stanley

Capital International).

ɰ

Sustainalytics top-rated ESG Companies list

for fourth year

ɰ

36% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas

emissions from our FY20 baseline (see page 45)

ɰ

Launch of a four-year partnership with Combat

Stress, the UK’s leading charity for veteran’s

mental health (see page 58)

ɰ

Innovative Social Value pilot for the National Cyber

Security Centre (NCSC) training

(see page 58)

ɰ

Improved support for Veterans and Cadets

(see page 59)

Delivering responsibly and sustainably

for the benefit of all our stakeholders.

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

40

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

Pictured above:

MOD Aberporth, located on the west coast

of Wales, provides a strategically significant, multi-domain

test and training environment, delivering high-quality data

and deployable capabilities that support mission-critical

defence programmes and long-term sovereign value.

Sustainability

Introduction

Strategy and materiality

It is important that we are focused on those environmental,

social and governance (ESG) elements of sustainability

that maer most to our business as it evolves and that we

meet the expectations and the needs of our stakeholders.

Delivering our sustainability strategy, based on key material

ESG factors, ensures we are addressing risks and creating

value for our shareholders and customers. It means we

create a great place to work for our people and future

workforce, foster responsible procurement, protect the

environment and have a positive impact in our communities,

all underpinned by our values and strong governance.

Our ESG framework is driven by our business strategy,

the external landscape and stakeholder requirements,

and informed by best practice frameworks such as the

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

Throughout the year, we engage with shareholders,

customers and our people about ESG directly, and via

reporting, surveys and questionnaires, so we are able

to listen, understand, and identify what maers most to

them; a focus during FY26 was the importance of climate

and energy resilience.

The external landscape continues to evolve: 2025 was

another record year for global temperatures and extreme

weather events; it saw rapid advances in AI, a technology

whose role in society continues to develop; and there are

ongoing and new conflicts driving the geopolitical climate.

We know it is important for us to proactively monitor and

understand changes and trends so that we can ensure

that sustainability remains an enabler for our business.

Our ESG framework

Protecting lives by serving the national security interests of our customers.

Material factors

Our purpose

Themes

Environmental

43

ɰ

Climate change: decarbonisation

ɰ

Climate change: resilience

ɰ

Environmental management

ɰ

Resource use

ɰ

Biodiversity and conservation

ɰ

Solutions for customers

Social

53

ɰ

Safety and wellbeing

ɰ

Employee engagement

and inclusion

ɰ

Skills and development

ɰ

Reward and recognition

ɰ

Social and community impact

Governance

60

ɰ

Business ethics, Code

of Conduct and Speak Up

ɰ

Anti-bribery and corruption

ɰ

Human rights and modern slavery

ɰ

Responsible tax management

ɰ

Responsible procurement

Underpinned by our values, integrity, collaboration and performance, we deliver safely, responsibly

and sustainably for the benefit of all our stakeholders.

41

Sustainability

Introduction

ESG disclosures

We recognise that disclosing our ESG performance is an

essential part of building trust with our stakeholders by

demonstrating progress against our targets and plans.

QinetiQ Group plc is subject to a growing number of

regulatory reporting requirements, and we meet many of

those obligations within this Annual Report (for example,

the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures

– TCFD (page 48) – and Streamlined Energy and Climate

Reporting – SECR page 45).

Our goal is to provide information in this annual report

for our priority areas, supplemented by more detail on

our website

There have been developments in ESG reporting across all

of our geographies in FY26 and we will continue to monitor

these changes closely. We recognise the importance

of the International Sustainability Standards Board

(ISSB) disclosure standards. With the adoption by the UK

Government of the Sustainability Disclosure Standards as

part of the UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (UK SRS),

we have undertaken an initial evaluation and contributed to

the government consultation. In Australia, similar reporting

set by the Australian Auditing Standards Board (AASB) is

also required, but with some identified differences. Our

approach is to consider non-financial reporting holistically,

with an ethos of ‘capture once, use many times’ wherever

possible. We will evolve our reporting plan in readiness

for the first reporting aligned with the UK and Australian

standards, from FY28.

We will also be evaluating the UK Government’s proposed

Modernisation of Corporate Reporting and we have been

reviewing the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial

Disclosures (TNFD)

(see page 47).

We currently have below-threshold presence in Europe

and so reporting frameworks such as the Corporate

Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate

Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) do not apply.

As we prepare for implementation of Provision 29 of the

UK Corporate Governance Code, we have been reviewing

our material controls for non-financial reporting (see

pages 104 and 107 of the Audit Commiee Report).

Stakeholder engagement

on ESG maers

Employees

We know our employees are interested in and supportive of

sustainability and we want to ensure they feel informed to

be able play their part – be it saving energy or volunteering in

their local communities. We communicate regularly through

various channels, including campaigns on our intranet, our

dedicated online community of interest (the Sustainability

Knowledge NetworQ), our ‘Let’s Talk Sustainability’ events,

and resources and guides for our leaders.

We underpin our communications with a range of learning

options, including our mandatory training (on topics such as

ethics and conduct, and environment and safety), as well as

more targeted training, e.g. for Energy Champions or Ethics

Champions. We have training modules on modern slavery,

social value and a climate change e-learning module. During

FY26 we developed a training package tailored for our global

Project Management community, enabling those individuals

with direct responsibility for operational delivery to consider

sustainability within their planning and decision-making.

This will be rolled out in FY27.

Customers, partners and suppliers

We strive to be proactive in engaging our customers,

partners and suppliers on sustainability issues. We actively

collaborate with customers, peers, academic partners and

suppliers on topics such as climate change, ethics, modern

slavery and skills. We continue to be active within our sector,

chairing the Sustainability Network for our UK trade body,

ADS (Aerospace, Defence and Security) and acting as

Industry Chair of the JOSCAR ESG Working Group. We are

members of the MOD-Industry Sustainable Procurement

Working Group and the Tech UK Climate Council. We have

been actively involved in the new UK Regional Defence

Cluster and we run Collaborate events for our suppliers (see

page 61). We are also proactive in our professional body, the

Institute Of Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

(ICRS). We are signatories to a number of key UK charters,

including the ADS ESG Defence Charter, The 5% Club, and

The Women in Defence Charter.

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

42

Sustainability:

Environmental

We are commied to minimising our

impact on the environment and key to this

is our climate transition action plan and our

environmental stewardship programmes

Climate change

The changes we continue to see and experience within

the physical environment globally represent a growing

risk to business and to defence as a sector. Businesses

across all industry sectors are facing shared challenges;

the physical aspects of climate change impact their ability

to continue to operate successfully such as in the face of

unprecedented extremes of weather conditions. There are

also the transitional impacts of climate change, with the

need to meet evolving and complex regulatory reporting

requirements, planned cross-border carbon taxation

measures, and evolving customer needs. We recognise

that climate change is a risk to our business, and we remain

commied to decarbonising to reduce our greenhouse

gas (GHG) emissions, in parallel with working to ensure

our business remains resilient to a changing climate.

GHG emissions methodology

We measure our Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions every year.

We use a Financial Control boundary approach, with a

methodology derived from the GHG Protocol Corporate

Accounting and Reporting Standard and best practice

outlined by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi),

alongside UK Government emission conversion factors.

We regularly review our methodology, and during FY26

applied a series of material improvements to our approach

to calculating Scope 3 emissions, which are, increasing

relevance and accuracy, and driving greater alignment with

the GHG Protocol. We are commied to being transparent

about our approach and we publish our methodology

documentation on the climate change pages of our website.

Additional information is provided on the climate change

page of our website.

GHG emissions targets

We have set near-term and Net-Zero GHG emissions targets,

against a baseline year of FY20 (April 2019 – March 2020),

which cover our full value chain, across all categories of

Scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions. These targets have been

validated by the SBTi, which confirmed that they were

ambitious and aligned to a 1.5°C global temperature

pathway. We have made a commitment to reduce our

absolute emissions by at least 90% across our full value

chain by 2050 or sooner, recognising that there will be

elements of our carbon footprint that will be extremely

challenging to eliminate completely with the current pace

of development, availability and maturity of alternative

solutions. We will require investment in carbon offsets in the

future, to address these residual elements of our footprint,

in order to achieve our goal of Net-Zero emissions.

Targets

-50%

Absolute reduction of

Scopes 1 & 2 by FY30

Baseline year FY20

-30%

Absolute reduction of

Scope 3 by FY30

Baseline year FY20

Net-Zero

By FY50 or sooner

43

Sustainability

Environmental

Workstream 1

Jet fuel

Workstream 2

Operational

energy

DECARBONISATION

RISK MANAGEMENT

Workstream 3

Procurement

Workstream 4

Business travel

Workstream 5

Climate

resilience

Evolving workstreams driving reductions across

wider carbon footprint; increased resilience

50%

Reduction of Scope 1 and 2

GHG emissions by 2030

2050

Have achieved Net-Zero or sooner

30%

Reduction of Scope 3

GHG emissions by 2030

Resilience and TCFD

Climate Transition Action Plan

To achieve our targets, we have developed a Climate

Transition Action Plan (CTAP) – see diagram below. This

provides a clear pathway to address our most material

sources of GHG emissions, while maintaining a focus on

climate resilience. Our CTAP sponsor is our Chief Financial

Officer, and senior leaders from across the business are

responsible for the delivery of the key workstreams. We

regularly review progress against our CTAP and we perform

an annual assessment of the drivers of our footprint to

ensure we remain focused on the most material sources

of emissions. Collectively, the sources of emissions we are

currently targeting within our decarbonisation workstreams

are responsible for nearly 90% of our carbon footprint.

While our CTAP directs actions addressing specific sources

of emissions in order to reduce them, it also directly

supports business value creation by raising awareness and

driving behavioural change across the organisation linked to

improvements in efficiency, productivity and cost reduction.

There are also secondary business benefits and linkages

between workstreams; for example, by accelerating

the adoption of renewable power generation systems

across our estate, we are driving greater resilience to both

environmental and market forces, mitigating both physical

and transitionary climate risks while delivering cost savings

in the longer term.

Our focus on driving efficiency and reducing energy

consumption also extends to our research and development

activities, and to our delivery of customer solutions, to

support customers with their climate challenges, such as

climate resilience (see page 47).

Our CTAP workstreams are supported by our internal

ideation and collaboration platform, IdeaXchange, with

specific channels focused on the CTAP available to our

people across the organisation, enabling the sharing of

ideas and collaboration on solutions.

A summary of our Climate Transition Action Plan

Cross-cuing enabling programmes

Data and tools

Governance, policy and process

Skills, awareness, leadership and culture

A

B

C

Workstreams

Reducing

Scope 1 emissions:

ɰ

Operational

efficiency

ɰ Platform efficiency

ɰ

Sustainable

aviation fuel

Reducing

Scope 1 and 2

emissions:

ɰ

Behavioural change

ɰ

Building

consolidation

ɰ

Energy projects

Reducing

Scope 3 emissions:

ɰ Efficiency

programme

ɰ

Selection criteria

ɰ

Supplier

engagement

Reducing

Scope 3 emissions:

ɰ

Travel less

ɰ Travel differently

ɰ Policy and tools

Increasing

climate resilience:

ɰ

Financial modelling

ɰ

Business continuity

ɰ

Risk assessment

ɰ

Scenario analysis

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

44

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Progress against targets

Scope 1 and 2 emissions

We have consistently achieved year-on-year reductions

in Scope 1 and 2 emissions, and within FY26 we achieved

a 36% reduction against our FY20 baseline. The table

below outlines our Scope 1 and 2 emissions and energy

performance since our baseline year, indicating the

proportion for the UK. Within the table, three fields include

the symbol

, which indicates figures that have been

through independent assurance. PricewaterhouseCoopers

LLP (‘PwC’) carried out a limited assurance engagement on

selected Scope 1 and 2 emissions data for the year ended 31

March 2026, in accordance with International Standard on

Assurance Engagements 3000 (revised) and 3410, issued by

the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.

A copy of the assurance report is available on the climate

change page of our website.

The figures presented in the table below represent a full

restatement of our historic Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions,

triggered by the sale and leaseback of our Farnborough site

in FY25. This site was a considerable source of Scope 1 and 2

emissions, so this structural change was material as defined

by our restatement policy, outlined in our methodology

document (see page 43). All remaining emissions have now

been moved into Scope 3.

QinetiQ Group Streamlined Energy and

Carbon Reporting (SECR) Data

We have undertaken a series of activities in FY26 as part of

our CTAP, aimed at increasing energy efficiency, reducing

consumption and growing our renewable power sources.

Key examples include:

ɰ

Formalisation and implementation of a comprehensive

Decarbonisation Strategy for our UK estate.

ɰ

Development of a new UK Site Strategy.

ɰ

Our ‘switch-off’ programme, which engages employees

to turn off lights, heating and equipment before

public holidays.

ɰ

Application of upgrades to our Building Management

Systems at various UK sites, optimisation of heating,

ventilation and air-conditioning systems.

ɰ

Delivery of a building consolidation pilot at our

Farnborough site, reducing heating, lighting and

power requirements by co-locating employees

during low-aendance periods.

ɰ

Implementation of a new Hydrotreated Vegetable

Oil (HVO) heating system at our Haslar site, as a

replacement for a legacy fossil fuel system.

ɰ

Installation of further roof-mounted photovoltaic (PV)

arrays at our Malvern site (see image on next page),

ground-mounted PV arrays at Portsdown Technology

Park and solar street lighting at both sites.

Sustainability

Environmental

Restated

As reported in FY25

Scope 1 & 2 emissions

Units

FY26

FY25

FY24

FY20

FY25

FY24

FY20

Total Scope 1 emissions

tCO

2

e

17,020

19,156

R

19,331

R

25,274

R

19,662

19,362

28,377

Total Scope 2 emissions

(location-based)

tCO

2

e

5,744

6,959

R

7,261

R

10,484

R

8,729

10,542

16,281

Total Scope 1 & 2 emissions

tCO

2

e

22,764

26,115

R

26,592

R

35,758

R

28,391

29,904

44,658

Intensity ratio

tCO

2

e/

£m Revenue

12

14

R

14

R

33

R

15

16

42

Energy consumption

kWh

104,936,271

113,474,688

R

116,047,322

R

137,058,515

R

124,902,749

132,659,501

176,376,247

Proportion of energy consumed by

UK operations

%

75%

70%

R

69%

R

71%

R

73%

73%

77%

Proportion of emissions from

UK operations

%

71%

68%

R

66%

R

72%

R

71%

70%

78%

R

signifies restated data, in line with our restatement policy (GHG emissions methodology, outlined on page 43).

indicates figures that have been through independent assurance.

A summary of Scope 1 and 2 emissions

45

Sustainability

Environmental

LOOKING AHEAD

In FY27, we plan to continue our

decarbonisation projects, increasing energy efficiency

and energy resilience; for example, the installation of

improved heating and lighting control systems across our

UK estate, and PV projects such as new solar canopies

across existing parking areas.

Scope 3 emissions

Access to granular Scope 3 data remains a challenge.

In comparison to Scope 1 and 2 data, the time required to

navigate the complexity of producing Scope 3 information

for the Financial Year means that we are currently unable

to include this within our Annual Report and Accounts.

During FY26, we published our Scope 3 data for FY25 on

our website, totalling 321,308 tonnes CO

2

e – nearly 92%

of our total emissions.

We saw a downward trend in most Scope 3 categories,

but our total FY25 Scope 3 emissions were higher than the

previous year, driven primarily by an increase in procurement

of goods and services, a reflection of the fact that the

current calculation methodology continues to be based

directly on spend. We recognise the challenges associated

with improvements, but progress has been made on the

steps we need to take. We have also seen an increase in

Scope 3 emissions associated with Leased Assets as a

direct result of the sale and leaseback of our Farnborough

site, with remaining emissions moving from Scopes 1 and 2

into Scope 3.

Within our CTAP, we remain focused on our two largest

sources of Scope 3 emissions, namely Workstream

3 – Procured Goods and Services/Capital Goods, and

Workstream 4 – Business Travel. During FY26 we completed

various activities to address these, for example:

ɰ

Engagement with our supply chain:

ɰ

Discussions with our top 50 suppliers by

spend-based emissions, around obtaining

product/service carbon footprints or some

other form of activity-based emissions data.

ɰ

Discussions with other suppliers that have

previously indicated their ability to provide a

product/service carbon footprint, to assess

the feasibility of adopting these.

ɰ

Developed a methodology to calculate the carbon

footprint of procured professional services, to be

used as an alternative to spend-based calculations

as part of hybrid emissions accounting, and to

be shared with our service providers to enable

vendor-specific customisation.

ɰ

Developed an energy management guide for

high-energy-intensive Small to Medium Enterprise

(SME)manufacturers, providing suggestions on

how to reduce energy consumption and emissions

from their operations.

ɰ

Rollout of a significant new Digital Workplace IT

architecture, providing teams with new global digital

collaboration toolsets and data sharing capabilities,

which provides alternatives to business travel.

LOOKING AHEAD

From FY27, we plan to increase our focus

on obtaining supplier product/service carbon footprints,

clearly communicating our expectations with our supply

chain (e.g. strengthening our climate contracting clauses),

and where possible implementing requirements for greater

visibility of activity-based data. As part of our adoption

of new global digital toolsets, we will also be working to

standardise systems and centralise data repositories, to

provide greater data analysis and forecasting capabilities

to identify further opportunities for improvement.

Environmental management

Our environmental management framework is structured

around defined Group Requirements aligned to the

principles of the ISO 14001:2015 Standard. During FY26,

these were updated and re-framed as the Environment and

Climate Change Group Requirements, maintaining 22 core

areas of environmental governance. Five requirements

were amended to explicitly incorporate climate-related

considerations within risk identification, design and

development control, operational control, procurement,

and awareness requirements.

ISO 14001 certification was maintained at 25 UK-based

locations and one Canadian-based location during the year.

External certification bodies completed sampling audits,

Roof-mounted PV at our Malvern site

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

46

Sustainability

Environmental

identifying a small number of minor non-conformities and

improvement opportunities. Corrective actions have been

implemented in response to the non-conformities. Our

internal second-line environmental evaluation programme

also undertook supporting audits during the reporting

period. We continued implementation of a regulatory

compliance evaluation system to improve visibility of

applicable environmental obligations across operationally

controlled locations. Preliminary screening has been

completed at the majority of sites worldwide, with further

validation activity planned.

Environmental concerns, reported by employees are

recorded through our internal reporting system and

investigated in accordance with established procedures.

No environmental enforcement actions, notices or financial

penalties were issued to the Group during FY26.

Resource use: waste and water

Our business activities are predominantly service-based

and do not involve significant product manufacturing

processes. Reported waste primarily comprises general and

inert solid waste streams. Waste data are compiled from

contracted service provider reports, site-level reporting

and, where necessary, some estimation. We recognise the

limitations associated with estimation and are reviewing

opportunities to improve primary data capture. Waste-

related emissions represent less than 1% of our global

Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions. Water consumption is

associated primarily with routine occupation of facilities and

limited operational testing activities. Many of the sites we

occupy are leased properties or customer-owned facilities

where water use data is not directly controlled by the Group.

Biodiversity and conservation

Several UK locations at which we operate or provide

services are situated within or adjacent to nationally or

internationally designated areas for nature conservation.

These sites are generally owned by the UK MOD and

environmental responsibilities are defined within

contractual and regulatory frameworks. As the core work

undertaken on the sites consists of trials, activities are

typically temporary and project-specific and are undertaken

within aained consent and approval conditions. We help

deliver customer-funded nature conservation activities

across customer owned sites. Where contracted, we

provide services in accordance with agreed environmental

management plans. We do not undertake significant

land-use change as part of our core activities.

During FY26, we initiated a preliminary desktop screening

exercise across our principal UK locations to identify

potential nature-related interaction pathways. This

screening draws on conservation designation data and

considers factors including ecological sensitivity, business

criticality and activity intensity. The purpose of this work

is to assess whether nature-related constraints, such as

permiing requirements, seasonal restrictions or access

conditions, could give rise to financially material effects.

We are incorporating proportionate biodiversity

considerations into environmental risk management and

project planning processes and will continue to monitor

developments in emerging non-financial reporting

disclosures, for example TNFD (see page 42).

Although we divested our Farnborough site in 2025, we took

the opportunity to hold a celebration event to mark our

30-year partnership with Marwell Wildlife in the protection

and management of Eelmoor Marsh, a Site of Special

Scientific Interest (SSSI), which forms part of the estate.

We recognised the skill and dedication of the people

who contributed to the success of the programme.

Supporting our customers

Over the past year, we have been growing our portfolio to

support our customers in Defence in understanding the

impacts of Climate Change on Operations across the Land,

Maritime, Air and Space domains. In collaboration with

QinetiQ Training and Simulation, we have delivered several

projects into the MOD including; a broad analysis looking

at the impacts of climate change on military capabilities

and what can be done to combat those challenges and

a collection of 20 new climate security scenarios which

were developed to outline future potential climate change

related security challenges that could impact directly on

the UK Armed Forces. We have continued to spend internal

Innovation, Research and Development funding to further

explore and develop our collection of climate security

scenarios and their potential impact on Operations and

future conflict. Future investment could look at conducting

Pathway Analysis for specific scenarios to understand

a wider range of possibly outcomes to climate related

challenges and their impact on Defence and security.

In addition, we have aended numerous MOD and NATO

climate change focused working groups and conferences,

including studies on the future of Low Carbon Warfare and

the NATO Climate Change and Security Centre of Excellence

(CCASCOE) Climate Security Summit

(October 2025).

The Climate Security Summit explored the role of NATO

and its allies in preparing for, adapting to and mitigating

the challenges of climate change.

47

Describe the Board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities

Describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities

A

B

Taskforce on Climate-related

Financial Disclosures

The Financial Stability Board’s Taskforce on Climate-related

Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommends a reporting

framework across four themes: governance, strategy, risk

management, and metrics & targets. In accordance with

section 414CB of the Companies Act and following the TCFD

all-sector guidance (there is no specific supplementary

guidance for our sector), we provide our disclosures here

(pages 48–52) aligned to the four themes, providing material

information against each requirement. We also outline our

approach in our non-financial information and sustainability

statement on page 63. We provide links to where further

information is provided in this Annual Report and Accounts.

Compliance statement

In accordance with the UK Listing Rule 6.6.6R(8) we confirm

we have considered the guidance and believe our approach

is consistent with the TCFD recommendations, save for, we

recognise we need to do more on quantitative modelling as

part of the strategy disclosures, and we continue to evolve

our financial models to progress our quantitative financial

assessment. We are commied to implementing this

approach, to provide investors and other stakeholders

with information on climate-related risks that are relevant

and material to our business.

Governance

Disclose the organisation's governance around climate-related risks and opportunities

Recommended disclosures and overview

Additional information

QinetiQ's Board sets the Company's

strategic priorities, including on

ESG and climate change, and has

regular oversight of and input into

our climate change programme.

It has oversight of the threats and

opportunities resulting from climate

change, and this is considered

as part of our strategy. Our Group

CFO is the Board Sponsor for

climate change and our wider ESG

programme. The Group CFO and our

Group Director ESG provide regular

reports and briefings on ESG and

climate change to the Board and

Board Commiees.

ɰ

The Board reviews our Company

Strategic Plan, where climate

change is included in key

functional/sector plans, and

approves the annual budget

(which contains Net-Zero

targets and programmes).

ɰ

The Audit Commiee reviews

and monitors QinetiQ’s financial

and non-financial reporting

requirements, including TCFD.

During FY26, the commiee

received quarterly updates on

non-financial reporting provided

by the Group Director ESG.

ɰ

Updates on the CTAP were

provided as part of ESG updates

for the Board and papers for the

Audit Commiee.

ɰ

The Remuneration Commiee

oversees leadership incentives,

including ESG metrics, as part of

the Annual Bonus Plan.

ɰ

The Risk & Security Commiee

has oversight of and provides

assurance to the Board on

QinetiQ's risk management

system. This includes quarterly

monitoring and review and

regular deep dives of all QinetiQ's

principal risks, which includes

climate change as part of the

Environment principal risk.

Our Functional Councils support

good governance across QinetiQ,

where functional and sector leaders

come together to communicate,

review and agree on issues,

actions and standards of best

practice that are enterprise-wide

and/or have operational significance.

The key Functional Council is

the Environment Council, chaired

by the Group Director ESG. The

climate change programme

includes leaders and subject

maer experts from across the

business, ensuring the necessary

multidisciplinary approach.

Climate change forms part of the

Environment principal risk and the

Group Director ESG is responsible

for identification, assessment

and oversight of the risk and

opportunities, undertaking regular

reviews of the programme and

capturing those risks through

the enterprise risk management

governance process.

The Group CFO has oversight of the

programme. Leadership and delivery

of the Climate Change Programme

is the responsibility of the Group

Director ESG, reporting to the Group

CFO. They conduct monthly review

meetings of the CTAP.

Our QinetiQ Leadership Team (QLT)

is responsible for managing

climate-related risks and

opportunities and delivering the

programmes through our operations

and across our value chain. ESG and

climate change form an integral part

of our strategic planning process.

The Annual Bonus Plan (ABP) rewards

non-financial performance through

the delivery of key ESG

goals, including those related

to environment (Net-Zero).

Board Directors

84

Board Commiees

87

Board

responsibilities

88

Audit Commiee

104

Remuneration

Commiee

115

Risk & Security

Commiee

110

ESG Governance

62

Non-financial

information and

sustainability

statement

63

Annual Bonus Plan

123

Sustainability

Environmental

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

48

Strategy

Disclose the actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation's

business strategy and financial planning where such information is material

Recommended disclosures and overview

We have reviewed and refined

our climate-related risks and

opportunities (see table) and

assessed that our business is

exposed to both physical and

transitional risks (before mitigation

activities) and opportunities, with

impacts varying over the short

(0–2 years), medium (2–5 years)

and long term (5–20 years),

depending on climate change

scenarios. This aligns with our

strategic planning approach over

a rolling five-year cycle.

Each risk was associated

(qualitatively) with a financial impact;

for example, an increase in costs or,

in the case of opportunities,

an increase in revenue.

We will continue to review our risks

and opportunities as the external

landscape and our business evolve

over time, and refine our approach,

particularly focusing on quantifying

the impacts, and we will report

further information as this develops.

Table of risks and

opportunities

50

We recognise the importance of

integrating climate change and

wider ESG considerations into our

Company strategy and planning,

and our wider governance and

processes. While there is no

requirement for a fundamental shift

in our overarching business strategy

due to climate change, having

assessed the risks, we understand

it to be resilient to climate change

(subject to the delivery of the CTAP

plans and programmes). This is

illustrated as follows:

ɰ

Our commitment to sustainability

forms part of our investment case.

ɰ

Climate change forms part of

our Environment principal risk.

ɰ

Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions

are a core non-financial KPI.

ɰ

ESG metrics (including Net-Zero)

formed part of the performance

measures in the Annual

Bonus Plan.

ɰ

We have commied funding

to support our climate

change programme.

ESG and climate change are part

of our annual strategic planning

process. During FY25, we planned

for a number of actions which were

implemented in FY26, including:

ɰ

Allocation of budget to deliver

energy-saving projects.

ɰ

Investment in access to third-

party horizon scanning tools.

ɰ

A new suite of resources and

support for leaders.

In addition, as part of the broader

scenario impact assessment of our

strategic plan, a climate change

event (a significant flood at a critical

site) was selected as one scenario

for financial modelling. The findings

inform the consideration of the

recommended longer-term viability

statement and going-concern

statement disclosures.

The science is clear and it is

unequivocal that the climate is

changing. However, the precise

trajectory is dependent on:

ɰ

the influence of activities in

the past,

ɰ

the global action taken now and

in the coming years, and

ɰ

the rate at which that action

is taken.

To guide our strategy and planning,

we consider different scenarios:

ɰ

A: <2°C strongly declining

emissions: intensification

of decarbonisation action

resulting in increasing and rapid

transition, with more limited

physical impacts.

ɰ

B: 2–4°C stabilising/slowly

declining emissions: physical

risks continue and transition

risks continue to increase.

ɰ

C: >4°C rising emissions

: failure to

address climate change results

in high physical risks, with more

limited transition issues.

We used the scenarios above,

based on the Representative

Concentration Pathways

(RCPs), which are used by the

Intergovernmental Panel on

Climate Change (IPCC). We

considered horizons aligned with

our Net-Zero targets and used

a variety of data sources.

We have aligned our assessment

with our risk management approach

(see next section) so that we

are able to evaluate risks as low,

medium or high. We review this

approach regularly.

We have made a qualitative

assessment of the financial impacts

(see table on the next page) and

are actively progressing our work on

modelling the quantitative impacts.

Investment case

5

Environment

principal risk

68

Non-financial KPIs

39

Annual Bonus Plan

123

ESG Framework

41

Climate transition

action plan

44

Viability statement

and going-concern

statement

69

Climate change

programme and

targets

43-46

Approach to risk

management

65

Sustainability

Environmental

Additional information

Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the

short, medium and long term

Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s business strategy

and financial planning

Describe the resilience of the organisation’s strategy taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios,

including 2°C or lower scenario

A

B

C

49

Impact

Timescale

Low

Medium

High

Long term

Medium term

Short term

Sustainability

Environmental

Risk effect (unmitigated)

Financial impact

A: Declining

emissions

B: Stabilising

emissions

C: Rising

emissions

Mitigation/adaptation

Flooding

Type of Risk: Physical (acute)

Direct damage to sites due to

increase in severity and frequency

of flooding, resulting in damage

to assets and causing disruption

to operations.

Reduced revenue

and increased

costs

Low impact

Short to

medium term

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

ɰ

Risk assessment

ɰ

Climate resilience business

continuity planning

ɰ

Customer and supplier

engagement

Extreme temperature fluctuations

Type of Risk: Physical (chronic)

Increased need for cooling

and heating to minimise

damage to high-value

equipment within buildings.

Increased costs

Low impact

Short to

medium term

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

ɰ

Risk assessment

ɰ

Climate resilience business

continuity planning

ɰ

Customer and supplier

engagement

Wind and storms

Type of Risk: Physical (acute)

Direct damage to operational sites

due to wind and associated storms,

resulting in disrupted operations and

increased cost for building repairs.

Reduced revenue

and increased

costs

Low impact

Short to

medium term

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

ɰ

Risk assessment

ɰ

Climate resilience business

continuity planning

ɰ

Customer and supplier

engagement

Increased cost of energy

Type of Risk: Transition (market)

Energy costs, such as those related to

fossil fuels and electricity derived from

non-renewable sources, are expected

to increase. Cost of alternative fuels

such as sustainable aviation fuel and

HVO remain high.

Increased costs

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

ɰ

Improving forecasting

ɰ

Reduce reliance on fossil fuels

through climate programme

ɰ

Monitoring fuel costs

Carbon taxation

Type of Risk: Transition (policy and legal)

Current and emerging regulations on

carbon emissions may result in carbon

taxes, and increased resourcing

required to meet non-financial

reporting disclosures.

Increased costs

Medium impact

Medium to

long term

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

Medium impact

Short to medium

to long term

ɰ

Legislative monitoring

ɰ

Energy reduction programmes

ɰ

Improvements to data

capture and reporting

Cost of raw materials

Type of Risk: Transition (market)

Potential for exposure to increases

in prices of raw materials, directly

or in supply chain.

Increased costs

Low impact

Medium to

long term

Low impact

Medium term

Low impact

Medium term

ɰ

R&D investment

ɰ

Customer and supplier

engagement

Access to capital

Type of Risk: Transition (reputation)

Failure to meet shareholder

expectations of Net-Zero & resiliance

commitments, and resulting

access to, or cost of, capital.

Increased costs

Low impact

Long term

Low impact

Short to medium

to long term

Low impact

Medium to

long term

ɰ

Reporting of progress

ɰ

Investor advocacy

ɰ

Customer and supplier

engagement

Increased customer demand

Type of Risk: Opportunity (product and service)

Growth in customer demand for more

sustainable and resilient solutions

could result in increased sales/access

to new markets.

Increased revenue

Low impact

Long term

Low impact

Short to medium

to long term

Low impact

Medium to

long term

ɰ

R&D investment

ɰ

Customer and supplier

engagement

See page 49 for further information on

these scenarios.

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

50

Sustainability

Environmental

Risk Management

Disclose how the organisation identified, assesses and manages climate-related risks

Recommended disclosures and overview

Identifying risk:

Our risk

assessment approach is in line

with TCFD recommendations and

addresses both physical risks, such

as flooding and extreme weather

events, and transition risks, which

are related to the transition to a

lower-carbon economy, such as

policy or regulation change and

changing markets. It is important

that we understand where these

risks are material to our business.

ɰ

For physical risks we considered

these primarily by site, as well as

the potential impact on our supply

chain and business delivery.

A variety of potential risks have

been identified (e.g. where there

may be increased flood risk or

exposure to storm events).

We recognise that this needs

to be a continuous process due

to new emerging information

or changes to our business (e.g.

use of site, supplier etc). As part

of our day-to-day management

of our site operations, we have

a good understanding of the

physical risks posed and

suitable mitigations.

ɰ

To identify transition risks

(such as market or regulatory

changes) we undertake horizon

scanning to identify any

relevant changes. We work with

subject maer experts across

the business and our industry

networks and have invested in

a third-party tool to support our

horizon-scanning approach.

Assessing risk:

As the global

landscape changes and our

business evolves, we recognise the

need to review and update our risks

regularly. Risks and opportunities

are scored considering the potential

impact, the likelihood of occurrence,

and the velocity (proximity of

occurrence). Scenario analysis

has been undertaken on our most

material risks and opportunities, and

this has formed the foundation for

the development of financial models

to quantify financial impacts (taking

into account impact on revenue,

costs and asset value).

Environment

principal risk

68

Summary table

of risks

50

Enterprise risk

management

65

Our risk management and control

framework enables us to effectively

identify, assess, monitor and

manage risks. Ownership and

management of individual risks

are assigned to members of the

QinetiQ Leadership Team (QLT)

who are responsible for ensuring

the operational effectiveness of

internal control systems and for

implementing risk mitigation plans.

Climate change is recognised as part

of the Environment principal risk and

the Group CFO is accountable.

The Board Risk & Security Commiee

review and discuss principle risks

quarterly and the Board undertakes

a twice-yearly assessment

of the principal risks, including

risks associated with climate

change. The QLT is supported by

our Group Director Risk & Assurance

and our risk managers, who are

able to have more tactical and

operational oversight. All risks

are assigned owners.

We have based our approach to

climate risks on our enterprise risk

management methodology, to

ensure that we are embedding it

into our existing processes.

Managing transition risks requires

us to consider a range of factors.

Any new changes (e.g. new

legislation) will be addressed in line

with our standard processes.

Key to supporting the management

of risks is raising awareness

and engagement with internal

stakeholders. We also engage

with key stakeholders such as

our Environment Council.

Our Business Management

System contains our Group policy,

requirements and instructions, to

ensure that we have established and

are maintaining robust and adequate

procedures, systems and controls.

Principal risks

66

Risk & Security

Commiee

110

Enterprise risk

management

65

Internal

stakeholder

engagement

42

Environment

Council

63

Additional information

Describe the organisation’s processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks

Describe the organisation’s processes for managing climate-related risks

Describe how processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate related risks are integrated into the

organisation’s overall risk management

A

B

C

51

Sustainability

Environmental

Metrics and Targets

Disclose the metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate-related risks and opportunities

where such information is material

Recommended disclosures and overview

ɰ

GHG absolute Scope 1 emissions

ɰ

GHG absolute Scope 2 emissions

ɰ

Intensity ratio (tCO

2

e per £m

of revenue)

ɰ

Energy consumption

ɰ

GHG Scope 3 emissions

Non-financial KPIs

39

Summary of

emissions, intensity

and energy

consumption

45

Scope 3 emissions

46

We annually report our absolute GHG

Scope 1 and 2 emissions and data are

subject to independent third-party

limited assurance.

ɰ

Total FY26 Scope 1 emissions

were 17,020 tCO

2

e

ɰ

Total FY26 Scope 2 emissions

were 5,744 tCO

2

e

ɰ

Total FY26 Scope 1 and 2 emissions

were 22,764 tCO

2

e

We have reported our total Scope

3 emissions for FY25 in this Annual

Report and Accounts and are

finalising our FY26 scope 3 data,

which will be published on our

website during 2026:

ɰ

Total FY25 Scope 3 emissions

were 321,308 tCO

2

e

Climate change forms part of our

Environment principal risk.

We have commied to near-term

and long-term science based

targets across our value chain,

validated by SBTi in June 2022

(all from an FY20 baseline):

ɰ

50% absolute reduction of

Scope 1 and 2 by FY30

ɰ

30% absolute reduction of

Scope 3 by FY30

ɰ

33% absolute reduction by FY30

ɰ

Net-Zero by FY50 or sooner

Performance

: we

have achieved

progress against our Scope 1 & 2

target and by the end of FY26 we

have achieved a reduction of 36%

against our FY20 baseline. Scope 3 is

currently more challenging and

we saw an increase in FY25 compared

with the previous year, driven

primarily by an increase in purchased

goods and services. (Note we will be

reporting our FY26 Scope 3 data later

in 2026).

Scope 1 and Scope 2

GHG emissions

45

Scope 3 GHG

emissions

46

Environment

Principal risk

68

Net-Zero targets

43

SBTi validation

of targets

43

Scope 1 and 2

performance

45

Scope 3

performance

46

Additional information

Disclose metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and

risk management process

Disclose Scope 1, 2, and if appropriate, Scope 3 GHG emissions and the related risks

Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance

against targets

A

B

C

Plans for FY27

Our focus for FY27 will be to continue to deliver our Climate Transition Action Plan. Under the four decarbonisation

workstreams, we will be delivering projects that focus on reducing our key GHG emissions. We will also be continuing to

improve our resilience to climate change through reviewing and managing our identified physical and transitional risks

(Workstream 5) and further progressing our cross-cuing workstreams, such as improving data and processes.

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

52

Sustainability:

Social

Investing in our people, delivering for our

customers. Our aim is to create a safe,

secure and sustainable workplace where

our people can deliver the very best for

our customers in a working environment

in which they can thrive, realise their

potential and feel recognised for their

expertise and contribution.

Safety and wellbeing: Care and thrive

A safe and secure working environment is fundamental to

how we support our people, enabling them to deliver for

our customers and feel recognised for their contribution.

Our programme focuses across four thematic workstreams.

FY26 saw continued maturity within each area:

1.

Risk management:

We embedded improvements to

our risk control processes and strengthened reporting

discipline across all sites. Work to improve the visibility

of safety-critical information continued, enabling earlier

intervention and reinforcing line ownership of risk. The

three-year risk stabilisation programme completed with

>90% of actions achieved. A safety legal compliance

programme was completed and provides the foundation

of enhancements to how we manage our hazardous

activities planned for FY27.

2.

Culture:

We have continued to improve through the

cultural maturity model established in 2024, with this

year’s focus on leadership behaviours that support

a positive safety culture and encourage learning

rather than blame.

3.

People:

Our focus on wellbeing deepened, including

proactive occupational health and mental health

support for individuals following incidents and

continued roll-out of the Wellbeing Knowledge

NetworQ. In the UK we have developed trauma training.

4.

Technology:

We progressed our use of data and digital

tools to provide earlier insight into risk trends, improve

reporting consistency and enhance decision-making.

FY26 safety performance remained stable; we have seen an

overall reduction in number of incidents and also a reduction

in severity. The Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR)

remained steady and the Lost Time Incident Rate (LTIR) has

increased slightly due to a reduction in total headcount and

isolated lost time events.

LTIR is one of our non-financial KPI

(page 39).

Strengthened occupational health capability (both

external and internal) is supporting more proactive case

management and earlier return to work outcomes.

Measure

FY26

FY25

FY24

FY23

LTRI

1

1.82

1.45

1.69

1.89

TRIR

2

3.12

3.62

2.78

3.63

1

The number of lost time incidents where the employee is away from

work for one or more days, multiplied by 1,000 and divided by the

average number of employees.

2

The frequency of recordable workplace incidents per 100 full-time

employees, annually.

Case study: Optimising safety cases

Safety cases remain a critical mechanism for demonstrating

that operations and systems are safe, supported by

structured argument and evidence. Our approach, aligned

with practices in high hazard industries and defence,

ensures clear articulation of design and operational safety

and enables proportionate, risk-based assurance. We

continue to make strong progress on transforming our

safety case framework to deliver consistency, reduce

cost and provide the assurance needed across complex

facilities, systems and products. Building on the work trialled

and proven in the previous year, focus in FY26 has been on

embedding the new approach and a wider roll-out.

Wellbeing

Our wellbeing strategy provides direction and a common

approach to ensuring we have the mindset, skill sets and

toolsets for our people to take care of themselves and each

other. Formal support channels help ensure that support is

available when times are tough. These include our Employee

Assistance Programme, which offers a 24/7 support service,

including counselling. Employees are also encouraged to

talk to a Mental Health First Aider. One of the key deliverables

in FY26 was our sessions on navigating change. Working

through the restructuring programme and recognising the

impact of change on our people, we ran a series of sessions

aimed at providing support and advice. While predominantly

aimed at managers, the 13 sessions aracted nearly 900

employees. Recordings and materials from the sessions

have creating a lasting resource for continued learning.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

A key objective for FY27 will be ensuring

that we maintain and continuously improve the high

standards of safety we have set in our hazardous activities,

which represent a core part of our culture. Specific work

will be undertaken to review the training and capability

necessary to grow and develop the specialist technical skills

that ensure we conduct our trials and activities safely.

53

Sustainability

Social

Employee engagement and inclusion:

Driving performance and enabling

sustainable growth

We are building a workplace based on engagement and

inclusion. When our people feel connected to their work and

valued for their contribution, they bring their best ideas,

energy and commitment. When we embrace different

ways of thinking, we drive performance, strengthen

decision-making and enable sustainable growth.

Listening to our people helps us improve our working

environment and we encourage feedback via:

ɰ

Global Employee Voice (GEV) representatives,

who act on behalf of our colleagues to shape ideas

and initiatives

ɰ

Workday Peakon, our employee engagement platform,

which delivers four surveys annually, informing our

decision-making at a Group, business and team level

ɰ

Two-way communication channels, such as our

intranet and Q-Talks, which encourage colleagues to

share thoughts, feedback and experiences. This year

we also introduced ‘Manager Talking Points’, equipping

UK managers with practical toolkits to support

meaningful conversations

ɰ

Global Employee Roadshows, which are held

group-wide twice a year, provide an opportunity to

hear from our leadership team about strategic

progress and priorities, as well as ask questions

ɰ

UK Site Champions and Heads of Site bring people

together, building communities at a local level

Employee engagement is tracked as a non-financial KPI

(see page 39). In FY26, we held two full employee

engagement surveys and two shorter pulse surveys

(via Peakon), with reported engagement scores reflecting

aggregate results over a six-month period. The final

full survey, completed in February 2026, recorded an

engagement score of 6.5 out of 10 (compared with 7.5

reported in FY25). This reduction reflects the challenging

operating environment during FY26 and the actions taken

to control costs, which required a number of difficult

decisions, including a restructuring programme that had a

direct impact on our people and their sense of engagement.

Through Peakon and other engagement channels, our

people provide valuable insight into what we do well and

where we can further improve their experience.

Our people express a deep commitment to our mission,

taking great pride in their work and valuing the supportive

teams and relationships that make our Company feel unique.

Flexible working continues to be recognised as a core

strength, with employee feedback consistently highlighting

the positive impact it has on how our people work and

collaborate. We offer a range of options, including

Compressed Working (a nine day fortnight) in the

QinetiQ Ltd business, with 28% of colleagues taking up

this option. This helps us to build an inclusive, collaborative

and customer-focused culture.

Listening to our people about what we could do beer, we

have prioritised improving our communication channels.

This has included reintroducing in-person Global

Employee Roadshows to complement the virtual sessions,

refreshing our approach to Q-Talks (our monthly discussion

communication channel), ensuring our leaders are more

visible on our sites and puing in place a forum for feedback

and improvement on our communications.

Throughout the year, we have continued to respond

directly to employee feedback by strengthening our

Digital Workplace programme and improving the tools

and support that our people rely on every day. As a result,

we have delivered weekly updates to provide transparent

progress, introduced new productivity tools and expanded

face-to-face and targeted support sessions to help teams

adapt with confidence. More than 6,000 colleagues in the

UK and Australia have now successfully transitioned to the

Digital Workplace.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

Our people have told us they believe

in QinetiQ’s potential and want to help shape a stronger,

more aligned and more people-centred organisation. To

do so, they want greater clarity and increased investment

in modern tools and working environment, enabling them

to continue delivering meaningful, high-quality work. This

insight is being incorporated into our Engagement Working

Groups, where feedback from across our engagement

channels is brought together to strengthen understanding,

prioritise areas of focus and inform actions that will make

a tangible difference. This includes updating our Hybrid

Working approach to ensure colleagues are spending more

of their time on site, to take advantage of the benefits of

increased face-to-face collaboration and connection.

Our voluntary arition was 11.2%, compared with 10.7% in FY25.

As we strive to create an inclusive environment,

we continue to:

ɰ

Further embed inclusive recruitment into our hiring

practices to ensure merit-based, fair, consistent and

accessible hiring for all candidates

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

54

ɰ

Take part in the KPMG Cross Company Allyship

Programme, a mentoring initiative that connects

mentors with mentees from black heritage and ethnic

minority backgrounds

ɰ

Run our employee-led networks, which build

understanding of lived challenges and individual

strengths, creating a space for discussion, learning

and advocacy

ɰ

Support awareness-raising campaigns, such as

International Women’s Day, International Men’s Day,

International Women in Engineering Day, Pride Month

and Armed Forces Week

ɰ

Deliver our award-winning military spouses

programme, as part of our Social Value commitments

with UK customers (see page 55)

ɰ

Support UK Women in Defence as signatories to their

charter and long-term sponsors of the Innovation &

Sustainability Award, and provide resourcing support

through a part-time secondment

ɰ

Set a target to achieve 7% ethnic minority for Senior

Management (QLT and their direct reports) by 2027

QinetiQ Group conducts its employment practices

in relation to diversity and inclusion in compliance

with applicable local, state, provincial and federal law,

regulations and executive orders in the jurisdictions in

which it operates.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

In FY27, we will publish an Engagement

and Inclusion plan, reaffirming our commitment and seing

out our priorities. While meaningful and sustainable change

will take time, we remain focused on progress. Through

continued action, we aim to build a QinetiQ that reflects

the communities we serve and ensure that our people can

contribute with confidence.

Last year, recognising the cultural change required to

successfully deliver our strategy and improve performance,

we commied to launching a Culture and Leadership

Programme of work. This will build on pre-established

cultural foundations, including the QinetiQ Values and

Behaviours and the Leadership Expectations introduced

in FY25.

In FY26, we undertook a culture diagnostic and defined

our aspirational ‘Culture North Star’. The introduction

of our new operating model was a critical enabler of this

transformation, most notably through the creation of the

Performance and Growth Functions. The Performance

Function drives accountability, operational excellence and

continuous improvement. The Growth Function modernises

our business-winning capability, enabling more integrated,

collaborative and sophisticated approaches to growth.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

Moving into FY27, we will fully embed

our leadership expectations by prioritising leadership

capability. Our QLT and top 100 leaders will participate in

a bespoke development programme designed to equip

them for their critical role in driving and embedding further

culture change initiatives across the organisation.

Gender balance data

The table below shows the breakdown by gender of our Board, Senior Managers and all employees:

FY26

FY25

FY24

FY23

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Board Directors

1

3 (33%)

6 (67%)

4 (36%)

7 (64%)

4 (44%)

5 (56%)

3 (33%)

6 (67%)

Senior Managers

2

59 (23%)

197 (77%)

65 (22%)

237 (78%)

69 (22%)

251 (78%)

57 (19%)

244 (81%)

Other employees

3

1,747 (25%)

5,366 (75%)

2,054 (25%)

6,036 (75%)

2,144 (26%)

6,152 (74%)

1,976 (25%)

5,989 (75%)

1

For more information on Board diversity, see page 81.

2

Senior Managers are defined (in accordance with section 414C of the Companies Act 2006) as employees who have responsibility for planning,

directing or controlling the activities of the Group, or a strategically significant part of it. This includes Directors of subsidiary companies.

It includes our QinetiQ Leadership Team (QLT) but excludes our CEO and CFO, who are captured under Board Directors.

3

Excluding Senior Managers and the CEO and the CFO.

The proportion of women who are Senior Managers has increased in FY26 and the proportion of women across our overall

workforce has remained steady at 25%. We also participate annually in the FTSE Women Leaders Review, which focuses

on female representation at executive management level and their direct reports, which is a smaller population than the

Senior Managers. We reported 34.3% (at October 2025), compared with 27.6% in FY25 (and in line with Provision 23, we report

FY26 data on Page 100). In our latest UK Gender Pay Gap report (for the FY25 reporting period

), we report a mean gender pay

gap of 9.9%, which is an improvement compared with the previous year (11.6%, for the FY24 reporting period).

Sustainability

Social

55

Skills and development:

Growing future capability

As we strive to grow our business, we need to ensure we

are developing skills and capability aligned to customer

needs, both now and in the future.

In the context of the challenging operating environment,

we prioritised Health, Safety and Compliance training,

alongside business-critical requirements. Formal training

outside of these areas has been subject to review to

ensure we link professional development directly to

business priorities.

We continue to support and invest in our group-wide

Fellows scheme, which recognises technical, scientific and

engineering leaders. Our Fellows and Senior Fellows are

nationally or internationally renowned experts in fields such

as Avionic Systems, Lasers and Adaptive Optics, Target

Acquisition & Tracking and Sustainability. The scheme

helps us aract and retain leading experts, enabling us

to win work and invest in our capability.

To strengthen our professional development offering,

we launched a partnership for colleagues in the UK with

KPMG’s Learning Services practice. This provides high-

quality, relevant and cost-effective training that supports

individual development and organisational performance.

At the beginning of FY26, we put in place a new Performance

Framework, helping to ensure goals are relevant and

meaningful, fostering a culture of collaboration and

transparency. Through the framework, we are driving

collective performance by ensuring that Company goals

are cascaded through sectors and functions. It also

focuses on improving performance management as

well as engaging our people and role-modelling safety,

security and environmental leadership. All employees are

encouraged to have a development goal, ensuring a focus

on continuous learning and career growth.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

We are internally developing training in

several specific areas, including; Leading in a Technical

Environment (to equip engineers and scientists with the

skills to lead within projects) and a Test and Evaluation

foundation programme, to set QinetiQ standards for the

skills required for the delivery of test and evaluation.

Career growth is an area clearly identified by our people

as important and we continue to build new resources to

enable learning and development. From FY27, building on the

new Performance Framework, we are increasing the focus

on development by incorporating it into our continuous

performance management cycle.

Early careers

With a commitment to investing in the next generation,

in FY26 we continued to provide a rage of early career

options, and also to ensure apprenticeships are both an

entry route and upskilling opportunity for professional

development later in our peoples’ career. Our early careers

community continue to make a meaningful contribution,

with deployment to customer work. The value of this

experience is reflected in the feedback we receive via

our employee engagement activities.

Commitment to The 5% Club

As a Patron and founding member of The 5% Club, we

remain commied to achieving 5% of our workforce being

either part of our Early Careers programmes or wider Earn

and Learn opportunities. The breakdown of our UK Earn

and Learn community is published each year (see table on

page 57), including the percentage they comprise of the

UK workforce. While we report a smaller number of Early

Careers roles in FY26, which reflects the difficult operating

environment, we maintain our longer-term ambition to

reach 5% of our UK workforce.

Sustainability

Social

Leadership engagement session for our

Early Careers people

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

56

Sustainability

Social

UK Earn and Learn

community

FY26

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY22

Apprentices

83

97

139

85

53

Graduate

programme

32

106

105

128

105

Sponsored students

(Year in Industry

and summer

placements)

2

21

16

26

24

Upskilling

apprenticeship

(within first five

years in QinetiQ)

30

64

48

25

8

Early Careers

as % of

UK workforce

2.1

3.7

4.2

4.2

3.4

Total Earn and

Learn as % of

UK workforce

2.6

4.7

5.0

4.7

3.5

An additional 24 colleagues who have been with QinetiQ for

more than five years are on an upskilling apprenticeship.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

Looking ahead to FY27, we continue to

focus on building a group-wide learning capability within

our Early Careers community, ensuring we are developing

the skills needed across our Company. We will undertake a

strategic review of the programme, ensuring consistency

in our approach, while enabling more specific focus in areas

such as cyber, software, project management and ranges.

Rewarding for Performance:

Celebrating employee contribution

We offer a range of tangible rewards and benefits designed

to incentivise both collective performance and individual

contribution. Through our ‘Rewarding for Performance’

approach, we acknowledge and reward employee

contribution – individually and as a team – to our success.

In FY26, we:

ɰ

Awarded £500 to each employee as part of our AEIS

(All Employee Incentive Scheme) for their contribution

in FY26, with additional payments of up to 5% of salary

to high-performing employees

ɰ

Invested £700k, as part of our Pay & Progression

approach, on developing employees through in-year

role changes and grade progression

ɰ

Recognised 24 teams and individuals across eight

award categories as part of our Global Recognition

Gala, celebrating the aributes most important to

us at QinetiQ

ɰ

Continued to provide additional support to our

people who are experiencing challenging personal

circumstances through our Group Hardship fund and

Employee Assistance Programmes (EAP)

ɰ

Continued to be accredited as a Living Wage Employer

For colleagues in the UK and Canada, we launched a new

ThankQ recognition platform in FY26, with 1,791 recognition

awards. The platform enables employees to recognise

each other’s contribution across three new categories,

using four different levels of recognition, as well as to

celebrate milestones and events through a range of eCards.

Colleagues can also interact with recognition posts to

further acknowledge contributions and the platform

provides access to employee savings options.

Our communities

As a significant employer in most of the communities

where we operate, we are commied to giving back.

Our Social Impact strategy includes volunteering, charity

partnership and our ‘Science for Society’ programme.

We are closely aligned with our social value programmes

and our commitment to the armed forces.

Volunteering

Our employee volunteering programme is designed to

enable our skilled workforce to dedicate their time

and expertise to deliver social, environmental and

economic benefits within the communities where we

work. Through our social impact programme, we delivered

a series of high-impact initiatives with a focus on promoting

careers in defence and STEM (science, technology,

engineering, maths):

ɰ

Championing STEM inspiration across the UK

with our flagship events – the Power Boat Challenge,

marking International Women in Engineering Day,

our presence at the Royal International Air Taoo,

our ‘Hands on Science Day’ at Malvern, and our STEM

Exploration Day at Haslar – we aim to inspire the next

generation of scientists and engineers through

hands-on experiences and real-world role models.

Students participate in the 2026

Powerboat Challenge

57

Sustainability

Social

ɰ

Bringing innovation to life

by hosting the LEGO finals

at our Malvern site, giving children the opportunity to

showcase creativity, teamwork and engineering talent.

ɰ

Opening doors to maritime careers

through our

presence at HMS Collingwood (the RN’s largest training

establishment), where we highlighted the breadth of

opportunities available within the sector.

ɰ

Connecting communities to our work

through site

visits for schools, partners and youth groups, enabling

people to experience our facilities and expertise

first-hand.

ɰ

Optimising partnership

with non-profits and

companies such as The School Outreach Company,

to expand access to STEM inspiration and career

awareness, for example under-represented

groups including girls and those in receipt of

Free School Meals.

We have launched a new STEM Working Group,

created to drive and embed STEM volunteering

throughout the business in alignment with our wider

skills and growth strategy.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

In FY27 we will continue to build our

STEM outreach programme, delivering key flagship

events, including having a presence at the Farnborough

Airshow Pioneers of Tomorrow exhibition, expanding our

engagement with cadet groups across the areas in which

we operate, creating stronger local connections and

broadening pathways into STEM- and defence-related

careers. We will be encouraging greater participation in

volunteering; for example, new skills-based volunteering

programmes.

Science for Society

Our Science for Society programme harnesses the

expertise of our people to address critical challenges. In

FY26, our team undertook a study on

support

for those who

are helping children exposed to extreme messaging online.

Charitable giving

In FY26, we launched a four-year partnership with

Combat Stress, a UK charity for veterans’ mental health.

This partnership reflects our commitment to supporting

positive mental wellbeing, both within our workforce and

in the communities connected to our sector. By working

with Combat Stress, we aim to raise awareness of the

importance of early intervention and sustained care.

This initiative aligns closely with our business strategy

and highlights our ongoing commitment to the Armed

Forces Covenant, supporting veterans, serving personnel

and their families. Through this partnership, our mental

health first aiders have completed the first of two training

sessions focused on how best to support individuals

experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD ).

In addition to this partnership, we also donated to Legacy,

the Australia charity that supports the families of veterans.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

We will continue to build awareness of

PTSD across the organisation and work with Combat Stress

to support our veterans and reservists directly. We also

plan to work with the charity’s experts to develop a suite of

resources to help both managers and wider employees in

effectively supporting colleagues impacted by PTSD.

Social Value

QinetiQ also delivers a range of ‘Social Value’ activities as

part of delivery for UK Government contracts. This activity

complements and supports our Group ESG strategy and

programmes, and sees project teams working with, and on

behalf of, our customers on a range of areas; from positively

growing the next generation of suitably qualified and

experienced personnel (SQEP), to volunteering for local

good causes or championing wellbeing. These projects

have not only met the expectations of our customers,

but have also contributed to the social and economic

wellbeing of the communities we are involved in, prioritising

initiatives that foster community job creation, inspiring

the next generation of STEM innovators and championing

sustainability. Examples include:

ɰ

Delivering a national first ‘hub-and-spoke’ version of

the CyberFirst Advanced course: the team piloted an

industry-leading approach in delivering the National

Cyber Security Centre’s (NCSC) CyberFirst Advanced

programme, with 70 students aending from four

sites across the UK. This model is going to grow in

the next FY, with plans to impact 300 young people in

collaboration with 12 Higher Education Institutions.

“We’re incredibly grateful to QinetiQ for their

innovative hub-and-spoke delivery model for

the CyberFirst Advanced courses. This exciting

approach not only expands access to high-quality

cyber education, but also sets a powerful example

of how collaboration and creativity can help

scale CyberFirst opportunities across the UK.

We hope others will be inspired to adopt and

build on this model in the future.”

Chris Ensor

Deputy Director Cyber Growth,

National Cyber Security Centre

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

58

ɰ

Employability skills for Military Spouses with our

charity partner ‘Recruit for Spouses’. This has

included delivering our targeted ‘Demystifying

Defence’ briefings to support spouses to identify

their transferable skills, find roles on LinkedIn,

prepare their CV and get ready for a mock interview

programme, alongside in-person support in Chepstow.

We have also provided paid work placements for

Military Spouses – designed to help them re-enter

the workforce by building skills, confidence and

experience. Throughout the placement, each

participant was supported by both a QinetiQ Buddy

and a Recruit for Spouses coach and had opportunities

to network with QinetiQ colleagues working in roles

they may wish to explore.

ɰ

Summer programme for BAME Students: as part of the

Sanderson-led ‘Strive’ programme, QinetiQ provided

a paid summer internship for a student from the

University of West of England.

ɰ

Skills donation to military charities: working with

military charities in the ‘Thrive Together’ network,

the team has provided pro-bono support to their

development, advising on everything from impact

reporting to their cyber security provisions.

ɰ

We launched a new partnership with the charity

Futures for All to deliver bespoke virtual work

experience, designed to inspire the next generation

and raise awareness of the wide variety of careers

available within the defence sector.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

In FY27 We will focus on designing and

delivering projects to drive the skills agenda, support the

armed forces community, and provide meaningful support

to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and Voluntary,

Community and Social Enterprises (VCSEs) in helping

them enter the defence supply chain.

Our commitment to the Armed Forces

QinetiQ is deeply commied to supporting veterans,

reservists and the wider Armed Forces community. In FY26,

we strengthened this commitment in accordance with our

formal commitment to the Armed Forces Covenant, through

targeted engagement, improved policies and deeper

partnerships designed to ensure that those who serve,

who have served and their family members are recognised,

supported and empowered to thrive within our organisation.

Achievements in FY26 include:

Community and Membership:

We enhanced engagement

and visibility across our Armed Forces through a number

of initiatives. We improved on-boarding guidance for

new employees with military backgrounds. We focused

on growing the membership of the QinetiQ Veteran and

Reservist Network (QVRN). We created veteran lanyards

to raise awareness and ran Breakfast & Brew sessions to

maintain engagement across the network. We represented

QinetiQ at Remembrance ceremonies across multiple

locations. We included Cadet and Cadet Force Adult

Volunteers in our policies and activities fully for the first

time, recognising their contribution to this community.

We focused on advocacy to other employers aimed at

encouraging them to take a positive Armed Forces

approach through a series of workshops.

Wellbeing, Mental Health and Charity Support:

Wellbeing remained a priority. Through our partnership

with Combat Stress, we supported increased access to

mental health services for veterans.

Policy, Governance and Operational Support:

We strengthened key policies and governance structures,

providing consistent support for reservist mobilisation and

reintegration. We updated the Reservist Policy to include

international reservists, began reviewing our Armed Forces

Covenant commitments, and continued supporting the

maintenance of our Employer Recognition Scheme Gold

Award status.

Recruitment and Transition Support:

To enhance

our position as an employer of choice for veterans and

reservists, we expanded collaboration with the Career

Transition Partnership, increased visibility of military-

friendly roles and improved our understanding of the

veteran and reservist population across QinetiQ.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

In FY27, we will strengthen our presence

at the National Armed Forces Day event being hosted in

Aldershot and expand the network of QVRN site champions.

We will launch the QVRN Mentoring Scheme to support the

transition of new employees with military backgrounds

and introduce a comprehensive skills mapping initiative

to beer understand and utilise the capabilities of our

veteran and reservist community. We will also enhance line

manager training to support mobilised reservists, deepen

collaboration with our Armed Forces Charity Partner,

and fully embed the updated multinational Reservist

Policy across the organisation. We will continue our support

of the Cadet movement through offering unique work

experiences to cadets and we will enhance further our

support of Cadet Force Adult Volunteers. We will continue

to provide support to other organisations and employers

by helping them progress a positive stance on their own

Armed Forces community.

Sustainability

Social

59

Sustainability:

Governance

Effective governance is a critical pillar,

underpinning our ethical standards

and supporting how we work responsibly

and sustainably.

Business ethics: doing business

the right way

Our values

Our values of integrity, collaboration and performance

underpin all that we do. Our values form part of our

performance management framework, our leadership

expectations that are part of our reward and recognition

framework. As part of our FY25 Gala awards (page 57),

Living our Values was celebrated as an award category.

INTEGRITY

Trusted to do the right thing at all times, we take pride

in our decisions and work to create a sustainable and

responsible business.

We are responsible and accountable for all our actions.

We take personal responsibility to do the right thing,

demonstrating this individually and as an organisation

in our decisions, behaviour and day-to-day actions.

We actively support each other to meet the highest

ethical conduct and professional standards.

COLLABORATION

The chosen partner for customers and industry partners,

we are a community with a common purpose; every

contribution is valued.

Delivering value through partnership and teamwork, we

actively collaborate with our colleagues, customers and

industry partners to bring together the best thinking, the

smartest talent and breadth and depth in capability to our

work, driving innovation. We know that working together is

the best way to meet our stakeholders’ needs.

PERFORMANCE

Customer focused and highly responsive, providing

operational excellence and assuring safe and

secure delivery.

Our performance is measured by how we deliver for

our customers; meeting their needs through flawless

execution and delivery of the mission-critical solutions

on which they depend. This includes being accountable

for geing things right first time, safely, securely and in a

cost-effective way. Taking an innovative and responsive

approach to create an outstanding customer experience,

we try to go the extra mile and act with courage.

Code of Conduct

Our Group Code of Conduct defines our ethical standards,

providing clear direction and guidance on how we do

business and our expectations of all of our employees.

It contains information on ethical decision-making and

provides information on how to seek help and advice. We

review the Code annually to reflect the evolving needs of

our business, the regulatory environment and best practice.

Our Code of Conduct is for our people but we also make it

available for customers, suppliers and other partners.

Our Code of Conduct is available on the business ethics

pages of our website

Conduct and ethics training

Annual business conduct and ethics training is mandatory

for employees and supports our people in understanding

and using the Code of Conduct. The training is undertaken

by our Board. We provide a number of challenging scenarios

to help our people know what to do if they were to come

across issues such as bribery, fraud, harassment, conflict

of interest and modern slavery.

Speak up

We strive to create an environment where our people feel

safe and confident to speak up and we provide a number of

different ways for them to seek help or to raise concerns.

Employees can talk to a manager, use our ethics email

advice services, our global network of Ethics Champions

and our independently run, 24/7, confidential reporting

line. For third parties, we provide our Speak Up contacts

via our website and in our supplier Code of Conduct. We

have responded to all queries received via our ethics email

advice services and confidential reporting line. Our Board

oversees our approach to confidential reporting (see page

95). Throughout the year we have promoted the importance

of speaking up and the various different contact routes,

via awareness campaigns, in the Code of Conduct and in

our mandatory business conduct and ethics training. We

promoted our Speak Up Guide for Managers, supporting

them in creating an open and inclusive environment, where

our people feel confident to raise concerns, and managers

know how to listen to and support anyone who may come to

them with an issue.

Anti-bribery and corruption

One of our values is Integrity and we operate a zero-

tolerance approach to bribery and corruption in any form.

We comply with applicable anti-bribery laws and regulations

in the jurisdictions around the world in which we operate.

Our anti-bribery and corruption framework seeks to ensure

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

60

Sustainability

Governance

the identification, assessment, monitoring and mitigation

of bribery and corruption risks. Anti-bribery and corruption

(ABC) forms part of our annual business conduct and ethics

training (see above), and we provide ABC training for our

people in certain high-risk roles, helping them to identify

and mitigate any potential bribery risks that they may

face. The prevention of bribery and corruption is a focus

within our third-party risk management and due diligence

processes, as well as our monitoring and audit programmes.

Human rights and modern slavery

We operate and manage an action plan across the Group

to address the risk of forced labour, child labour, migrant

workers, human trafficking and modern slavery. During FY26,

we have been aligning this plan with the UK Government

Transparency in Supply Chains (TISC) Guidance. Our annual

modern slavery statement is published on the homepage of

our QinetiQ Group website. We maintained our score of 82%

on the UK Government Modern Slavery Assessment Tool

in FY26. Our supplier Code of Conduct helps to ensure our

suppliers have clear guidance on their responsibilities on

human rights, forced labour, modern slavery and speaking

up. We provide tailored training to our people in key roles

and continue to provide supporting resources for all

employees and suppliers, including industry engagement

events through our Collaborate Series. Responsible

business practice underpins how we operate, and we are

commied to respecting human rights. We continue to

anticipate, prevent and mitigate potential negative human

rights impacts through our policy and processes. These are

monitored through our business and supplier assurance

processes and regular self-assessment, with oversight by

our Business Ethics Commiee. For example, we address

salient human rights issues through our Code of Conduct,

our ethical trading policy, international business risk

management process, supply chain due diligence,

export controls process and grievance mechanisms.

Our confidential reporting approach (see page 60) provides

routes for third parties to raise concerns).

Artificial intelligence

During FY26, we have been further developing our approach

to governance of AI, including the roll-out of an AI impact

assessment considering legality, ethicality, safety,

security and sustainability.

OUR FOCUS IN FY27

We will be reviewing and updating

our Modern Slavery action plan to reflect the evolving

external requirements. We will continue to evolve our

approach to ethical trading and further develop our

AI governance approach.

Responsible tax management

We make a significant tax contribution to the economies

of the countries where we operate. In alignment with our

sustainability and tax strategies, we strive to be responsible

in all our business dealings, with zero tolerance of tax

evasion. Our annual tax strategy statement is published on

our website. We apply our approach to tax management in a

consistent and transparent manner in our dealings with tax

authorities around the world. As a UK-headquartered Group,

we file our country-by-country report and have registered

to file our first OECD Pillar 2 GloBE Information Return with

the UK tax authorities. Our policies, processes and controls

are regularly reviewed and risk-assessed. Recognising

the importance of embedding the tax strategy as a Group-

wide culture, we provide relevant tax insights through our

quarterly internal newsleer, regular presentations across

the business and bespoke tax training. Our Audit Commiee

oversees our approach to tax (see page 108).

Responsible procurement

We are commied to responsible procurement, both in how

we work with our suppliers and in our engagement on all

aspects of sustainability, from modern slavery to climate

change. As an extension of our Company, we expect our

suppliers to be commied to the same standards and

values of safety, security, sustainability and governance

as we are, which we articulate through our Supplier Code

of Conduct and Sustainable Procurement Guide (available

on our website). Through promoting inclusive procurement

and removing barriers to entry, we strive to enable access

to opportunities for diverse suppliers, including small and

medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and minority-owned

and non-traditional defence suppliers. We maintain our

support to the SME community through our various trade

associations, events such as the Defence Procurement

Research and Technology Exportability (DPRTE) trade show,

and active engagement with the new UK Regional Defence

and Security Clusters. We have continued to enhance

our Supplier and SME Hub web pages to make it easier for

suppliers to engage and register their interest with us.

We are commied to paying suppliers promptly and we also

continue to work with our third-party subcontractors on UK

sites as they progress towards compliance with our Real

Living Wage commitment. In support of Workstream 3 of

our CTAP (page 44), we developed a new climate-conscious

clause and after successfully integrating this within our

UK supplier terms and conditions, we further rolled this

out to our Canadian business and QTS UK in FY26.

61

Sustainability

Governance

ESG Governance and leadership

Our approach to sustainability is sponsored by our Group

CFO and actively supported by our Board. Our Group Director

ESG leads our sustainability strategy and programmes,

working with leaders and subject maer experts across

the business. Regular briefings and papers are provided

to the Board and key Board Commiees. These cover

all material aspects of our sustainability programmes,

including sustainability strategy, climate change, non-

financial reporting, ethics and community impact, as well

as programmes such as ABC, confidential reporting, safety,

and engagement, which are reported to the Board by key

functional leaders (page 93). This ensures the necessary

oversight of our approach, progress and plans. Within the

organisation, key aspects of governance are overseen by

the Environment Council (chaired by our Group Director

ESG) and Business Ethics Commiee (Chaired by our

Group Director Legal and Company Secretary). These

multidisciplinary leadership groups provide governance and

oversight, and also the opportunity to collaborate across

functions and sectors. Policy and governance aspects of

key ESG programmes are described on pages 63 and 64.

The ABP rewards non-financial performance through the

delivery of ESG goals related to environment (Net-Zero),

employee engagement, safety and security (see page 123).

ESG information for shareholders

This section provides additional information in response to

ESG-related questions commonly raised by shareholders,

investors and ESG data providers when assessing

companies operating in the defence sector. It is intended

to summarise information, including disclosures made

elsewhere in the Annual Report. We recognise that some

investors apply sector-based exclusions to defence

companies. This disclosure is provided to support

shareholders and potential investors who assess QinetiQ

under their own ESG frameworks and methodologies.

Defence and ESG considerations:

We recognise the

importance of transparency for investors assessing our

shares through an ESG lens. QinetiQ operates in defence

and national security markets and provides services to

government customers, primarily in the UK, US, Australia,

Canada and Germany. In an increasingly complex and

uncertain global environment, the ability of democratic

nations to safeguard national security, protect civilian

populations and maintain strategic stability is an important

public policy objective. We believe that investment in

defence companies is compatible with ESG considerations,

when underpinned by strong governance, ethical business

practices and compliance with applicable laws and

regulations. Our activities are conducted within robust

governance frameworks, with oversight by the Board and

executive management, and subject to strict national and

international regulatory regimes, including export controls

and security requirements.

Our end markets and revenue profile:

In FY26 the

majority of Group revenue was derived from defence and

national security activities. QinetiQ is one of the largest

suppliers to the UK Ministry of Defence (ranking as 4th

largest by contract value during the year). The Group’s

activities are predominantly focused on test, evaluation,

training, systems integration, mission-critical services and

scientific and technical assurance. These services support

operational effectiveness, platform safety, regulatory

compliance and the protection of personnel. A small

percentage of Group revenue is associated with weapons

related programmes. The majority of this revenue relates

to test, evaluation and certification activities, rather than

the manufacture of complete weapons systems.

Controversial weapons:

QinetiQ is not engaged in,

nor exposed to the production, development,

manufacture or use of controversial weapons as

defined by applicable international conventions. All of

QinetiQ’s activities are conducted in compliance with

applicable national and international law, including

relevant international conventions.

Nuclear weapons and submarine activity:

QinetiQ is not

involved in the design, construction, testing, manufacture

or maintenance of nuclear weapons. The Group provides

test, training and evaluation services to the UK Royal Navy’s

fleet of vessels including submarines. These services are

focused on platform performance safety, training and

operational assurance and are provided irrespective of

payload. It is important to make a distinction between the

testing and assurance of vessels and the weapon systems

that may be deployed from them.

Governance, ethics and compliance:

QinetiQ operates

under robust governance and compliance frameworks and

internal controls, designed to ensure responsible business

conduct. These include Board-level oversight of ethics,

risk management and ESG maers; robust export controls

and security compliance processes, aligned to applicable

national licensing regimes; ethical standards governing

customer and supplier selection, contract acceptance

and delivery; and ongoing engagement with stakeholders,

including customers, regulators, investors and ESG

providers. Our governance process has oversight of how

we align our operations with relevant human rights

standards and international humanitarian law.

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

62

The non-financial and sustainability reporting requirements contained in sections 414CA and 414CB of the Companies Act

2006 are addressed within this section by means of cross-reference, in order to indicate where they are located within

the strategic narrative and to avoid duplication. We have a range of policy and guidance, some of which is published on

our website. Certain of the non-financial and sustainability information required pursuant to the Companies Act 2006 is

provided by reference to the following locations:

Non-financial information

Section

Pages

Business model

Business model

18

Environmental, social and governance maers

Sustainability

48-62

Policies

Non-financial and sustainability information statement

63

Principal risks and risk management

Risk management

64

Key performance indicators

Key performance indicators

39

Climate-related financial disclosures

Sustainability

48-52

Non-financial and sustainability

information statement

Environmental management

Climate-related financial disclosure requirements S414CB(2A)

Code of Conduct

Health and Safety

Our People Policy

Environmental maers

Our people

We are commied to embedding an environmentally sustainable

approach to business (see page 46 for more details). The

effectiveness of our Environmental Group Requirement is governed

through our assurance process including the six-monthly

Assurance Statement undertaken by functions and sectors.

Environmental issues are part of a regular governance timetable,

with oversight by the Environment Council and the Board Risk &

Security Commiee. We are certified to ISO 14001 in the UK and

Canada and so are subject to external audit as well as our internal

processes, which are overseen by the Risk and Assurance Director.

The Companies (Strategic Report) (Climate-related Financial

Disclosure) Regulations 2022 place requirements on QinetiQ to

incorporate climate disclosures in the annual report and accounts.

We believe these have been addressed within our statement on

TCFD (pages 48 to 52), climate-related governance (page 48), climate-

related risk management (page 51), climate-related strategy (page 49)

and climate-related metrics and targets (page 52).

Our Code of Conduct provides direction and guidance on how we

do business across the Company (page 60). There is guidance on

our standards, on ethical decision-making and on how to seek help

and raise concerns. We review our Code of Conduct annually to

reflect the needs of our business, regulations and best practice.

Guidance for our people and third parties on how to ‘speak up’ is

provided within our Code of Conduct and our supplier Code of

Conduct (see page 61), both available on our website. Speak up and

the Code of Conduct form part of the Business Ethics Commiee

agenda and updates are part of ESG papers for the Board.

Confidential reporting is overseen by the Board (page 95).

Our Safety Policy outlines our commitment to continually improving

standards of safety management and compliance. This is

supported by our Safety Strategy. The effectiveness of the policy is

monitored through a set of performance measures that are subject

to regular management review (internal and external) and our six-

monthly Assurance Statement.

We hold ISO 45001 certification for selected sites. Safety

performance is part of a regular governance timetable, reviewed

at least quarterly through the Group-level Operations Council,

through QLT meetings and as part of the Board Risk & Security

Commiee (see page 110). The Lost Time incident Rate is a key

non-financial KPI (page 39). Safety programmes are described on

page 53 and Safety is listed as one of our principal risks (page 68).

Our approach to supporting our employees is underpinned by our

suite of People policies, including reward & performance, resourcing

& learning, engagement & culture and governance & reporting.

Culture is listed in our principal risks (page 67).

The effectiveness of this approach is governed via our assurance

processes and KPIs (a key KPI is employee engagement –

page 39). Leadership oversight comes from the People

Council. Regular updates are provided to the Board (page 93).

63

Non-financial and sustainability

information statement

Community

Human rights

Anti-bribery and corruption

Tax

Modern slavery

Data protection

Community and society maers

Human rights

Anti-bribery and anti-corruption

Within our Business Management System we provide Instructions

for employees to use dedicated volunteering time to use their skills,

which enable us to make a positive difference in the community

(page 57). The effectiveness is monitored by the ESG team.

For our work with charities (page 58), we undertake review and due

diligence of donations and charity selection has oversight by

the Sponsorship and Donations Commiee, supported by

our assurance processes.

We seek to anticipate and prevent potential negative human rights

impacts through our policies and processes and address salient

human rights issues through our Code of Conduct, ethical trading

policy, international business risk management process and trade

compliance process. Our policies and processes ensure we meet

all statutory requirements.

We monitor the application of these policies through our business

assurance processes and regular self-assessment and with

leadership oversight (Business Ethics Commiee and Board).

We believe that this integrated approach is effective in ensuring

our business acts responsibly and respects human rights (see

page 61). Our Supplier Code of Conduct helps ensure our suppliers

have clarity on our expectations on human rights issues. See

page 61 and our website for more details.

Our anti-bribery and corruption (ABC) policy and process sets out

our responsibilities in observing and upholding our zero-tolerance

approach to all forms of bribery and corruption. This ensures we

meet statutory requirements and has senior oversight at QLT and

Board level. It is managed via our assurance processes and QinetiQ

Assurance Statement and there are regular internal audits.

Details of our ABC programme are provided on page 60. This

is underpinned by a number of supporting requirements and

instructions, for example our approach to gifts and hospitality and

for managing Commercial intermediaries. The foundation for all of

this is our Code of Conduct, which lays out our ethical standards

and contains advice on anti-bribery and corruption (see page 60).

Our tax strategy (available on our website) outlines our

commitment to being compliant with tax legislation wherever we

do business. We recognise our responsibility to pay the right

amount of tax, at the right time and in the right jurisdiction.

Oversight of this commitment comes through external challenge,

such as business risk reviews and audit questions from tax

authorities and external auditors, and internal reviews such as

quarterly tax updates, with executive-level reviews of process

and procedure. The tax strategy also has oversight by the Audit

Commiee (page 108).

We recognise our responsibility to comply with all relevant legislation,

including the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015, Australian Modern

Slavery Act 2018 and Canadian Fighting Against Forced labour

and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act 2023 and in accordance the

modern slavery laws of other locations in which QinetiQ operates.

Our supporting policies and processes focus on management of the

supply chain and the requirements for due diligence.

In addition, we include modern slavery in our resourcing policy.

Our QinetiQ Group Modern Slavery Statement is updated annually,

signed by our Board and published on the homepage of our website.

The effectiveness is monitored via our assurance programme and

leadership oversight (QLT and Board). See page 61 for more details.

Our Data Protection policy and process details how we manage the

privacy, holding and security of personal information.

The effectiveness is monitored via our assurance programme and

leadership oversight (QLT and Board).

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

64

Risk

management

The Group operates in an increasingly complex and

volatile global environment characterised by heightened

geopolitical tensions, evolving security threats, supply

chain pressures, technological acceleration and regulatory

change. Effective risk management is fundamental

to supporting the delivery of strategic objectives,

safeguarding the Group’s people and assets, maintaining

operational resilience and creating sustainable long-term

value for shareholders.

The Board recognises that risk is inherent in all business

activity and seeks to manage risk within clearly defined

appetite parameters, ensuring that risks are identified,

assessed, mitigated and actively monitored across

the Group.

Risk and assurance highlights

ɰ

Developed the maturity of our risk management

framework by enhancing the way we combine horizon

scanning with long-term planning and mitigation,

enabling beer management of emerging threats.

ɰ

Completed Commiee-level deep-dives on

our principal risks, focusing on mitigations and

exposure reduction.

ɰ

Refined the Group Assurance Framework and

rationalised assurance to align to risk and our

regulatory obligations (including Provision 29

of the UK Corporate Governance Code), creating

a more focused and efficient approach.

Our Enterprise Risk

Management Framework

Our annual cycle consists of comprehensive identification,

monitoring and review of current and emerging risks

material to the Group, which we conduct together with

our sectors and functions. We take into account industry

insights, competitor analyses, geopolitical, macro

and microeconomic developments and advancements

in technology.

Risk identification and management is conducted

within the Group’s Quality, Risk and Assurance Policy,

supported by the Operational Framework.

Key elements include:

ɰ

Risks identified and owned by sectors and

Group functions.

ɰ

Risks recorded in local and Group risk registers.

ɰ

Assessment of likelihood, impact and time horizon.

ɰ

Annual formal refresh of business risks.

ɰ

Regular review through Monthly sector and function

Performance Reviews.

ɰ

Aggregation and escalation of material risks to

Group level.

We align our assurance activity to the identified risks in

the context of our business processes and how those risks

may affect our strategic goals and day-to-day operations.

This is presented to the Risk & Security Commiee

quarterly, ensuring adequate monitoring to maintain the

effectiveness of the Group’s risk management activities

and internal control processes.

Ongoing communication and feedback process

1

Seing and

periodic review

of risk appetite

2

Risk

identification

and ownership

4

Risk response

and action

tracking

3

Risk assessment

5

Monitoring and

reporting

This diagram illustrates a continuous five-part cycle

that supports effective enterprise risk management

throughout the year.

65

Risk

management

Governance and Responsibilities

The Board retains overall responsibility for determining

the nature and extent of the risks the Group is willing to

accept in pursuit of its strategic objectives. Risk is reviewed

regularly through Board and Commiee activity and

is embedded within strategy, business planning and

making processes.

Oversight of risk management is delegated as follows:

Board

ɰ

Sets risk appetite and reviews principal and

emerging risks

ɰ

Oversees the effectiveness of the risk management

and internal control framework

Audit Commiee

ɰ

Oversees the framework of internal controls

addressing the main risks faced by the Company

Risk & Security Commiee

ɰ

Monitors key risks and material controls

ɰ

Reviews the effectiveness of the risk management

and internal control framework

ɰ

Reports to the Board at least twice annually

QinetiQ Leadership Team

ɰ

Reviews and challenges business risks

ɰ

Assigns executive ownership for principal risks

Risk management and

assurance activity

We use a Three Lines Model for our risk management

and assurance activities. The first line is performed

by operational management, who are responsible for

managing risks and report to the QinetiQ Leadership

Team. The second line is performed by teams that

provide expertise, framework design and oversight role

but sit outside of day-to-day management of the risks

reporting through the Group Director Risk and Assurance

to the QinetiQ Leadership Team and the Risk & Security

Commiee. The third line is performed by internal or

external teams, such as Internal Audit, that provide

independent, objective assurance reporting to the

QinetiQ Leadership Team and the Audit Commiee.

Further reading

Board of Directors

84

Audit Commiee Report

104

Risk & Security Commiee Report

110

Principal and emerging risks FY26

During FY26 the Board carried out a robust assessment of the material and emerging risks relevant to the Group’s business.

The Group Principal Risk Register consists of material risks that could affect the delivery of our strategic objectives and may

have a material impact on our stakeholders and environment. We accept that risk is an inherent part of doing business and

our Principal Risk Register aims to provide reasonable assurance that we understand, monitor and manage the effects of

the main uncertainties that we face in delivering our objectives.

As part of our continual cycle of review and improvement in risk management, we completed an annual identification of

risks to our strategic objectives, followed by activities in sizing and handling those risks. The results were shared with

the Risk and Security Commiee, who reviewed and agreed the principal risks for the year.

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

66

Risk

management

Potential for our security to be breached by

insiders, state-sponsored actors, criminals

or activists; resulting in the loss, theft,

denial or compromise of critical assets

(including people, facilities, information

or technology). This would subsequently

damage our reputation, competitive edge,

and/or ability to win/deliver work, trigger

regulatory sanctions, and harm our people.

QinetiQ may lose market share

(and therefore revenue) due to the

volatility of global defence and national

security markets, driven by shifting

geopolitical landscapes, evolving

threat environments and fluctuating

government defence budgets.

QinetiQ may lose market share

(and therefore revenue) due to the

volatility of global defence and national

security markets, driven by shifting

geopolitical landscapes, evolving threat

environments and fluctuating government

defence budgets. Rapid changes in policy,

international relations and economic

conditions may impact demand for defence

capabilities, disrupt supply chains and

affect long-term strategic planning.

Failure to define and build a single, inclusive

and high-performing organisational culture

and leadership behaviour could impact

achieving our strategic goals and ambition.

Failure to appropriately leverage adequate

functional skills, processes and tools

to meet regulatory requirements and

standards, deliver consistent performance

and enable growth. Failure to adapt the skills

and aligned capacity required to deliver

future business and keep pace with the

evolved offerings of the Company.

Information is protected through a comprehensive framework of policy, procedural,

physical and digital security controls, significantly strengthened in the past year through

the deployment of our Digital Workplace environment. These controls are reinforced by

ongoing assurance activities, organisation-wide awareness initiatives and mandatory

annual security training. We maintain a robust programme for the deployment, testing

and continual enhancement of our cyber security detection and protective technologies,

including routine network testing and technical assessments. The evolving and

increasingly sophisticated threat landscape is continuously monitored through our

Security Council and Risk & Security Commiee, ensuring an appropriate balance

between security, cost and operational flexibility.

We are strengthening our competitive position as an established provider in the defence

and technology sector through a customer-centric approach to the digital transformation

of our offerings. Performance is expected to benefit from enhanced win strategies that

support improved through-life delivery and more efficient business operations. A renewed

focus on growth opportunities aligned to the evolving priorities of our customers is

expected to deliver strong returns in a challenging environment.

We are strengthening our competitive position as an established defence and technology

provider through a customer-centric approach, including active engagement with the UK

Government in support of our UK first strategy. We are reviewing the strategic positioning

of our German business within the evolving EU and NATO defence landscape, alongside

a broader assessment of changing market dynamics across these regions.

We continue to selectively develop and broaden our product portfolio and distinctive mix

of skills, capabilities and resources to beer align with customer requirements in our home

and priority markets. These actions are expected to mitigate contract risk, optimise project

execution and deliver improved efficiency and customer satisfaction across the capture

and delivery lifecycle.

The maturing of the QinetiQ Operating Model is supporting investment in our culture and

the embedding of our approach to inclusion, diversity and effective people management.

We continue to review the competitiveness of reward, pay and progression, to ensure

we aract and retain top talent, and develop supporting tools and processes that drive

performance in the way we work. Regular Peakon employee engagement reviews are

used to test engagement and develop focused action plans to improve. We set and

communicate clear behavioural values at all levels to embed a cohesive, high-performing

organisational culture.

Building on the introduction of a joint strategy and people-focused approach to strategic

capability planning, supported by enhanced talent and demand management systems,

we are implementing further actions to drive performance excellence. This approach allows

us to plan for new skills and support to new technologies in a rapidly changing environment.

We have continued investment in our people, with a focus on strengthening management

and leadership capability across the Group and ensuring a competitive performance and

reward framework to beer incentivise individual and team outcomes. We are making

progress in implementing a common set of tools and processes across the Group to

support a standardised, high-performing and consistent way of working.

Risk and Impacts

Mitigation

Security

Business Winning

Markets

Culture

Capability

1

2

3

4

5

67

Risk

management

Failure to select and integrate

value-accretive businesses to enable

strategic ambition and realise the

maximum potential benefits, from

acquisition to integration into the business.

QinetiQ may lose market share due to

changes in market competitiveness in

the external environment – both from a

customer and competitor perspective.

Failure to keep pace with evolving

requirements and technologies may

reduce growth and impact performance.

Inconsistent and suboptimal contract

execution due to lack of ability to leverage

appropriate competency and capability

across our Engineering, P3M and Supply

Chain Management functions.

Rapidly shifting macroeconomic

uncertainty, failure to meet our published

climate change targets and outbreak

of diseases could impact stakeholder

expectations and resilience needs,

resulting in operational disruption, loss

of new business, reduced investor

confidence and compromised reputation.

Failure to effectively implement health,

safety or wellbeing strategies resulting

in serious physical or mental health

injury, fatality of employee(s), third party

personnel or member(s) of the public,

loss of assets or significant regulatory

enforcement action. Significant impact

to the brand and long-term delivery

performance could be realised as a

consequence of a major safety failure.

Effectiveness and stability of our IT

infrastructure and business tools could

affect broader Company business

operations and ability to support

revenue-generating services. Inability

to realise the value of and/or manage

the change programme associated

with the introduction of a new

integrated ERP system.

The focus has been on realising the value of acquisitions and enhancing the overall

Group offerings, using our capabilities through appropriate integration. Alignment of

the QinetiQ Operating Model and agreement of management system processes is being

used to improve efficiency while maintaining the unique selling and delivery capabilities of

subsidiary units. Work continues to enhance due diligence process and associated policies,

including ESG, to ensure a strong acquisition framework is in place for the future.

The Group has defined a set of technical capability priorities to shape our skills

requirements for future customer needs, including plans to embed and exploit emerging

technologies. As part of this approach, we have established an ethical framework for the

development and use of artificial intelligence, designed to align with current regulatory

and legal requirements and to anticipate future regulatory developments. We continue

to monitor this rapidly evolving area closely. In parallel, we are strengthening our diverse

product portfolio and distinctive mix of skills, capabilities and resources to align more

closely with customer requirements in our home and priority markets. These actions

are intended to mitigate contract risk, optimise project execution and deliver efficient,

high-quality outcomes across the capture and delivery lifecycle.

Focused actions are in place to ensure we have a robust system of aligning competence

with project complexity, ensuring we apply our skills to reduce risk and meet customer

demands. Several enhancements have been delivered to increase the efficiency and agility

of the core project lifecycle, to enable us to rapidly shape, bid for and deliver technical work

for our customers. We continue to evolve our contractual framework approach and embrace

new business models to increase pace of delivery, maintaining the high levels of quality that

our customers expect.

The Group has a mature and well established framework of policies and controls to manage

and respond to volatile economic and financial conditions. We have developed a Climate

Transition Action Plan and are commied to SBTi validated targets, with the ambition to

achieve Net-Zero emissions by 2050 or sooner. A range of initiatives is in place across

the Group to embed our plan, including investment in energy efficiency projects and

programmes to reduce Scope 3 emissions, plus underpinning projects on data and skills.

We recognise the important of climate resilience within the plan. We are active in our

sector and seek to support our customers’ focus on resilience.

A global Safety Improvement Programme continues to deliver as planned, enabling

measurable improvements in the safety culture maturity. A focus on high-hazard activity is

driving more effective global safety processes to achieve overall risk reduction and ensure

our core business is delivered safely, protecting our employees and our brand. We continue

to develop the competence of our leaders and managers to role-model safe behaviours

and educate our staff on the use of new technology as an enabler for safety. We have

established a robust legislative map across all of our operating countries, to ensure we

meet all of our safety requirements across the Group, and this is being integrated into our

Safety Management System.

The new Digital Workspace has been established in the UK, and is deploying across the

group in early FY27, to enhance our collaboration, enable the leverage of our skills globally,

and allow the use of modern, fit-for-purpose toolsets across the Group. Aligned to our

Security risk, we have a robust programme of continual upgrade of our cyber security

detection and protective capabilities and technologies, including routine exercising

and technical assessment of our networks, IT architecture and security. Focused risk

management time and competence has been invested into the scoping and planning

of the future ERP solution, to ensure a smooth and managed transition in FY27.

Risk and Impacts

Mitigation

Acquisition and Integration

Competition

Delivery

Environment

Safety

Business Platforms

6

7

8

9

10

11

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

68

Viability

statement

Assessing the prospects of the Group

This viability statement should be read in conjunction

with the Group’s growth strategy on pages 14 and 15.

The Group’s corporate planning processes involve the

following individual processes covering differing time frames:

ɰ

An annual Integrated Strategy-to-Perform Plan (ISP)

process that looks at the financial outlook for the

following five years. This process commences with an

assessment of the orders pipeline, producing an order

intake scenario. A review of the phased delivery profile

of that order intake, as well as contracted order backlog

and the cost base required to support this, enables

generation of a base-case profit forecast. Capital

expenditure and working capital requirements are also

collected, reviewed, approved and an operating cash flow

produced for the plan period. This is then overlaid with

inorganic growth assumptions as well as detailed tax,

interest, funding and other non-operating assumptions

to produce a five-year net debt/cash forecast including

relevant covenant and funding metrics;

ɰ

An annual budget process that covers the first year of

the five-year planning horizon in detail;

ɰ

A rolling monthly ‘latest best estimate’ process to assess

significant changes, as well as risks and opportunities,

to the budget/forecast for the year in progress.

The corporate planning process is underpinned by

assessing scenarios and risks that encompass a wide

spectrum of potential outcomes, both favourable

and adverse. The sensitivity analysis undertaken by

management explores the resilience of the Group to the

potential impact of each of the principal risks set out on

pages 67 to 68, and a combination of those risks.

The scenarios are designed to be severe but plausible and

take full account of the availability and likely effectiveness

of the mitigating actions (as described on pages 67 and

68) that could be taken to avoid or reduce the impact or

occurrence of the underlying risks, and that realistically

would be open to them in the circumstances.

In considering the likely effectiveness of such actions,

the conclusions of the Board’s regular monitoring and

review of risk and internal control systems, as discussed

on page 110, is taken into account.

Alongside the annual review of risk scenarios applied to

the strategic plan, performance is rigorously monitored

to alert the Board and QinetiQ Leadership Team to the

potential crystallisation of a key risk. We consider that

this stress-testing-based assessment of the Group’s

prospects is reasonable in the circumstances of the

inherent uncertainty involved.

The period over which we confirm

longer-term viability

The period over which the Directors consider it possible to

form a reasonable expectation as to the Group’s longer-term

viability is the five-year period to 31 March 2031. This period

is deemed appropriate as the Group has good visibility

of revenue out to 2031, driven by long-term contracts

and frameworks. This is also the period covered by our

strategic planning process and is subject to stress-testing

and scenario planning around potential risks. It has been

selected because it presents the Board and readers of the

Annual Report with a reasonable degree of confidence

while still providing an appropriate longer-term outlook.

The five-year extension to the LTPA contract was signed

by the UK MOD in May 2025, which provides cover for this

contract out to 31 March 2033.

Assessing the viability of the Group

The scenarios applied consider the key risks facing the

Group, as summarised in the Risks and Uncertainty section

on page 70. These include:

ɰ

Sensitivities on growth metrics in the plan, such as

margin achievement and revenue growth

ɰ

Sensitivities based on our cash position, including

increased working capital burden and the availability

of debt financing beyond the currently agreed periods

for the term loan and revolving credit facility

ɰ

An environmental risk focusing on a severe flooding

event at the Shoeburyness site

ɰ

Sensitivities linked to the economic environment,

including revenue reduction and foreign exchange risk

The impact of each scenario is assessed in terms of

revenue, operating profit, net cash/(debt) and loan

covenants (leverage and interest cover ratio). They are

considered individually and aggregated through

a combined stress-test covering both financial

pressures and poor trading performance.

The Group has significant contracted backlog, pipeline

visibility and forecast growth over the plan period.

Significant levels of free cash flow are expected to be

generated and deployed in accordance with the Group’s

capital allocation policy. The sensitivities assume that the

Group continues to have access to revolving credit facilities

of £290m (expiring April 2029 after the one-year extension

option). A sensitivity scenario has been modelled on the

basis that the term loan of c.£333.6m expires in September

2027 and is not renewed.

69

Viability

statement

The financial impacts are inherently subjective and highly variable, but have provided an indicative assessment to the

Board. None of the risks, applied individually, have a material impact on long-term viability (in terms of breaching our

available facility headroom or associated covenants). Despite the risks being unlikely, the Directors have considered

mitigations that could be put in place to offset them. The Group has a number of cost-control levers that could immediately

be drawn on to control cash outflows. In addition, it continues to review its portfolio of assets to ensure they remain relevant

to the strategic ambition (through disposal of non-core assets). The revolving credit facility has the option to increase

further by an additional £110m, with agreement from the lenders, prior to considering the reduction of dividends or reduction

of the in-flight share buyback programme. All of these options can be drawn on to ensure the Group remains a going concern

and does not breach covenants.

Confirmation of longer-term viability

As noted on page 65, the Directors confirm that their assessment of the principal risks facing the Group was robust.

Based upon the robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Group and their stress-testing-based assessment of

the Group’s prospects, all of which are described in this statement, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the

Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period to 31 March 2031.

Scenario 1 – Profit margin downgrade

Scenario 2 – Reduction in revenue growth

Scenario 3 – Reduced operating cash conversion

Scenario 4 – Major environmental event

Scenario 5 – Increased FX rates

Scenario 6 – Term loan not renewed in September 2027

Profit margin is downgraded as a result of competitive pressure, project execution,

inability to achieve supply chain and organisational efficiency savings or

a regulatory fine.

Assumptions:

A 2% reduction in profit margin, no impact on revenue.

Revenue grows at a slower rate through the planning period, driven by slow-down

in orders as a result of customer spending, macroeconomic pressures, a cyber

incident, or failure to plan the future resource and skill set needed.

Assumptions:

A 5% per annum reduction in revenue compared to the ISP base plan.

Economic environment causes delays in customer payments, high inventory

levels driven by supplier shortages, or IT system failure resulting in inability to

raise invoices and receipt of supplier payments.

Assumptions:

Cash conversion restricted to 90%.

For the purposes of this scenario we have assumed a failure that would result in

significant flooding. This flooding would, despite mitigation measures, damage

the equipment and infrastructure, resulting in significant remediation work to

safely restore capability.

Assumptions:

There would be an immediate impact to our ability to deliver.

The impact has been modelled through lost backlog, pipeline revenue and

reputational damage, together with lost recoveries from people impacted.

Macroeconomic trends, global events and government interventions may cause

foreign exchange rates to move in unfavourable directions (mainly an increase

in the USD:GBP and AUD:GBP rates) such that the returns of the US and Australia

businesses are worth less in GBP terms.

Assumptions:

10% increase in FX (USD, CAD, EUR and AUD) rates.

Macroeconomic trends and global events may result in a reduction in the availability

or aractiveness of financing such that it may not be possible or desirable to

extend the term loan when it expires in September 2027.

Assumptions:

Term loan of c.£333.6m repaid in cash in September 2027.

ɰ Markets

ɰ

Business Winning

ɰ

Delivery

ɰ

Business Platforms

ɰ Security

ɰ

Environment

ɰ Safety

ɰ Markets

ɰ

Competition

ɰ

Business Winning

ɰ Security

ɰ

Environment

ɰ

Delivery

ɰ

Capability

ɰ

Business Platforms

ɰ

Environment

ɰ

Delivery

ɰ Safety

ɰ Security

ɰ Markets

ɰ

Environment

Scenarios modelled

Links to Principal Risks

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

70

Viability

statement

Going Concern Disclosures

The Group’s activities, combined with the factors that

are likely to affect its future development and

performance, are set out on pages 1 to 31. The Group

meets its day-to-day working capital requirements

through its available cash funds and its bank facilities.

The Chief Financial Officer’s review on pages 32 to 37

sets out details of the financial position of the Group,

the cash flows, drawn and commied borrowing facilities

(including associated covenants), liquidity, and the

Group’s policies and processes for managing its capital

and financial risks.

This past year has seen further increased unrest and

growing conflict across many regions of the world.

The defence and security context continues to elevate

the market needs for our mission-critical capabilities.

Both our addressable market and our confidence in

capitalising on that market opportunity continue to

grow. The Group enters the new financial year with

a healthy balance sheet and leverage position, and

a strong order backlog and pipeline. After making

enquiries, the Directors believe that the Group is

well positioned to manage its overall business risks

successfully and have a reasonable expectation that

the Group has adequate resources to continue in

operational existence for the foreseeable future.

The Group therefore continues to adopt the going-

concern basis in preparing its financial statements.

The Group is exposed to various risks and uncertainties,

the principal ones being summarised in the ‘Principal risks

and uncertainties’ section on pages 67 to 68. In reaching

its conclusion on the going concern assessment, the

Board also considered the findings of the work performed

to support the statement on the long-term viability of the

Company and the Group. As noted below, this included

assessing forecasts of severe but plausible downside

scenarios and further downside stress-testing related

to the Company’s principal risks. Crystallisation of

such risks, to the extent not fully mitigated, would lead

to a negative impact on the Group’s financial results,

but none are deemed sufficiently material to prevent

the Group from continuing as a going concern for the

period to 30 September 2027. This period is considered

an appropriate timeframe to assess going concern as it

considers the Group’s short and medium-term cash flow

forecasts and available liquidity, including the upcoming

refinancing its term loan.

71

Section 172(1)

statement

Key stakeholder groups and

Section 172 statement

Section 172 Statement

We are commied to our responsibilities to promote the

success of the Group. The Board of QinetiQ Group plc

confirms that during the year under review, it has acted in

the way that it considers in good faith would be most likely

to promote the Group’s success for the benefit of its

members as a whole, having due regard to the maers set

out in Section 172(1)

(a) to (f) of the Companies Act 2006.

QinetiQ Group plc is a public Company limited by shares,

registered in England and Wales No. 4586941.

In large and complex organisations such as QinetiQ, the

Directors discharge their duties through an established

governance framework that delegates day-to-day

decision-making to employees. The Board recognises that

this delegation must operate within a robust structure

that reflects our values, supports effective stakeholder

engagement, and provides assurance that governance

systems of controls remain strong.

This statement and the relevant disclosures referenced

in this section summarise how the Board has upheld and

discharged its duties to consider:

(a)

The likely consequences of any decision in the

long term;

(b)

The interests of the Company’s employees;

(c )

The need to foster the Company’s business

relationships with suppliers, customers and others;

(d)

The impact of the Company’s operations on the

community and the environment;

(e)

The desirability of the Company maintaining a

reputation for high standards of business conduct; and

(f)

The need to act fairly as between members of

the Company.

See page 75 for relevant disclosures.

Our stakeholders and

engagement approach

To deliver responsibly and for the benefit of our

stakeholders we must understand what maers to

them. To do this we engage in a variety of ways in an

open and transparent manner, with the aim of identifying

common goals.

In some cases the Board will engage directly with certain

stakeholders, however, the relevant delivery teams will

also manage these relationships if they are beer-placed

to facilitate meaningful engagement.

We consider our respective stakeholders and relevant

issues to ensure that engagement is led by those

best-placed to affect any necessary change and therefore

expect that, to best benefit our stakeholders, our approach

to how we engage will continue to evolve as we pursue

further growth.

Board activity and principal decisions in FY26

Board activity during the year is set out on page 93 and the

principal decisions taken by the Board in FY26 are detailed

on pages 91 and 92. Due to the nature of these decisions,

a variety of stakeholders are considered as part of the

Board’s discussions.

C

us

t

o

m

e

r

s

S

h

a

r

e

h

o

l

d

e

r

s

P

e

o

p

l

e

C

o

m

m

u

n

i

t

i

e

s

S

u

p

p

l

i

e

r

s

R

e

g

u

l

a

t

or

s

Our stakeholders

Primary

Other

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

72

Section 172(1)

statement

How we engage with our key stakeholder groups

Customers

People

ɰ

We regularly invest time listening and understanding

customer views and needs through our formal

customer research systems.

ɰ

Ongoing engagement enables close collaboration

throughout programme delivery.

ɰ

Executive Director aendance at stakeholder events

including DSEI and RIAT.

ɰ

Every QinetiQ customer has a dedicated delivery team.

ɰ

Regular executive engagement with senior leaders of

our major customers.

ɰ

The introduction of the T&E Innovation Gateway.

ɰ

Customers are a central part of our Company and

the Board takes formal feedback from customers

which allows us to respond and adapt our approach to

achieving their objectives.

ɰ

Feedback is reviewed at all levels of the organisation

to support continuous improvement of business

processes and delivery solutions.

ɰ

Customers benefit from a responsive and agile

approach, the ability to innovate at pace and

delivery of value for money.

ɰ

Employee shareholders are able to aend the AGM.

ɰ

The business holds regular Global Employee

Roadshows to enable employees to engage directly

with the QLT and members of the Board.

ɰ

The Board regularly engages with employees through

site visits in the UK and the Group Chair visited sites in

the UK, US and Australia.

ɰ

Continuing insights from employee feedback

mechanisms supported the Board’s understanding

of workforce thoughts and culture.

ɰ

The Group Chair is the dedicated Non-Executive

Director for gathering the views of employees.

ɰ

Employees are able to openly and directly engage with

senior leaders, including QLT and Board members.

ɰ

Employees receive regular updates from leadership

through various different communications channels,

such as ‘Q-Talk’ briefings, email broadcasts and

intranet updates.

ɰ

A workplace culture that promotes trust, inclusion and

psychological safety, where employees feel confident

raising concerns including having a meaningful voice

and being listened to through engagement channels,

including the Global Employee Voice Group, Peakon,

and the ‘Speak Up’ programme.

How the Board engaged

What we believe is most important to them

Shareholders

ɰ

The Board engaged with Shareholders via roadshows

and results presentations and at the AGM.

ɰ

The Group Chair and Executive Directors have engaged

directly with a number of shareholders during the year.

ɰ

The Chair of the Remuneration Commiee has

consulted with shareholders this year regarding the

renewal of the Remuneration Policy. See page 121.

ɰ

A investor perception audit was carried out during

the year and the Board considered proposals for an

enhanced Investor Relations programme.

ɰ

Maintaining open and transparent dialogue between

the Company and its shareholders remains a priority.

ɰ

Clear communication regarding the long-term strategy

of the Company.

ɰ

Understanding the views of its shareholders short and

longer term priorities.

73

Community

Environment

Regulators

ɰ

Our Community Impact Strategy guides our

engagement with local communities, focused on

delivering positive environmental and socio-economic

outcomes where we operate.

ɰ

The CFO is board sponsor for this programme and is

updated regularly by the Group Director ESG, who is

responsible for delivery. The full Board was briefed in

May and November 2025.

ɰ

Corporate Responsibility, community and volunteering

programmes are discussed at Board meetings.

ɰ

Our approach focuses on employee volunteering such

as STEM outreach and support for our partner charity

(see pages 57-58).

ɰ

Our communities expect us to be a good neighbour

and to deliver positive environment and

socio-economic outcomes.

ɰ

Support for the long-term strengthening of

science and engineering pipelines in communities

in our local area.

ɰ

The Board engages with the Group’s environmental

programmes and receives regular updates with

a key area of focus on CTAP (see page 44).

ɰ

The Board recognises the importance of value in

training on climate change and has been working

with the Group Director ESG with Board training

scheduled for FY27.

ɰ

At the Board dinner in November, the Board welcomed

a Director from a peer defence company to hear their

perspective on climate-related maers.

ɰ

Ensuring our business and infrastructure is resilient

to the impact of climate change.

ɰ

Understanding opportunities to improve our

sustainability in a way that brings value to our business.

ɰ

Obtaining a deeper understanding of the current and

emerging issues relevant to the business.

ɰ

Regulatory maers are considered by the Board and

the Company Secretary regularly delivers important

updates as appropriate.

ɰ

The Company focuses on how non-financial reporting

regulations can be used as a driver to strengthen

sustainability performance and improve resilience

to climate-related risks.

ɰ

The Board sought assurance that the Company’s

critical business controls were robust, coherent and

aligned with Provision 29, supporting effective risk

management and regulatory compliance.

ɰ

Open engagement with regulators relevant to our

operations in our core jurisdictions, including UK,

US and Australia.

ɰ

Internal controls and processes that ensure robust

regulatory compliance are effectively maintained.

ɰ

A strong culture of effective and proportionate

compliance within our businesses.

Section 172(1)

statement

Suppliers

ɰ

The Group engaged with its suppliers across the

defence and emerging sectors through a range of

structured engagement activities.

ɰ

Engagement with the supply chain provided insight

into how industry partners can work together to

effectively support our customers.

ɰ

Commercial performance is discussed at each

Board meeting.

ɰ

Increased focus on sustainability and climate-related

requirements within contracting processes

(see page 46).

ɰ

A shared understanding of customer needs and how

suppliers can collectively support delivery outcomes.

ɰ

Our updated Supplier Code of Conduct sets out the

standards we expect from our suppliers and reflects

the standards we set for our own employees and

Directors. Acceptance of our supplier code of conduct

forms part of our supplier due diligence assessment.

How the Board engaged

What we believe is most important to them

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

74

Section 172(1)

statement

Section 172 relevant disclosures

Considering long-term consequences

s172 link (a)

The Board holds annual strategy meetings to assess the

long-term sustainable success of the Group and our impact

on our investors, customers, people, and local communities

over a five and ten-year outlook. Our Group Chair and

Company Secretary working with the Executive Directors,

set a rolling agenda for each Board meeting, including

a two-day strategy review to consider the Company’s

overall purpose and strategy. This is supported by our

annual budget for the following year and both medium and

long-term (five and ten-year) financial planning informed

by strategic assessments such as SWOT analysis. These

arrangements are supported by external political, industrial

and customer inputs. There are also risk management

processes that identify the potential consequences of

decisions in the short, medium and long term, so that

mitigation plans can be put in place to prevent, reduce or

eliminate risks to our business and wider stakeholders.

Relevant S172(a) disclosures

Strategy

14

Business model

18

CFO Review

32

Climate Transition Action Plan (CTAP)

44

Viability statement

69

Governance Section

77

Integrated Strategic Planning

69

Frameworks for risk management and internal control

114

Fostering stakeholder relationships

s172 links (b, c)

To encourage mutually beneficial stakeholder relationships,

Directors and senior managers receive tailored training

to support effective stakeholder engagement, alongside

independent assurance through audits, stakeholder

surveys and reports from brokers and other advisers.

The Board is regularly informed of stakeholder maers

through structured presentations and reports on customer

engagement, risk, health and safety, confidential reporting,

defence process reviews, dividend policy, people and

culture strategy, and operational business updates.

During the year the Board reviewed progress against

previously identified themes and continued to develop

a more integrated approach to employee engagement.

This approach will integrate existing feedback channels

to create realistic, actionable and locally deliverable

engagement plans, aligned across the wider business.

Relevant S172 (b, c) disclosures

Sustainability: Environmental, Social & Governance

40

Sustainability: Social

53

Skills and development: Growing future capability

56

Employee engagement and inclusion

54

Rewarding for performance: celebrating

employee contribution

57

Non-financial information statement

63

Stakeholder engagement

42

Governance Section

77

75

Protecting communities and environment

s172 link (d)

The Group is commied to robust corporate responsibility

oversight including business ethics, anti-bribery and

corruption, human rights, modern slavery, environmental

stewardship and use of resources, sustainable solutions,

greenhouse gas emissions and energy management,

investing in our local communities and the armed forces.

Any major decisions taken by the Board include formal

consideration of these factors where relevant as well

as regular reviews through the Board risk management

process and the Audit, Risk and Security and

Remuneration Commiees.

Relevant S172 (d) disclosures

Sustainability: Environmental, Social & Governance

40

Environmental

43

TCFD disclosures

48

Sustainability: Social

53

Sustainability: Governance

60

Non-financial and sustainability information statement

63

Seing culture and conduct

s172 link (e, f)

The Board sets the Group’s purpose, values and strategy,

ensuring it is aligned with our culture. To ensure compliance

with section 172 of the Companies Act, stakeholder factors

are addressed through maers in Board papers, and

through standing agenda items at each Board meeting

including updates from the Group CEO on the financial

overview, strategic progress, investor relations, business

development, and operational progress. The Company

Secretary presents updates on relevant corporate

governance and compliance maers.

Relevant S172 (e, f) disclosures

Sustainability: Social

53

Employee engagement and Inclusion

54

Risk Management

65

Annual General Meeting

80

Governance Structure

87

Governance Section

77

Frameworks for risk management and internal controls

114

Section 172(1)

statement

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

76

Corporate

governance

78

Corporate Governance statement

78

Group Chair’s introduction

to Governance

81

Board at a glance

82

QinetiQ Culture:

How we embed and monitor

84

Board of Directors

87

Governance structure

88

Division of responsibilities

89

Composition, succession

and evaluation

91

Board decision-making

93

Board activity

94

Management and control

of US subsidiaries

94

Employee engagement

96

Nominations Commiee Report

104

Audit Commiee Report

110

Risk & Security Commiee Report

115

Directors’ Remuneration Report

118

Remuneration at a glance

121

Directors’ Remuneration Policy

129

Annual Report on Remuneration

142

Directors’ Report and

statutory information

145

Statement of Directors’ responsibilities

in respect of the financial statements

147

Independent auditor’s report

QinetiQ’s independent test, trials and safety

assurance supporting the introduction of

Sky Sabre into UK Army service.

77

Against a backdrop of accelerating

technical innovation in the warfighting

environment, it is more critical than ever

that Board and governance processes

are as efficient as possible, enabling our

business to combine proportionate and

effective corporate governance with

agility in how it delivers for our customers,

partners and shareholders.

Introduction to Governance

The following corporate governance statement provides

an overview of the system of governance adopted by the

Company and will enable our shareholders to evaluate the

manner in which the Principles and Provisions of the 2024

UK Corporate Governance Code have been applied and/or

complied with for the year ended 31 March 2026.

Key Board activities

During this reporting year, the critical areas that the

Board played a highly active role in were:

Input and guidance to the actions taken by the Company,

and the evolution of its growth strategy, in response to

the performance challenges it faced in the current

economic climate.

The ongoing stewardship of the Company’s capital

allocation policy, including the delivery of its share

buyback programme and the enablement of returning

value to its shareholders.

Oversight of the review of and update to the Company’s

risk framework and internal controls in response to the

requirements of Provision 29 of the 2024 UK Corporate

Governance Code.

Board succession planning, including the role of

Remuneration Commiee Chair, strengthening the C-suite

experience with the non-executives; and the ongoing

induction and onboarding of our two most recent board

appointments, all of which I say more about below.

A fuller summary of the Board’s activity during the year

can be found on page 93 and further information about

the Group’s stakeholder engagement can be found on

page 42.

Environmental, Social and

Governance (ESG)

QinetiQ is commied to responsible and sustainable

business practice, as we recognise that it is an enabler

for our business and meets the expectations of our

stakeholders. We are proud of the progress made on our

ESG programmes. Through FY26, the Board and Commiees

have regularly discussed the different facets of ESG, with

a particular focus on the Climate Transition Action Plan and

on the evolving landscape of sustainability/non-financial

reporting. Through our ongoing business review,

we are able to oversee and monitor the management of

key ESG programmes such as safety, ethics and culture.

We continue to support the business in its ambition to

ensure the consideration of ESG supports our corporate

strategy and decision-making.

Group Chair’s

introduction to Governance

Neil Johnson

Non-executive Group Chair

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

78

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Health, safety and wellbeing

Health, safety and wellbeing are a priority for the Company

and its leadership teams, across the breadth of its varied

operations and in all territories in which it carries out its

business. We remain commied to ensuring the physical

and mental wellbeing of all our people, customers and

associated third parties, including the public. This year,

we have created an integrated Safety and Quality function

under renewed leadership, to ensure we can deliver our

hazardous activities safely and efficiently, and to further

strengthen our safety culture. Further information on

health, safety and wellbeing can be found on page 53.

Culture

Promoting a culture of transparency, robust debate and

effective challenge in the Boardroom is one of my key

responsibilities as Group Chair. As a Board, we have an

important role in leading and promoting the desired culture

and identity of the organisation. As described on pages

53-55 of this report, the Company has made considerable

efforts to ensure its culture is well aligned to its strategy

going forward; its purpose and values are meaningful and

clearly articulated to its employees; and it is investing in the

quality of its culture leadership. The Board has been well

involved in supporting and shaping these actions, which

are a critical enabler to the success of the Company. This

involvement has been facilitated through engagement

with leaders in the boardroom; through conversation

with employees, during site visits and GEV engagements

for example; and taking direct feedback from investors.

The Company remains highly commied to delivering the

best support it can to its customers, to secure their vital

interests and ultimately protect lives.

Further reading:

Board decision-making

91-92

Sustainability: Environmental, Social and Governance

40

Group Chair’s

introduction to Governance

Application of the provisions of the

2024 UK Corporate Governance Code

(the ‘Code’)

The Board is accountable to shareholders for its standards of

governance, and as a UK-listed company, in respect of the year

ended 31 March 2026, the Company was subject to the Code,

with the exception of the changes to Provision 29, which relate

to the effectiveness of the risk management and internal control

framework. The changes to Provision 29 will apply to the financial

year beginning on 1 April 2026. The Board confirms that it applied

the Principles and complied with the Provisions of the Code

throughout the year.

Significant time has been spent during the year planning for the

upcoming changes relating to Provision 29. See page 107 for

more information.

Further information on compliance with the Code can be found as follows:

Board leadership and Company purpose

Provides an overview of the activities undertaken by the Board in the

year, how the Board has considered its Section 172(1) responsibilities

and its governance framework.

Section 172(1) statement

72

Board of Directors

84

Sustainability: Social

53

Stakeholder engagement

42

Employee engagement

94

Division of responsibilities

Governance structure

87

Division of responsibilities

88

Board of Directors

84

Time commitment

89

Board and Commiee processes

89

Composition, succession and evaluation

Nominations Commiee Report

96

Board of Directors

84

Director effectiveness

102

Audit, risk and internal control

Audit Commiee Report

104

Risk & Security Commiee Report

110

Remuneration

Directors’ Remuneration Commiee Report

115

Directors’ Remuneration Policy

121

79

Board succession and evaluation

of the Board’s performance

I have overseen a significant evolution of the Board over the

previous two years, with succession designed to build depth

and strength in the key skills and experience needed to help

guide and support the Company to successfully deliver its

reset growth strategy. This year we have seen Dina Knight

step into the role of Remuneration Commiee Chair, and

Ezinne Uzo-Okoro and Roger Krone fully contribute their

respective experience in relation to the US market. Roger’s

involvement has also brought the depth of his experience

as a former CEO in the US defence sector, in addition to the

considerable C-suite-level defence sector experience we

already have on the Board through our Senior Independent

Director, Steve Mogford.

The Board has maintained its focus on effectiveness

through an ongoing review of its progress against

recommendations from the external assessment carried

out by Bendon Advisory in FY25, including a further internal

effectiveness review undertaken in FY26 by the Company’s

Secretariat team. Please see page 102 for details of the

outcome of that activity. The Board has also been guided

by the outputs of a further investor perception audit

undertaken this year, by Bendon Advisory, which built

upon the last review undertaken two years ago.

Remuneration

During the year, the Board’s Remuneration Commiee has

focused on ensuring that its current Remuneration Policy

continues to operate effectively, to appropriately reward,

retain and incentivise the Executive Directors who are

driving the Company’s success. This has been managed

through ensuring the Company’s remuneration schemes,

and the outcomes they are designed to achieve, are

transparent and aligned with the Company’s strategy,

as well as with the interests of our shareholders and

the value we deliver to them. This year, the Company

will propose a renewed Remuneration Policy, for which

shareholder approval will be sought at our upcoming 2026

Annual General Meeting. The development of the Policy

has been led by a dedicated sub-commiee of the Board,

headed by the Chair of the Remuneration Commiee,

and this has involved consultation and active engagement

with our major shareholders during this process.

Please see page 121 for further details on the proposed

Remuneration Policy.

Annual General Meeting

We are delighted this year to again welcome

shareholders to our AGM. The AGM will be held at 11:00

on Thursday 16 July 2026 at the office of Ashurst LLP,

London Fruit and Wool Exchange, Duval Square,

London E1 6PW. The Notice of AGM and related papers will,

unless otherwise noted, be sent to shareholders at least

20 working days before the meeting. For those shareholders

who have elected to receive communications electronically,

notice is given of the availability of the documents via

www.qinetiq.com.

Neil Johnson

Non-executive Group Chair

21 May 2026

Group Chair’s

introduction to Governance

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

80

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Board

at a glance

Number of years

Age

Gender balance

Gender balance

Ethnicity

Independence

Non-executive Director tenure

*

Neil Johnson (Chair)

Steve Mogford

Shonaid Jemme-Page

Dina Knight

Roger Krone

Gordon Messenger

Ezinne Uzo-Okoro

Average (3.6 years)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Board members

41-50

51-60

61-70

71-80

11.11%

22.22%

55.56%

11.11%

Board members

Women

Men

33.33%

66.67%

Board members

White

Asian

Not disclosed

77.78%

11.11%

11.11%

Board members

Independent

Not Independent

77.78%

22.28%

Direct Reports to QLT

Women

Men

29.30%

70.70%

QLT

Women

Men

44.44%

55.56%

*

As at 20 May 2026.

81

Alignment with our strategy

As a growing business, we have a significant opportunity

to be part of a truly integrated global defence and security

company. Our strategy is designed to deliver significant

long-term growth and stability, so we can be confident we

are working as part of an organisation with strong ambition,

focus and direction.

Our people are uniquely placed to help our customers

respond to national and global defence and security

needs. While we have an exciting future ahead of us,

we are commied to finding beer ways to work more

closely together. Improving teamwork, creativity and

our performance, and unlocking the enormous potential

in our people.

We want ours to be a company where we put:

ɰ

People at our heart; an engaging and inclusive culture

where we enjoy working together, have opportunities

to grow our skills, are recognised for our contribution

and feel proud of the work we do.

ɰ

Customers at our centre; partnering to drive, at pace,

innovative and cost-effective solutions that have an

impact on the world around us.

ɰ

Excellence at our core; improving how we work by

streamlining our processes and systems, removing

unnecessary barriers and empowering us all to

operate more efficiently and effectively.

Our purpose and our values

Everything we do is about delivering on our purpose,

protecting lives and securing the vital interests of our

customers. It connects everyone who works for QinetiQ

around the world together, giving us all focus, direction

and a sense of pride.

Our values and behaviours support our high-performance,

inclusive culture and we are commied to delivering

responsibly and sustainably for the benefit of all:

INTEGRITY

Trusted to do the right thing at all times, we take pride in

our decisions, and work to create a sustainable and

responsible business.

We are responsible and accountable for all our actions.

We take personal responsibility to do the right thing,

demonstrating this individually and as an organisation

in our decisions, behaviour and day-to-day actions. We

actively support each other to meet the highest ethical

conduct and professional standards.

COLLABORATION

The chosen partner for customers and industry partners,

we are a community with a common purpose; every

contribution is valued.

Delivering value through partnership and teamwork,

we actively collaborate with our colleagues, customers

and industry partners to bring together the best thinking,

the smartest talent and breadth and depth in capability to

our work, driving innovation. We know that working together

is the best way to meet our stakeholders’ needs.

PERFORMANCE

Customer focused and highly responsive, providing

operational excellence and assuring safe and secure delivery.

Leadership Expectations

55

Our Leadership Expectations

The QinetiQ Leadership Expectations are designed to provide

a collective view of leadership in QinetiQ, so that our leaders

and managers know what is expected of them, can focus their

efforts where they maer the most, hold themselves and

each other to account and, ultimately, create an environment

in which our customers, our people and our stakeholders

can succeed. This year, we are refreshing the expectations

to beer align to our growth mindset and are launching

a leadership competency framework which will further

operationalise and embed the Leadership Expectations

into core systems and processes across the Company.

QinetiQ Culture:

How we embed and monitor

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

82

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Embedding and

monitoring our culture

How we monitor culture

Risk management

As we respond to rapidly changing geopolitical context and

customer expectations, we recognise the importance of the

health of our culture on our future success. To ensure we are

managing it effectively, we have highlighted it as a principal

risk in our risk management system and it is now included

in the quarterly risk updates, as well as an annual deep dive

review, in the Risk & Security Commiee.

Risk Management

65

Workday Peakon

The Workday Peakon employee engagement survey tool

has been well embedded at QinetiQ since 2019. The survey

runs four times a year and the results are routinely reported

to the Board, together with core themes and action plans.

Following each survey, we encourage action based on

company, sector/function and team results, ensuring

we are making improvements at all levels.

Employee engagement and inclusion

54

Global Employee Voice (GEV)

The Global Employee Voice (GEV) is a collective of

employees who participate on a voluntary basis to

represent the employee population on various business

topics and issues. Since its inception in 2013 (originally

as the Employee Engagement Group), the GEV has been

running effectively, with representation across all parts

of the Company globally. Each geography is represented

by a Chair. The Global Chair collates a dashboard of key

themes quarterly. Four times a year, the Global Chair

meets with the CEO to discuss key themes and business

context. Twice a year, the Global Chair meets with a number

of Board members, including the Chairman, to discuss these

themes. In early FY27, we will appoint a new Global Chair of

the GEV and refresh the Terms of Reference to drive an even

greater level of focus for the GEV in supporting culture and

business change.

Planned culture interventions

In September 2025, the Board asked the Chief People

Officer and Director of Culture & Learning to join them for

a deep dive on culture. The key topics were: our culture

aspiration; how culture change links to our strategy; and

what priority interventions would support achievement

of our desired culture.

Culture North Star

The Board was presented with a current state diagnostic,

together with the Culture North Star (an articulation of our

cultural change aspiration). Following robust discussion of

how this change will serve to deliver the QinetiQ strategy

and achieve future growth, it endorsed this approach and

approved the high-level plan based on: People at our heart;

Customer at our centre; Business Excellence at our Core.

Integrated Change Programme

Culture change is recognised as a critical programme and

a key enabler for the portfolio of transformation projects

within the Integrated Change Programme (ICP). These

programmes require dedicated focus and funding to

achieve the benefits realisation and business change

planned, including modernising our performance, business

development and project management capabilities as

well as improving some of our operating systems, such as

finance, assurance and shared services. The Board receives

regular progress updates on the ICP.

Leadership development

It is well understood that leadership capability is the strong

foundation for a healthy culture and that investment in

leadership development is a priority to support culture

change. A programme of work has been designed as a

cascaded approach, with development starting at the

QLT and senior leader level first to ensure role-modelling.

The programme is bespoke for QinetiQ, to ensure it meets

the specific requirements of the business, with pragmatism

and pace as key principles. Key metrics are under

development to ensure reporting to the Board on

successful outcomes is delivered.

83

Board of

Directors

Skills, competence

and experience

Neil’s former CEO experience and

current roles as a plc Group Chair

and Non-executive Director bring

to the Board relevant knowledge,

challenge and leadership.

Starting his career at Sandhurst

and the Army, Neil spent much of

his early career in the automotive

and engineering industries. He was

worldwide Sales and Marketing

Director at Jaguar before being

seconded to the UK Ministry of

Defence to command 4th Baalion

The Royal Green Jackets. He

returned to industry with British

Aerospace, initially with Land Rover

and then running all of its European

automotive operations. Neil was

later CEO of the RAC and is a former

Director General of the EEF and

was a Home Office-appointed

Independent Member of the

Metropolitan Police Authority. He

was previously Chair of Motability

Operations Group Plc, Synthomer

Plc and Electra Private Equity Plc.

Skills, competence

and experience

Martin has more than

25 years’ experience leading

multi-disciplinary teams in senior

finance roles. He brings valuable

global experience, particularly

in the UK, US and Australia,

coupled with deep financial

and operational expertise and

significant experience in the

capital markets. His detailed

understanding of our sector

and the markets we operate in

is instrumental in helping the

Group perform and grow.

Martin is a Chartered

Accountant, having qualified at

PricewaterhouseCoopers. He

subsequently moved to Credit

Suisse and then to BAE Systems,

where he held numerous finance

roles over a 22-year career. These

included Finance Controller, M&A,

Divisional Finance Director and

Head of Investor Relations roles.

Skills, competence

and experience

Steve’s proven track record of

driving growth and his in-depth

experience of the defence and

technology industries is of

essential importance and

benefit to the Board.

Steve is a Fellow of the Institution

of Engineering and Technology,

the Royal Aeronautical Society,

and the Royal Academy of

Engineering. He was previously

a member of the Prime Minister’s

Business Advisory Group,

Co-Chair of the National Defence

Industries Council Research

and Development Group, and a

Non-executive Director of the UK

MOD Research and Development

Board. He has held various roles

with MBDA, including as Managing

Director, MBDA UK. Previously

he held various roles with Matra

BAe Dynamics and British

Aerospace. He was also Chair

of the Defence Industry Liaison

Board of the UK Department for

International Trade, Defence

and Security Exports.

Skills, competence

and experience

Steve has vast experience

in both executive and

non-executive roles across

a range of sectors. In particular,

his long and comprehensive

international defence and security

sector experience equips him

to further develop the skill sets

of our Board. Steve has a first

class honours degree in

astrophysics, maths and physics

from London University.

Formerly the CEO of United Utilities

Group PLC, Steve started his

career at British Aerospace.

During his long career with

them, he held a number of senior

positions before being appointed

COO and a member of the BAE

Systems plc Board. Steve then

joined Finmeccanica as Chief

Executive of SELEX Galileo. He also

served on the Board of G4S plc as

Senior independent Director up to

its acquisition in 2021.

Nationality

British

Nationality

British

Nationality

British

Nationality

British

Appointed

April 2019

Appointed

April 2015

Appointed

September 2024

Appointed

August 2022

Other appointments

Chair of Dialight plc, Trustee and Council

Member – National Army Museum.

Other appointments

Co-Chair of UK Defence Growth

Partnership with HM Government

and a Member of UK MOD’s Defence

Industry Joint Council.

Other appointments

N/A

Other appointments

Chair of Intertek Group plc and

Independent Non-executive

Director of Costain Group PLC .

Neil Johnson

Group Chair

Martin Cooper

Group Chief

Financial Officer

Steve Wadey

Group Chief

Executive Officer

Steve Mogford

Senior Independent

Non-executive Director

N

R

RS

RS

RS

N

R

A

RS

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

84

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Skills, competence

and experience

Shonaid has widespread

experience as an Executive and

Non-executive Director spanning

a variety of sectors, including

industrial and technology-based

businesses with international

operations. This, combined with

her extensive financial experience,

is invaluable in her role as Chair

of the Audit Commiee. Shonaid

is a Fellow of the ICAEW.

Shonaid’s previous Board-level

experience includes serving as

Chief Operating Officer of CDC

Group plc, the UK Government’s

development finance institution,

having joined from Unilever, where

she was Senior Vice-President

Finance and Information, Home

and Personal Care, originally in

Asia and later for the Group as a

whole. Her early career was spent

at KPMG, laerly as a partner. She

also held roles as Non-executive

Chair of Greencoat Wind plc,

MSAmlin plc and Non-executive

Director at GKN plc.

Audit

Nominations

Remuneration

Risk & Security

Commiee Chair

Skills, competence

and experience

Gordon brings considerable

experience from the Armed Forces,

having served for 37 years as

a Royal Marine. Throughout his

military career he served in key

appointments in various UK and

NATO headquarters, overseeing

the planning and execution of

UK and coalition military and

humanitarian relief operations

worldwide. He most recently

served as Vice Chief of the

Defence Staff, a position he held

for three years until his retirement

in 2019.

His unique experience enables

him to provide invaluable insight

in his role as the Chair of the Risk &

Security Commiee.

Skills, competence

and experience

Dina is a highly experienced

Chief People Officer and

Non-executive Director with

over 35 years’ experience gained

across both private and PLC

business environments. She has a

strong track record of working with

international workforces, building

high-performing teams, leading

organisational transformation

and delivering sustained business

performance, while ensuring that

strategic outcomes are balanced

with a continued focus on people,

culture and wellbeing.

She brings deep expertise in

executive remuneration, talent

governance and succession

planning at board level. Dina read

Business Studies and gained

a Post Graduate Diploma in

Personnel Management from

Teesside University. Dina is

Chief People Officer of global

technology provider Datatec

Group and Logicalis International,

where she is accountable for its

people operations and strategy.

Previously she was Global HR

Director at Truphone, responsible

for driving a collaborative and

innovation-centred culture. She

has also held positions as Group

HR Director for Teledyne e2v and

Northgate Information Solutions.

Nationality

British

Nationality

British

Nationality

British

Appointed

May 2020

Appointed

March 2024

Appointed

October 2020

Other appointments

Non-executive Chair of Cordiant

Digital Infrastructure Limited and

ClearBank Limited and Non executive

Director of Aviva plc.

Other appointments

Chief People Officer of Datatec Group.

Other appointments

A Board member of the UK Health

Security Agency, a member of the

Advisory Board of C3.ai Inc., Senior

Independent Advisor to BUPA, Trustee

of Historic Royal Palaces, Trustee of

the King’s Foundation, and Constable

of His Majesty’s Tower of London.

Shonaid Jemme-Page

Independent

Non-executive Director

Dina Knight

Independent

Non-executive Director

A

N

R

RS

Board of

Directors

General Sir

Gordon Messenger

Independent

Non-executive Director

N

N

N

R

R

R

A

A

A

RS

RS

RS

85

Skills, competence

and experience

Roger served as the Chairman

and CEO of Leidos Holdings, Inc.

from 2014 until his retirement in

2023. Previously, he served as a

Director of BorgWarner Inc. and

of Mercury Systems Inc., and as

President of Network and Space

Systems for The Boeing Company

from 2006 to 2014. He also held

various senior programme

management and finance

positions at Boeing, McDonnell

Douglas Corporation and

General Dynamics Corporation.

Roger is a Certified Public

Accountant and has a bachelor’s

degree in Aerospace Engineering

from the Georgia Institute of

Technology, a master’s degree in

Aerospace Engineering from the

University of Texas at Arlington

and a Master of Business

Administration from the Harvard

Graduate School of Business.

Skills, competence

and experience

James joined QinetiQ as an

in-house lawyer in 2004,

progressing through various

roles to Head of the Group Legal

and Intellectual Property team,

before becoming Group Director

Legal. James was appointed as

Company Secretary in July 2022.

Prior to QinetiQ, James worked

as in-house Legal Counsel at

Transport for London, and has

a background in London-based

private legal practice.

Skills, competence

and experience

Ezinne brings over 20 years of

experience at the intersection

of space systems, defence

technology, government

procurement and national security

policy. From 2021 to 2024 she

served as Assistant Director

at the White House Office of

Science and Technology Policy,

with responsibility for US Space

Policy, authoring the national

space economy strategy, and

leading development of the ISAM

framework. Earlier in her career

she contributed to more than 60

NASA missions and programmes

valued at over US$9bn.

Her board-relevant expertise

spans space and autonomous

systems, dual-use technology

assessment, sovereign capability

architecture, and transatlantic and

Gulf defence market dynamics.

She holds an undergraduate

degree in Computer Science from

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

and master’s degrees in Aerospace

Systems, Space Robotics and

Science & Technology Policy from

Johns Hopkins University, MIT and

Harvard University, respectively.

She also earned a doctorate

degree in Aeronautics and

Astronautics from MIT.

James Field

Company Secretary

Ezinne Uzo-Okoro

Independent

Non-executive Director

Board of

Directors

Roger Krone

Independent

Non-executive Director

Other appointments

Director of Lear Corporation and the

President and Chief Executive Officer

of Scouting America.

Other appointments

Senior Fellow, Belfer Center for Science

and International Affairs, Harvard

University; General Partner, Calthorp

Group, Senior Partner AzurX, a space

and defence investment firm, and

a Member of Portal Global Council.

Other appointments

N/A

Nationality

USA

Nationality

USA

Nationality

British

Appointed

January 2025

Appointed

November 2024

Appointed

July 2022

N

N

R

R

A

A

RS

RS

hps://www.qinetiq.com/

en/who-we-are/board-of-

directors

hps://www.qinetiq.com/

en/who-we-are/qinetiq-

leadership-team

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

86

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Governance

structure

The structure through which the Company is managed is

detailed below. It continues to evolve to meet the needs

of the business and the Company’s stakeholders, and

day-to-day management and decision-making has been

delegated to Executive Management. Directors should

maintain oversight of a company’s performance and ensure

that management is acting in accordance with the strategy

and its delegated authorities. The Board has reserved

certain maers for its own consideration so that it can

exercise its own judgement when making major decisions to

promote the success of the Company for its stakeholders.

For further info please see:

www.qinetiq.com/en/who-we-are/corporate-governance

Audit Commiee

Reviews and monitors

the Group’s financial

and non-financial

accounting and

reporting processes and

the integrity of published

financial statements.

Reviews the Group’s

system of internal

control, including the

effectiveness of its

Internal Audit function

and the independence

and effectiveness of its

external auditors.

104-109

Nominations

Commiee

Considers the structure,

size and composition

of the Board and

Commiees, and

succession planning.

It identifies and

proposes individuals

to be Directors and

Executive Management

and establishes the

criteria for any

new positions.

96-103

Remuneration

Commiee

Determines and

recommends to the

Board the framework

for the remuneration of

the Group Chair, Group

CEO, Group CFO and QLT.

Oversees workforce

remuneration and

workforce policy.

115-120

Risk & Security

Commiee

Provides scrutiny

and assurance to the

Board that the required

standards of risk

management, security,

health, safety and

environment within the

UK, and internationally,

are achieved.

110-114

Disclosure Commiee

Considers and acts on

the need for disclosures

to be made to the market

under the requirements

of the Market Abuse

Regulations. The

Commiee comprises

all Board members,

except for when called

at short notice, when

it comprises the Group

Chair, the Group CEO, the

Group CFO and any one

of the Commiee Chairs.

Shareholders

Group Chair

QinetiQ Leadership

Team (QLT)

Group Chief

Executive Officer

Board of

Directors

Commiees

Responsible for the leadership of the Board and for ensuring that it operates effectively through dynamic discussions

and constructive challenge.

The interaction between the Board and the QLT enables the Board to receive information first-hand about the

Company and its operations and to give guidance on strategy and oversight of the business directly to senior

management. The QLT meets on a monthly basis. It is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Group’s

activities. The focus of the QLT includes managing the operational performance of the business, delivering the

strategy, managing risk, managing regulatory compliance, establishing financial and operational targets and

monitoring performance against those targets.

Responsible for the day-to-day running of the Group’s business, Group performance, and the development and

implementation of the Group strategy.

The Board is responsible for leading the Group, by seing strategic priorities and overseeing the delivery of the

strategy in a way that promotes sustainable long-term growth, while cultivating a balanced approach to risk

within a framework of effective controls and taking into account the interests of a diverse range of stakeholders.

87

Role of the Board

Underpinned by good corporate governance, the Board is focused on

delivering an effective and entrepreneurial Board which:

ɰ

Provides challenge, advice and support to management

ɰ

Drives informed, collaborative and accountable decision-making

ɰ

Creates long-term sustainable success and value for our

shareholders, having regard to the interests of all our stakeholders

Roles and responsibilities

The Board has agreed a clear division of

responsibilities between the Group Chair

and the Group CEO. Other Directors, and

the Company Secretary’s roles are also

clearly defined to assist in enhancing the

effectiveness of the Board. A summary

is set out below.

Division of

responsibilities

Neil Johnson

Steve Wadey

Martin Cooper

Steve Mogford

Shonaid Jemme-Page,

Dina Knight,

Roger Krone,

General Sir Gordon Messenger,

Steve Mogford,

Ezinne Uzo-Okoro

James Field

ɰ

Provides overall leadership and ensures

effectiveness of the Board

ɰ

Sets the agenda, character and tone of the

Board meetings and discussions

ɰ

Maintains an effective working relationship with

the Group CEO

ɰ

Leads the annual performance evaluation

of the Board and its Commiees and ensures

that each Non-executive Director makes an

effective contribution

ɰ

Develops the Group’s strategy for consideration

and approval by the Board and provides effective

leadership of the QinetiQ Leadership Team (QLT)

in its delivery of strategy

ɰ

Develops the Group’s business model and

manages the Group’s operations

ɰ

Overseas the QLT’s development and

implementation of corporate, safety and

environmental policies and standards

ɰ

Directs Legal & Governance functions

ɰ

Establishes and services relationships with

key stakeholders

ɰ

Reinforces the Group’s values and sets expected

employee behaviours

ɰ

Communicates (alongside the Group CFO) the

Group’s financial performance and strategic

progress to investors and analysts

ɰ

Ensures the Board is kept fully appraised of the

Group’s operational and safety performance,

risks and opportunities

ɰ

Responsible for the financial stewardship of the

Group’s resources through appropriate accounting,

financial and other internal controls

ɰ

Directs and manages the Group’s finance,

tax, treasury, risk management, ESG and

insurance functions

ɰ

Communicates (alongside the Group CEO)

the Group’s financial performance and strategic

progress to investors and analysts

ɰ

Acts as sounding board for the Group Chair and

a trusted intermediary for the other Directors

ɰ

Available to shareholders to discuss any concerns

that cannot be resolved through the normal Group

Chair or Group CEO channels

ɰ

Leads the Board in the annual performance

evaluation of the Group Chair and in developing the

long-term plans for the Group Chair’s succession

ɰ

Meets with the Non-executive Directors without

the Group Chair present at least annually, and as

required, to discuss Board maers

ɰ

Monitor and scrutinise the Group’s performance

against its strategic goals and financial plans

ɰ

Provide an objective perspective on the Board’s

deliberations and decision-making, drawing

on their own broad collective experience and

individual expertise and insights

ɰ

Monitor and assess the Group’s culture, use

appropriate and effective means to engage with

employees and acquire an understanding of other

stakeholders’ views

ɰ

Assess the effectiveness of, provide support to, and

constructively challenge, the Executive Directors

ɰ

Play a lead role in the functioning of the

Board’s Commiees

ɰ

Provides advice and support to the Board, its

Commiees, the Group Chair and other Directors

individually as required, primarily in relation to

corporate governance maers, and Non-executive

Directors’ training and development needs

ɰ

Responsible, with the Group and Commiee Chairs,

for seing the agenda for Board and Commiee

meetings and for high-quality and timely information

and communication between the Board and its

Commiees, and between the Directors and senior

management as required

ɰ

Ensures that Board and Commiee policies and

procedures are complied with

Group Chair

Group CEO

Group CFO

Senior Independent Non-executive Director

Independent Non-executive Directors

Company Secretary

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

88

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Composition of the Board

The Board considers that its composition reflects the

requisite balance of skills, experience, challenge and

judgement appropriate for the requirements of the business

and full Board effectiveness. The skills and experience of

the Board’s individual members, particularly in the areas

of UK defence and security, the commercialisation

of innovative technologies, corporate finance and

governance, international markets and risk management,

have brought both support and challenge to the Group CEO,

Group CFO and the QinetiQ Leadership Team during the year.

Independence

The majority of Board members are independent

Non-executive Directors. The independence of the

Non-executive Directors is considered annually by the

Nominations Commiee, using the independence criteria

set out in Provision 10 of the UK Corporate Governance

Code. The Group Chair was independent upon his

appointment in April 2019 and continues to use objective

judgement in his leadership of the Board. As part of

this process, the Board keeps under review the length

of tenure of all Directors, as this is a factor when

assessing independence.

Time commitment

Each Non-executive Director must be able to devote

sufficient time to their role as a member of the Board to

discharge their responsibilities effectively. As part of the

appointment process, consideration is given to assess

Non-executive Directors’ ability to devote time to an

additional directorship.

Prior to undertaking an additional external role or

appointment, the Non-executive Directors are asked to

confirm that they will continue to have sufficient time to

fulfil their commitments to the Company. This means

not only aending and preparing for formal Board and

Commiee meetings, but also making time to understand

the business of the Company. The Non-executive

Directors’ commitment is reviewed as part of the Board

and Director evaluation process.

Board and Commiee processes

The Board has a formal schedule of maers reserved for its

approval, which includes (but is not limited to): strategy;

risk appetite and review of Group-wide principal and

emerging risks; major M&A, contracts and bids; share

capital, debt financing and other liquidity maers; financial

results and budgets; key policies; Board and Commiee

membership; and governance.

Other maers, responsibilities and authorities have

been delegated by the Board to its standing Commiees,

comprising Nominations, Audit, Risk & Security,

Remuneration and Disclosure. Any maers outside of the

schedule and the responsibility of the Commiees fall

within the authority of the Group CEO. The schedule of

maers reserved for the Board and the terms of reference

of each Commiee, which are regularly reviewed and

approved by the Board, can be found on the Company’s

website at www.qinetiq.com.

The Group Chair and the Company Secretary are

responsible, in consultation with the Group CEO and the

Chairs of the Commiees, for maintaining a scheduled

12-month programme of business for the Board and its

Commiees, with flexibility for additional business to be

discussed as required. The programme ensures that all

necessary maers are covered and appropriate time is

given for discussion and, if thought fit, approval of relevant

business. At each scheduled Board meeting, the Board

rigorously reviews updates from the Executive Directors on

Group and operational sector safety, operating and financial

performance and investor relations, and from the Group

Director Legal & Company Secretary on legal compliance

and corporate governance. Other regular Board agenda

items include strategic proposals (including those relating

to major contract bids and capital allocation), integrated

change programmes, risk management, people and

culture updates (including on employee relations, talent

development and diversity promotion), and stakeholder

engagement. Senior management and external advisers

regularly aend both Board and Commiee meetings,

which allows for detailed and informed discussions on

specific maers on which their input or advice is needed.

The Board also seeks to hear external viewpoints inside and

outside the Boardroom, including from customers, suppliers

and experts in areas relevant to the Company’s strategy.

Composition, succession

and evaluation

89

In advance of each Board and Commiee meeting,

Directors receive, via a secure web portal, high-quality

briefings, prepared by the Executive Directors, senior

management, the Company Secretary and/or external

advisers where appropriate, on the agenda items to be

discussed. The portal also gives Directors immediate

access to a range of other resources, including previous

meeting papers, minutes, financial reports, business

presentations, investor reports, Company policies and

governance guidelines, and details of Board and Commiee

procedures. If a Director is unable to aend a meeting due

to illness or exceptional circumstances, they will still receive

all supporting papers in advance of the meeting and are

directed to discuss with, and provide input, opinion and

any instructions to, the Group Chair or relevant Commiee

Chair on the business to be considered at that meeting.

The Board has access to the Company Secretary for support

and advice as required, and the Company operates a policy

which allows Directors to obtain, at the Company’s expense,

independent professional advice where required to enable

them to fulfil their duties effectively. In addition to Board and

Commiee meetings, the Non-executive Directors hold

private meetings without the Executive Directors present,

including to discuss Executive Director performance.

There are also opportunities during the year for Directors

to have informal discussions outside the Boardroom,

either between themselves or with senior management

or external advisers.

Conflicts of interest

The Board operates a policy to identify and manage

situations declared by the Directors (in accordance with

their legal duty to do so) in which they or their connected

persons have, or may have, an actual or potential conflict

of interest with the Company. In accordance with the

Companies Act 2006 and the Articles of Association, the

Board has the authority to authorise conflicts of interest.

This ensures that the influence of third parties does not

compromise the independent judgement of the Board.

Directors are required to declare any potential or actual

conflicts of interest that could interfere with their ability

to act in the best interest of the Group.

The Company Secretary maintains a conflicts register,

which is a record of actual and potential conflicts,

together with any Board authorisation of the conflict.

The authorisations are for an indefinite period and are

reviewed biannually by the Nominations Commiee,

which also considers the effectiveness of the process

for authorising Directors’ conflicts of interest. The Board

reserves the right to vary or terminate these authorisations

at any time. No Director conflict of interest currently exists.

Board and Commiee Meetings

During the year, the Board has seven meetings, each

scheduled over one or two days, for Board and Commiee

business. Additional Board sub-Commiee meetings

and conference calls are held between the scheduled

meetings as required. The table below sets out the Board

and Commiee membership and aendance by members

at meetings held in FY26.

1

In compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code,

and the Commiee Terms of Reference, Steve Wadey and

Martin Cooper are not members of the Audit, Nominations,

and Remuneration Commiees, and Neil Johnson is not

a member of the Audit Commiee.

2

Ross McEwan resigned from the Board on 17 July 2025.

Absences were due to unavoidable prior commitments. Directors

who are unable to aend meetings continue to receive the papers in

advance of the meeting and have the opportunity to discuss with the

relevant Chair or the Company Secretary.

Composition, succession

and evaluation

Director meeting aendance FY26

Board and Commiee meeting aendance – 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Members

Board

Audit

Commiee

Nominations

Commiee

Remuneration

Commiee

Risk & Security

Commiee

Martin Cooper

1

7/7

4/4

Shonaid Jemme-Page

7/7

4/4

2/2

4/4

4/4

Neil Johnson

7/7

2/2

4/4

4/4

Dina Knight

7/7

4/4

2/2

4/4

4/4

Roger Krone

7/7

3/4

2/2

4/4

3/4

Ross McEwan

2

2/2

1/1

2/2

2/2

2/2

General Sir Gordon Messenger

7/7

4/4

2/2

4/4

4/4

Steve Mogford

7/7

4/4

2/2

4/4

4/4

Ezinne Uzo-Okoro

7/7

4/4

2/2

4/4

3/4

Steve Wadey

1

7/7

3/4

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

90

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

In making decisions, the Board of Directors is conscious

of undertaking its legal duties, including its duty under

Section 172(1), in the way that is most likely to promote the

success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a

whole, and the need to have regard to the factors set out in

Section 172(1); see pages 72 to 76 for more information.

Examples of some important decisions taken by the Board

during the year, and the factors which the Board had regard

to when reaching those decisions, are set out below.

Board

decision-making

Short- to Medium-Term

Performance Milestones

Background

In response to performance challenges faced by the

Company in its previous financial year, it was determined

that a number of strategic actions were required to drive

improvements in performance.

Board discussion

The Board considered, debated and identified the defined

set of milestones that the Company needed to meet over

the short to medium term, to successfully deliver the

actions required in response to the performance challenges

faced. The Board agreed a set of measures against each

strategic action, which would be reported on at each

meeting, enabling the Board to monitor the Company’s

progress. These discussions were informed by the in-depth

review of the business and its strategy undertaken at the

FY26 October Strategy Board meeting.

Board stakeholder considerations and impact

Ensuring the Company’s business and strategy are

optimally positioned and enabled to achieve consistent

operational and financial performance for the benefit of

effective delivery for its customers; maximising returns

for its investors; and retaining and aracting its key

employee talent.

Outcome

Clear alignment between the Board and the Company

leadership on the critical actions to be undertaken to deliver

against its growth strategy; oversight of progress against

defined performance measures through regular reporting

to the Board; and enhanced Board input into critical actions

being taken by the Company to improve performance.

Equity Market

Narrative

Background

The Company, with the Board, has given considerable

consideration to the effectiveness of the narrative its uses

to present itself to shareholders and the investment market.

Board discussion

The directors discussed shareholder perceptions of the

Company’s current equity narrative and opportunities to

make improvements in it; ways in which its Investor Relations

programme could be strengthened; and the effectiveness

of quality of earnings reviews facilitated by the Company.

The Board also reviewed the Company’s current capital

allocation policy and how that had performed over the

preceding year, including by reference to a comparable

FTSE peer group.

Board stakeholder considerations and impact

The Board had regard to direct feedback from shareholders

given in response to an investor perception audit

commissioned by the Group Chair and facilitated by the

external consultancy, Bendon Advisory. The Board also

considered proposals to develop an enhanced Investor

Relations programme; improve and simplify quality of

earnings reviews for the benefit of investors; and ensure

the Company’s capital allocation policy and actions

remained strongly aligned to shareholder interests.

Outcome

An enhanced equity market narrative, beer aligned to

shareholder interests, that can be utilised as part of the

Company’s engagements with its shareholders and the

investor market.

1

2

91

Board

decision-making

Triennial Remuneration

Policy Renewal

Background

In compliance with its UK Corporate Governance Code

obligations, the Company has developed a renewed

Directors’ Remuneration Policy, to be presented for

shareholder approval at the Company’s 2026 AGM.

Board discussion

A dedicated sub-commiee of the Remuneration

Commiee was established, led by the Remuneration

Commiee Chair, to oversee and give guidance to the

development of the Policy. The sub-commiee considered

the effectiveness of existing incentive schemes in driving

the successful delivery of the Company’s performance,

and alignment with the Company’s strategy; the interests

of shareholders; and current market best practice.

Board stakeholder considerations and impact

Potential changes to the Policy were evaluated to assess

whether the outcomes they are designed to achieve are

transparent, and remain aligned to the interests of the

Company’s shareholders and the value we deliver to

them. This assessment has been informed by direct

consultation and engagements with a number of the

Company’s largest shareholders, whose feedback has

been taken into consideration.

Outcome

A refreshed Directors’ Remuneration Policy has been

developed, taking into account key stakeholder inputs

and views, ready for presentation to shareholders at the

2026 AGM.

Business Systems

Finance Programme

Background

The Company has established a programme to deliver an

upgraded IT system for managing its business finances,

enabling a consistent toolset and fully aligned processes

across its global business. The programme is delivered

in defined phases, with each key phase requiring Board

approval for the investment required.

Board discussion

A dedicated Board sub-commiee has been established

to oversee progress of the programme. During the course

of the year, the sub-commiee has reviewed and approved

the investment required for two key phases; ‘Design to Build’

and ‘Test & Deploy’. Consideration and guidance was given

on progress against key gating milestones; management

and mitigation of material risks; understanding of key

dependencies; cost versus budget; implementation

planning and communication; and ensuring that

the identified benefits of the new system could be

effectively realised.

Board stakeholder considerations and impact

The sub-commiee considered the impact of

implementation of the new system on employees,

and how effective communications could be used to

ensure the benefits of the systems were fully realised by

key user communities within the business. The system will

also be an enabler of improved business budgeting and

forecasting across the organisation, which will support

improved delivery and value returns performance for

customers and shareholders.

Outcome

Approval for investment in the programme, allowing it to

be delivered on target against time and budgeted cost.

3

4

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

92

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Board

activity

The key business and activities of the Board during the year were as follows:

Strategy and operations

Financial performance

Internal control and risk management

Leadership, people and culture

Engagement, environment and community

Governance and legal

ɰ

Reviewed and approved the Company’s

reset purpose, values and strategy

ɰ

Approved the Group’s five-year Integrated

Strategic Plan (ISP). See more on page 69

ɰ

Undertook in-depth reviews of business

performance against defined short- to

medium-term milestones

ɰ

Reviewed and approved material bids

and significant investments in

improvement programmes

ɰ

Received updates from each of the Group’s

sectors and functions on their performance

vs strategy and budget, and their priorities

and initiatives

ɰ

Reviewed the Group’s capital allocation policy

ɰ

Reviewed progress of the Group’s Digital

& Data improvement programme

ɰ

Monitored the economic, environmental,

legislative and geopolitical landscape,

particularly as regards the ongoing conflicts

in Ukraine and Gaza and the emerging

dynamic in the Middle East

ɰ

Approved the Company’s annual budget,

business plan and KPIs, and monitored

performance against them. See more on

page 38

ɰ

Reviewed and approved the Group’s

full and half-year results and interim

trading updates

ɰ

Approved the full-year and

half-year dividends

ɰ

Approved the Company’s Annual Report,

including its fair, balanced

and understandable nature

ɰ

Reviewed and confirmed the Group’s viability

statement and going-concern status

ɰ

Reviewed the Group’s capital, debt and

other liquidity arrangements

ɰ

Approved the Group’s tax strategy and

treasury policy

ɰ

Considered and approved expenditure

related to material bids and internal

investment programmes

ɰ

Reviewed and approved the Group’s risk

appetite and reviewed the Group’s principal

and key risks, the processes for identifying

them, and actions to mitigate those

ɰ

Received reports from the Chair of the

Risk & Security Commiee on its activities

ɰ

Received reports from the Chair of the Audit

Commiee on its activities and assessments

ɰ

Reviewed and assessed the effectiveness of

the Group’s system of internal controls and

preparedness for Provision 29

ɰ

Regularly monitored confidential reporting

reports and actions made within the

Company (the process of which is described

further on page 60)

ɰ

Received recommendations from the

Nominations Commiee on the re-election

of Directors and advice regarding the

structure, size and composition of the Board

ɰ

Reviewed and actioned succession plans for

the Board and senior management, having

regard to skills, experience and diversity

ɰ

Reviewed and approved amendments to the

Board Diversity Policy

ɰ

Received reports from the Chair of the

Remuneration Commiee on its activities,

recommendations regarding remuneration

strategy and decisions regarding the Group

Chair’s, Executive Directors’ and senior

management’s pay, and reviewed and

approved Non-executive Directors' fees

ɰ

Reviewed people reports, including updates

on talent development, retention and

acquisition programmes and engagement

and inclusion programmes

ɰ

Assessed and monitored culture,

how it aligns to strategy and how it has

been embedded

ɰ

Engaged with the Company, its advisers

and shareholders on the development of the

triennial Director Remuneration Policy

ɰ

Undertook an annual review of the Group’s

stakeholders – who they are, methods of

engagement, outcomes and feedback.

See more on page 42

ɰ

Reviewed feedback from investors and

analysts and the output of engagement with

major shareholders and other stakeholders,

including commissioning an external investor

perception audit

ɰ

Reviewed workforce engagement activities

and outcomes, including the results

of the Peakon surveys, and received

reports on the Group Chair’s workforce

engagement activities

ɰ

Reviewed regular reports on our approach to

ESG issues. See more on page 40

ɰ

Reviewed the activities of, and approved

a financial commitment to, the Company’s

Climate Transition Action Plan, environmental

programmes, ethics programmes and

charitable and community initiatives

ɰ

Approved the Group’s Section 172(1)

statement. See page 72

ɰ

Approved the Notice of the AGM

ɰ

Undertook an annual compliance review

of the UK Corporate Governance Code

and DTR7

ɰ

Undertook an annual review of

the Group's defence process and

vulnerability position

ɰ

Reviewed the results of the internal Board

and Commiee effectiveness evaluations

ɰ

Reviewed and approved maers reserved

for the Board and its Commiees’ terms

of reference

ɰ

Reviewed and approved the Group’s

annual Modern Slavery and Human

Trafficking statement

ɰ

Through the Audit Commiee, regularly

reviewed and monitored the Company’s

activity in preparation for compliance

with Provision 29

93

QinetiQ’s US sector is comprised of QinetiQ Inc and its

subsidiary operating companies, including Foster Miller Inc

and the Avantus Federal group. These companies operate

under a Special Security Agreement (SSA) between the

QinetiQ Group and the US Government, which governs how

the rest of the Group interfaces, collaborates and works

with the companies in the US sector. The controls contained

in the SSA are required by the US National Industry Security

Program Operating Manual Rule, governing contractor

access to classified information, to appropriately mitigate

certain aspects of foreign ownership, control and influence

to the extent they might otherwise adversely affect the

interests of US national security. The SSA establishes

procedures that regulate the management and operation

of our US sector to achieve that mitigation. Under the SSA,

the Board of Directors of QinetiQ Inc is comprised of three

types of Directors, all nominated by QinetiQ Group plc,

as the foreign owner of QinetiQ Inc, and approved by the

US Government. These are Outside Directors, Inside

Directors and Officer Directors of QinetiQ Inc.

Through the Inside Directors, QinetiQ maintains appropriate

visibility of the management and operations of the

companies in the US sector. These positions are typically

held by the Group CEO and Group CFO of QinetiQ Group

plc. To ensure there is no undue control or influence on

the actions of the US sector by QinetiQ Group plc as the

foreign owner, Inside Directors occupy a minority of seats

on the QinetiQ Inc Board of Directors. Inside Directors do not

need to be US citizens, and are excluded from access to US

classified and export-controlled information in possession

of QinetiQ Inc and its subsidiaries.

Officer Directors are responsible for the day-to-day

operations of the US sector, and serve as a liaison with the

wider QinetiQ Group. The Chief Executive & President of

the US sector is the appointed Officer Director of QinetiQ

Inc. Officer Directors must ensure that the procedures and

requirements of the SSA are effectively implemented, and

have an obligation to maintain the security of classified and

export-controlled information entrusted to QinetiQ Inc and

its subsidiaries, as well its ability to perform on classified

contracts and participate in classified programmes. They

must be resident US citizens who either have, or are eligible

to possess, personal US security clearance.

Outside Directors must be resident US citizens who are

objective individuals, who have no prior relationship with

QinetiQ, and possess personal US security clearance.

Our appointed Outside Directors are currently John Hillen,

Chair of the QinetiQ Inc Board, John Kavanaugh and Brad

Feldmann. The number of Outside Directors must exceed

the number of Inside Directors. The Outside Directors also

form the Government Security Commiee, which is in place

to ensure US national security interests are respected.

Management and control

of US subsidiaries

Employee

engagement

We have experienced, diverse and dedicated people

who are recognised as key assets to our business and

who are critical to our success, and the Group has

a long-standing commitment to the importance and

value of employee engagement.

The Board recognises the value of engaging directly with

employees to ensure an understanding of their views

and inform its decision-making in considering employee

interests. The Board typically holds a number of its meetings

at different Company sites and undertakes site visits

outside of scheduled board meetings, both in the UK and

other home countries, to take the opportunity to meet

with employees in person.

The list of engagement channels set out below describes

how the Board continued to be able to effectively gain the

views of employees throughout the year.

How does it work?

ɰ

By using a number of different employee engagement

mechanisms and accessibility, ensuring flexibility

ɰ

By having a direct link to the Board via the designated

Non-executive Director

ɰ

By way of a dedicated forum to relay the voice

of the employees

ɰ

By regularly reporting to the Board on culture, people

strategy and employee engagement

ɰ

By drawing on each individual Board member’s

accessibility and unique experience as business leaders

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

94

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Employee

engagement

Dedicated Non-executive Director

The Group Chair, Neil Johnson, is the dedicated Non-

executive Director for gathering the views of employees.

ɰ

At least two meetings with the Global Employee Voice

(GEV) each year

ɰ

Aends the Global Recognition Gala and also Global

Employee Roadshows

ɰ

Reports back to the Board

Global Employee Voice (GEV)

The GEV is a global forum that acts as the collective voice

of all QinetiQ employees. Elected employees from across

QinetiQ sites in all home countries represent the employees

to the leaders of the Company.

ɰ

Two meetings annually with Dina Knight, the Chair of

the Remuneration Commiee

ɰ

Regular meetings with the Group Chief Executive

Officer and Chief People Officer, who reports to the

Board on culture, employee and people strategy,

and employee engagement

Monthly Q-Talks

Delivered by members of the QinetiQ Leadership Community

(QLC) to their teams, with the purpose of keeping employees

up to date with what is currently important across QinetiQ.

ɰ

A mechanism accessible for employees to get a

thorough understanding of what is happening in the

Company, and also to provide individual feedback

Global Employee Roadshows

Delivered biannually by the QLT, the Global Employee

Roadshows give an update on the progress we are

making against our vision and strategy, and provide

an understanding of our key priorities for the future.

ɰ

Non-executive Directors are able to aend when available

ɰ

Employees have the opportunity to ask questions,

either in person or through a number of online mediums

ɰ

Reported to the Board by the Group CEO

Regular QLC events

Delivered by the QLT and providing updates to the direct

reports of the QLT on latest operational, financial,

strategic and key stakeholder issues.

ɰ

The members of the QLC feed back to their teams

at team meetings, sharing key messages on

Company strategy

Workday Peakon employee engagement surveys

Quarterly surveys enabling the Board and the Leadership

team to assess and understand issues affecting employee

engagement throughout the Group. See more on page 54.

ɰ

After each survey, the Group Director Employee

Experience has a meeting with the Group CEO where they

discuss the results, trends and any maers for concern

ɰ

The Group CEO feeds back to his fellow Board members

at each Board meeting

ɰ

QLC members interact directly with their team to identify

tangible actions in response to feedback from each survey

Global Portal – our intranet

ɰ

A platform where all employees can access our polices

and be kept fully informed of the latest Group news

through internal communications and community groups

ɰ

Enables employees to ask questions and discuss

topics internally

Confidential reporting

QinetiQ has in place a Group-wide ‘Speak Up’ programme,

which includes an externally provided confidential reporting

process, as detailed on the Company’s intranet and in its Code

of Conduct. All concerns are passed by the external third-party

to the Group Director Internal Audit, who ensures that they are

held in strict confidence and properly investigated.

ɰ

Reports on confidential reporting activity and

outcomes of investigations are reported to the Board

at each of its meetings

ɰ

The Board annually reviews the effectiveness of the

Group’s confidential reporting process, provides

challenge and advice on the issues raised, and remains

satisfied that the process in place is fit for purpose

More information on the Group’s 'Speak Up' programme

can be found on page 60.

How we engage with our people

95

QinetiQ values a diverse and highly skilled

workforce, supporting our delivery of

world-class technology and engineering

to our customers for the benefit of

national defence and security, and

helping to protect lives, in the countries

we work with.

Year in review

This year saw a continued evolution of the Board, with our

two most recent Non-executive Director appointments

becoming well embedded. We have built expertise to

support the Company’s evolved growth strategy,

including increasing the Board’s C-suite experience

in the Defence sector.

We have also supported Dina Knight’s transition into the

Remuneration Commiee Chair role, which brings the

benefit of her current external experience as a senior

people leader at executive level. This will help support

the Company’s programme to enhance leadership skills

throughout the organisation.

The Commiee has maintained its focus on gender

and diversity in its leadership Commiees and throughout

the organisation.

The Nominations Commiee undertook its usual

assessment of Directors’ continued independence for the

year in review, and further information on the Commiee’s

effectiveness can be found on page 101 and 102.

Nominations Commiee

Report

On the Commiee’s agenda:

ɰ

Overseeing changes to the senior leadership team

ɰ

Review of Board and Senior Management succession

plans – improved internal succession bench strength

in Senior Leadership team

ɰ

Updates to Board Diversity Policy and the Company’s

inclusion initiatives

ɰ

Ensuring leadership succession plans are enabled

ɰ

Overseeing the seing of Parker Review targets for

diversity balance within Senior Management of the

Company by 2027

Priorities going forward:

ɰ

Progress towards meeting diversity targets under

UK Listing Rules

ɰ

Building the experience of the Board in its leadership

of achieving the Company’s climate change targets

and goals

ɰ

Board succession planning

ɰ

Further embedding the Board’s assessment of culture

FY26

FY27

Neil Johnson

Nominations Commiee Chair

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

96

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Skills and experience

Our Board offers the obvious, expected strengths in governance, risk management and financial reporting. Equally

impressive, however, are the coverage and deep knowledge held by the Directors in various industrial fields and markets

globally, particularly in defence and security, government services, and aerospace and aviation. This strength, when

coupled with a broad diversity of age, gender, ethnicity and geographic balance, affords our Company a robust and

strategic influence to match our high delivery standards.

Principal responsibilities

ɰ

Keeping the structure, size and composition of

the Board under review

ɰ

Succession planning for Directors and

Senior Executives

ɰ

Reviewing the leadership needs of the organisation,

both Executive and Non-executive, to ensure the

continued ability of the organisation to compete

effectively in its core markets

ɰ

In accordance with the Board Diversity Policy,

identifying and nominating for Board approval

appropriately diverse candidates to fill Board and

Commiee vacancies when they arise

ɰ

Reviewing the time required from Non-executive

Directors to sufficiently discharge their duties

ɰ

Evaluating the skills and experience of the Directors,

to assess the Board’s capability to support the

execution of the Company’s strategy and delivery

of its operations

ɰ

Evaluating and monitoring the Company’s culture and

how this has been embedded

ɰ

Reviewing the independence of the Non-executive

Directors and any potential conflict of interest for

all Directors

The Commiee’s detailed responsibilities are

set out in the Terms of Reference, available at:

www.qinetiq.com/en/who-we-are/corporate-governance

Nominations Commiee

Report

Corporate governance

8

8

8

8

7

7

9

9

9

9

9

9

9

9

Finance and financial reporting

Risk management

ESG (including safety)

People (e.g. culture, D&I, succession, talent, reward)

Cyber security

Technology/digital

Transformation

M&A

Strategy

International business

Government services market

Aerospace and aviation market

Defence and security market

Director skills and experience

97

The effectiveness of the Commiee’s succession plans is demonstrated by the successful succession of Dina Knight into

the Remuneration Commiee Chair role, and the increased depth of knowledge and experience, relevant to the current

strategic actions and needs of the Company, developed through changes to the Board over the previous two years.

Identifying current and future needs and skills gaps

Ensuring accountability and success of the Board’s performance

The Commiee maintains and regularly reviews a matrix of the Directors’ experience

and skills to ensure that the Board and its Commiees are composed of individuals

who have the right experience and skills to enable them to shape (and, in the case of

the Executive Directors, deliver) the Company’s strategy, and to monitor and assess

the effectiveness of the Company’s control environment and management of risk.

The matrix considers:

ɰ

Diversity, including age, gender and ethnicity.

ɰ

Background, professional skills and experience.

ɰ

The number and balance of Executive and Non-executive Directors.

ɰ

Length of tenure.

ɰ

Independence.

Annual Board effectiveness and performance evaluation, using an external provider,

at least every three years.

ɰ

Annual review of the Group Chair’s performance led by the

Senior Independent Director.

ɰ

Annual independence review of the Non-executive Directors.

ɰ

Continued assessment of the Non-executive Directors’ time commitment.

ɰ

Policy on Board members’ appointments to other Boards.

ɰ

Annual performance review of the CEO and CFO, supplemented by the Group

Chair’s and Non-executive Directors’ continual assessment of their performance.

ɰ

A thorough and tailored induction programme for new Directors.

ɰ

Annual training for the Board as a whole and on an individual basis.

ɰ

Enhancing the C-suite experience in the defence

sector with the appointment of Roger Krone in

addition to Steve Mogford.

ɰ

Deeper experience of US Government and

the US defence and security market.

ɰ

Dina Knight’s succession as Chair of the

Remuneration Commiee and the planned

induction spanning the first year as

Commiee Chair.

ɰ

The FY26 Board effectiveness review concluded

that the Board has been effective, engaged with

and was helpful to the organisation.

ɰ

A summary of the Board’s decision-making,

considering Section 172(1), can be found on

pages 72 to 76.

Action

Outcome/impact

Succession planning

Board and Commiees

The Commiee annually reviews the composition of the Board and its Commiees, and the Nominations Commiee

expects to continue to implement its succession plans for the Board and its Commiees in FY27 and beyond. We use the

process outlined below to ensure that we continue to recruit only candidates of the highest standard, that we continue

to make progress towards our diversity and inclusion targets, and that we have the right balance of an appropriately

experienced and skilled Board, yet maintaining a fresh perspective.

After this year’s review, the Commiee is satisfied that we have an appropriate mix of skills, knowledge and experience

to operate effectively.

Nominations Commiee

Report

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

98

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Sub-Commiee appointed

A sub-Commiee of the Nominations Commiee

is appointed to oversee the recruitment and

appointment process

Tender process

A tender process identifies the most suitable

recruitment agency to conduct the search and

prepare candidate specifications

Recommendation

Nominations Commiee recommends to the Board

which of the preferred candidates best fulfils the

Board’s and its Commiees’ needs

Interviews

The sub-Commiee conducts initial interviews

with the candidates on the shortlist and identifies

preferred candidates

Other Board members, including the Group CEO and

Group CFO, interview the preferred candidates

Review

The sub-Commiee reviews the list of candidates and

narrows down to a shortlist of those who best meet the

Company’s requirements, considering the following:

ɰ

Background, skills and experience

ɰ

Independence and other commitments

ɰ

Diversity

ɰ

Other individual aributes to widen the Board’s

overall knowledge, providing challenge and

further support

Senior management succession

planning programme

The Commiee has undertaken its usual programme

of senior management succession planning. Senior

management for this purpose includes the members of

the QinetiQ Leadership Team, as well as those talented

individuals who have demonstrated the potential for

promotion to higher or broader positions in the Group’s

senior management structure.

The programme includes an annual review of such senior

managers’ experience and skills and their progress and

notable achievements, to ascertain their potential for

further career progression. The Commiee also keeps the

performance of potential successors to Executive Director

roles under regular review throughout the year during Board

interactions and visits to the Company’s operations.

This gives Commiee members the opportunity to observe

senior managers’ working practices and relationships with

their stakeholders first-hand. These reviews complement

the Executive Directors’ assessment of these individuals’

performance through a formal process of annual reviews and

continual feedback and support. This enables the Commiee

to identify any gaps in the senior management succession

pipeline which may need to be met externally, and any

requirements for senior managers’ further development.

The new operating model was brought into effect in July

2025 and included new appointments to the QLT, including

Chief Growth Officer and Chief Corporate Affairs Officer.

Nominations Commiee

Report

The process that the Commiee has established,

together with the particular considerations it takes

into account, in identifying and nominating Director

candidates, is set out below:

Ongoing Director training

The Directors have the opportunity to participate

in an ongoing training programme organised by

the Company Secretary. This includes the Board

being briefed on relevant regulatory changes, and

aending external training sessions on topics

including climate change and ethics.

99

Nominations Commiee

Report

Board and Company commitment

to diversity

The Board believes that a broad range of skills, experiences

and perspectives is fundamental to strong performance

and long-term success. A diverse workforce enhances our

collective capability, strengthens decision-making, and

enables the Company to adapt and thrive in a changing

environment. Accordingly, the Board is commied to

fostering diversity across all levels of the organisation,

including at Board and senior management level and

throughout the workforce, including gender, ethnic and

social backgrounds. This commitment is driven by our

belief that diversity of skills and perspectives:

ɰ

Enhances decision-making

through the combination

of different skills, insights and expertise, supporting

well-rounded and effective outcomes.

ɰ

Enables us to aract, develop and retain the best

talent

by creating an inclusive environment where

individuals are empowered to apply and grow their

skills to their full potential.

ɰ

Strengthens our ability to serve customers

and stakeholders

by drawing on a wide range of

capabilities and experiences that reflect the needs

of diverse communities in which we operate.

This focus on diverse skills and perspectives aligns with

our values and supports our strategy for sustainable

growth, by ensuring we build, develop and retain the talent

needed to deliver high-quality outcomes for our customers.

Board Diversity Policy

Our commitment is confirmed in the Board’s Diversity Policy,

which has been updated and strengthened again this year,

and which applies to the Board and all of its Commiees –

the main objectives of which are:

ɰ

To achieve and maintain targets on gender and ethnic

diversity on the Board and its Commiees.

ɰ

To ensure that the membership of the Board and its

Commiees reflect the diversity of the geographies

and communities we operate in, and the customers

that the Group serves.

ɰ

To respect the differences of its members, and

value and encourage the diversity of thought that

such differences can bring – in each case within the

context of Board members having, between them,

the experience and skills required to support the

development, oversight and delivery of the

Company’s strategy.

We are pleased to have seen the positive benefits to these

initiatives, which have resulted in improvements in both

gender and ethnic diversity at a number of levels of the

business, including:

ɰ

At least one member of the Board identify as coming

from an ethnic minority background.

ɰ

The Audit and Remuneration Commiee Chairs are

female, with Shonaid Jemme-Page as Chair of the

Audit Commiee and Dina Knight as Chair of the

Remuneration Commiee.

ɰ

Female representations of the direct reports to the

QLT has increased to 29.3% (28.9% in 2025), and

remains a key area of focus.

ɰ

The seing during FY26 of an ethnic minority target

of 7% for the Senior Management team working in

the UK, to be achieved by 2027, as required by the

Parker Review

The Company has, as at 31 March 2026, met the following

target, as referenced in Listing Rule 6.6.6(9): that there

should be a Director from a minority ethnic background on

the Board. The remaining targets – that at least 40% of the

Board are women, and that at least one of the senior Board

positions is held by a woman – have not been met this year.

Female representation on our Board is currently 33.3%

(2025: 36%), and in line with Provision 23, 31.3% at senior

management level (which comprises the QLT and their

direct reports) (2025: 28.2%). This will remain an important

consideration in future appointments. Disclosures relating

to gender diversity within the Company and further

information on our engagement and inclusion plan can

be found on page 55.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

100

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

A performance evaluation of the Board, its Commiees and the individual Directors is conducted annually, with an externally

facilitated review required at least once every three years. As illustrated by the chart above, FY25 was the first in our current

three-year review cycle, when an external evaluation was undertaken by Emma Bendon of Bendon Advisory. Neither Emma,

nor Bendon Advisory, has any other connection to the Group aside from the consultancy services they provide. In FY26, an

internal evaluation has been undertaken by the Company’s Secretariat team, the key outcomes of which are summarised

here. In FY27, it is anticipated that a further internal evaluation will be carried out.

The principal sources of data used to assess the effectiveness of the Board and its Commiees were questionnaires which

were completed by each Board member, a selection of members of the senior management team, and the Company’s lead

auditor at PwC.

Director effectiveness three-year cycle

FY25

External

Evaluation by selected

independent consultants

Bendon Advisory, with an

agreed scope of review

and approach

FY26

Internal

Evaluation to focus on

reviewing core effectiveness

and areas identified for

development from the

Year 1 external evaluation

FY27

Internal

Evaluation to focus on reviewing

progress made on areas

identified for development from

the Year 2 internal evaluation and

identify any gaps where further

action is required to improve

YEAR 1

YEAR 2

YEAR 3

Nominations Commiee

Report

Voluntary disclosures required under Listing Rule 6.6.6(10)R as at 31 March 2026

(a) Table for reporting on gender identity or sex

Number of

Board members

Percentage of

the Board

Number of senior

positions on the

Board (CEO, CFO,

SID and Chair)

Number in

executive

management

Percentage

of executive

management

Men

6

66.7%

4

7

55.56%

Women

3

33.3%

0

2

44.44%

Not specified/prefer not to say

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

(b) Table for reporting on ethnic background

Number of Board

members

Percentage of

the Board

Number of senior

positions on the

Board (CEO, CFO,

SID and Chair)

Number in

executive

management

Percentage

of executive

management

White British or other white

(including minority-white groups)

7

77.78%

4

5

55.56%

Mixed/multiple ethnic groups

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Asian/Asian British

1

11.11%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Black/African/Caribbean/Black British

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other ethnic group

N/A

N/A

N/A

1

11.11%

Not specified/prefer not to say

1

11.11%

N/A

3

33.33%

The above data was obtained on a voluntary self-reported basis. Participants were invited to provide information through

a secure electronic portal, wherein they were asked to share detail such as ethnic background. In compiling the data

required in order to fulfil its legal obligations under Listing Rule 6, the Group has acted in compliance with applicable local,

state, provincial, and federal law, regulations, and executive orders in the jurisdictions in which it carries out its operations.

During FY26, we set a target of 7% ethnic minority for Senior Management in the UK, to be achieved by 2027, as required by

the Parker Review. As part of our refreshed Engagement and Inclusion strategy, we are focusing on achieving this target

by the end of 2027, through diverse recruitment and talent pipelines. The delivery of our culture change programme will

continue to support an inclusive culture where everyone can feel they belong and thrive.

Director effectiveness

101

The Company Secretary, in consultation with the Group Chair and Commiee Chairs, reviewed and analysed the results

of the questionnaires by reference to scores given against a defined rating system; qualitative feedback provided; and

specific observations, based on which, recommendations for improvements in Board effectiveness were formulated.

This output was then discussed and considered by the Board and its Commiees, to agree actions to be taken as a result.

FY26 Internal Review

A summary of key actions taken by the Board and its Commiees during the course of this year in response to the output

of its effectiveness review is shown below:

Areas for focus

Action taken during the year

Increase time allocated to

strategic and risk-orientated

topics, especially emerging

technologies and policy

trends, allowing more time for

non-executive directors to

share their own experience.

ɰ

Reset Board Annual Planner and agenda scheduling to allow more time for strategically focused topics

ɰ

Dedicated time in each meeting to review Company performance against defined short- to

medium-term milestones

ɰ

Reduced levels of data and detail in Board papers to allow greater focus on presentation of

strategic issues

ɰ

Increased opportunities to receive valuable customer, shareholder and industry perspectives on

strategic issues relevant to the Company through allowing greater time for guest speakers to aend

planned Board events

Improved non-executive

director experience, in

relation to training and depth

of understanding of the

Company’s operations and

technical capabilities.

ɰ

Reinvigorated director site visit programme introduced up to FY28, to give all non-executives greater

opportunities to visit key facilities, increase direct engagement with a range of employees, and gain

greater insights into the Company’s innovative technical capabilities

ɰ

New training programme introduced, tailored to targeted areas of experience, which have

included external presentations on non-financial reporting; climate resilience; and

AI implementation in business

More regular updates on

shareholder engagements

and increased insight into key

investor relations issues and

considerations relevant to

the Company.

ɰ

Investor Perception Audit undertaken, facilitated through an external consultancy (Bendon Advisory),

to gain greater insight into the views of both current shareholders and prospective investors

ɰ

Increased time at Board meetings allocated for feedback on shareholder engagements; updates

on the Company’s investor relations activity; and discussion of maers important to shareholders,

for example, capital allocation policy and delivery of shareholder value

ɰ

Identifying opportunities for the Board to collectively have greater direct engagement with

shareholders as part of planned Board events

The Group Chair’s

individual performance

As part of our annual evaluation process, Steve Mogford,

as Senior Independent Director, led a review of the

Group Chair’s performance. At a private meeting, the

Non-executive Directors, with input from the Executive

Directors and Company Secretary, assessed the Group

Chair’s ability to effectively fulfil his role. It was concluded

that he had showed effective leadership of the Board; had

strong levels of engagement with shareholders, customers

and employees; and his actions continued to positively

influence the Board and the wider organisation. It was also

recognised that, in response to feedback from the prior

year’s review, the Group Chair had delivered increased levels

of briefings to the Board on his engagements with external

stakeholders, to provide deeper and highly valuable context

to Board discussions and decision-making.

Director induction

On joining the Board, whether in an Executive or

Non-executive role, each Director undertakes a tailored

induction programme covering subject areas relevant to

the requirements of their role. This programme is designed

to fast-track a new Director’s understanding of the

Group’s purpose, values, strategy and operations,

thereby equipping them to perform their role.

The Directors’ individual performances

The Group Chair, Neil Johnson, held performance meetings

with each Board member to discuss their individual

contribution and performance over the year, and their future

training and development needs. After these meetings,

Neil Johnson confirmed to the Nominations Commiee that,

during the year, all Directors have demonstrated a clear

commitment to their roles.

Board meetings and site visits

Physical Board meetings and Director visits are scheduled

throughout the year at our sites, both in the UK and

internationally. Locations for meetings and site visits

are agreed annually and are arranged by the Company

Secretary with assistance from the QLT as appropriate.

During the year, the Board held physical meetings in

London, as well as some Board meetings that continue

to be held virtually.

Nominations Commiee

Report

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

102

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Background reading material, including previous

Board and Commiee packs, investor and strategy

presentations, relevant Company procedures and

Board policies

Meetings with the Group Chair, Executive Directors

and members of senior management

Meetings with the Chairs of the Commiees, external

auditors and external remuneration advisers

Visits to Company sites, meetings with senior

local management

Guidance on corporate governance arrangements,

including the Board and Commiee agendas and

procedures, Board succession planning and Board

evaluation – provided by the Company Secretary

Details of the induction programme, organised by the

Company Secretary in conjunction with the Group Chair,

for new Non-executive Directors, are illustrated by the

following diagram:

The Annual Board Strategy meeting was held in October

2026, at the Company’s London office. This event

provides dedicated time for the Board to engage with

senior leadership on the macro political, industry and

economic environment affecting the Company and its

strategic priorities, assessed against both its short- and

longer-term priorities across an up to 10-year outlook.

During this year’s meeting, key topics included the critical

actions required and being progressed in response to the

performance challenges experienced in the prior financial

year; the changes that were required to effectively reset

the Company’s growth strategy; and defining the short- to

medium-term measures against which the Board would

monitor the Company’s strategic performance over the

present and future years. The Board’s deliberations were

also informed by valuable key customer insights given by

a senior-level guest speaker, as part of the event.

Nominations Commiee

Report

Meetings and Director site visits

In March 2026, four of our Non-executive

Directors, Shonaid Jemme-Page, Ezinne

Ozo-Ukoro, Steve Mogford and Roger Krone,

visited the Company’s headquarters in

Farnborough to see the labs and facilities in

which our laser directed energy weapons

(LDEW) capability is housed, and to meet

and engage with the talented scientists

and engineers who have developed this

groundbreaking technology. The visit included

a tour of the newly refurbished DragonFire

MDC AIT facility, which will see the production

of advanced laser technology which has the

potential to play a central role in protecting

our Armed Forces and critical assets and

infrastructure from airborne threats. The visit

also included a presentation and Q&A on the

Company’s current technology partnership

with MBDA and Leonardo; future plans for

development of the LDEW capability; and

opportunities for further partnering to

advance the technology in new domains.

These engagements help to enhance the

Board’s understanding of this key capability

area, and to create increased opportunity

for the Board to more actively engage in and

contribute to its future success.

103

Dear Shareholder,

I am pleased to present this report which sets out the

work carried out by the Audit Commiee during the year,

including the key topics it has considered and how it has

discharged its responsibilities.

The Commiee provides oversight of the system of internal

controls and risk management across the business. This

includes considering both financial and non-financial risks.

A particular area of focus for the year has been helping the

Company prepare for the upcoming Provision 29 changes to

the UK Corporate Governance Code and declaration on the

effectiveness of controls. The Audit Commiee has spent

significant time during the year guiding the ongoing work

to finalise the list of material controls and plan the scope

of the testing and assurance strategy.

The Commiee also continues to ensure the integrity

of reporting, including the Annual Report and Accounts.

For FY26, the Commiee has reviewed and challenged

the key accounting estimates and judgements inherent

within the financial results, particularly the assumptions

relating to the goodwill impairment testing, the allocation

of underlying results from specific adjusting items, and

long-term contract accounting.

The Group’s ESG credentials continue to be strong and the

Commiee supports the evolving sustainability agenda,

including target-seing, assurance and reporting. Its work

during the year in this area has included the embedding of

existing requirements and the preparation and planning

for future requirements.

Shonaid Jemme-Page

Audit Commiee Chair

Audit Commiee

Report

The US sector has experienced a more stable year in FY26,

now refocused with a refreshed strategic clarity reflecting

market dynamics and pipeline opportunities. The US sector

continues to be an area of focus for the business, and

therefore for the Commiee. As the business continues

to evolve and mature, the Commiee will ensure that

there is continuous improvement in the system of internal

control and risk management. The Commiee maintains

regular dialogue with the US Special Security Arrangement

(SSA) Audit Commiee, and I was pleased to spend time

welcoming and onboarding the new Chair of the SSA Audit

Commiee during the second half of the financial year.

The Internal Audit function continues to be effective and

collaborative. It has been instrumental in informing the

Commiee’s work on a range of topics, including cash flow

forecasting and the associated target seing.

The key areas of focus for the Commiee are addressed

by the internal audit plan, the scope of work of the external

auditors and scheduled deep-dive review sessions.

The focus areas are set and evolve based on the

changing needs of the business and the risks it faces,

as it simplifies its strategy and investment case and

seeks to deliver more effectively for all stakeholders.

The Commiee’s detailed responsibilities are

set out in the Terms of Reference, available at:

www.qinetiq.com/en/who-we-are/corporate-governance.

The Commiee is content that it meets the relevant

responsibilities set out in the FRC’s External Audit:

Minimum Standard.

Looking ahead, the Audit Commiee is keen to oversee

further improvements and enhancements to the Group’s

control environment. The Provision 29 material controls

effectiveness declaration within the FY27 annual report

will be a key area of focus during the coming financial year.

I hope you find the information in this report about the

Commiee’s work helpful and I will be pleased to answer

any questions you have about it at this year’s AGM.

Shonaid Jemme-Page

Audit Commiee Chair

Providing oversight and challenge

through proportionate governance

and effective controls.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

104

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Audit Commiee

Report

Activities during the year

Financial reporting

During the year, the Commiee spent significant time

reviewing the most critical accounting estimates and

judgements inherent within the annual and interim financial

results. These include the assumptions within the goodwill

impairment testing, judgements relating to the future

costs and risks within long-term contracts, the quality of

income and the allocation between underlying performance

and specific adjusting items. The quality of income review

includes considering one-off items within the underlying

results and their consequence on the overall sustainability

of earnings. This assessment informs the Commiee’s work

on determining whether the accounts are fair, balanced and

understandable, and whether any adjustments should be

considered in remuneration calculations.

During the year, the Commiee held deep-dive sessions

into various topics, including the status and future

strategy of the pension scheme, debt financing and

covenant management, and tax strategy, including

OECD Pillar II compliance.

Fair, balanced and understandable

In accordance with the Code, the Board has established

processes to ensure that all reports and information

it is required to present in accordance with regulatory

requirements represent a fair, balanced and understandable

assessment of the Company’s performance, position

and prospects.

As such, the Audit Commiee was requested to provide

advice to the Board on whether the FY26 Annual Report and

Accounts, taken as a whole, provide a fair, balanced and

understandable assessment of the Company’s financial

position and future prospects and provide all information

necessary to a shareholder to assess the Group’s

performance, business model and strategy.

Following the established process, the Commiee

reflected on the information it had received and its

discussions throughout the year. The review is a

well-established and documented process involving

senior management and the core reporting team.

The assessment was assisted by an internal verification

of the factual content by management, a review at

different levels of the Group to ensure consistency and

overall balance, and a comprehensive review by the

senior management team and the external auditors.

The Board considers that the FY26 Annual Report

and Accounts, taken as whole, are fair, balanced and

understandable and provide the information necessary

for shareholders to assess the Company’s position,

and its performance, business model and strategy.

Rigour over non-financial reporting

(TCFD and other sustainability metrics)

The Companies (Strategic Report) (Climate-related

Financial Disclosure) Regulations 2022 place requirements

on QinetiQ to incorporate climate disclosures in the

Annual Report and Accounts. Since FY22, we have included

a section in this report which addresses the four TCFD

recommendation pillars (Governance, Strategy, Risk and

Metrics) and 11 disclosures. We are commied to continuous

improvement as guidance and methodologies mature.

The Commiee has reviewed the proposed disclosures

and endorsed the assumptions and judgements applied

by management.

With the growing and evolving body of non-financial

reporting requirements, the Audit Commiee charter

includes non-financial reporting, to ensure that the

Audit Commiee has oversight of non-financial reporting

(including TCFD). The Commiee has a standing agenda

item and is briefed quarterly. The Commiee is provided

with a reporting tracker providing progress on all current

reporting, an update on how new requirements are being

prepared for, and a horizon-scanning summary to look

further ahead. The TCFD reporting, on page 48,

has been reviewed and endorsed by the Commiee.

Internal financial controls

Internal financial controls are the systems that the

Group employs to support the Board in discharging its

responsibilities for financial maers and the financial

reporting process.

During the year, the Audit Commiee spent significant

time progressing management’s roadmap to the upcoming

required declaration relating to the effective operation of

material controls. The Commiee reviewed and challenged

the assessment of material controls and the proposed

scope for effectiveness testing and assurance strategy.

The Commiee maintains regular dialogue with the

US Special Security Arrangement (SSA) Audit Commiee,

regarding scope and coverage and the sharing of best

practice. The Commiee takes a keen interest in the

ongoing evolution of the US sector’s control environment

under the newly appointed SSA Audit Commiee Chair.

105

Audit Commiee

Report

Key issues and judgements impacting FY26 accounts

Issue

Key uncertainties and judgements

Review and challenge

Conclusion

Impairment

of goodwill

and

acquired

intangibles

The Group holds goodwill on its balance

sheet in respect of various Cash

Generating Units (CGUs).

An impairment review has been undertaken

to assess the level of headroom (the

difference between the net present value of

future cash flows and the carrying value of

net operating assets) in respect of all CGUs.

The impairment testing resulted in

headroom in all CGUs, and as such,

no impairments are required.

The Commiee reviewed the outputs of

management’s annual impairment testing

exercise, noting the use of external advisors

to prepare the technical assumptions

(discount rates, long-term inflation), which

have also been verified as appropriate by

the external auditors.

The Commiee held detailed discussions

with management and the external audit

team, specifically challenging revenue

and profit assumptions, as well as the

technical assumptions.

There are a wide range

of outcomes to the US

impairment test, which is

very sensitive to outer year

cash flows. On challenging

management, the

Commiee concluded that

management’s estimates

were reasonable and that

the associated disclosures

within the financial

statements are appropriate.

Long-term

contract

accounting

Risk

assessment on

key contracts

The Group has a large number of

contracts which span multiple periods

and are accounted for on a ‘percentage of

completion’ basis in accordance with IFRS 15.

Long-term contract accounting requires a

number of judgements and management

estimates to be made, particularly in

calculating the forecast costs to

complete the contract, and resultant

contract profitability.

The Commiee received commentary

from both management and the external

auditors in respect of the most significant

contracts being delivered by the Group and

discussed the main financial assumptions

(including level of risk reserves, assumed

forecast savings challenges and the use

of Monte-Carlo modelling).

The Commiee concluded

that management’s best

estimates were reasonable.

Specific

adjusting

items

The Group reports underlying performance,

which excludes the impact of specific

adjusting items.

The Commiee receives an update on the

nature and quantum of specific adjusting

items, as well as management assessment

as to their appropriate use.

The Commiee agreed with

management’s assessment

that the restructuring costs

and other such items are

distorting in nature and it

is therefore consistent

and helpful to the reader

to separate their impact.

Restructuring

costs

Specific adjusting items for FY26 includes

the costs of restructuring and a number

of associated impacts in the US.

Digital

investment

The ongoing one-off period of digital

investment continues to be included

as a specific adjusting item.

Provisions

and

contingent

liabilities

The Group holds provisions in respect of

legal, regulatory and environmental issues.

Judgement is required in determining

whether provisions are required.

The key judgements considered by the

Commiee were the quantum of the

potential costs involved, probability of

economic outflow, disclosure requirements,

and in relation to the Pendine incident,

that insurance will cover the cost of any

civil damages (with a provision of c£10.7m

being recorded together with an equally

offseing Other Receivable).

The Commiee concluded

that management’s best

estimates were reasonable.

Restructuring

and other

provisions

A residual provision is held in respect of the

restructuring, various obligations relating

to the sale and leaseback transaction, and

the incident at the MOD range at Pendine

in a previous financial year.

Pensions

Net pension

asset valuation

The Group’s net pension asset increased

during the year. The key assumptions relate

to inflation, discount rates, demographic

assumptions and liability experience data.

The Commiee reviewed and challenged

the results of the valuation exercise,

and the key assumptions used, noting

the use of external advisers to prepare

the calculations.

The Commiee concluded

that the assumptions

and outputs made by

management and the

external advisers

were reasonable.

Taxation

Key judgements

including

recoverability

of losses

The key accounting assumptions relating

to tax include tax and RDEC provisioning

and the recoverability of deferred tax

balances relating to historical losses.

During the prior year, the Group

derecognised the deferred tax balance

in respect of historical losses in the US.

The Commiee reviewed and challenged

the key judgements taken by management,

particularly relating to the future

recoverability of deferred tax relating to

losses, which will depend on the future

financial results of the relevant entities

and has linkages to the testing of goodwill

for impairment.

The Commiee concluded

that the judgements

made by management

were reasonable.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

106

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Audit Commiee

Report

Going concern and long-term viability statements

The acquisition of Avantus during FY23 took the Group

into a net debt position and the ongoing share buyback

programme has meant that the Group has maintained a net

debt position through FY26, with leverage as at 31 March

2026 of 0.5x. The Audit Commiee continues to pay close

aention to the Group’s net debt and leverage positions and

their underlying drivers, including free cash flow generation,

capital allocation including the ongoing share buyback

extension, and the availability of external debt financing.

The Commiee has again reviewed the annual going

concern and long-term viability assessments, in particular

considering the renewal dates of financing facilities and

key long-term customer contracts, forecast covenant

compliance, debt capacity and the implications of the

ongoing share buyback programme.

After review of the available information and challenge

of the underlying assumptions, the Commiee has

concluded that the Group will be able to continue in

operation and meet its liabilities as they become due

through the going concern period of 12 months from

21 May 2026, and that it agrees with the longer-term

viability statement. The Commiee considered it

appropriate that the long-term viability statement

continues to cover a five-year period. In reaching its

conclusion, the Commiee reviewed the budget for

the next financial year, the five-year business plan, the

stress-testing scenarios applied and the mitigating actions

available. The viability statement and the going concern

statement can be found in full on page 69, including the

detail on how the assessments were conducted.

Internal Audit

The Group Internal Audit function operates independently

as part of QinetiQ’s adoption of the Three Lines Model

(see page 66 for further details). The function continues

to provide an independent input to help maintain a robust

system of risk management and internal control, and also

to ensure there remains a collaborative approach to

assurance across the Group.

Group Internal Audit have formally reported to the Audit

Commiee four times during the year, with the Commiee

approving the annual audit plan, reviewing findings from

the audit reviews, and assessing the overall effectiveness

of the internal audit process. The audit plan for the year

was developed using a robust risk assessment, informed

by the Group’s strategic objectives, enterprise risk profile,

emerging risks, prior audit results, regulatory requirements

and management input.

The plan aims to ensure that significant financial and

non-financial risks are reviewed on a rolling basis, with the

plan built around a number of priorities including business

change and system implementations, overseas entities’

business controls, trade controls and compliance, and

project management processes and controls. Fraud risk

management was also a priority following the new

Economic Crime & Corporate Transparency Act that

includes an offence of failure to prevent fraud, with

further enhancements made to ensure the fraud risk

management framework is robust and effective.

The overall assessment following the audit and

assurance activity is that the control environment is

considered effective, with a culture conducive to

continual improvement of internal controls and risk

management processes.

As we progress into the next financial year, the Audit

Commiee recognises the importance of addressing the

new Provision 29 reporting requirements from the updated

UK Corporate Governance Code, while allowing sufficient

time to provide assurance over other important internal

projects, such as the new ERP system due to go live in the UK

and Australian businesses in the year. Other priority areas

include business resilience and project management.

The core UK-based audit team has remained stable in the

year, with the global reach enhanced by the recruitment of

an Internal Audit Manager in the US business. This will help

the delivery of a Group audit plan, with the function planning

to utilise the Group-wide resources across Group and

US-specific audits where possible.

107

Audit Commiee

Report

Risk management

The Group Risk Management function operates

independently within the business, as part of the

second-line assurance under QinetiQ’s adoption of

the Three Lines Model (see page 66 for further details).

The function works closely and collaboratively with the

business, providing an independent input to help develop

a robust system of risk management and internal control,

and is fully engaged with the ongoing work to prepare for

the upcoming required declaration relating to the effective

operation of material controls. The Commiee notes the

continual activity to monitor the risk landscape and ensure

the principal risks to the business are mitigated effectively

through robust and transparent risk management activity.

Treasury strategy and compliance

The Group Treasury policies and procedures provide a

robust framework of internal controls for the management

of treasury risks faced in a net debt environment. These

include monitoring of leverage and availability of liquidity

through Group cash forecasting, managing intra-Group

loans and financing arrangements, meeting our covenant

compliance and legal requirements for our banking

partners, and managing our financial exposures to foreign

exchange and interest rate fluctuations. The Commiee

continues to challenge and review this framework to ensure

that it is fit for purpose and robust enough to meet the

changing nature of financial and counterparty risks, the

interest rate environments and other macroeconomic

factors, and the banking sector’s policies on investing in the

defence sector, which impact the availability of liquidity.

Tax strategy and compliance

The Group Tax policies and procedures provide the

framework of internal controls for the management of

tax risks for the growing business in an ever-changing

global regulatory environment, in which tax transparency

has increasing prominence. The Commiee reviews the

Group’s tax affairs annually, which includes considering

the Group Tax Strategy, status of any tax audits and filings,

tax accounting judgements (including the recoverability of

deferred tax assets and any judgements relating to RDEC

income) and associated disclosures, the structuring of

key transactions, and important regulatory changes, such

as the adoption of global Pillar 2 compliance. The UK tax

authorities tested the Group Tax policies and procedures

during last year’s business risk review and provided an

overall low risk rating across all measures of systems and

delivery, governance and approach to tax compliance.

External audit

PwC audit scope

QinetiQ Limited, QinetiQ Australia Pty Ltd and QinetiQ’s

US sector (comprising the Foster Miller Inc, MTEQ and

Avantus entities) are ‘full scope’. Consistent with the

prior year, QinetiQ Target Systems Limited is also in scope

for inventory and intangible assets only. The Commiee

considers that the audit scope provides adequate audit

coverage over the consolidated financial statements.

Non-audit work and auditors’ independence

The Commiee is responsible for the Group’s policy, the

Code of Practice on non-audit services and the approval

of non-audit services. The Code of Practice is applicable

to all employees and sets out the principles for regulating

the award of non-audit work to the external auditors.

To safeguard the auditor’s independence and objectivity,

and in accordance with the FRC’s 2024 ethical standard,

the Group does not engage PwC for any non-audit services

except where it is work that they must, or are clearly

best-suited, to perform.

Accordingly, the Group’s policy for the engagement of the

auditors to undertake non-audit services broadly limits

these to audit-related services such as reporting to lenders

and grant providers, or where there is a requirement by

law or regulation to perform the work. All other non-audit

services are considered on a case-by-case basis in light of

the requirements of the ethical standard and in compliance

with the Group’s own policy.

The Commiee approves the terms of all audit services,

as well as permied audit-related and non-audit services,

in advance. Pursuant to the Code of Practice, any non-audit

services conducted by the external auditors require the

prior consent of the Group Chief Financial Officer or the

Chair of the Audit Commiee, and any services exceeding

£50,000 in value require the prior consent of the Commiee

as a whole.

For work that is permissible by type, the Commiee will take

into consideration the size of the contract in proportion

to the Group’s revenue and profit, and also the total size

when aggregated with other contracts with PwC, noting

that some non-auditing services are subject to an annual

regulatory 70% spending cap of the average of the audit

fees billed over the last three-year period.

It is also the Group’s policy that no former PwC employee may

be appointed to a senior position within the Group without

the prior approval of the Group Chief Financial Officer.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

108

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Audit Commiee

Report

Review of non-audit work during the year

The Commiee reviews the cost and nature of non-audit

work undertaken by the external auditors at three meetings

during the financial year as a standing item, with a fourth

meeting considering the auditor’s fees as part of the

year-end review. The Commiee concluded, prior to

engaging PwC for the provision of these services, that

there had not been any conflict of interest that might

compromise the independence of PwC’s audit. Fees paid

to PwC are set out in note 8 to the Consolidated Financial

Statements on page 165.

Non-audit related fees paid to the auditors during the year

were £0.17m (FY25: £0.17m), representing 9% (FY25: 9%) of

the audit fee. This included £0.12m (FY25: £0.12m) relating

to the review of the half-year results. Our annual review of

the external auditors takes into account the nature and

level of all services provided.

Review of the effectiveness and the independence

of the external auditors

At its September meeting, the Commiee discussed

the effectiveness of the external audit for FY25. PwC

continues to perform its audit work to a high standard,

with a deep understanding of the Company’s business,

key contracts, control processes and the maers on

which significant accounting judgements or estimates are

required. The Commiee is of the view that PwC provides

a well-considered validation and robust challenge of

management’s views as appropriate. Following several

recommendations made in previous years, the audit

process is now in a stable cycle of continuous improvement,

with no significant changes made during FY25 or FY26.

Audit appointment and partner succession

PwC was appointed as auditors of the Group at the 2017

Annual General Meeting (AGM) following a tender process.

PwC is now in its ninth year as auditors, with the external

audit engagement partner, John Ellis, in his fourth year,

having taken the lead for the FY23 audit cycle. The external

audit contract will be put out to tender at least every

10 years. During FY26, the Commiee has started planning

for an external audit tender to take place in FY27, to ensure

that PwC is reappointed or new auditors are appointed

for the FY28 audit cycle. The Commiee is of the view

that the timing for the audit tender strikes an appropriate

balance between continuity for the current audit firm and

consideration of alternative firms.

The Commiee and the Board will be recommending

PwC’s reappointment at the 2026 AGM for the FY27 cycle.

Governance

Audit Commiee structure

The Audit Commiee is comprised entirely of independent

Non-executive Directors and is chaired by Shonaid

Jemme-Page, who is considered by the Board to fulfil

the Code requirement of having recent and relevant

experience from the financial sector.

The Board considers the members of the Audit Commiee

to be independent and, in accordance with the Code, the

Board concludes that the Commiee as a whole possesses

competence relevant to the Group’s sector, having a range

of financial and commercial experience in the industry and

the commercial environment in which the Group operates.

The Group Chief Executive Officer, Group Chief Financial

Officer, Group Financial Controller, Group Director Internal

Audit, Group Director Risk & Assurance and representatives

of the external auditors aended all Commiee meetings

by invitation during the year. Twice a year we also welcome

the Chair of the US SSA Audit Commiee to update us

specifically on the internal controls and risk management

across the US business. The Commiee met with PwC

and the Group Director Internal Audit on two separate

occasions, without Executive Directors present, to discuss

the audit process and assure itself regarding resourcing,

auditors independence and objectivity.

Audit Commiee effectiveness review

The evaluation of the effectiveness of the Commiee

was conducted alongside the Board effectiveness

review. See more on pages 101 and 102. The outcome

of the evaluation confirmed that the Commiee continues

to operate highly effectively and determined that

Commiee members have good oversight of, and are able

to raise appropriate challenges in respect of, important

financial maers, such as management’s significant

accounting judgements and the implementation of

new accounting standards.

Statutory audit services compliance

The Company confirms that during the year under review,

it applied and was in compliance with the Competition and

Market’s Authority’s Order on statutory audit and services,

which relates to the frequency and governance of external

audit tenders and the seing of a policy on the provision of

non-audit services.

109

Risk & Security Commiee

Report

We will never stand still, we’ve improved

our processes, we have demonstrated

our willingness to invest to mitigate, and

we continue to horizon scan future risk.

Dear Shareholder,

I am pleased to present our Risk & Security Commiee

report for FY26, which describes our activities and areas

of focus during the year.

Key responsibilities

The Commiee’s primary functions are:

ɰ

To oversee the sound operation of the Group’s risk

management systems

ɰ

The ongoing review of the Group’s principal and

emerging risks (see pages 66 to 68)

ɰ

To oversee the Group’s physical and non-physical

security systems, including monitoring security

exposures and security culture, and considering

emerging security issues

ɰ

To ensure that health and safety risks are being

effectively managed across the Group

ɰ

To oversee the Group’s second-line assurance activity

over the first-line compliance activity taking place

across the Group’s functions and businesses

ɰ

To monitor adherence to the generic MOD

compliance system

ɰ

To review the Group’s policies, processes and controls

for the detection and prevention of bribery, corruption

and modern slavery and compliance with applicable

laws, regulations and codes of conduct

The Board assumes ultimate responsibility for the effective

management of risk across the Group, determining its

risk appetite and ensuring that each operating sector

implements appropriate internal controls. The Group’s

risk management systems are designed to appropriately

manage the risk of failure to achieve business objectives,

and thus can only provide reasonable and not absolute

assurance against material misstatement or loss.

ɰ

Rationalised the QinetiQ Assurance Model, ensuring

we meet all legal, regulatory and compliance

requirements, delivering risk-based assurance in

an efficient and effective manner

ɰ

Enhanced and embedded the Business Management

System, the single source for all policies and

requirements, to ensure an appropriate balance

of Group governance standards and locally

tailored implementation

ɰ

Upgraded the Enterprise Risk Management Framework,

improving the processes, governance and metrics and

competency across the organisation

ɰ

Developed the Security Management System to stay

ahead of the increasing threat profile, enhancing the

robustness of deployed operations and the tracking

and management of internal and external information

security threats

ɰ

Specific improvements to physical security measures

at key sites to proactively address growing threats,

identified through close working relationships with

our in-country security services

ɰ

Delivered a robust and assured new working

environment in the form of the Digital Workplace,

enabling first-class security protections and creating a

secure platform for collaborative work across our Group

ɰ

Focus on a strategic mix of oversight, resilience

and adaptability

ɰ

Further enhance our visibility of medium- to long-term

threats, embracing AI-enabled horizon-scanning tools

to scenario-plan risks to the business

ɰ

Increase the competency of first-line compliance

activities to create further efficiency

ɰ

Integrate project and enterprise risk to align

appetite and mitigation strategies fully throughout

the business

ɰ

Drive proactive continuous improvement through

embedding of the assurance model and associated

leading indicators

ɰ

Complete aligned activity to confirm compliance with

FRC UK Corporate Governance Code changes

ɰ

Drive a risk culture that ensures a predictable,

planned business with smooth performance

FY26 key highlights:

FY27 priorities:

General Sir Gordon Messenger

Risk & Security Commiee Chair

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

110

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

These systems are also designed to be sufficiently agile

to respond to changes in circumstances, such as

increased competition and disruptive business models,

technological advancements, economic volatility and

supply chain disruptions.

The Commiee’s detailed responsibilities are

set out in the Terms of Reference, available at:

www.qinetiq.com/en/who-we-are/corporate-governance.

Risk profile of the Group

In my view, risk management continues to be vital and

ever-improving within the organisation, as it needs to be

with the evolving threat landscape we face. We have robust

reviews and regular progress updates throughout the year

and conducted deep-dive workshops across each of our

principal risks, to ensure the alignment of our risk appetite

and mitigation strategies. The quarterly review of the Group

Risk Register, which is described further on page 65, has

evolved to focus on risk performance metrics, enabling the

Commiee to undertake its duties and make real progress in

understanding our risk profile, the true impact on the Group

and the mitigation strategies.

Geostrategic challenges

Ongoing challenges have been dominated by the increasing

threat landscape, with active war and heightened levels of

aggressive state actors emphasising that at no point can

the business be complacent in its approach to managing

and mitigating risk. Our role is to ensure that potential

threats are anticipated, mitigated and transformed into

opportunities for resilience and growth, of both the

Company and the customers we serve. QinetiQ continues

to do hazardous work safely, and has robust risk processes

to manage our activities on our sites and where we deploy

globally, to minimise risk and ensure safety.

Security profile of the Group

One of our core responsibilities is to oversee the Group’s

physical and non-physical security systems. As our future

success is dependent on our ability to exploit and operate

technology at pace while still retaining the rigorous levels

of security required by our customers and partners, the

Commiee members and I have, together with the Chief

Enterprise Services Officer, Group Director Security, and

Group Director Risk and Assurance, ensured that security

remains a focus area, and that the Commiee continues

to be able to oversee this key pillar. The Commiee

continues to be curious and is kept aware of the evolving

risks to QinetiQ as a defence, technology and engineering

Company by the notable experts employed by the business.

This ensures the commiee can actively engage with our

executives on leveraging tools, processes, systems and

people to address increasing risks arising from changing

cyber threats, climate change, and technological and

geopolitical instability.

The Risk & Security Commiee

risk management responsibilities

The Risk & Security Commiee has a close relationship

with the Audit Commiee which enhances the efficiency

and effectiveness of Board oversight. The Commiee

provides further scrutiny and assurance to the Board

that the required UK and international standards in risk

management, quality, security, and health and safety are

achieved. This includes ensuring that the organisation fulfils

its statutory requirements and duty of care. This assists

the Board in seing the risk appetite and reviewing and

assessing the Group’s risk management systems.

Risk & Security Commiee structure

All Directors are members of the Risk & Security Commiee,

which is chaired by General Sir Gordon Messenger. The Chief

Operating Officer, the Chief Enterprise Services Officer, the

Group Director Security, the Chief Information Officer, the

Chief Information Security Officer, the Group Director Risk

and Assurance and the Group Director Internal Audit aend

Commiee meetings by invitation to provide competent

input and periodic updates on maers of interest.

To ensure the Commiee has a comprehensive

understanding of how risk management processes have

been implemented, and to ensure that these are fully

embedded within the business’s day-to-day work,

deep-dives are presented to the Commiee by

employees who have first-hand knowledge of such

maers, i.e. perform the work on a daily basis.

Risk monitoring and reporting is incorporated into the

management of the business through the QinetiQ

Leadership Team and monthly performance reviews feed

into the Group strategy at the Executive and Board level.

I hope you find the information in this report about the

Commiee’s work helpful, and I will be pleased to answer

any questions you have about it at this year’s AGM.

General Sir Gordon Messenger

Risk & Security Commiee Chair

Risk & Security Commiee

Report

111

The risk management and risk monitoring processes are

divided as following:

Risk management

ɰ

Review risk management structures

and reporting lines (i.e. effectiveness

of control environment)

ɰ

Evaluate the effectiveness of risk

reporting processes, including risk

control assessment

ɰ

Review the effectiveness of risk

identification processes

ɰ

Consideration of any security issues

relating to the appointment of

external auditors

Risk monitoring

ɰ

Review of risk register and key exposures

ɰ

Monitor Health, Safety and

Environmental performance

ɰ

Scrutinise Internal Audit reports with

respect to risk and security issues

ɰ

Oversee international business governance

ɰ

Oversee application of applied anti-bribery

and corruption measures

Further reading

Risk management

65

Principal risks

66

Security management

The business employs a proactive threat assessment

process, with effective horizon-scanning for future and

emerging threats to the business to manage and mitigate

risk. Security Incident Management is achieved through

a Security and Information Governance process with

a defined structure and escalation process through

sectors, Group, Security and Information Council,

Security Steering Group and on to the Risk & Security

Commiee, to ensure visibility of current and emerging

risks and their management.

The Commiee is assured by the progress made by the

Group in the year, although, with the volatility of critical

regions globally, continued increasing incidence and

sophistication of cyber-aacks and the consequent need

for the Group to remain vigilant, the Commiee expects

security to remain one of its key areas of focus. The Security

Culture Survey conducted by the Group Security team,

covering the whole Group and aimed at understanding the

security maturity levels across four areas – information,

physical, cyber and personnel security – once again proved

invaluable in identifying areas for focus.

Cyber security

Given the nature of our business and emergent security

threats such as the adoption of artificial intelligence and

the broader geopolitical landscape, we continue to invest

in our Digital and Cyber Security programmes. This is most

visible through the roll-out of the Digital Workplace secure

working environment, which represents a significant

modernising of our IT infrastructure.

In combination with our wider education and culture

initiatives, we continued to strengthen our policies,

procedures, education and tooling to ensure we can

appropriately identify, assess and manage cyber security

risks. Our strategy remains under constant review and our

Cyber and Information Security Operating Model ensures

we best utilise our technical expertise and knowledge

across all business areas.

The Commiee continues to receive regular reports from

the CIO and CISO on our cyber and information security

risks, the performance of protective controls and the

progress of any ongoing security improvement activities.

Digital Transformation

At a time when cyber threats loom ever larger

and interconnectivity of information is vital to

keep pace with our customer expectations,

QinetiQ is delivering a secure cloud-based

IT environment across all of its territories. The

change programme encompasses the technical

tools, training and interconnectivity to provide

a state-of-the-art, secure digital environment

for our workforce to accelerate the way we

operate both internally and with our partners

while reducing overheads and mitigating cyber

threats as well as our delivery and growth risks.

Risk & Security Commiee

Report

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

112

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

All employees must complete mandatory cyber, information,

physical and personnel security training each year,

which focuses on our policies, procedures, culture and

behaviours, aligned to known threats. Our Group intranet

also includes a comprehensive Security Knowledge

Library which is used both individually and by leaders for

regular security engagements at team level. Our Security

professionals augment their already excellent competence

with select specialist advice from third parties, to ensure

we apply current best practice in all we do.

Business continuity and

crisis management

Our business continuity and crisis management procedures

have been designed for flexible arrangements when

responding to incidents and emergencies. They are

scalable and can be adapted to work in a wide range of

specific scenarios. We focus on resilience, informed by our

risk identification and assessment rather than individual

emergency scenarios. Our Crisis Management Plan sets

out a decision-making model and overarching management

response which supports the Leadership Team, and

ultimately the Board, in making effective decisions during an

incident. This has proved to be an effective approach, with

incidents managed well without causing adverse effects on

the business. Supplementary training has been provided to

the Leadership Team and we will continue with this approach

in FY27, including the effective exercising of our plans. We

continue to work with our customers, partners and suppliers

to ensure we have appropriate resilience on shared sites, in

our programmes and throughout our extended supply chain.

Self-certification process

An annual process of self-certification on the effectiveness

of internal controls is well established and embedded

across the Group, and has been enhanced in FY26 to ensure

we are identifying potential vulnerabilities as well as known

risks. This process provides a documented and auditable

trail of accountability for the operation of the system of

internal controls and continues to be our preferred tool to

tangibly assess the effectiveness of those controls in all

functions and sectors across the Group. It is informed by

a rigorous and structured self-assessment, with personal

accountability, that addresses compliance with Group

policies and processes, and provides a comprehensive level

of assurance to be given at higher levels of management

and, finally, to the Board.

Each Sector and Functional Chief Officer are required to

make a declaration that their system of internal controls

is effective, is fit for purpose and is being monitored

throughout the year. Any material risks, control failures or

non-compliance with the Group’s risk policies, legislation

and/or local delegations of authority must be highlighted as

part of this process. The outcomes of the self-certification

process, which is carried out at the full and half-year,

is reported to the Risk & Security Commiee by the Group

Director Risk and Assurance.

Generic MOD compliance system

A key aspect of the Commiee’s work is the oversight of the

UK Ministry of Defence’s (MOD) generic compliance system.

This is integral to the work of QinetiQ in its relationship with

the UK Government. The system is designed to give the

MOD customer confidence that QinetiQ is able to provide

impartial advice during any competitive evaluation of

a procurement opportunity where the Group wishes to

operate on both the ‘buy’ and the ‘supply’ sides.

The aim is to achieve a balance between meeting the needs

of the procurement customers in the MOD (principally

defence equipment & support) and the need to allow

QinetiQ the flexibility to commercialise research into the

supply chain and pursue its planned business activities,

without compromising the defence or security interests of

the UK. The Board nominates a senior manager within the

business to act as Compliance Implementation Director

(CID) for the programme, with assurance provided as an

integrated part of the Company’s assurance framework.

Anti-bribery and corruption

The Commiee oversees a zero-tolerance approach to

bribery and corruption, as confirmed by the Company’s

anti-bribery and corruption policy and the supporting local

policies that apply to members of its Group. The Group also

has in place a range of procedures, including regular training

targeted at potentially risk-exposed roles of our employees,

Group and local gifts and hospitality policies, and Group

and divisional procurement, contracting and partnering

practices, which are designed to prevent bribery. See more

on page 60.

Data privacy

The Company respects the personal data privacy of its

customers, employees and other individuals in respect

of whom it and members of its Group process personal

information. The Group therefore has in place policies which

mandate the lawful processing and protection of such

personal information in accordance with applicable laws

and procedures which are designed to achieve the same.

Any risks or exceptions to GDPR compliance are presented

to the Commiee at each Commiee meeting.

Risk & Security Commiee

Report

113

Effectiveness review

A performance evaluation of the Commiee is conducted

annually. This process is described further on page 101.

Frameworks for risk management

and internal control

The Board is responsible for promoting the long-term

success of the Company for the benefit of shareholders,

as well as taking account of other stakeholders, including

employees and customers. To discharge this responsibility,

the Board has established frameworks for risk management

and internal controls using the Three Lines Model (see

page 66), and reserves for itself the seing of the Group’s

risk appetite. In-depth monitoring of the establishment

and operation of prudent and effective controls to assess

and manage risks associated with the Group’s operations

is delegated to the Audit Commiee, complemented by the

work of the Risk & Security Commiee. However, the Board

retains ultimate responsibility for the Group’s systems of

internal controls and risk management and has reviewed

their effectiveness during the year. The frameworks

are regularly reviewed for prudency. They were in place

throughout the financial year under review and up to the

date of this report. They help ensure the Group complies

with the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) guidance on

Risk Management, Internal Controls and related financial

and business reporting.

After discussions with the Audit Commiee and the

Risk & Security Commiee, the Board conducts a robust

six-monthly assessment of the Group’s emerging and

principal risks and this year specifically considered the

principal risks facing the Company, including the impacts

to the Group’s business model and future performance,

which therefore require management prioritisation and

action when approving the Group business plan.

During the year, as part of the oversight process, the Board

and the Risk & Security Commiee received updates on

risks and associated mitigating actions. Principal risks were

also taken into account in the design of scenarios which

are intended to stress-test the Group’s five-year strategic

business plan, recovery plan, climate change impacts,

decisions on the return of capital to shareholders and

operational resilience.

Our risk management framework is designed to consistently

identify, evaluate, manage, monitor and report the

principal risks to the achievement of the Group’s strategic

objectives and is embedded throughout the Group. It is

codified through risk policy and associated processes and

procedures which set out the risk appetite, requirements

and controls for the Group’s worldwide operations.

The Group maintains a manual of financial reporting policies

which is compliant with International Financial Reporting

Standards (IFRS). An internal control framework is in place

across the Group which covers Group financial reporting

and local statutory reporting activity. The process follows

a risk-based approach, with management identification of

key financial reporting-related controls.

Board oversight of risk management

The Board’s delegated responsibilities regarding

oversight of risk management and the approach to internal

controls are set out on page 66. There are strong working

relationships between the Board Commiees, which enable

robust oversight of internal controls and risk management.

Commiees provide regular reports to the Board on

their activities and escalate significant maers where

appropriate. The responsibilities and activities of each

Board Commiee are set out in the Commiee reports.

Rapid Performance Improvement

Agility and pace continue to drive the defence

domain, and have been brought into sharp

focus with developing conflicts globally.

QinetiQ underwent a rapid transformation project

to simplify how we govern and release bids to

our customers, to increase the speed at which

we can turn customer requirements into outputs.

This project reduced our average bid phase time

by over 30%, with work underway to replicate these

improvements in the delivery phase. By increasing

the pace of delivery and maintaining our high

levels of quality, we are mitigating our growth

and competitor risks.

Risk & Security Commiee

Report

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

114

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Directors’

Remuneration Report

Reward decisions for FY26

Our resilient financial performance has delivered orders and

cash flow above target, with revenue and profit out-turns

between threshold and target. The formulaic FY26 Annual

Bonus Plan (ABP) ouurn was 70.7% of the maximum for both

Steve Wadey (CEO) and Martin Cooper (CFO). The payment

for FY26 will be structured as 70% in cash and 30% in shares,

deferred for two years.

The third grant under the Long-term Performance Award

(LPA) was made in July 2025, with the same scorecard of

performance metrics as the July 2024 award, comprising:

cumulative underlying operating profit; Return on Capital

Employed (ROCE); and total revenue growth. Stretch targets

remain aligned to the Company’s growth ambitions.

The final contingent share award under the legacy Deferred

Share Plan (DSP), which was granted in FY23, based on

performance in that year, will vest in June 2026, as the

profit underpin set at grant was met. There will be no

further awards vesting under the DSP.

Having concluded its three-year performance period,

the first grant under the LPA, made in September 2024,

will vest at 42.3% of the maximum award, recognising

partial achievement of the stretching performance targets.

The award will vest in September 2026 and be subject to

a two-year hold period.

The FY26 CEO single figure shown on page 119 reports a

252.5% increase against the ouurn achieved in FY25.

This movement reflects the Commiee’s decision, at the

recommendation of the CEO, to reduce the FY25 annual

bonus to zero as well as the inclusion of the vested value of

the legacy FY23 DSP and FY24 LPA in this year’s single figure,

as required by the regulations. It should be noted that the

FY26 annual bonus is lower than the equivalent award in FY24,

when the bonus paid out at 87.5%. Given the strong progress

in challenging geopolitical and market environments, the

Commiee believes that the FY26 CEO compensation fairly

reflects the performance achieved by the Company.

In assessing the remuneration outcomes, the Commiee

has continued to carefully assess the potential impact on

incentive targets of the ongoing share buyback programme,

which commenced in June 2025 and involves the gradual

purchase and cancellation of up to £200m of shares over

24 months.

The Commiee confirms that no current incentive plans

measure performance on a ‘per share’ basis and that there

has been no direct financial performance boost from the

share buyback. Therefore, the Commiee concluded that

no adjustment to incentive outcomes was required.

Dear Shareholder,

FY26 has been a transitional year as we navigated tough

near-term market conditions across our key markets in

a heightened global threat environment.

Despite these conditions, the Group has delivered a record

order backlog and strengthened its forward order pipeline,

providing confidence in the long-term fundamentals of

the business.

The decisive actions taken by management last year,

supported by the Board, have improved operational

discipline, driven efficiencies and contributed to

a recovery in Group margins to expected levels.

Dina Knight

Remuneration Commiee Chair

Strengthening performance and

aligning reward to deliver long term

sustainable growth.

115

Directors’ remuneration policy

The existing Policy was introduced in 2023 after an

extensive review by the Commiee, incorporating broad

consultation with shareholders. The Policy received an

84.3% ‘For’ vote at the 2023 AGM.

Over the last 12 months we have been reviewing the Policy

and further consulting with major shareholders to ensure

it remains effective and aligned with our strategy.

The current Policy represented a fundamental shift in our

approach to Executive Director remuneration when it was

introduced and the Commiee’s starting assumption was

that major changes would not be appropriate until the

Policy had been in place for further cycles. Substantive

feedback indicated that the Policy was performing in line

with expectations, although two areas were identified for

further improvement:

ɰ

In order to strengthen alignment of the long-term

reward outcomes with earnings growth and

sustainable shareholder value creation, the

LPA’s current underlying operating profit metric

will be replaced by a cumulative earnings per share

(EPS) metric.

ɰ

The Commiee also received feedback that the

existing tapered post-employment guidelines were

behind market practice. We have therefore taken the

decision to increase the post-employment share

ownership requirements to 200% of salary for two

years post termination of employment (from 100% in

year one and 50% in year two). This higher requirement

will apply to any shares acquired from grants made

under the Company’s share plans after the approval

of the new Policy at the 2026 AGM.

Salary review

As disclosed in last year’s report, in light of the below

expectations performance in FY25 and the trading update

issued in March 2025, the Remuneration Commiee took

a number of actions, including exercising its discretion

to reduce the FY25 ABP ouurn to zero and, at the CEO’s

request, to defer its decision on the level of his July 2025

salary increase until the end of FY26. Having carefully

considered and reviewed FY26 performance, which saw

strong delivery and improved operational discipline

resulting in greater efficiencies and improved margins,

the Commiee was satisfied that a 3% increase should be

awarded, effective from 1 April 2026. This increase is below

the level of the workforce increase and also slightly below

the increase awarded to the CFO in respect of FY26.

For FY27, the overall salary review budget for UK employees

is 4%, with new salaries effective from 1 July 2026 in-line with

the Group’s normal practice. The Commiee has determined

that the increase for the CEO will be 3.5% effective from

1 July 2026. For the CFO, the Commiee has reviewed the

level of his salary in light of his strong performance and

development in the role since his appointment in September

2024. Following its review the Commiee determined that

his salary should be increased to a level consistent with

other CFO roles in comparable UK listed companies and has

therefore awarded an increase of 6.4%. This is moderately

above the wider workforce increase, but is consistent with

increases awarded to other high performing employees

within the business with salaries positioned below the

median of the benchmark for their role.

Implementation for FY27

For FY27, Revenue has been included as an additional

financial metric within the ABP, alongside the existing

metrics of orders, profit and cash as in FY26. Stretch targets

are aligned with the FY31 Integrated Strategy-to-perform

Plan (ISP) with half-year and full-year targets to drive

consistent operational performance. Each financial

metric will have an equal weighting of 20%, with a total

weighting of 80% (increased from 75%) and non-financial

targets reducing to 20% (from 25%). As in prior years,

the non-financial targets are a combination of personal

and strategic goals, including selected ESG metrics.

The Commiee has reviewed the performance metrics

for the FY27 LPA three-year performance period and has

decided to simplify the plan to two metrics. Following

shareholder feedback, for FY27, these will be EPS, measured

cumulatively over three years, which will replace cumulative

profit, and ROCE. The revenue metric used in prior plans

has been removed from the LPA going forward following

its inclusion in the annual incentive.

While consideration was given to introducing a relative

Total Shareholder Return (TSR) metric, a detailed review

has concluded that it is not currently suitable for QinetiQ.

TSR remains heavily driven by market sentiment and

external factors and analysis provided to the Commiee

found no peer group with sufficiently comparable business

fundamentals to ensure payouts would align with Company

performance and shareholder value creation. Similarly,

broad equity indices such as the FTSE 250 showed

weak correlation with QinetiQ’s share price, meaning

these would likely produce outcomes misaligned with

underlying performance.

Directors’

Remuneration Report

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

116

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Employee engagement and reward

The Group CEO and the Chief People Officer have held

regular discussions with our Global Employee Voice (GEV)

representatives on reward maers. Members of the Board

also met with the GEV representatives twice in FY26. The

social section on page 53 details our employee engagement

activity.

The expertise, pride and values of our people are key to

the delivery of our strategy. Their commitment to our

customers over the year has enabled us to deliver improving

performance despite the challenging external environment

and the need to control our costs.

The Company operates a range of incentive and reward

programmes throughout the organisation that align our

people with our goals. These arrangements are tailored to

reflect employee levels and specific market conditions.

This includes an All Employee Incentive Scheme (AEIS)

under which every eligible employee can earn a payment

if the Company achieves a level of operating profit within

a predetermined range from target to stretch.

The AEIS is a key element of the Company’s Rewarding

for Performance framework, aligning employees with

shareholder interests by incentivising and rewarding

profitable growth. The potential lump-sum payment

ranges from £500 to £1,250 per employee. In addition,

high-performing employees can earn up to an additional

5% of salary based on personal performance rating.

For FY26, a £500 payment was awarded to all employees

in recognition of their contribution towards the

performance of the business.

Our Group Hardship Fund and Employee Assistance

Programme (EAP) continue to provide vital support to our

people experiencing personal challenges. We also continue

to uphold our commitment to paying above the UK Real

Living Wage and supporting employees with an income

that enables meaningful retirement contributions.

Conclusion

The Commiee remains focused on ensuring that executive

remuneration is aligned with performance, supports

delivery of the Group’s strategy, and reflects the interest

of shareholders and the wider workforce.

As we look ahead, our priorities remain clear: to support

the delivery of sustainable growth, maintain strong

performance discipline, and ensure that reward outcomes

remain appropriately aligned to both financial performance

and long-term value creation.

I hope that we can rely on your vote in support for

the Directors’ remuneration report at the AGM on

16 July 2026. I would welcome comments and questions

from shareholders in relation to this Directors’

remuneration report and I can be contacted through

[email protected].

Dina Knight

Remuneration Commiee Chair

21 May 2026

QinetiQ’s Gender Pay Gap data can be found on our website

at www.qinetiq.com

Directors’

Remuneration Report

117

Fixed pay

Annual Bonus Plan

ABP

Long-term Performance Award

LPA

Remuneration

at a glance

FY26 Annual Bonus Plan performance metrics

FY26 Long-term Performance Award performance metrics

Components of executive remuneration

Orders

Organic underlying operating

profit on a three-year cumulative basis

Underlying operating profit

Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)

Underlying net cash flow from operations

Total revenue growth

Personal goals

Incentive

Incentive

Weighting

Weighting

Link to strategy

Link to strategy

Enables us to assess the execution of our

strategy to grow the Group.

Ensures consistent and sustained

financial performance.

Used for performance analysis as a measure

of operating profitability.

Captures how investments are converted

into sustainable financial returns.

Gives an indication of the ability to make

discretionary investments and pay dividends.

Demonstrates ability to grow market share

and deliver long-term sustainable growth.

Aligning personal performance to core

metrics around safety, engagement and

the environment.

25.0%

35.0%

25.0%

35.0%

25.0%

30.0%

25.0%

Competitively designed to aract and

retain the talent required to lead our

business. Set on appointment and

regularly reviewed and aligned with

the wider employees of the Group.

Revised policy changes

No change in prior-year

implementation.

The ABP rewards strong financial and

non-financial business performance,

aligning with shareholders to promote

longer-term sustainable focus.

Revised policy changes

No change in prior-year

implementation.

The LPA incentivises long-term

performance and growth, with

share-based payouts held for two

years to reinforce sustainable,

shareholder-aligned performance.

Revised policy changes

No change in prior-year implementation.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

118

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Remuneration

at a glance

To create strong alignment between executive

remuneration and the long-term interests of our

shareholders, the ABP is paid partly in deferred shares

vesting two years after the award was earned.

The LPA has a three-year performance period,

after which any vested shares must be retained

by the Executive for a further two years.

The FY26 CEO single figure shown above includes the vested value of the legacy FY23 DSP

and FY24 LPA, as required by the regulations. The FY25 single figure reflects the Commiee’s

decision, at the recommendation of the CEO, to reduce the FY25 annual bonus to zero.

The FY26 CFO single figure includes the vested value of the first part of the Compensation

Share Plan (CSP) awarded in part for share awards which were forfeited on resigning from

his former employer. The FY25 single figure for the CFO is lower as it is pro-rated based on

a mid-year start date.

Timing

Single figure FY26

Core elements of our employee reward offering include:

ɰ

A fair base salary for employees, recognising individual

performance and contribution

ɰ

Support for career growth and progression

ɰ

Incentives aligned with role seniority, including

the All Employee Incentive Scheme recognising

Company performance

ɰ

A recognition scheme celebrating the contribution

of individuals and teams

ɰ

Living wage employer accreditation

Wider workforce remuneration

67:1

ratio of the CEO’s to the pay

of UK employees (FY25 25:1)

46.9%

of employees are in the

Share Incentive Plan

+4.7%

increase in employee

remuneration in FY26

YEAR 1

YEAR 2

YEAR 3

YEAR 4

YEAR 5

Fixed pay

ABP

LPA

Fixed pay

Pay at risk subject to performance conditions

Shares held, not subject to performance conditions

Fixed pay

Annual Variable Pay

Long-term Variable Pay

£880 £861

£917

£917

£1,454

£4,006

£1,028

£2,451

Steve Wadey

Group Chief Executive

£6,376

£4,396

£1,740

F

Y26

F

Y26 MAX

F

Y25

(£’000)

£304

£541

£541

£933

£624

£659

£624

Martin Cooper

Group Chief Financial Officer

£2,097

£1,824

£304

F

Y26

F

Y26 MAX

F

Y25

(£’000)

119

Ensuring executive pay is closely linked to the

Company’s strategy, long-term value creation

and shareholder interests.

ɰ

A significant proportion of remuneration is variable

and equity-based, with bonuses partly deferred

into shares and long-term incentives vesting over

several years.

ɰ

Share-ownership guidelines requiring leaders

to build and maintain a meaningful equity stake,

aligning executive financial interests with

shareholders over the long term.

Ensuring executives are incentivised to deliver results

within a robust governance and risk framework.

ɰ

Incentive outcomes are subject to clearly defined

financial and non-financial performance conditions,

with the Remuneration Commiee retaining

discretion to adjust payouts where outcomes do

not reflect underlying performance.

ɰ

Deferral, malus and clawback provisions further

reinforce accountability over time.

Driving strong, sustained financial and operational

performance over both short and long-term time periods.

ɰ

The structure balances annual incentives

(short-term delivery) with long-term awards

(multi-year performance) using stretching targets

such as orders, profit, revenue, cash, EPS and ROCE.

This ensures consistent focus on both short-term

execution and long-term growth.

Encouraging behaviours that support teamwork,

shared goals and a positive organisational culture.

ɰ

The Annual Bonus Plan incorporates non-financial

metrics in the form of personal objectives,

including ESG-related measures, to reward not

only the delivery of critical outcomes but also

how they are achieved. The definition of goals and

targets promotes cross-functional collaboration,

responsible decision-making and alignment with

Company values.

Our remuneration philosophy

How our approach to remuneration creates alignment with our key stakeholders.

Alignment

Accountability

Performance

Collaboration

Our approach

Our key principles

Remuneration

at a glance

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

120

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Directors’

Remuneration Policy

Introduction

Having substantially revised and simplified the Policy in

2023, the Commiee concluded that the Policy remains

effective, with outcomes that align with the Company’s

performance and shareholder experience, supports the

delivery of our strategy, maintains leadership focus during

a period of operational momentum, and remains

appropriately competitive within the market.

Therefore, the Commiee is not proposing any changes

to the incentive structures or maxima; however, they have

used the review as an opportunity to take a comprehensive

look at the Long-term Performance Award (LPA) plan

metrics, to ensure the metrics continue to support the

Company’s strategic objectives, and to update the share

ownership requirements to ensure executives continue

to be aligned with shareholders following the end of their

employment at QinetiQ.

The review process

The Commiee led the review process throughout, taking

account of market practice and the views of executives

and external advisers, as appropriate, to help shape our

thinking. No individual is involved in the decision-making

on their own remuneration.

We engaged with our largest shareholders representing

over 54% of the register to explain the Policy and the positive

impact it will have on Company performance and culture and

revised the initial proposals to reflect the input received.

The Remuneration Commiee therefore seeks approval

for the Policy at the AGM on 16 July 2026.

Scope of Policy

The Policy applies to Executive Directors, the Group Chair

and Non-executive Directors. Reference may also be made

to the QinetiQ Leadership Team who, while not Directors,

fall within the Remuneration Commiee’s remit, although

the Policy is not binding for these individuals.

Changes to the Policy

The post-employment share ownership requirement will

be increased from 100% of salary for the first year after

termination and 50% for the second year to 200% of salary

for two years post termination, to align more closely with UK

governance best practice and shareholder expectations.

This higher requirement will apply to any shares acquired

from grants made under the Company’s share plans after

the approval of the new policy at the 2026 AGM.

For future new hires at Executive Director level, flexibility

will be included in relation to in-employment share-

ownership requirements, to ensure that the level of holding

requirement is appropriate in the circumstances and is

appropriately stretching based on the ability of a new hire to

comply with the requirement within an expected five-year

time period. Therefore, in future, the Commiee will set the

level at appointment of any new Executive Director, taking

into account the role, market practice at that time, any

on-hire awards (e.g. buy-outs) delivered in shares and the

annual award maxima under the LPA, with the requirement

being not less than 200% of salary.

No further changes are proposed for the future Policy other

than minor changes to the text to improve clarity or reflect

the passage of time.

Discretion

The Commiee has discretions in several areas of Policy as

set out in this report or as provided in the relevant plan rules.

The Commiee commits to communicating to shareholders

when discretion is used.

121

Base salary

Pension allowance

Benefits

To aract and retain

the talent needed to

lead our business.

To ensure that

Executive Directors’

total remuneration

remains aractive

and competitive.

To ensure that

Executive Directors’

total remuneration

remains aractive

and competitive.

An Executive Director’s base salary is set on

appointment and reviewed annually or when there

is a change in position or responsibility.

When determining an appropriate level of salary,

the Commiee considers:

ɰ

General salary rises to employees;

ɰ

Remuneration practices within the Group;

ɰ

Any change in scope, role and responsibilities;

ɰ

The general performance of the Group;

ɰ

The experience of the relevant Director;

ɰ

The economic environment; and

ɰ

Pay levels for similar roles among

appropriate comparators.

Individuals who are recruited or promoted to the Board

may, on occasion, have their salaries set below the

targeted policy level until they become established

in their role. In such cases subsequent increases

in salary may be higher than the general rises for

employees until the target positioning is achieved.

The Company provides a pension contribution

allowance in line with practice relative to its

comparators to enable the Company to recruit and

retain Executive Directors with the experience

and expertise to deliver the Group’s strategy.

The allowance is non-consolidated and does not

impact any incentive calculations.

Benefits include car allowance, health insurance,

life assurance, income protection, expenses incurred

which HMRC may deem taxable and membership of the

Group’s employee Share Incentive Plan which is open

to all UK employees (the Executive Directors will also

be eligible to participate in any other all-employee

plan operated by the Company from time to time).

The Commiee recognises the need to maintain

suitable flexibility in the benefits provided to ensure

it is able to support the objective of aracting and

retaining personnel to deliver the Group strategy.

Additional benefits may therefore be offered

such as relocation allowances on recruitment

or where new benefits are introduced for the

wider employee population.

Typically, the base salaries of Executive Directors in

post at the start of the policy period and who remain

in the same role throughout the policy period will be

increased by a similar percentage to the average

annual percentage increase in salaries of all other

employees in the Group. The exceptions to this rule

may be where:

ɰ

An individual is below market level and a decision

is taken to increase base pay to reflect proven

competence in the role; or

ɰ

There is a material increase in scope or

responsibility to the Executive Director’s role.

The Commiee ensures that maximum salary levels

are positioned in line with companies of a similar size

to QinetiQ and validated against other companies

in the industry, so that they are competitive against

the market.

The Commiee intends to review the comparators

periodically and may add or remove companies from

the Group as it considers appropriate.

The maximum policy pension allowance is aligned

with the Company pension contribution paid to

the majority of UK pension scheme members

(which is currently 10.5% of salary).

The maximum is the cost of providing the

relevant benefits.

Executive Directors’ Remuneration Policy

The Policy will be put forward for approval at the AGM on 16 July 2026. This Policy covers the three-year period commencing

1 April 2026 and complies with the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounting and Reports) (Amendment)

Regulations 2013.

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation and performance measures

Maximum opportunity

Directors’

Remuneration Policy

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

122

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Annual incentive: Annual Bonus Plan (ABP)

Long-term incentive: Long-term Performance Award (LPA)

The ABP provides an incentive

for the Executive Directors

to achieve targets that are

entirely aligned to the

Company’s strategy.

The ABP rewards strong

sustainable financial

performance through an 80%

weighting for FY27 on core

financial metrics, driven by the

implementation of our strategy.

The ABP also rewards non-

financial performance through

the delivery of key goals related

to environment (Net-Zero

roadmap), employee engagement

and inclusion and safety in

addition to the achievement

of personal goals.

The partial deferral of any ABP

payment into shares drives

a long-term and sustainable

focus aligned to the interests

of shareholders.

The LPA provides an incentive

for the Executive Directors to

achieve long-term financial

targets that are entirely aligned to

the Company’s strategy and the

creation of shareholder value.

With regard to the FY27 targets:

Cumulative earnings per share

(50% weighting): Replacing

the cumulative profit metric

used in previous cycles, to

deliver consistent operational

performance over the longer

term. Understood, relevant

and actionable for QinetiQ

senior leaders.

Returns (50% weighting):

To drive robust investment

selection and delivery.

The delivery of any LPA in shares

which must be held for a further

two years drives a long-term and

sustainable focus aligned to the

interests of shareholders.

The ABP is an annual incentive plan with a one-year performance

measurement period, with any award paid partly in deferred shares:

ɰ

A maximum award of 200% of salary is available each year.

ɰ

At the end of the first year 70% of the award is paid as

a cash bonus.

ɰ

The remaining 30% is deferred as an award of deferred shares

that must be held for two years, and are subject to malus and

clawback for up to three years from the payment date.

ɰ

Dividend equivalents will be paid on the deferred shares.

ɰ

The financial metrics will normally not be less than 60% of

the overall weighting.

In exceptional circumstances the Commiee retains the

discretion to:

ɰ

Change the performance measures and targets and the

weighting aached to the performance measures and targets

part way through a performance year if there is a significant

and material event which causes the Commiee to believe

the original measures, weightings and targets are no longer

appropriate; for example adjustments for: acquisitions and

disposals; restructuring costs; business structure changes;

restated corporate allocations; foreign currency exchange

rates; and Board-approved budget adjustments; and

ɰ

Make downward or upward adjustments to the amount

of incentive earned resulting from the application of the

performance measures, if the Commiee believes that the

incentive outcomes are not a fair and accurate reflection of

business performance.

Vesting of the LPA award will be determined by performance

against a scorecard of three-year performance measures, the

majority of which will be financial (which will not duplicate those for

the ABP). Any vested shares must be held for a further two years.

Malus and clawback provisions apply to the LPA.

The Commiee will normally provide dividend equivalents on

vested shares under the LPA.

In exceptional circumstances the Commiee retains the

discretion to:

ɰ

Change the performance measures and targets and the

weighting aached to the performance measures and targets

part way through a performance year if there is a significant

and material event which causes the Commiee to believe

the original measures, weightings and targets are no longer

appropriate; for example adjustments for: acquisitions and

disposals; restructuring costs; business structure changes;

restated corporate allocations; foreign currency exchange

rates; and Board-approved budget adjustments;

ɰ

Make downward or upward adjustments to the amount

of incentive earned resulting from the application of the

performance measures, if the Commiee believes that the

incentive outcomes are not a fair and accurate reflection of

business performance; and

ɰ

Scale back incentive awards at grant if there were to be

a substantial Company share price fall.

Maximum = 200% of salary.

Target = 100% of salary.

Threshold = 0% of salary.

Maximum = 250% of salary.

Target = 125% of salary.

Threshold = 50% of salary.

No more than 20% of each

element of the LPA may vest at

threshold levels of performance.

Directors’

Remuneration Policy

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation and performance measures

Maximum opportunity

123

Directors’

Remuneration Policy

Notes to the policy table

Performance measures and targets

The performance measures and targets, financial and non-financial, are determined annually based on the Company’s

strategy. Targets are set taking into account a variety of inputs including but not limited to the strategic plan, the annual

plan and brokers’ forecasts. The measures and, where possible, the targets will be disclosed after the end of the relevant

financial year in that year’s remuneration report.

Remuneration policy for all employees

All employees of QinetiQ are eligible for base salary, benefits

and pension.

The link between performance and reward cascades down

from the Executive incentive plans with the Leadership

and Business Development Communities typically

invited to participate in the Company’s formal annual

incentive arrangements. All other employees may receive

a discretionary bonus based on Company and individual

performance. Participation in long-term incentive plans is

available to Executive Directors, QinetiQ Leadership Team

members, Leadership Community and selected other

employees. Share ownership is further encouraged via

the QinetiQ Share Incentive Plan.

The Remuneration Commiee is made aware of pay,

incentives and benefits by grade across the Company and

the relevant costs. This is actioned by an annual report to

the Commiee which also includes details of any changes

in remuneration policy for all employees during the year.

Recruitment policy

The Company’s principle is that the remuneration of any new

recruit will be assessed in line with the current Executive

Directors. The Commiee is mindful that it wishes to

avoid paying more than it considers necessary to secure

a preferred candidate with the appropriate calibre and

experience needed for the role. In seing the remuneration

for new recruits, the Commiee will have regard to guidelines

and shareholder sentiment regarding one-off or enhanced

short-term or long-term incentive payments as well as giving

consideration for the appropriateness of any award. The

Company’s detailed policy when seing remuneration for

the appointment of new Directors is summarised below.

Salary, benefits and pension

These will be set in line with the policy for existing

Executive Directors.

Incentive Plans

Maximum annual participation will be set in line with the

Company’s policy for existing Executive Directors and

will not exceed 450% of salary in aggregate.

Minimum shareholding requirements – during and after employment

To align Executive

Directors’ interests with

those of shareholders

through the build-up and

retention of a personal

holding in QinetiQ shares.

Executives have five years to accumulate the

required shareholding.

300% of base salary for the current CEO.

200% of base salary for the current CFO.

For new appointments, no less than 200% of base

salary for Executive Directors.

For share grants or purchases made before the

2026 AGM:

Executive Directors will have a post-employment

shareholding requirement of 100% of salary for the

first year post cessation, then 50% of salary for the

second year post cessation of employment.

For shares acquired from grants made after the

2026 AGM:

Executive Directors will have a post-employment

shareholding requirement of 200% of salary for

two years post cessation of employment.

The Commiee has adopted formal shareholding

requirements to encourage the Executive Directors to

build up over a five-year period and then subsequently

hold a shareholding equivalent to a percentage of

base salary. Adherence to these requirements is a

condition of continued participation in the equity

incentive arrangements. This policy ensures that

the interests of Executive Directors and those of

shareholders are closely aligned.

Executive Directors are required to retain at least

50% of the post-tax amount of vested shares from

the Company incentive plans until the minimum

shareholding requirement is met and maintained.

Vested awards under the LPA must be retained

by the participant for two years post vesting to

further support the post-employment shareholding

requirement where an Executive Director leaves

the Company.

The Commiee retains the discretion to increase

the shareholding requirements.

Purpose and link to strategy

Requirement

Operation

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

124

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Directors’

Remuneration Policy

Depending on the timing of the appointment, the

performance measures and targets used for the first award

may differ to those of the existing Executive Directors.

If different, they will be explained in detail in the following

relevant Directors’ Remuneration Report.

Maximum variable remuneration

The maximum variable remuneration which may be granted

is 450% of salary (excluding any buy-outs).

Relocation policies

In instances where the new Executive Director is required

to relocate or spend significant time away from their normal

residence, the Company may provide one-off compensation

to reflect the cost of relocation for the Executive Director.

The level of the relocation package will be assessed on a

case-by-case basis but will take into consideration any cost

of living differences/housing allowance and schooling.

Buy-out awards

Where the Commiee determines that it is necessary to

buy out previous entitlements forfeited on cessation of

an Executive Director’s previous employment, the value

of such a buy-out award will be calculated taking into

account the following:

ɰ

The proportion of the vesting period completed on the

date of cessation of employment;

ɰ

The performance conditions aached to the vesting

of the entitlements and the probability of them being

satisfied; and

ɰ

Any other terms and conditions having a material effect

on their value.

The Commiee may then agree to compensate for the value

forfeited using, where possible, existing incentive plans.

To the extent that it is not possible or practical to provide

the buy-out within the terms of existing incentive plans,

a bespoke arrangement would be used, using any flexibility

provided under the Listing Rules.

Where an existing employee is promoted to the Board,

the policy set out above would apply from the date of

promotion but there would be no retrospective application

of the policy in relation to subsisting incentive awards or

remuneration arrangements.

Service contracts

Current Executive Directors have open-ended service

contracts terminable by the Company immediately without

notice upon breach by the individual or by the Company

giving to the individual 12 months’ wrien notice or, at its

discretion, payment in lieu of salary, pension and benefits

only during that notice. The payment in lieu of notice may be

made in staged payments and may either reduce or cease

completely where the departing Executive Director gains

new employment. The Executive Director may terminate

their contract by giving the Company 12 months’ wrien

notice. Contracts for new Executive Directors will be limited

to 12 months’ notice by both parties (or payment in lieu of

notice in respect of the Company).

Copies of the service contracts are available for inspection

at the Company’s registered address.

The Group Chair and the Non-executive Directors have

leers of appointment and are appointed for initial fixed

terms of three years, subject to re-election at each Annual

General Meeting. The Group Chair and the Non-executive

Directors are not entitled to any payment in lieu of notice or

any compensation for loss of office.

The dates of the service contracts, leers of appointment

and unexpired term periods are set out in the Annual Report

on Remuneration (page 139).

Loss of office and change of

control policy

When determining any loss of office payment for a departing

Executive Director the Commiee will always seek to

minimise the cost to the Company while complying with the

contractual terms and seeking to reflect the circumstances

in place at the time. The Commiee reserves the right to

make additional payments where such payments are made

in good faith in discharge of an existing legal obligation

(or by way of damages for breach of such an obligation);

or by way of selement or compromise of any claim arising

in connection with the termination of an Executive Director’s

office or employment.

‘Good leaver’ is a person whose cessation of employment is

for one of the following reasons:

ɰ

Death; ill-health; injury or disability; redundancy;

retirement; employing Company ceasing to be a Group

Company; transfer of employment to a Company

which is not a Group Company; and where the person

is designated a good leaver at the discretion of the

Commiee (as described above).

A person who ceases employment in circumstances other

than those set out above is designated as an ‘other leaver’.

125

Directors’

Remuneration Policy

The Commiee has a number of discretions, including in relation to the determination of a good leaver. Any exercise of the

Commiee’s discretions will be disclosed in full to shareholders.

Salary, benefits (on cessation of employment)

Pension (on cessation of employment)

Annual Bonus Plan (on cessation of employment)

Annual Bonus Plan (on change of control)

Long-term Performance Award (on cessation of employment)

Long-term Performance Award (on change of control)

Other contractual obligations (on change of control)

In the event of termination by the Company, there will be

no compensation for loss of office due to misconduct or

normal resignation.

In other circumstances, Executive Directors may be entitled

to receive compensation for loss of office which will be

a maximum of 12 months’ salary and benefits.

Such payments will be equivalent to the monthly salary and

benefits that the Executive Director would have received if still in

employment with the Company. These will be paid over the notice

period. Executive Directors will be expected to mitigate their loss.

Pension contributions or payments in lieu of pension contribution

will be made during the notice period.

For the year of cessation

Good leavers: Performance conditions will be measured at the

normal measurement date. The Company incentive payment

will be pro-rated for the period worked during the financial year

of cessation.

Unvested deferred shares will vest in line with the normal vesting

cycle of the award.

Other leavers: No Company incentive cash payment or deferred

shares awarded for the year of cessation. Any unvested deferred

shares awarded in prior years will lapse on cessation.

For the year of the change of control performance conditions

will be measured to the date of the change of control. The Company

incentive payment will be pro-rated to the date of the change

of control.

Unvested deferred shares will vest immediately on the change

of control.

Good leavers: Performance conditions will be measured at the

normal measurement date and vest on their original vesting dates

and remain subject to the sale restrictions. The LPA will normally be

pro-rated for the part of the three-year performance period worked.

Vested LPA awards will remain subject to the holding restrictions.

Other leavers: LPA awards lapse immediately on cessation and

no award for the year of cessation or if serving notice at the time

of the award.

Performance conditions will be measured at the date of the change

of control and the award will normally be pro-rated to the date of the

change of control.

There are no other contractual provisions other than those set out

above that could impact quantum of the payment.

The Company has discretion to make a payment in lieu of notice,

either as a lump sum or as a series of phased payments.

The Company has discretion to make a lump sum payment in lieu

or a series of phased payments.

For the year of cessation

Any payment will normally be made as a mix of cash and shares.

However, the Commiee has the discretion (e.g. in the event of

death or ill-heath retirement of a participant) to pay the entire

amount in cash.

Deferred shares

The Commiee may decide to accelerate the vesting (e.g. in the

event of death or ill-heath retirement of a participant) so that

these vest at cessation of employment.

The Commiee has discretion to make a payment entirely in cash.

The Commiee may decide to accelerate the vesting of LPA

awards and measure performance up to the date of cessation in

circumstances where there is an appropriate business case.

The Commiee may also waive or shorten the holding restrictions

applicable to an award on compassionate grounds (e.g. due to

death or ill-health retirement).

The Commiee may waive pro-rating in circumstances where it

feels it is in the interests of shareholders to do so.

None.

Approach

Application of Commiee discretion

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

126

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Directors’

Remuneration Policy

Malus and clawback

Malus provisions apply to both the ABP and the LPA. Malus is

the adjustment of ABP or LPA ouurns or awards which have

not vested or been paid due to the occurrence of one or

more circumstances. The adjustment may result in the

value being reduced to nil.

Clawback is the recovery of payments made or vested

shares as a result of the occurrence of one or more

circumstances. Clawback may apply to all or part of a

participant’s payment or share award under the ABP or

LPA and may be effected, among other means, by requiring

the transfer of shares, payment of cash or reduction of

awards or bonuses.

The circumstances in which malus and clawback could apply

are as follows:

ɰ

Discovery of a material misstatement resulting in an

adjustment in the audited accounts of the Group or

any Group Company;

ɰ

The assessment that any performance condition

or condition in respect of a payment or award under

the ABP or LPA was based on error, or inaccurate or

misleading information;

ɰ

The discovery that any information used to determine

the ABP or LPA award was based on error, or inaccurate

or misleading information;

ɰ

Action or conduct of a participant which amounts to

fraud or gross misconduct; or

ɰ

Events or the behaviour of a participant have led to the

censure of a Group Company by a regulatory authority

or have had a significant detrimental impact on the

reputation of any Group Company provided that the

Board is satisfied that the relevant participant was

responsible for the censure or reputational damage

and that the censure or reputational damage is

aributable to the participant.

The following table sets out the periods during which malus

and clawback may be effected.

Annual Bonus Plan

Long-term

Performance Award

Malus

Up to the date of

a payment/award

Any time before vesting

Clawback

Three years post

the date of any

payment/award

Three years from the

date of vesting

Pay and performance scenario analysis

The proposed Directors’ Remuneration Policy is illustrated

in the following charts showing what each Director could

expect to receive in FY27 under different performance

scenarios, based on the following definitions:

Scenario

Linked to performance

50% share price

appreciation

Stretch plus 50% share price growth

(on 100% of LPA)

Stretch

100% of ABP opportunity (200% of salary)

100% of LPA opportunity (250% of salary)

Target

50% of ABP opportunity (100% of salary)

50% of LPA opportunity (125% of salary)

Minimum

No variable pay

Salary, Pension and Benefits

Annual Variable Pay

Long-term Variable Pay

35%

100%

29%

36%

22%

17%

32%

51%

35%

44%

Steve Wadey

CEO (£’000)

£5,599

£4,408

£2,679

£950

Stretch

+50%

Target

Fixed

34%

100%

29%

37%

20%

16%

32%

52%

35%

44%

Martin Cooper

CFO (£’000)

£3,549

£2,786

£1,677

£569

Stretch

+50%

Target

Fixed

127

Directors’

Remuneration Policy

Policy for the Chairman and the Non-executive Directors

Fees for the appointment of a new Group Chair or Non-executive Directors will be aligned with the Policy for

existing incumbents.

Chairman and Non-executive Directors

Element: Fees

To aract and retain

Non-executive Directors

of the calibre required to

assist the Company in

seing and delivering

its strategy.

The Executive Directors and the Group Chair are

responsible for seing the remuneration of the

Non-executive Directors.

The Board, minus the Chair, is responsible for seing

the Chair’s fees.

Non-executive Directors are paid an annual fee and

additional fees for chairmanship of Commiees and

any other additional duties, and the Company retains

the flexibility to pay fees for the membership of

Commiees. The Chair does not receive any additional

fees for membership of Commiees.

Fees are reviewed annually based on equivalent roles

in the comparator group used to review salaries paid

to the Executive Directors.

An additional fee is payable to those Non-executive

Directors aending meetings outside of their country

of residence.

Non-executive Directors and the Group Chair do not

participate in any variable remuneration or benefits

arrangements.

Fee levels may be increased on a temporary basis

for a significant increase in time commitments (e.g.

assuming an executive position for an interim period).

The fees for Non-executive Directors and the

Group Chair are broadly set at a competitive level

against the comparator group.

In general the level of fee increase for the

Non-executive Directors and the Group Chair will

be set taking account of any change in responsibility

and the general rise in salaries across employees.

The Company will pay reasonable expenses

incurred by the Non-executive Directors and

Group Chair and may sele any tax incurred in

relation to these.

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation and performance measures

Maximum opportunity

Consideration of shareholder and

employee views

The Chair of the Commiee and the Group Chair consult

with key shareholders on remuneration maers from time

to time, and particularly in seeking views on the Directors’

Remuneration Policy in preparation for the triennial vote

at the AGM. Any concerns expressed by shareholders

are reported to the Commiee and these are taken into

account as the Commiee develops and implements its

Policy. Any comments received from shareholders outside

these consultation exercises are also reported to the

Commiee, and the Commiee takes account of general

views on remuneration expressed by shareholders and

their representative bodies.

The Remuneration Commiee is grateful for shareholders’

comments and engagement during the Directors’

Remuneration Policy consultation process. At the end of

this process, the Remuneration Commiee was pleased

that the majority of the shareholders consulted expressed

support for the new Policy.

The Commiee has not formally consulted with employees

in developing this Policy. However, our Global Employee

Voice (GEV) is deeply engaged across the Company to

provide an employee voice at the table on all relevant issues,

including remuneration (regular interactions are held

with the Group Chair, Remuneration Commiee Chair,

CEO and the Chief People Officer). The Company takes

the views of employees very seriously and we monitor

this through a quarterly survey using a market-leading

dynamic tool (Peakon).

The Commiee is cognisant of employment conditions

when determining Executive Director pay. In particular,

the annual salary increase available to the rest of the

workforce is an important factor in determining any salary

increase for the Executive Directors. The Commiee

reviews the CEO pay ratio and considers it in the broader

context of pay trends within the business.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

128

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Annual Report

on Remuneration

The following section of this report details how the Directors’ Remuneration Policy has been implemented for the

year ended 31 March 2026. In the interests of clarity, CEO refers to Steve Wadey, CFO to Martin Cooper and Former CFO

to Carol Borg.

Executive Directors’ single total figure of remuneration (audited):

Executive Director

Year

Salary

£’000

Benefits

£’000

Pension

£’000

Total

fixed pay

£’000

Annual

Bonus

Plan

£’000

Deferred

Share

Plan

£’000

Compensation

Share Plan

£’000

Long-term

Performance

Award

£’000

Total

variable

pay

£’000

Total

remuneration

£’000

Steve Wadey (CEO)

FY26

727

113

76

917

1,028

1,312

1,139

3,480

4,396

FY25

719

85

76

880

0

861

861

1,740

Martin Cooper (CFO)

FY26

466

25

49

541

659

624

1,284

1,824

FY25

265

11

28

304

0

0

304

Benefits can include travel and subsistence expenses incurred in relation to the execution of their duties with the Company

that are considered by HMRC to be taxable. Where the Company seles the Director’s tax, the value disclosed is not

grossed up for tax.

Salary (audited)

Salaries are reviewed effective 1 July, which is the same

timing as for the rest of the UK employee population. The

decision on the salary increase for the CEO was deferred

until the end of FY26 at the CEO’s request to allow the

Commiee to consider the appropriate level of any increase

in light of the progress made by the Group following the

March 2025 trading statement. Following this review the

Commiee determined that the CEO’s FY26 increase should

proceed but that this would be implemented from 1 April

2026. This results in the effective increase for the CEO in

FY26 being nil, with his FY26 bonus and LPA grant being

determined based on the FY25 salary.

Salary as

1 April 2025

£'000

Increase in

the year

Salary as

1 July 2025

£'000

FY26

salary

actually

paid

£'000

CEO

727

0.0%

727

727

CFO

455

3.3%

470

466

Benefits (audited)

Benefits comprise a car allowance, travel allowance, private

medical insurance, life assurance, income protection and

taxable expenses.

Taxable

expenses

£'000

Travel

& car

allowance

£’000

Insurance

benefit

£’000

Total

benefits

£’000

CEO

63

19

32

113

CFO

0

13

12

25

Pensions (audited)

The Executive Directors did not participate in the QinetiQ

pension scheme for FY26. The pension figure is cash in lieu

of pension equating to 10.5% of base salary.

Cash in

lieu of

pension

£’000

Total in lieu

of pension

£’000

CEO

76

76

CFO

49

49

129

Annual Report

on Remuneration

FY26 Annual Bonus Plan (audited)

The Annual Bonus Plan (ABP) is an annual incentive with a one-year performance measurement period, with any award paid

partly in deferred shares. After the end of the first year, 70% of the award is paid as a cash bonus. The remaining 30% is made

as a deferred share award that must be held for two years and is subject to continued employment. Malus and clawback

apply for up to three years from the payment date.

ABP award

£’000

June 2026

payment in cash

(70% value £’000)

Value of share

payment

(30% value £’000)

30-day average

share price to

31 March 2026

(p)

Estimated

deferred shares

awarded

June 2026

CEO

1,028

720

308

490.1p

62,934

CFO

659

462

198

490.1p

40,362

On-target performance provides a payment equal to 100% of base salary, rising on a linear scale to 200% of base salary

for achievement of stretch performance. The scheme begins to pay out once threshold performance measures have

been achieved.

For the year ended 31 March 2026, the CEO and CFO were measured against financial objectives of orders, profit and cash

and a non-financial objective based on their personal performance; all with an equal weighting of 25%. To drive consistent

cash collection, 30% of the cash financial objective was based on the achievement of H1 performance. The target payment

was 50% of maximum for financial and non-financial objectives.

When seing performance targets the Remuneration Commiee takes into account the budget and the Company’s

strategy set in relation to the Integrated Strategy-to-perform Plan (ISP), shareholder expectations an the external

environment.

The aim is to set stretching targets which incentivise the Executive Directors to deliver annual results which will exceed

the expectations of investors, but which are also sustainable and do not create undue profit risk. Financial performance

measures exclude the contribution from businesses acquired in the year.

FY26 performance outcomes (audited)

Weighting

%

Threshold

0%

payment

Target

50%

payment

Stretch

100%

payment

Actual

% of

maximum

reward

achieved

CEO

ouurn

CFO

ouurn

CEO/CFO financial

performance measures

Orders

1

25.0%

£1,700.0m

£1,800.0m

£2,000.0m

£1,876.8m

69.2%

£251,542

£161,326

Underlying operating profit

1

25.0%

£210.0m

£220.0m

£240.0m

£218.9m

44.5%

£161,758

£103,743

Underlying H1 net cash flow

from operations

7.5%

£95.0m

£113.0m

£135.0m

£128.0m

84.1%

£91,701

£58,812

Underlying full-year net cash flow

from operations

17.5%

£235.0m

£277.0m

£331.0m

£313.9m

84.2%

£214,162

£137,353

CEO non-financial measures

Personal goals: performance

against stretching objectives

25.0%

40%

50%

100%

85.0%

£308,975

CFO non-financial measures

Personal goals: performance

against stretching objectives

25.0%

40%

50%

100%

85.0%

£198,161

CEO overall result

70.7%

£1,028,138

CFO overall result

70.7%

£659,394

1

Orders and underlying operating profit have been adjusted to account for the disposal of the non-core Federal IT Services business, as part of the

US restructuring programme, as described in note 12 to the financial statements (page 168).

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

130

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

FY26 Personal goals (25% weighting)

(audited)

FY26 performance

Measure

Outcome

Ouurn

(% maximum)

CEO

Deliver performance

Achieving consistent operational

performance through improving discipline

in our execution, controls and forecasting

Organic revenue growth of 1.3% at 11.3%

operating margin, against a challenging

external market

Achieved

Develop capability

Improving our organisation ability to

ensure we operate with greater efficiency

and effectiveness, professionalising

how we work

Comprehensive restructuring programme

completed, reducing costs, reshaping the

portfolio and simplifying the organisation

Achieved

Drive growth

Driving strategic growth by shaping and

winning larger long-term programmes

aligned to our customers’ mission

Record order intake of £3.6bn and year-end

backlog of £4.8bn

Exceeded

Enterprise leadership

Role model visible and responsible

(safety, security and environmental)

leadership to inspire and engage our

people to enable a high performing

inclusive culture

Demonstrated strong leadership through

a challenging external environment,

strengthening QinetiQ leadership team

with internal and external appointments

Continued good progress on safety, security,

and environmental goals

Achieved

Total

85.0%

CFO

Deliver performance

Instil Company-wide discipline and

integrity on financial control, governance

and accounting

Implemented stricter and clearer reporting and

financial review processes

Achieved

Develop capability

Lead reorganisation of Supply Chain

to deliver indirect savings and a change

in procurement and cost aitude in

the Group

Reorganisation started and successful delivery

of indirect savings targets

Achieved

Drive growth

Deliver improvements in finance and

business analysis and forecasting

Lead improvements in cash forecasting that

enabled more accurate decision making

across the Group

Achieved

Enterprise leadership

Role model visible and responsible

(safety, security and environmental)

leadership to inspire and engage our

people to enable a high performing

inclusive culture

Maintained high levels of engagement with

the Board and QinetiQ Leadership Team

Demonstrated strong leadership within the

Group by engaging with key employee groups

during a period of uncertainty and change

Continued good progress on safety, security,

and environmental goals

Exceeded

Total

85.0%

Annual Report

on Remuneration

131

FY24 Annual Bonus Plan (audited)

In accordance with the scheme rules, 30% of the FY24 ABP was awarded on 1 July 2024 as deferred shares, at a share price

of 448.8p. These shares must be held for two years and vest in July 2026.

FY24 Shares awarded

Vesting

Shares vesting

Estimated value

£’000

CEO

78,911

100%

78,911

406

Former CFO

49,765

100%

49,765

256

The value of this award is calculated as CEO £405,603 and Former CFO £255,792 based on the three-month average to

31 March 2026 (496.5p). The estimated value includes CEO £13,809 and Former CFO £8,709 as dividend equivalent payments

based on an aggregate dividend of 17.5p paid in FY25 to FY26 and a share price appreciation between grant and vesting of

£87,306 and £55,059 respectively.

Deferred Share Plan (audited)

The DSP figures shown in the FY25 single figure has been

updated in accordance with the regulations to show the

actual vesting of the FY22 award replacing the estimate

provided last year. The share price at vesting was 517.1p

and the FY25 figure includes £37,180 and £8,904 paid to

the CEO and Former CFO respectively as income in respect

of a dividend equivalent payments.

The FY23 legacy DSP award achieved the performance

underpin and, therefore, the shares ceased to be

contingent. These will vest in June 2026 and are disclosed

in the single figure for FY26. These values will be restated

in the FY27 report based on the actual share price and

dividend equivalents at vesting.

FY23

Shares

awarded

Vesting

Shares

vesting

Estimated

value

£’000

CEO

251,444

100%

251,444

1,312

Former CFO

163,256

100%

83,360

435

The FY23 DSP award performance underpin required the

FY26 profit to exceed that in FY23 (£169.5m). Adjusting for

the disposal of the non-core Federal IT Services business,

as described in note 12 to the financial statements, profit

for FY26 was £218.9m and, therefore, the shares will be

released on 20 June 2026. The 100% vesting refers to the

shares which have passed the underpin of those initially

granted based on FY23 performance, which was 100% of

the maximum available. If the underpin had not been met,

50% of the DSP award would have lapsed.

For the Former CFO, the shares vesting were pro-rated

based on her leaving arrangements, with 79,896 shares of

the original award having lapsed. The net shares vesting

from the FY23 DSP must be retained for a further two years.

The value of this award is calculated as CEO £1,312,286 and

Former CFO £435,056 based on the share amounts due to

vest of 251,444 and 83,360 (pro-rata) respectively based

on the three-month average to 31 March 2026 (496.5p).

The estimated value includes CEO £63,867 and Former

CFO £21,173 as dividend equivalent payments based on an

aggregate dividend of 25.4p paid in FY24 to FY26 and a share

price appreciation between grant and vesting of £378,080

and £125,343 respectively (for the Former CFO this is based

on her pro-rata award).

After the approval of the new Directors’ Remuneration

Policy at the 2023 AGM, the DSP was terminated with this

FY23 award being the final award, with no further awards

having been made.

Compensation Share Plan (audited)

The Compensation Share Plan (CSP) was awarded to Martin

Cooper in part compensation for share awards which were

forfeited on resigning from his former employer as disclosed

at the time of his appointment and in the FY24 Directors’

Remuneration Report. This award comprises of two parts,

both granted on 18 December 2024, at a share price of

410.4p, with the first part, detailed below, vesting in

March 2026 and the second part vesting in March 2027.

The value of the first part of the award is calculated as

£624,305 based on the actual share price on 31 March 2026,

the date of vesting (454.0p). The value includes a dividend

equivalent payment of £15,881 based on an aggregate

dividend of 11.85p paid between date of grant and vesting

and a share price appreciation of £148,251.

Shares

awarded

Vesting

Shares

vesting

Value

£’000

CFO

134,015

100%

134,015

624

Annual Report

on Remuneration

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

132

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

FY24 Long-term Performance Award outcome (audited)

The FY24 Long-term Performance Award (LPA) was measured against three metrics, with a clear link to Company strategy

and incentivising growth (20% of each element vests at Threshold):

Measure

Weighting

%

Threshold

20%

payment

Target

50%

payment

Stretch

100%

payment

Actual

% of

maximum

reward

achieved

FY24 Shares

awarded

Shares

vesting

Estimated

value

£’000

Cumulative underlying

operating profit

(FY24 to FY26)

35%

£630m

£660m

£710m

£620.6m

0.0%

ROCE (FY24 to FY26)

35%

15.0%

17.5%

20.0%

25.5%

100.0%

Revenue (FY26)

1

30%

£1,900m

£2,200m

£2,700m

£1,943.1m

24.3%

CEO overall result

42.3%

521,352

220,495

1,139

1

Revenue has been adjusted to account for the disposal of the non-core Federal IT Services business, as part of the US restructuring programme,

as described in note 12 to the financial statements (page 168).

The value of this award is calculated as £1,139,077 based on the share amounts due to vest of £1,094,758 based on the three-month

average to 31 March 2026 (496.5p). The estimated value includes £44,319 as dividend equivalent payments based on an aggregate

dividend of 20.1p paid in FY24 to FY26 and a share price appreciation between grant and vesting of £340,749 respectively.

FY26 Long-term Performance Award targets for grant in July 2025 (audited)

The Commiee maintained the same set of performances measures and weightings used in FY25 for the FY26 Long-term

Performance Award (LPA). These have a clear link to Company strategy and incentivising growth:

Measure

Weighting

%

Threshold

Stretch

Rationale

Cumulative underlying

operating profit

(FY26 to FY28)

35%

TBA

1

TBA

1

ɰ

Designed to deliver consistent operational performance over

the longer term

ɰ

Understood, relevant and actionable for QinetiQ senior leaders

ROCE (FY26 to FY28)

35%

20.0%

25.0%

ɰ

Average EBITA for the three-year period divided by average

capital employed

ɰ

Designed to drive robust investment selection and delivery

Revenue (FY28)

30%

£2.2bn

£2.7bn

ɰ

Designed to drive value creation through collaboration and

market leverage

1

Cumulative earnings targets are deemed commercially sensitive at this time but are consistent with our growth ambition at 11–12% margin.

The FY26 LPA target level of performance is not calculated on a linear basis and the target is deemed commercially sensitive

at this time as it is aligned to confidential Group strategy. 20% of each element vests at threshold. Subject to the targets no

longer being commercially sensitive they will be disclosed in full at the time of vesting.

FY26 LPA conditional share awards were granted based on a maximum of 250.0% of base salary at a share price of 502.5p

for the CEO and CFO in July 2025 determined over a five-day period before grant, in line with the scheme rules. The three-

year performance period for the FY26 award ends on 31 March 2028. Any shares which vest must then be held until fifth

anniversary after grant.

FY26 Long-term Performance Award

Participant

Date of grant

Number

of shares

granted

Share price

used to

determine

grant

Exercise price

Face value of

shares

% of salary

granted

Vest date

Performance

period end

CEO

3 Jul 25

361,720

502.5

£1,817,500

250.0%

3 Jul 28

31 Mar 28

CFO

3 Jul 25

226,386

502.5

£1,137,500

250.0%

3 Jul 28

31 Mar 28

Annual Report

on Remuneration

133

Statement of Directors’ shareholding

and share interests (audited)

In relation to the shareholding requirement adopted on

1 April 2017, the Company requires Executive Directors to

hold shares (beneficially owned) equivalent to 300%

(CEO)

and 200% (CFO) of base salary. Executive Directors have

five years from the adoption of the guideline to achieve the

required level through, at a minimum, retaining 50% of the

after-tax shares vesting from Company incentive plans.

The CEO has achieved his shareholding requirement and

currently holds shares equivalent to 711% of base salary

using a share price of 496.5p (three-month average to

31 March 2026).

The CFO does not currently meet the minimum shareholding

requirement, with a current holding equivalent to 110%

of base salary using a share price of 496.5p (three-month

average to 31 March 2026). This reflects his relatively recent

appointment as CFO.

The Remuneration Commiee continues to monitor

compliance with the shareholding requirement.

Shares

beneficially

owned

Shares

subject to

performance

conditions

Shares not

subject to

performance

conditions

Total share

interests

at 31 March

2026

Steve Wadey

1,040,105

1,600,883

446

2,641,434

Martin Cooper

104,030

588,836

692,866

Shonaid

Jemme-Page

7,000

7,000

Neil Johnson

100,000

100,000

Dina Knight

Roger Krone

Ross McEwan

1

20,000

20,000

General

Sir Gordon

Messenger

11,958

11,958

Steve Mogford

Ezinne

Uzo-Okoro

1

Ross McEwan – Resigned 17 July 2025.

Shares beneficially owned comprise shares purchased

under the Share Incentive Plan (SIP) and shares owned by

the Director and any connected persons. SIP matching

shares are identified as shares not subject to performance

conditions. On 9 April 2026 Steve Wadey purchased

31 shares, then on 11 May 2026 he purchased a further

36 shares, through his participation in the SIP. Shares

subject to performance conditions comprise awards made

under the Deferred Share Plan and Long-term Performance

Award which remain contingent subject to the relevant

performance conditions as detailed on page 133.

There have been no other changes to the shares shown

above between 31 March 2026 and 21 May 2026.

Payments to past Directors and

payment for loss of office (audited)

No payments were made to past Directors for loss of office

during the year.

As disclosed in last year’s report, Carol Borg stepped

down from the role of CFO by mutual agreement. Her FY24

ABP will vest in July 2026 (shown in table on page 132) at

an estimated value of £255,792. Additionally her FY23 DSP

award (shown in table on page 133), which was adjusted

pro-rata for time served, will vest in June 2026 at an

estimated vale of £435,056, with the vested shares

remaining subject to a two-year holding period.

Full details of Carol Borg’s termination agreements were

disclosed in accordance with s.430(2B) of the Companies

Act 2006 in the FY24 Directors’ Remuneration Report.

Annual Report

on Remuneration

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

134

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Total scheme interests summary (audited)

Total scheme interests, including those awarded during the financial year ended 31 March 2026, are as follows.

Plan name

Date of grant

Number

1 April 2025

Granted in year

(maximum

potential of

awards)

Vested in year

1

Lapsed in year

Number

31 March 2026

Share price on

date of grant

Vest date

Steve Wadey

DSP 2022

14 Jun 22

159,198

159,198

0

302.1

10 Jun 25

DSP 2023

20 Jun 23

251,444

251,444

330.2

20 Jun 26

LPA 2024

28 Sep 23

521,352

521,352

321.3

28 Sep 26

ABP 2024

1 Jul 24

78,911

78,911

448.8

1 Jul 26

LPA 2025

1 Jul 24

387,456

387,456

448.8

1 Jul 27

LPA 2026

3 Jul 25

361,720

361,720

502.5

3 Jul 28

1,398,361

361,720

159,198

1,600,883

Martin Cooper

CSP Tranche 1

18 Dec 24

134,015

134,015

0

410.4

31 Mar 26

CSP Tranche 2

18 Dec 24

85,282

85,282

410.4

31 Mar 27

LPA 2025

18 Dec 24

277,168

277,168

410.4

18 Dec 27

LPA 2026

3 Jul 25

226,386

226,386

502.5

3 Jul 28

496,465

226,386

134,015

588,836

Carol Borg

DSP 2022

14 Jun 22

37,489

37,489

0

302.1

10 Jun 25

DSP 2023

20 Jun 23

83,360

83,360

330.2

20 Jun 26

ABP 2024

1 Jul 24

49,765

49,765

448.8

1 Jul 26

170,614

37,489

133,125

1

Vested shares include shares sold to cover tax and National Insurance contributions.

There have been no other changes to the interests shown above between 31 March 2026 and 21 May 2026.

Performance review

The 10-year chart shows the Company’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) over the period from 31 March 2016 to 31 March 2026

compared with the FTSE 250 (excluding investment trusts) over the same period based on spot values. The Commiee has

chosen to demonstrate the Company’s performance against this index as it is the index in which the Company is listed.

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

TSR – Value of £100 investment

made on 31 March 2016

As at 31 March

10-year comparator chart

QinetiQ

FTSE 250

Annual Report

on Remuneration

135

CEO remuneration

The table below shows the CEO’s remuneration over the same performance period 31 March 2016 to 31 March 2026 as the

TSR chart:

Financial year ended 31 March

CEO

Salary/fees

Single figure

Annual bonus

(% of maximum)

Long-term incentives

(% of maximum vesting)

FY26

Steve Wadey

727,000

4,396,185

70.7%

61.1%

FY25

Steve Wadey

719,147

1,740,459

100.0%

FY24

Steve Wadey

689,160

2,928,669

85.6%

100.0%

FY23

Steve Wadey

664,126

2,164,306

98.2%

FY22

Steve Wadey

639,121

2,477,069

71.4%

100.0%

FY21

Steve Wadey

511,550

2,695,414

95.7%

100.0%

FY20

Steve Wadey

610,357

1,978,247

87.5%

38.4%

FY19

Steve Wadey

596,422

2,339,474

94.4%

31.7%

FY18

Steve Wadey

582,167

1,522,460

66.7%

FY17 (restated)

Steve Wadey

568,166

1,829,470

86.4%

CEO pay ratio

The calculation below is based on the FY26 single figure

for the CEO of £4,396,185 and similar calculations for the

UK workforce (i.e. ‘Option A’ as defined by the Companies

(Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018

). The

Remuneration Commiee chose Option A as it is the

approach generally favoured by investors and GC100.

The calculations for the UK workforce were performed

as at 31 March 2026, with all calculations made using full-

time equivalent pay.

Total remuneration

Ratio of the CEO’s to the pay of UK employees

Year

25th percentile

Median

75th percentile

FY26

88: 1

67: 1

53: 1

FY25

33: 1

25: 1

20: 1

FY24

67: 1

50: 1

38: 1

FY23

53: 1

40: 1

31: 1

FY22

67: 1

49: 1

37: 1

FY21

70: 1

52: 1

39: 1

FY20

56: 1

41: 1

31: 1

The CEO pay ratios have increased between FY25 and

FY26 as a result of the higher CEO single figure for FY26

due to zero annual bonus being paid in FY25 as well as the

inclusion, in accordance with the regulations, of the vested

value of the FY23 DSP in addition to the FY24 LPA in this

year’s single figure.

The Company believes that the median pay ratio for FY26 is

consistent with the pay, reward and progression policies for

the UK employees as the approach for all QinetiQ employees

is monitored and reported to the Remuneration Commiee

on an annual basis.

Year-on-year movements in the CEO pay ratio are likely to be

volatile due to the wide range of incentive outcomes for the

CEO single figure, but the Remuneration Commiee does

note the ratio and will monitor long-term trends.

Total pay of UK employees

25th percentile

Median

75th percentile

Total pay

and benefits

£49,835

£65,369

£82,718

Salary

component

£45,151

£52,686

£69,386

The Remuneration Commiee welcomes the opportunity to

provide this information to shareholders. The Company aims

to reward all employees fairly for the success and growth

they create.

Annual Report

on Remuneration

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

136

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Remuneration policy for all employees

All employees of QinetiQ are entitled to base salary, benefits

and pension. UK and Australia-based employees are entitled

to participate in the QinetiQ Share Incentive Plan. The

maximum incentive opportunity available is based on the

seniority and responsibility of the role. Participation in the

LPA is available to Executive Directors, senior leaders and

selected employees throughout the Company.

The All Employee Incentive Scheme (AEIS) provides every

eligible employee the opportunity to earn a cash bonus

based on Company and personal performance. For FY26 the

Company performance element of the AEIS was awarded

at the target award level of £500. The AEIS will be operated

again in FY27 and thereafter.

The Commiee reviews (but does not decide) the general

reward policy for all employees and any significant changes

proposed. Alignment with the workforce is delivered

through the Rewarding for Performance framework,

including a transparent and consistent approach to the

annual salary review, the AEIS to drive Company and

personal performance, recognition schemes and market

competitive benefits in our countries.

The CEO and the Chief People Officer have held regular

discussions with our Global Employee Voice (GEV)

representatives on reward maers. Members of the Board

also met with the GEV representatives twice in FY26.

Among other things, these meetings have discussed

how executive remuneration is aligned to the broader

employee offering in support of Group strategy.

Single figure total remuneration for the Chairman and each Non-executive

Director (audited)

Non-executive Directors’ remuneration is shown as a single figure to provide an annual comparison between the

remuneration awarded during the financial year ended 31 March 2026 and the preceding year.

Non-executive Directors

Fees

£’000

Benefits

£’000

Single figure

£’000

FY26

FY25

FY26

FY25

FY26

FY25

Shonaid Jemme-Page

1

78

76

3

1

81

77

Neil Johnson

290

281

5

2

295

283

Dina Knight

1

78

62

3

2

81

64

Roger Krone

76

18

16

3

93

21

Ross McEwan

2

22

74

9

24

31

98

General Sir Gordon Messenger

1

78

76

2

1

80

77

Steve Mogford

76

74

5

3

81

77

Ezinne Uzo-Okoro

64

26

21

5

85

31

1

Fees include Commiee Chair fees.

2

Ross McEwan – Resigned 17 July 2025.

The fees for Steve Mogford, Roger Krone and Ross McEwan include £12,500 as Senior Independent Director, Senior US

and Australia resident Non-executive Director (pro-rated based on resignation date) respectively.

Benefits include travel and subsistence expenses (grossed-up for tax) incurred in relation to the execution of their duties

with the Company that are considered by HMRC to be taxable. Aendance fees are also included in this number.

Roger Krone and Ezinne Uzo-Okoro as US residents received a $4,000 fee for aending UK meetings; as an Australian

resident Ross McEwan received a UK meeting fee of AU$8,000.

Annual Report

on Remuneration

137

Percentage change in Directors’ remuneration

The following table compares the percentage change in the Director’s salary/fees, bonus and benefits to the average

percentage change in salary, bonus and benefits for a comparison group (4,635 employees) in the UK business in service

between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026. The analysis only includes Directors who served for FY26.

Fees

Benefits

Annual bonus

FY26

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY22

FY26

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY22

FY26

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY22

Executive

Directors

Steve Wadey

1.1%

4.4%

3.8%

3.9%

24.9%

33.3%

-1.2%

9.2%

21.5%

-4.3%

— -100.0%

-10.5%

43.0%

-22.7%

Martin Cooper

75.9%

139.9%

Non-

executive

Directors

Shonaid

Jemme-Page

3.3%

4.8%

8.2%

1.5%

168.1%

123.9%

-62.1%

0%

Neil Johnson

3.2%

4.2%

4.2%

3.6%

14.3%

168.5%

103.2%

-77.2%

33.3%

100%

Dina Knight

26.7% 1,140%

39.7%

Roger Krone

350.8%

429.6%

Ross McEwan

-70.0% 1,133%

-61.0%

422.3%

General

Sir Gordon

Messenger

3.3%

4.8%

4.3%

103.4%

173.6%

-76.8%

Steve Mogford

3.4%

9.6%

82.4%

93.8%

589.5%

-52.7%

Ezinne

Uzo-Okoro

147.5%

324.3%

Employees

Average UK

employee

1

4.3%

6.0%

7.8%

4.4%

2.9%

34.7%

-1.0%

-22.2%

5.7%

10.9%

391.6%

-76.7%

3.0% 96.2%

-38.2%

1

UK employees were chosen to avoid the impact of exchange rate movements over the year. QinetiQ Group plc has no employees so QinetiQ Group

Ltd employees were used.

The benefits paid to Non-executive Directors are largely travel and subsistence expenses incurred in relation to the

execution of their duties with the Company that are considered by HMRC to be taxable.

Relative importance of spend on pay

The graph below shows actual spend on all employee remuneration, shareholder dividends and buybacks and any other

significant use of profit and cash within the previous two financial years.

Total employee remuneration

£676.2m

£707.1m

2025

2026

£195.5m

£122.8m

2025

2026

Share-based profit distribution

Other significant profit distribution

There were no other significant

profit distributions in 2025 or 2026.

Dividend cash payment plus purchase of

own shares (see CFO Review page 32).

Difference

-4.4%

Difference

+59.2%

Annual Report

on Remuneration

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

138

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Gender related pay

QinetiQ is subject to gender pay reporting for UK employees and a copy of our latest report is available on the

Company’s website.

Service contracts/leers of appointment

The Company’s policy is that Executive Directors have rolling contracts which can be terminated by either party giving

12 months’ notice.

The Group Chairman and the Non-executive Directors do not have service contracts but are appointed under leers of

appointment. All service contracts and leers of appointment are available for viewing at the Company’s registered office

and at the AGM.

Non-executive Directors typically serve two three-year terms but may be invited by the Board to serve for an additional

period (see table in the Nominations Commiee report on page 96).

Director

Date appointed

Arrangement

Notice period

Steve Wadey

27 April 2015

Service contract

12 months

Martin Cooper

2 September 2024

Service contract

12 months

Shonaid Jemme-Page

19 May 2020

Initial term of three years from date of appointment, subject

to annual reappointment at the AGM

Neil Johnson

2 April 2019

Initial term of three years from date of appointment, subject

to annual reappointment at the AGM

Dina Knight

1 March 2024

Initial term of three years from date of appointment, subject

to annual reappointment at the AGM

Roger Krone

8 January 2025

Initial term of three years from date of appointment, subject

to annual reappointment at the AGM

General Sir Gordon Messenger

12 October 2020

Initial term of three years from date of appointment, subject

to annual reappointment at the AGM

Steve Mogford

1 August 2022

Initial term of three years from date of appointment, subject

to annual reappointment at the AGM

Ezinne Uzo-Okoro

1 November 2024

Initial term of three years from date of appointment, subject

to annual reappointment at the AGM

Implementation of Policy for the year ended 31 March 2026

The Remuneration Policy operated as intended for the

year ended 31 March 2026. Non-executive Directors’ fees

reviewed effective 1 July 2025 were set as follows:

ɰ

Basic fee £64,500 (was £62,500)

ɰ

Commiee Chair fee £14,500 (was £14,000)

ɰ

Senior Independent Director fee £12,500 (was £12,000)

The fee increase was based on a Non-executive Directors’

fee benchmarking report provided by Mercer, with increases

in line with increases applied to the UK workforce in FY26.

The Non-executive Group Chair receives a fee of

£292,500 per annum which was increased by 3.0% effective

1 July 2025, less than the increases applied to the

UK workforce in FY26.

Fees are reviewed in line with Policy.

Executive Directors are permied to accept one external

Non-executive Director position with the Board’s approval.

Any fees received in respect of these appointments may be

retained by the Executive Director. The CEO and CFO do not

hold any Non-executive Directorships in other companies.

Fees effective

1 July 2025

£

Group Chairman

292,500

Basic fee for UK Non-executive Director

64,500

Additional fee for chairing a Commiee

14,500

Additional fee to Deputy Chair/Senior

Independent Non-executive Director

12,500

Additional fee for aendance at a Board meeting

held in US by UK resident Non-executive Director

2,500

Additional fee for aendance at a Board meeting

held in UK by US resident Non-executive Director

$4,000

Additional fee for aendance at a Board

meeting held in UK by Australia resident

Non-executive Director

AU$8,000

Annual Report

on Remuneration

139

Implementation of Policy for the year

ending 31 March 2027

At the 13 May 2026 meeting of the Remuneration Commiee,

the Commiee considered the CEO’s FY26 increase which

had been deferred until this time at the CEO’s request. It

was agreed that a 3.0% increase (to £748,800) would be

implemented from 1 April 2026. This increase is below the

4% budget for the workforce in FY26 and also slightly below

the 3.3% increase awarded to the CFO from 1 July 2025.

For FY27, the salary review will operate on the normal

timetable, with increases becoming effective from 1 July.

Having considered the 4% budget awarded for increases to

the wider workforce, the Commiee has determined that

the CEO’s salary should be increased by 3.5% (to £775,000).

For the CFO, a 6.4% increase (to £500,000) was approved

in recognition of his strong performance and development

since joining the Company in September 2024 as well as the

below market position of his current salary. This increase

is in-line with increases awarded to other high performing

employees who are below the market median.

Incentives for Executives

The table below shows the measures and relative weighting

for the Annual Bonus Plan for the CEO and CFO:

Performance measure

Relative

weighting

(%)

Orders

20.0%

Revenue

20.0%

Underlying operating profit

20.0%

Underlying net cash flow from operations

20.0%

Personal and strategic goals, including selected

ESG metrics

20.0%

For FY27 the Remuneration Commiee adjusted the

financial metrics for FY27 including revenue alongside the

same three financial metrics as in FY26 (orders, profit and

cash) each with an equal weighting of 20%. Building on the

changes made in FY26 to drive consistent performance, 30%

of all financial elements will be based on the achievement

of meeting H1 performance targets, with 70% based on

performance over the full financial year. The personal and

strategic goals will continue to provide greater emphasis

on personal leadership, performance standards and ESG

metrics (safety, security and environmental leadership).

In line with the Directors' Remuneration Policy, target

performance results in 100% of base salary being paid, with

stretch performance resulting in 200% of base salary being

paid. Details of specific performance targets for the ABP

have not been provided as they are deemed commercially

sensitive. The targets will be disclosed retrospectively in

next year’s Annual Report on Remuneration.

After the inclusion of revenue within the annual plan, the

Commiee has removed it from FY27 LPA, focusing on

two core measures of:

ɰ

Earnings:

cumulative earnings per share (EPS) on

a three-year basis (50% weighting) has replaced

organic underlying operating profit

ɰ

Designed to strengthen alignment between

long-term reward outcomes, earnings growth and

sustainable shareholder value creation

ɰ

Returns:

ROCE (50% weighting)

ɰ

Average EBITA for the three-year period divided by

average capital employed

ɰ

Designed to drive robust investment selection

and delivery

Threshold

Stretch

Cumulative 3-year EPS (FY27 to FY29)

110p

120p

3-year average ROCE (FY27 to FY29)

20.0%

30.0%

The FY27 target level of performance is not calculated on a

linear basis and the target is deemed commercially sensitive

at this time as it is aligned to confidential Group strategy.

Subject to the targets no longer being commercially

sensitive they will be disclosed in full at the time of vesting.

Annual Report

on Remuneration

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

140

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

141

Annual Report

on Remuneration

Remuneration Commiee meetings, activities and decisions FY26

The following table provides a summary of all the key activities during the year. The aendance at each meeting is detailed

on page 90.

The membership of the Remuneration Commiee for the whole of FY26 was Dina Knight (Chair), Neil Johnson, General Sir

Gordon Messenger, Shonaid Jemme-Page, Roger Krone, Steve Mogford and Ezinne Uzo-Okoro. Ross McEwan joined the

Commiee on 14 May 2025 and 16 July 2026 respectively.

Date Incentives Share awards Governance Salaries and resourcing
May 2025 Review of Review FY25 Approve FY26 Directors’ QLT base salary reviews
FY25 Company LPA performance Remuneration Report
performance Confirm FY26 2026 Directors’
LPA targets Remuneration Policy
Review share plan equity dilution
July 2025 AGM preparation
Review shareholder feedback
November 2025 FY26 half-year forecast Review of QLT shareholdings
Review of all-employee
remuneration to ensure,
inter alia, alignment of incentives
and reward with culture
March 2026 FY26 provisional results Mercer review of independence Preliminary 2025 CEO
FY27 target seing salary review

Remuneration Commiee

effectiveness review

A performance evaluation of the Commiee is conducted

annually. This process is described further on page 101.

Remuneration consultants

Mercer was appointed as independent adviser to the

Commiee to provide advice on market practice, corporate

governance and investors’ views. Mercer was selected by

the Commiee after providing ad-hoc advice in support of

the design of the Directors’ Remuneration Policy and prior

experience of working with it. Fees paid to Mercer during

the year for services provided were £92,723 calculated on

a time-spent basis at pre-agreed rates.

Statement of voting

Directors’ Remuneration
Report – 2025
Votes for 410,589,945 (97.7%)
Votes against 9,873,611 (2.3%)
Total votes cast 420,463,556 (77.4% of share capital)
Abstained 1,647,962
Directors’ Remuneration
Policy – 2023
Votes for 406,828,507 (84.3%)
Votes against 75,547,245 (15.7%)
Total votes cast 482,375,752 (83.4% of share capital)
Abstained 26,105

Details on the voting on all resolutions at the 2026 AGM

will be announced via the RNS and posted on the QinetiQ

website after the AGM.

Directors’ Remuneration Report 2025 % of votes

(%)

Votes for

Votes against

97.7%

2.3%

Directors’ Remuneration Report 2023 % of votes

(%)

Votes for

Votes against

84.3%

15.7%

Dina Knight

Remuneration Commiee Chair

21 May 2026

Directors’ report

In accordance with Section 415 of the Companies Act 2006

(the 'Act'), the Directors present their report together with

the audited consolidated financial statements for the year

ended 31 March 2026. Other sections of the Annual Report

and Accounts have been deemed to be incorporated into

the Directors’ report by reference, and the table below

details where the required disclosures can be found.

Corporate governance statement

78

Culture

82

Board of Directors

84

Directors’ conflicts of interest

90

Directors’ interests in shares

134

Dividends

35

Engagement with employees

94

Engagement with suppliers, customers and others

60

Employment of disabled people

144

Financial instruments: Information on the Group’s financial

risk management objectives and policies, and its exposure

to credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk and foreign

currency risk

179

Future developments

1-76

Greenhouse gas emissions

43-52

Results

32-39

Section 172 Statement

72

Subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates

199

Publication of the ratio of the CEO’s remuneration to

the median, 25th and 75th quartile pay remuneration

of the Company’s UK employees in the Directors’

Remuneration Report

136

Illustration of the effect of future share price

increases on executive pay outcomes in the

Directors’ Remuneration Report

127

Management report

The Strategic report, Corporate Governance statement

and Directors’ Report together are the management

report for the purposes of DTR 4.1.5(2) and DTR 4.1.8R.

Corporate Governance statement

The Corporate governance statement, including the

Directors’ Remuneration Report, fulfils the requirement

of a corporate governance statement under DTR 7.2.1.

Disclosures in accordance with Listing Rule 6.6.1

For the purposes of the UK Listing Rules, the information

required to be disclosed by UKLR 6.6.1R can be found

as follows:

Section

Information

Page

(1)

Interest capitalised

n/a

(2)

Publication of unaudited

financial information

n/a

(3)

Details of long-term incentive schemes

123

(4)

Waiver of emoluments by a Director

n/a

(5)

Waiver of future emoluments

by a Director

n/a

(6)

Non pre-emptive issues of equity for cash

n/a

(7)

Non pre-emptive issue by major

subsidiary undertakings

n/a

(8)

Listed subsidiary

n/a

(9)

Contracts of significance

n/a

(10)

Provision of services by

a controlling shareholder

n/a

(11)

Shareholder waivers of dividends

n/a

(12)

Shareholder waivers of future dividends

n/a

(13)

Compliance with controlling

shareholder rules

n/a

Research and development

One of the Group’s distinct business capabilities is the

provision of funded research and development (R&D) to

customers. The Group also invests in the commercialisation

of promising technologies across all areas of business.

In the financial year, the Group recorded £341.2m

(FY25: £344.9m) of total R&D-related expenditure, of which

£330.6m (FY25: £332.9m) was customer-funded work and

£10.6m (FY25: £12.0m) was internally funded. Additionally,

£1.7m (FY25: £3.7m) of late-stage development costs

were capitalised and £11.8m (FY25: £6.2m) of capitalised

development costs were amortised in the year.

Political donations

QinetiQ’s policy is that it does not make what are commonly

regarded as donations to any political party. QinetiQ

does undertake legitimate interactions with MPs and

others in the political world, to make them aware of key

industry issues and maers that affect QinetiQ, and to

make an important contribution to their understanding of

QinetiQ, the markets in which it operates and the work of

their constituents.

Directors’ Report

and statutory information

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

142

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Branches

The Company and its subsidiaries have established

branches in a number of different countries; their results

are, however, not material to the Group’s financial results.

Share capital

As at 31 March 2026, the Company had an alloed and

fully paid-up share capital of 524,757,317 ordinary shares

of 1p each with an aggregate nominal value of £5.2m and

one Special Share with a nominal value of £1.

Details of the shares in issue during the financial year are

shown in note 28 on page 194.

Acquisition of own shares

On 5 June 2025, the Company announced an extension of its

share buyback programme for an additional £200m over two

years. The first two tranches for an aggregate £100 million

completed on 24 March 2026. In total 20,677,403 ordinary

shares of £0.01 were repurchased and subsequently

cancelled in the first two tranches of this programme.

The third £50m tranche of the extension commenced on

25 March 2026 and is expected to complete by the end

of September 2026. As at 20 May 2026, the Company has

repurchased 4,624,033 ordinary shares of £0.01 under

this programme.

Pursuant to the above-mentioned buyback programmes,

in the year ended 31 March 2026, the Company repurchased,

and subsequently cancelled, 28,623,138 Ordinary Shares

of £0.01, which represents approximately 5.45% of the

Company’s issued share capital.

Further details on the share buyback programme can be

found on our website www.qinetiq.com.

Rights of ordinary shareholders

The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive the

Company’s Reports and Accounts, to aend and speak

at general meetings of the Company, to exercise voting

rights in person or by appointing a proxy in accordance

with the deadlines set out in the relevant Notice of Meeting,

and to receive a dividend (where declared) or paid out of

profits available for that purpose.

Each ordinary share carries one vote. There are no

restrictions on voting rights or limits on the number of votes

a shareholder may exercise. Voting rights may be restricted

if a shareholder fails to comply with a notice issued under

section 793 of the Companies Act 2006. Shares may be

held through nominee arrangements where voting rights

are exercised in line with the arrangements between the

beneficial owner and the registered holder.

Rights of Special Shareholder

The Special Share is held by HM Government through the

Secretary of State for Defence (the Special Shareholder)

and it may only be held by and transferred to

HM Government. It confers certain rights to protect

UK defence and security interests. These include:

ɰ

The promotion and reinforcement of the MOD

compliance principles which require QinetiQ to

be an impartial, ethical and responsible contractor

by avoiding conflicts of interest in its dealings with

the MOD

ɰ

The protection of defined strategic assets of the

Group, such as certain testing facilities, by providing

the Special Shareholder with an option to purchase

those assets in certain circumstances

ɰ

The right to require certain persons with a material

interest in QinetiQ to dispose of some or all of their

ordinary shares on the grounds of national security

or conflict of interest

ɰ

A provision whereby at least the Non-executive

Chairman or Chief Executive Officer must be

a British citizen

The Special Share carries no financial and economic value

and the Special Shareholder is not entitled to vote at a

general meeting of the Company. At any time the Special

Shareholder may require QinetiQ to redeem the share at par

and, if wound up, the Special Shareholder would be entitled

to be repaid at its nominal value before other shareholders.

Any variation of the rights aached to the Special Share

requires the wrien approval of the MOD. Further details

can be found in note 28 on page 194.

Restrictions on the transfer of shares

As detailed above, the special share requires certain

persons with an interest in QinetiQ’s shares that exceed

certain prescribed thresholds to dispose of some or all of

their ordinary shares on the grounds of national security

or conflict of interest.

Directors’ Report

and statutory information

143

Directors’ Report

and statutory information

Employee share schemes

The QinetiQ Group plc Employee Benefit Trust (the Trust)

holds shares in connection with QinetiQ’s employee share

schemes, excluding the Share Incentive Plan. As at 31 March

2026, the Trust held 2,684,125 ordinary shares of 1p each

(the Trust Shares). The Trustees of the Trust have agreed

to waive their entitlement to dividends payable on the

Trust Shares.

Equiniti Share Plan Trustees Limited acts as Trustee in

respect of all ordinary shares held by employees under the

QinetiQ Group plc Share Incentive Plan (the ‘Plan’). Equiniti

Share Plan Trustees Limited will vote on all resolutions

proposed at general meetings in accordance with voting

instructions received from participants in the Plan.

Major shareholdings

In accordance with DTR 5, the following disclosures have

been notified to the Company from holders representing 3%

or more of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company.

Name of shareholder

As at 31 March

2026 % of issued

share capital*

As at 20 May 2026

% of issued share

capital*

Klear Kite LLC

14.02%

15.08%

BlackRock, Inc.

5.14%

5.14%

Franklin Mutual Advisers LLC

4.99%

4.99%

Schroders Plc

9.98%

4.96%

*

As notified by the shareholder and based on the issued ordinary share

capital at the time of the notification.

Employees

The Group is commied to the fair treatment of people with

disabilities in relation to applications, training, promotion

and career development. If an existing employee becomes

disabled, the Company makes every effort to enable them

to continue their employment and career development

and to arrange appropriate training, wherever practical.

Directors’ interests in contracts

At the date of this report, there is no contract or

arrangement with the Company or any of its subsidiaries

that is significant in relation to the business of the

Group as a whole in which a Director of the Company

is materially interested.

Indemnities

The Company has entered into indemnity deeds with

all its current Directors containing qualifying indemnity

provisions, as defined in Section 234 of the Companies Act

2006, under which the Company has agreed to indemnify

each Director in respect of certain liabilities, which may be

aached to them as Directors or as former Directors of the

Company or any of its subsidiaries. The qualifying third-

party indemnity was in force during the financial year and

also at the date of approval of the financial statements.

Articles of Association

Changes to the Articles must be submied to shareholders

for approval save in respect of the rights aaching to the

Special Share; the Company has not adopted any special

rules relating to the appointment and replacement of

Directors or the amendment of the Company’s Articles of

Association, other than as provided under UK corporate law.

Change of control –

significant agreements

The following significant agreements contain provisions

entitling the counterparties to require prior approval,

exercise termination, alteration or other similar rights

in the event of a change of control of the Company,

or if the Company ceases to be a UK company:

ɰ

The Combined Aerial Target Service contract is a

20-year contract awarded to QinetiQ Target Services

Limited by the MOD on 14 December 2006. The terms

of this contract require the Company to remain a UK

company which is incorporated under the laws of any

part of the UK, or an overseas company registered

in the UK, and that at least 50% of the Board of

Directors are UK nationals. The terms also contain

change of control conditions and restricted share

transfer conditions which require prior approval from

HM Government if there is a material change in the

ownership of the Company’s share capital, unless the

change relates to shares listed on a regulated market;

‘material’ is defined as being 10% or more of the share

capital. In addition, there are restrictions on transfers

of shares to persons from countries appearing on the

restricted list as issued by HM Government.

ɰ

The Long Term Partnering Agreement (LTPA) is

a 30-year contract (its original term being 25 years

but having been extended in 2025), which QinetiQ

Limited signed on 28 February 2003, to provide

test, evaluation and training services to the MOD.

This contract contains conditions under which the

prior approval of HM Government is required if the

contractor, QinetiQ Limited, ceases to be a subsidiary

of the QinetiQ Group, except where such change

in control is permied under the Shareholders

Agreement to which the MOD is a party.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

144

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

ɰ

The Maritime Strategic Capabilities Agreement Future

Arrangement contract is a 10-year contract awarded

by the MOD which came into effect on 1 April 2023. The

contract terms include a provision requiring that any

change of control of QinetiQ Limited requires prior

approval from HM Government (with control being

defined as the ability to control the Company’s affairs

by reason of the holding of shares or by means of voting

or other powers). If such approval is not obtained, the

MOD reserves the right to terminate the agreement.

ɰ

The Engineering Delivery Partner Agreement placed

with QinetiQ Limited by the MOD came into force

on 5 October 2018 and has a 10-year duration. The

contract contains a provision under which any change

of control of QinetiQ Limited requires prior approval

from HM Government (with control being defined as

the ability to control the Company’s affairs by reason

of the holding of shares or by means of voting or other

powers). The MOD is entitled to terminate the contract

where a change of control has occurred without such

approval having been obtained.

ɰ

The Group is party to funding agreements, provided

by a consortium of banks: a £290m multi-currency

revolving credit facility which is due to mature on

22 April 2029; a multi-currency floating rate term

loan of £333.6m which matures on 27 September

2027, and interest rate derivative contracts maturing

on 27 September 2027 to fix the floating rate bank

borrowings in line with Treasury policy. Under the terms

of the agreements, in the event of a change of control

of the Company, any lender may give notice to cancel

its commitment and require all outstanding amounts

to be repaid.

The Directors’ contracts contain no provisions for

compensation for loss of office on a change of control of

the Company.

Appointment and replacement

of Directors

According to the Articles of Association, all Directors

are subject to election by shareholders at the first AGM

after their appointment and must stand for re-election

at intervals of no more than three years thereafter. In

line with best practice reflected in the UK Corporate

Governance Code, however, the Company requires

each serving member of the Board to stand for election

or re-election on an annual basis at each AGM.

Powers of the Directors:

allotment/purchase of own shares

At the Company’s AGM held in July 2025, the shareholders

passed resolutions which authorised the Directors to allot

relevant securities up to an aggregate nominal value of

£1,822,873 (£3,645,746 pursuant only to a rights issue)

and to disapply pre-emption rights (up to 5% of the issued

ordinary share capital). The authorities will remain valid

until the 2026 AGM.

Resolutions in respect of the allotment of relevant

securities, the disapplication of pre-exemption rights and

the purchase of own shares will be laid before the 2026 AGM.

Annual General Meeting

The Company’s AGM will be held on Thursday 16 July 2026 at

11:00 at the office of Ashurst LLP, London Fruit and

Wool Exchange, Duval Square, London E1 6PW.

Independent auditors

A resolution to confirm the reappointment of

PricewaterhouseCoopers ('PwC') as auditor of the Company

will be proposed at the 2026 AGM. The reappointment has

been recommended to the Board by the Audit Commiee

and PwC has expressed its willingness to continue in office.

Statement of Directors’ responsibilities

in respect of the financial statements

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual

Report and Accounts including the Directors’ Remuneration

Report and the Financial Statements in accordance with

applicable law and regulations.

UK company law requires the Directors to prepare financial

statements for each financial year. Under that law, the

Directors have prepared the Group financial statements

in accordance with International Accounting Standards in

conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act

2006 and the Company financial statements in accordance

with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting

Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards,

comprising FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework,

and applicable law). Additionally, the Financial Conduct

Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules

require the Directors to prepare the Group Financial

Statements in accordance with UK-adopted International

Accounting Standards.

Directors’ Report

and statutory information

145

Directors’ Report

and statutory information

Under UK company law, Directors must not approve the

Financial Statements unless they are satisfied that they

give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group

and Company and of the profit or loss of the Group for

that period. In preparing the financial statements, the

Directors are required to:

ɰ

Select suitable accounting policies and apply

them consistently;

ɰ

State whether applicable international accounting

standards in conformity with the requirements of the

Companies Act 2006 and UK-adopted International

Accounting Standards have been followed for the

Group financial statements and United Kingdom

Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101, have

been followed for the Company financial statements,

subject to any material departures disclosed and

explained in the financial statements;

ɰ

Make reasonable and prudent judgements and

accounting estimates; and

ɰ

Prepare the financial statements on the going-

concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume

that the Group and Company will continue in business.

The Directors are also responsible for safeguarding the

assets of the Group and Company and hence for taking

reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of

fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate

accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain

the Group’s and Company’s transactions, and disclose with

reasonable accuracy at any time, the financial position of

the Group and Company and enable them to ensure that

the financial statements and the Directors’ Remuneration

report comply with the Companies Act 2006.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and

integrity of the Company’s website. Legislation in the UK

governing the preparation and dissemination of financial

statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Directors’ confirmations

The Directors of the Company who served during the

financial year ending 31 March 2026:

Neil Johnson

Steve Wadey

Martin Cooper

Steve Mogford

Shonaid Jemme-Page

Dina Knight

Roger Krone

Ross McEwan (resigned on

17 July 2025)

General Sir Gordon

Messenger

Ezinne Uzo-Okoro

Each of the Directors confirm that, to the best of

their knowledge:

ɰ

The Group financial statements, which have been

prepared in accordance with international accounting

standards in conformity with the requirements of

the Companies Act 2006 and international financial

reporting standards, adopted pursuant to UK-adopted

International Accounting Standards, give a true and

fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and

profit of the Group;

ɰ

The Company Financial Statements, which have

been prepared in accordance with United Kingdom

Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101, give a true

and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position

and profit of the Company; and

ɰ

The going-concern statement on page 71 includes a

fair review of the development and performance of the

business and the position of the Group and Company,

together with a description of the principal risks and

uncertainties that it faces.

In the case of each Director in office at the date the

Directors’ report is approved.

Scope of the reporting in this

Annual Report

The Board has prepared a Strategic report which provides

an overview of the development and performance of the

Group’s business in the year ended 31 March 2026.

For the purposes of DTR 4.1.5R(2) and DTR 4.1.8 the

Directors confirm that, so far as they are aware, there is no

relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditor

is unaware, and that they have taken all steps that they

ought to have taken as Directors to make themselves

aware of any relevant audit information and to establish

that the Company’s auditor is aware of that information.

By order of the Board.

James Field

Company Secretary

21 May 2026

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

146

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Report on the audit of the

financial statements

Opinion

In our opinion:

ɰ

QinetiQ Group plc’s group financial statements

and company financial statements (the “financial

statements”) give a true and fair view of the state

of the group’s and of the company’s affairs as at

31 March 2026 and of the group’s profit and the

group’s cash flows for the year then ended;

ɰ

the group financial statements have been properly

prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international

accounting standards as applied in accordance

with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006;

ɰ

the company financial statements have been properly

prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally

Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom

Accounting Standards, including FRS 101 “Reduced

Disclosure Framework”, and applicable law); and

ɰ

the financial statements have been prepared

in accordance with the requirements of the

Companies Act 2006.

We have audited the financial statements, included within

the Annual Report & Accounts 2026 (the “Annual Report”),

which comprise:

ɰ

the Consolidated balance sheet as at 31 March 2026;

ɰ

the Company balance sheet as at 31 March 2026;

ɰ

the Consolidated income statement for the year

then ended;

ɰ

the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

for the year then ended;

ɰ

the Consolidated statement of changes in equity for

the year then ended;

ɰ

the Company statement of changes in equity for the

year then ended;

ɰ

the Consolidated cash flow statement for the year

then ended; and

ɰ

the notes to the financial statements, comprising

material accounting policy information and other

explanatory information.

Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the

Audit Commiee.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International

Standards on Auditing (UK)

(“ISAs

(UK)”

) and applicable law.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (UK) are further described

in the Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial

statements section of our report. We believe that the audit

evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to

provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence

We remained independent of the group in accordance

with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our

audit of the financial statements in the UK, which includes

the FRC’s Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public

interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical

responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that

non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard

were not provided.

Other than those disclosed in Note 8, we have provided

no non-audit services to the company or its controlled

undertakings in the period under audit.

Our audit approach

Overview

Audit scope

ɰ

We conducted full scope audit work in the United

Kingdom over QinetiQ Limited, in the United States

over QinetiQ US, and in Australia over QinetiQ Pty Ltd

based on their size. This provides significant coverage

over all financial statement balances, except inventory

and intangible assets;

ɰ

We performed an audit of the inventory and intangible

assets financial statement line items at QinetiQ

Target Systems Limited to provide sufficient overall

group coverage;

ɰ

We performed procedures over goodwill, acquired

intangible assets, share-based payments, the defined

benefit pension scheme, IFRS 16 lease accounting,

taxation, borrowings and the consolidation at

a group level.

Key audit maers

ɰ

Long-term contract accounting (group)

ɰ

Valuation of goodwill related to the US CGU (group)

ɰ

Valuation of investment in subsidiary

undertakings (parent)

Independent auditors’ report

to the members of QinetiQ Group plc

147

Independent auditors’ report

to the members of QinetiQ Group plc

Report on the audit of the financial statements (continued)

Overview continued

Materiality

ɰ

Overall group materiality: £11,500,000

(2025: £10,000,000) based on 5% of underlying

profit before tax.

ɰ

Overall company materiality: £5,520,000

(2025: £5,400,000) based on 1% of total assets.

ɰ

Performance materiality: £8,600,000

(2025: £7,500,000)

(group) and £4,140,000

(2025: £4,050,000)

(company).

The scope of our audit

As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality

and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the

financial statements.

Key audit maers

Key audit maers are those maers that, in the auditors’

professional judgement, were of most significance in the

audit of the financial statements of the current period and

include the most significant assessed risks of material

misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by

the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect

on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in

the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team.

These maers, and any comments we make on the results

of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context

of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and

in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide

a separate opinion on these maers.

This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.

The key audit maers below are consistent with last year.

Key audit maer

How our audit addressed the key audit maer

Long-term contract accounting (group)

Refer to page 106 (Audit Commiee report)

and page 202 (note 35, Basis of preparation

and material accounting policies – Revenue

from contracts with customers) and page 160

(note 2, Revenue from contracts with

customers and other income). The group

has a large number of contracts which span

multiple periods and are accounted for on

a percentage of completion (POC) basis

in accordance with IFRS 15 (Revenue from

Contracts with Customers). Long term

contract accounting requires a number of

judgements and management estimates

to be made, particularly in calculating the

forecast costs to complete the contract.

These judgements drive revenue and profit

recognition, and together with cash paid

by the customer, impact the balance sheet

position at the year end.

We evaluated the contract governance policies and controls in place within the

business and tested the design and operating effectiveness of certain key controls

over long-term contracts. For long term contracts within the UK, the Group team

performed risk assessment procedures over the portfolio of contracts to identify

contracts to subject to detailed audit procedures. These detailed contract audits

involved meeting with key financial and non-financial personnel throughout the year

and at year end to discuss contract performance, as well as challenging management

to provide evidence to support the estimates taken on each selected contract in the

financial statements.

Specifically, our procedures included the following:

ɰ

We assessed the basis of revenue recognition to ensure it is in line with applicable

accounting standards.

ɰ

We agreed overall anticipated revenue to the underlying contract and validated a

sample of customer invoices through to cash receipt.

ɰ

We recalculated revenue recognised and agreed revenue, costs and associated

balance sheet positions to the underlying general ledger.

ɰ

We obtained evidence to corroborate management estimates and judgements,

particularly around forecast costs to complete and risk contingencies, including:

ɰ

Performing risk assessment sensitivity to identify those cost categories that

are most sensitive and require further assessment;

ɰ

Comparing forecasts to established run rates obtaining evidence for movements

outside of our expectation, where applicable; and

ɰ

Obtaining contract risk registers and obtaining support for significant movements.

ɰ

We validated the allocation of costs incurred to contracts during the year to

supporting documentation. For the remaining population of contracts, we selected

a sample and performed testing over revenue and costs, agreeing to supporting

documentation including customer contracts and validating a sample of customer

invoices to cash receipts. Additional testing was performed, where not sufficiently

covered by the above, over the contract asset and liability balance sheet positions

to gain assurance over the accuracy of these balances. These have been sample

tested and agreed to supporting documentation. Component audit teams in the

US and Australia stratify their contracts into risk categories and perform the above

procedures as relevant which were subject to oversight by the Group engagement

team. No material exceptions were found.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

148

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Independent auditors’ report

to the members of QinetiQ Group plc

Key audit maer

How our audit addressed the key audit maer

Valuation of goodwill related to the US CGU (group)

Refer to page 106 (Audit Commiee report),

page 206 (note 35, Basis of preparation and

material accounting policies – Impairment of

goodwill and tangible, intangible and held for

sale assets), page 168 (note 13, Goodwill).

The group has a material amount of goodwill

amounting to £236.9m at 31 March 2026

with £167.5m of this relating to the US cash-

generating unit (‘CGU’). As required by IAS

36, management performed an impairment

assessment, determining the recoverable

amount of each CGU as the higher of the

value in use or fair value less cost to sell.

This assessment is underpinned by the

Board-approved five-year strategic plan.

This annual impairment review was performed

as at 31 March 2026. The carrying value of

the US CGU is material and hence there is

a significant estimate as to the value held

on the balance sheet.

Our audit focused on the risk that the carrying value of goodwill in the US CGU could

be materially misstated. We assessed the design and implementation of the goodwill

impairment processes and related controls; however, we concluded that we would not

rely on the controls over financial reporting and therefore we performed only substantive

procedures in this area. We reviewed management’s assessment of value in use and

fair value less cost to sell for the US CGU to verify that the recoverable amount reflected

the higher of the two measures. We tested the principles and mathematical integrity of

the group’s discounted cash flow model. With the assistance of our valuation experts,

we assessed the long-term growth rate and discount rate used in the impairment

calculation, by comparing the group’s assumptions to external data. We confirmed that

cash flows for the next 5 years were consistent with internal budgeting and strategic

planning processes and the long term viability assessment and that the underlying

budgets and strategic plans have been approved by the Board. Within the US CGU, we

challenged the cash flow projections of future revenue growth used within the model

by reference to future market growth and contract opportunities, obtaining third

party evidence where possible. We held discussions with financial and non-financial

personnel, corroborating explanations to supporting evidence. We challenged

assumptions regarding forecast margin with reference to historical performance and

evidence of strategic plans supported by external advisors. We concluded that the

group’s assumptions were reasonable and supportable, and we did not identify any

indication of management bias. We assessed the related disclosures in the annual

report, including the sensitivity of the impairment calculations to changes in the

underlying assumptions and the dependency of the valuation on securing key contract

renewals and significant pipeline opportunities, and consider them to be appropriate.

Valuation of investment in subsidiary undertakings (parent)

Refer to page 214 (Accounting policies –

Investments and note 2, Investments in

subsidiary undertakings). The company

has investments of £551.6m in its subsidiary

undertakings. Annually, the Directors consider

whether any events or circumstances have

occurred that could indicate that the carrying

amount of the investment in subsidiaries may

not be recoverable. If such circumstances are

identified, an impairment review is undertaken

to establish whether the carrying amount of the

investments exceeds its recoverable amount,

being the higher of fair value less costs to sell

or value in use. Impairment assessments of this

nature require significant judgement and there is

a risk that a potential impairment trigger may not

be identified by management. In the event that

there is an impairment trigger identified, there

is a risk that the calculation of the recoverable

amount of the investment is incorrect and

therefore the value of the investment may be

misstated. No such indicators of impairment

were identified in the year ended 31 March 2026.

We have evaluated management’s consideration of impairment triggers through

performing our own independent assessment, which has included;

ɰ

Considering the market capitalisation of the group at year end and comparing this

to the carrying value of the investment.

ɰ

Assessing the overall financial performance of the group to identify any indicators

of impairment as a result of poor financial performance.

ɰ

Considering other information gathered during the course of our audits of

components and assessing whether there were any other indicators of impairment.

ɰ

Comparing the carrying value of the investment to the carrying value of the

underlying net assets.

We found that management’s conclusion, that there are no impairment triggers in the

investment in subsidiaries carrying value, was reasonable.

149

Independent auditors’ report

to the members of QinetiQ Group plc

Report on the audit of the financial statements (continued)

How we tailored the audit scope

We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we

performed enough work to be able to give an opinion

on the financial statements as a whole, taking into

account the structure of the group and the company,

the accounting processes and controls, and the industry

in which they operate.

We conducted full scope audit work over QinetiQ Limited,

QinetiQ US and QinetiQ Pty Ltd, with QinetiQ Limited being

the only component considered significant to the group.

The audit of QinetiQ Limited is performed in the United

Kingdom and the audits of QinetiQ US and QinetiQ Pty Ltd

are performed by component audit teams based in the

United States and Australia, respectively. This provides

sufficient coverage over all financial statement line items,

except inventory, intangible assets and central balances

audited by the group team.

We performed an audit of inventory and intangible assets

balances at QinetiQ Target Systems Limited to ensure

sufficient coverage over those financial statement line

items. QinetiQ Target Systems Limited is located within the

UK and the work was performed by the group audit team.

In addition to the above, we performed risk assessment

analytical procedures on the remaining entities, other

than those considered inconsequential, to understand

key balances and transactions in the year. This was

performed by the group audit team and did not identify

any balances requiring additional testing.

The audit procedures performed over the financial

information of full scope components, QinetiQ Limited,

QinetiQ US and QinetiQ Pty Ltd, accounted for 85% of

consolidated group revenue and 84% of underlying profit

before taxation (on an absolute basis, excluding holding

companies and consolidation entities).

The full scope audits plus the additional audit procedures

over inventory and intangible assets in QinetiQ Target

Systems Limited, resulted in coverage of 83% of total

group assets.

The combination of the work referred to above, together

with additional procedures performed at a group level,

including testing of significant journals posted within

the consolidation, goodwill, acquired intangible assets,

share-based payments, pensions, IFRS 16 lease accounting,

taxation and borrowings gave us the evidence required

for our opinion on the financial statements as a whole.

The group engagement leader discussed and agreed the

audit plan with our component audit teams, in addition

to agreeing the format and content of communications.

We determined that the level of involvement we were

able to have in the audit work at our reporting entities

was sufficient, and appropriate audit evidence had

been obtained, to enable us to form our opinion on the

financial statements as a whole. The group engagement

leader visited our local component teams and the local

management teams in the United States and Australia as

part of our planning procedures. We maintained regular

dialogue throughout the audit process with our component

audit teams through the use of video conferencing. We also

supervised the work performed by all component teams

through the review of component team working papers and

we concluded that sufficient and appropriate procedures

have been performed.

The audit of the company financial statements was

performed by the group audit team. The company is

principally a holding company and there are no branches or

other locations to be considered when scoping the audit.

There are no financial statement line items in scope for

the group audit. The company is audited on a stand-alone

basis and hence testing has been performed on all material

financial statement line items.

The impact of climate risk on our audit

As part of our audit we made enquiries of management to

understand the extent of the potential impact of climate

risk on the group’s and company’s financial statements, and

we remained alert when performing our audit procedures

for any indicators of the impact of climate risk. In particular,

when carrying out our work over long term contracts we

challenged management over the impact of climate change

(e.g. flooding at exposed areas) on the forecasted costs to

complete as well as any potential risks arising from physical

and environmental issues. Our procedures did not identify

any material impact as a result of climate risk on the group’s

and company’s financial statements.

Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application

of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for

materiality. These, together with qualitative considerations,

helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the

nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the

individual financial statement line items and disclosures and

in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually

and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

150

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Independent auditors’ report

to the members of QinetiQ Group plc

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:

Financial statements – group

Financial statements – company

Overall materiality

£11,500,000 (2025: £10,000,000).

£5,520,000 (2025: £5,400,000).

How we determined it

5% of underlying profit before tax

1% of total assets

Rationale for

benchmark applied

Underlying profit before tax is one of the primary

measures used by the shareholders in assessing

the performance of the group, and is a generally

accepted auditing benchmark. It is considered

appropriate to exclude specific adjusting items

due to the nature of these balances as disclosed

in note 4 of the group financial statements.

We believe that total assets is the primary measure

used by shareholders in assessing the performance

of this entity, and is a generally accepted auditing

benchmark for a holding company. This materiality

relates to the audit of the company only, as the

company was not in scope for the group audit.

For each component in the scope of our group audit,

we allocated a materiality that is less than our overall

group materiality. The range of materiality allocated

across components was between £6,000,000 and

£11,000,000. Certain components were audited to

a local statutory audit materiality that was also less

than our overall group materiality.

We use performance materiality to reduce to an

appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate

of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds

overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance

materiality in determining the scope of our audit and the

nature and extent of our testing of account balances,

classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in

determining sample sizes. Our performance materiality

was 75% (2025: 75%) of overall materiality, amounting

to £8,600,000 (2025: £7,500,000) for the group financial

statements and £4,140,000 (2025: £4,050,000) for the

company financial statements.

In determining the performance materiality, we considered

a number of factors - the history of misstatements, risk

assessment and aggregation risk and the effectiveness

of controls - and concluded that an amount at the upper

end of our normal range was appropriate.

We agreed with the Audit Commiee that we would report

to them misstatements identified during our audit above

£575,000 (group audit)

(2025: £500,000) and £276,000

(company audit)

(2025: £270,000) as well as misstatements

below those amounts that, in our view, warranted reporting

for qualitative reasons.

Conclusions relating to going concern

Our evaluation of the directors’ assessment of the group’s

and the company’s ability to continue to adopt the going

concern basis of accounting included:

ɰ

Obtaining the board-approved strategic plan. We held

discussions with management to understand the

budgeting process and the key assumptions made

over management’s going concern assessment period;

ɰ

Performing a comparison of the cash flow forecasts

used in the going concern assessment to those in the

strategic plan and, where applicable, compared these

forecasts for consistency to those used elsewhere

in the business, including for long term contract

accounting and impairment assessments;

ɰ

Assessing whether the stress testing performed by

management appropriately considered the principal

risks facing the business, and was adequate;

ɰ

Using our own knowledge from the audit and

assessment of previous forecasting accuracy we

assessed management’s sensitivities applied to the

cash flow forecasts. These procedures confirmed

liquidity and covenant headroom in management’s

forecasts when performing severe but plausible

downside sensitivities;

ɰ

Evaluating the feasibility of management’s mitigating

actions in response to the severe but plausible

downside scenarios; and

ɰ

Assessing the adequacy of disclosures in the

Going Concern statement on page 107 of the

Audit Commiee report and on page 201 in

Note 35 of the Financial Statements and found

these appropriately reflect our understanding of the

process undertaken and the conclusion reached.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not

identified any material uncertainties relating to events

or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast

significant doubt on the group’s and the company’s ability

to continue as a going concern for a period of at least

twelve months from when the financial statements are

authorised for issue.

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded

that the directors’ use of the going concern basis of

accounting in the preparation of the financial statements

is appropriate.

However, because not all future events or conditions

can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee

as to the group’s and the company’s ability to continue

as a going concern.

151

Independent auditors’ report

to the members of QinetiQ Group plc

Report on the audit of the financial statements (continued)

In relation to the directors’ reporting on how they have

applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have

nothing material to add or draw aention to in relation to

the directors’ statement in the financial statements about

whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt

the going concern basis of accounting.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors

with respect to going concern are described in the relevant

sections of this report.

Reporting on other information

The other information comprises all of the information in

the Annual Report other than the financial statements and

our auditors’ report thereon. The directors are responsible

for the other information. Our opinion on the financial

statements does not cover the other information and,

accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except

to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report,

any form of assurance thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements,

our responsibility is to read the other information and,

in doing so, consider whether the other information is

materially inconsistent with the financial statements or

our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears

to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent

material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are

required to perform procedures to conclude whether there

is a material misstatement of the financial statements or

a material misstatement of the other information. If, based

on the work we have performed, we conclude that there

is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to

report based on these responsibilities.

With respect to the Strategic report and Directors’ report,

we also considered whether the disclosures required by

the UK Companies Act 2006 have been included.

Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit,

the Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain

opinions and maers as described below.

Strategic report and Directors’ report

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course

of the audit, the information given in the Strategic report

and Directors’ report for the year ended 31 March 2026 is

consistent with the financial statements and has been

prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

In light of the knowledge and understanding of the group

and company and their environment obtained in the course

of the audit, we did not identify any material misstatements

in the Strategic report and Directors’ report.

Directors’ Remuneration

In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration

report to be audited has been properly prepared in

accordance with the Companies Act 2006.

Corporate governance statement

The Listing Rules require us to review the directors’

statements in relation to going concern, longer-term

viability and that part of the corporate governance

statement relating to the company’s compliance with

the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code

specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities

with respect to the corporate governance statement as

other information are described in the Reporting on other

information section of this report.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we

have concluded that each of the following elements of the

corporate governance statement is materially consistent

with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained

during the audit, and we have nothing material to add or

draw aention to in relation to:

ɰ

The directors’ confirmation that they have carried out a

robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks;

ɰ

The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe

those principal risks, what procedures are in place

to identify emerging risks and an explanation of how

these are being managed or mitigated;

ɰ

The directors’ statement in the financial statements

about whether they considered it appropriate to

adopt the going concern basis of accounting in

preparing them, and their identification of any

material uncertainties to the group’s and company’s

ability to continue to do so over a period of at least

twelve months from the date of approval of the

financial statements;

ɰ

The directors’ explanation as to their assessment

of the group’s and company’s prospects, the period

this assessment covers and why the period is

appropriate; and

ɰ

The directors’ statement as to whether they have

a reasonable expectation that the company will be

able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities

as they fall due over the period of its assessment,

including any related disclosures drawing aention

to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

152

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Independent auditors’ report

to the members of QinetiQ Group plc

Our review of the directors’ statement regarding the

longer-term viability of the group and company was

substantially less in scope than an audit and only consisted

of making inquiries and considering the directors’ process

supporting their statement; checking that the statement

is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK

Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether

the statement is consistent with the financial statements

and our knowledge and understanding of the group and

company and their environment obtained in the course

of the audit.

In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of

our audit, we have concluded that each of the following

elements of the corporate governance statement is

materially consistent with the financial statements and

our knowledge obtained during the audit:

ɰ

The directors’ statement that they consider the

Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced

and understandable, and provides the information

necessary for the members to assess the group’s

and company’s position, performance, business model

and strategy;

ɰ

The section of the Annual Report that describes

the review of effectiveness of risk management

and internal control systems; and

ɰ

The section of the Annual Report describing the work

of the Audit Commiee.

We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility

to report when the directors’ statement relating to the

company’s compliance with the Code does not properly

disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code

specified under the Listing Rules for review by the auditors.

Responsibilities for the financial statements and

the audit

Responsibilities of the directors for the

financial statements

As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’

responsibilities in respect of the financial statements,

the directors are responsible for the preparation of the

financial statements in accordance with the applicable

framework and for being satisfied that they give a true

and fair view. The directors are also responsible for such

internal control as they determine is necessary to enable

the preparation of financial statements that are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are

responsible for assessing the group’s and the company’s

ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as

applicable, maers related to going concern and using the

going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either

intend to liquidate the group or the company or to cease

operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the

financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about

whether the financial statements as a whole are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error,

and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is

not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance

with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement

when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or

error and are considered material if, individually or in the

aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence

the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these

financial statements.

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of

non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design

procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined

above, to detect material misstatements in respect of

irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our

procedures are capable of detecting irregularities,

including fraud, is detailed below.

Based on our understanding of the group and industry,

we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance

with laws and regulations related to Single Source

Contracting Regulations, the Health and Safety Executive

and anti-bribery and corruption legislation, and we

considered the extent to which non-compliance might

have a material effect on the financial statements. We also

considered those laws and regulations that have a direct

impact on the financial statements such as the Companies

Act 2006 and relevant tax legislation. We evaluated

management’s incentives and opportunities for fraudulent

manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk

of override of controls), and determined that the principal

risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries

to increase revenue as well as considering management

bias in accounting estimates. The group engagement team

shared this risk assessment with the component auditors

so that they could include appropriate audit procedures

in response to such risks in their work. Audit procedures

performed by the group engagement team and/or

component auditors included:

153

Independent auditors’ report

to the members of QinetiQ Group plc

Report on the audit of the financial statements (continued)

ɰ

Discussions with management at multiple levels

across the business, internal audit and the group’s

legal counsel throughout the year, as well as at year

end. These discussions have included consideration

of known or suspected instances of non-compliance

with laws and regulations and fraud;

ɰ

Evaluation of management’s controls designed to

prevent and detect irregularities, in particular their

anti-bribery controls;

ɰ

Assessment of maers reported on the group’s

whistleblowing helpline and the results of

management’s investigation of such maers;

ɰ

Reviewing correspondence with and reporting to

relevant regulatory authorities;

ɰ

Challenging assumptions and judgements made by

management in their significant accounting estimates

and judgements, particularly in relation to the key audit

maers above;

ɰ

Designing risk filters to search for journal entries, such

as those posted with unusual account combinations,

and testing those journals highlighted (if any); and

ɰ

Incorporating elements of unpredictability into the

audit procedures performed.

There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures

described above. We are less likely to become aware of

instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that

are not closely related to events and transactions reflected

in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not detecting

a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the

risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may

involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or

intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.

Our audit testing might include testing complete

populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly

using data auditing techniques. However, it typically

involves selecting a limited number of items for testing,

rather than testing complete populations. We will often

seek to target particular items for testing based on their

size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit

sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion about the

population from which the sample is selected.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of

the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at:

www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description

forms part of our auditors’ report.

Use of this report

This report, including the opinions, has been prepared

for and only for the company’s members as a body in

accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act

2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these

opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other

purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown

or into whose hands it may come save where expressly

agreed by our prior consent in writing.

Other required reporting

Companies Act 2006 exception reporting

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report

to you if, in our opinion:

ɰ

we have not obtained all the information and

explanations we require for our audit; or

ɰ

adequate accounting records have not been kept by

the company, or returns adequate for our audit have

not been received from branches not visited by us; or

ɰ

certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration

specified by law are not made; or

ɰ

the company financial statements and the part of the

Directors’ Remuneration report to be audited are not in

agreement with the accounting records and returns.

We have no exceptions to report arising from

this responsibility.

Appointment

We were first appointed by the company for the financial

year ended 31 March 2018. Our uninterrupted engagement

covers 9 financial years.

Other maer

The company is required by the Financial Conduct Authority

Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules to include

these financial statements in an annual financial report

prepared under the structured digital format required

by DTR 4.1.15R - 4.1.18R and filed on the National Storage

Mechanism of the Financial Conduct Authority. This

auditors’ report provides no assurance over whether

the structured digital format annual financial report has

been prepared in accordance with those requirements.

John Ellis (Senior Statutory Auditor)

for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors

Southampton

21 May 2026

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

154

GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC REPORT

Financial

statements

156

Consolidated income statement

157

Consolidated statement of

comprehensive income

157

Consolidated statement of

changes in equity

158

Consolidated balance sheet

159

Consolidated cash flow statement

159

Reconciliation of movements in net debt

160

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

212

Company balance sheet

213

Company statement of

changes in equity

214

Notes to the Company

Financial Statements

Specialist marine test infrastructure

generating high-quality data that

underpins trusted engineering decisions

and long-term customer programmes.

155

All figures in £ million

Note

FY26

FY25

Underlying*

Specific

adjusting

Items*

Total

Underlying*

Specific

adjusting

Items*

Total

Revenue

2, 3

1,922.6

1,922.6

1,931.6

1,931.6

Operating costs excluding depreciation

and amortisation

(1,609.0)

(53.8)

(1,662.8)

(1,669.1)

(136.8)

(1,805.9)

Other income

2

30.1

30.1

39.2

39.2

EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax,

depreciation and amortisation)

343.7

(53.8)

289.9

301.7

(136.8)

164.9

Depreciation and impairment of property,

plant and equipment

3, 15

(76.6)

(0.5)

(77.1)

(70.6)

(1.0)

(71.6)

Impairment of goodwill

13

(143.9)

(143.9)

Amortisation and impairment of other

intangible assets

3, 4, 14

(19.9)

(23.1)

(43.0)

(15.7)

(24.2)

(39.9)

Operating profit/(loss)

3

247.2

(77.4)

169.8

215.4

(305.9)

(90.5)

Finance income

7

5.2

2.4

7.6

6.6

1.0

7.6

Finance expense

7

(22.8)

(22.8)

(23.4)

(23.4)

Gain on business divestment

12

0.5

0.5

Profit/(loss) before tax

8

229.6

(74.5)

155.1

198.6

(304.9)

(106.3)

Taxation (expense)/income

9

(61.1)

13.5

(47.6)

(51.6)

(27.8)

(79.4)

Profit/(loss) for the year

168.5

(61.0)

107.5

147.0

(332.7)

(185.7)

Earnings/(loss) per share for profit/(loss) aributable to the owners of the parent company

All figures in pence

Note

FY26

FY25

Underlying*

Total

Underlying*

Total

Basic

10

31.5

20.1

26.1

(33.0)

Diluted

10

31.0

19.8

25.8

(33.0)

*

Alternative performance measures are used to supplement the statutory figures. These are additional financial indicators used by management

internally to assess the underlying performance of the Group. Definitions can be found on page 220. Also refer to note 4 for details of ‘specific

adjusting items’.

Consolidated

income statement

For the year ended 31 March

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

156

STRATEGIC REPORT

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GOVERNANCE

All figures in £ million

Note

FY26

FY25

Profit/(loss) for the year

107.5

(185.7)

Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss:

Actuarial gain recognised in defined benefit pension schemes

27

10.2

17.7

Tax on items that will not be reclassified to profit and loss

17

(2.6)

(4.4)

Total items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss

7.6

13.3

Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss:

Foreign currency translation losses on foreign operations

(5.4)

(11.6)

Movement in deferred tax on foreign currency translation

0.2

0.7

Movement in the fair value of hedging derivatives

0.7

(4.3)

Movement in deferred tax on hedging derivatives

(0.2)

1.1

Total items that may be reclassified to profit or loss

(4.7)

(14.1)

Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the year, net of tax

2.9

(0.8)

Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year

110.4

(186.5)

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

For the year ended 31 March

All figures in £ million

Share

capital

Capital

redemption

reserve

Share

premium

Hedge

reserve

Translation

reserve

Retained

earnings

Total

Note

28

At 1 April 2025

5.5

41.0

147.6

3.2

(27.6)

456.8

626.5

Total comprehensive expense

Profit for the year

107.5

107.5

Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the

year, net of tax

0.5

(5.2)

7.6

2.9

Total comprehensive income/(expense) for

the year

0.5

(5.2)

115.1

110.4

Purchase of own shares

(0.3)

0.3

(146.9)

(146.9)

Share-based payment

11.0

11.0

Tax on share-based payments (note 9)

0.7

0.7

Dividends

(48.7)

(48.7)

At 31 March 2026

5.2

41.3

147.6

3.7

(32.8)

388.0

553.0

At 1 April 2024

5.7

40.8

147.6

6.4

(16.7)

742.3

926.1

Total comprehensive expense

Loss for the year

(185.7)

(185.7)

Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the

year, net of tax

(3.2)

(10.9)

13.3

(0.8)

Total comprehensive expense for the year

(3.2)

(10.9)

(172.4)

(186.5)

Purchase of own shares

(0.2)

0.2

(74.9)

(74.9)

Share-based payments

8.9

8.9

Tax on share-based payments (note 9)

0.8

0.8

Dividends

(47.9)

(47.9)

At 31 March 2025

5.5

41.0

147.6

3.2

(27.6)

456.8

626.5

Consolidated statement

of

comprehensive income

For the year ended 31 March

157

All figures in £ million

Note

31 March

2026

31 March

2025

Non-current assets

Goodwill

13

236.9

249.8

Other intangible assets

14

249.4

293.9

Property, plant and equipment

15

444.6

473.3

Other financial assets

23

2.3

3.0

Equity accounted investments

16

1.1

2.1

Net pension asset

27

54.4

39.4

Deferred tax asset

17

18.2

10.7

1,006.9

1,072.2

Current assets

Inventories

19

73.7

70.7

Other financial assets

23

3.3

4.9

Trade and other receivables

20

394.9

388.4

Current tax asset

18

0.4

1.6

Cash and cash equivalents

23

259.2

290.6

731.5

756.2

Total assets

1,738.4

1,828.4

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables

21

(585.6)

(597.5)

Current tax payable

18

(13.4)

(3.6)

Provisions

22

(34.1)

(56.2)

Other financial liabilities

23

(13.5)

(15.1)

(646.6)

(672.4)

Non-current liabilities

Deferred tax liability

17

(102.2)

(101.0)

Provisions

22

(16.6)

(3.5)

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

23

(410.4)

(416.6)

Other payables

21

(9.6)

(8.4)

(538.8)

(529.5)

Total liabilities

(1,185.4)

(1,201.9)

Net assets

553.0

626.5

Equity

Ordinary shares

28

5.2

5.5

Capital redemption reserve

41.3

41.0

Share premium account

147.6

147.6

Hedging reserve

3.7

3.2

Translation reserve

(32.8)

(27.6)

Retained earnings

388.0

456.8

Total equity

553.0

626.5

The financial statements on pages 156 to 215 were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 21 May

2026 and were signed on its behalf by:

Steve Wadey

Martin Cooper

Group Chief Executive Officer

Group Chief Financial Officer

Consolidated balance sheet

As at 31 March

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

158

STRATEGIC REPORT

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GOVERNANCE

All figures in £ million

Note

FY26

FY25

Underlying net cash inflow from operations

24

343.2

316.2

Less: specific adjusting items

24

(51.6)

(29.5)

Net cash inflow from operations

24

291.6

286.7

Tax paid

(44.4)

(48.6)

Interest received

6.2

6.6

Interest paid

(21.6)

(23.4)

Net cash inflow from operating activities

231.8

221.3

Purchases of intangible assets

14

(12.9)

(12.7)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

15

(59.6)

(96.1)

Proceeds from sale of property

108.5

Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment

0.4

Dividends from joint ventures and associates

0.3

Disposal of businesses

12

17.9

Net cash (outflow)/inflow from investing activities

(54.6)

0.4

Purchase of own shares

(146.9)

(108.9)

Dividends paid to shareholders

11

(48.7)

(47.9)

Capital element of lease payments

(12.6)

(10.8)

Cash flow relating to intercompany loan hedges

9.2

Net cash outflow from financing activities

(208.2)

(158.4)

(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

(31.0)

63.3

Effect of foreign exchange changes on cash and cash equivalents

(0.4)

(3.7)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year

290.6

231.0

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year

23

259.2

290.6

Reconciliation of movements in net debt

For the year ended 31 March

All figures in £ million

Note

FY26

FY25

(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents in the year

(31.0)

63.3

Add back net cash flows not impacting net debt

12.9

12.4

Movement in net debt resulting from cash flows

(18.1)

75.7

Net increase in lease obligations

(7.3)

(50.8)

Net movement in derivative financial instruments

0.1

(4.7)

Other movements including foreign exchange

(0.6)

(2.2)

Movement in net debt as defined by the Group

(25.9)

18.0

Net debt as defined by Group at the beginning of the year

(133.2)

(151.2)

Net debt as defined by the Group at the end of the year

23

(159.1)

(133.2)

Less: borrowings

23

333.6

335.0

Less: total net derivative financial instruments, capitalised borrowing costs and lease liabilities

23

84.7

88.8

Total cash and cash equivalents

23

259.2

290.6

Consolidated cash flow statement

For the year ended 31 March

159

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the year ended 31 March

160

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

1. Significant changes in the current reporting period

The financial position and performance of the Group was particularly affected by the following events and transactions

during the reporting period:

1) A £146.9m (FY25: £74.9m

) reduction in equity due to the ongoing purchase to acquire own shares as part of the share

buyback programme

2) A reduction in Goodwill and Other intangible assets in the US CGU following completion of the Fed IT disposal in H1 which

resulted in a modest gain on disposal

For a detailed discussion of the Group’s performance and financial position refer to the Strategic Report on pages 1 to 76.

2. Revenue from contracts with customers and other income

Revenue and other income is analysed as follows:

Revenue by category

For the year ended 31 March

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25
Services contracts with customers 1,842.3 1,810.9
Sale of goods contracts with customers 78.6 110.6
Royalties and licences 1.7 10.1
Total revenue 1,922.6 1,931.6
Adjust for disposed businesses (9.7) (25.8)
Adjust to constant prior year exchange rates 18.8
Total revenue on an organic, constant currency basis* 1,931.7 1,905.8
Organic revenue growth at constant currency* 1% 2%

*

Alternative performance measures are used to supplement the statutory figures. These are additional financial indicators used by management

internally to assess the underlying performance of the Group. Definitions can be found on page 220.

Other income

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25
Share of joint ventures’ (loss)/profit after tax (1.0) 0.3
Research and development expenditure credits (RDEC) 29.3 30.0
Other income 1.8 8.9
Total other income 30.1 39.2

Revenue and loss after tax of associates and joint ventures was £1.3m and £1.2m respectively (FY25: revenue of £5.9m and

profit after tax of £0.3m). The figures in the table above represent the Group share of this profit after tax.

Other income is in respect of property rentals and the recovery of other related property costs.

Revenue by customer geographic location

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| All figures in £ million | FY26 | FY25 |
| United Kingdom (UK) | 1,416.4 | 1,311.0 |
| United States of America (US) | 288.0 | 348.4 |
| Australia | 93.5 | 147.9 |
| Home countries | 1,797.9 | 1,807.3 |
| Europe | 61.6 | 64.7 |
| Rest of world | 63.1 | 59.6 |
| Total revenue | 1,922.6 | 1,931.6 |
| Home countries revenue % | 94% | 94% |
| International (non-UK) revenue % | 26% | 32% |

161

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

2. Revenue from contracts with customers and other income (continued)

Revenue by major customer type

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| All figures in £ million | FY26 | FY25 |
| UK government | 1,290.4 | 1,205.3 |
| US government | 248.8 | 338.1 |
| Other | 383.4 | 388.2 |
| Total revenue | 1,922.6 | 1,931.6 |

‘Other’ does not contain any customers with revenue in excess of 10% of total Group revenue.

The following table shows the aggregate amount of revenue allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or

partially satisfied) as at the end of the reporting period:

All figures in £ million FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30+ Total
Total forecast revenue allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations 1,347.2 744.7 458.0 1,871.5 4,421.4

Management expects that 30% (£1,347.2m) of revenue allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations as of 31 March

2026 will be recognised as revenue during the next reporting period. The amount disclosed above does not include variable

consideration which is constrained.

The following table shows the aggregate amount of revenue allocated to performance obligations that were unsatisfied (or

partially satisfied) as at the end of the prior reporting period:

All figures in £ million FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29+ Total
Total forecast revenue allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations 1,393.3 645.8 453.0 353.0 2,845.1

Revenue of £195.2m was recognised during the year that was previously unrecognised as at the previous year end and

reported as a contract liability.

3. Segmental analysis

The analysis by business segment is presented in accordance with IFRS 8 Operating Segments, on the basis of those

reportable segments whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Board (the Chief Operating Decision Maker

as defined by IFRS 8) and are aligned with the Group’s strategic direction, determined with reference to the products and

services they provide, as follows:

EMEA Services provides technical assurance, test and evaluation and training services, underpinned by long-term

contracts. EMEA Services comprises the following business units which are not considered reportable segments as defined

by IFRS 8: UK Defence, UK Intelligence and the Australia sector.

Global Solutions combines all other business units not aggregated within EMEA Services, including the QinetiQ US Sector

and Other Products (which includes QinetiQ Target Systems). Generally these business units (which are not considered

reportable segments as defined by IFRS 8) deliver innovative solutions and products which include contract-funded

research and development and developing intellectual property in partnership with key customers and through internal

funding with potential for new revenue streams.

Operating segments

FY26 FY25
Revenue Underlying Revenue Underlying
from external operating from external operating
All figures in £ million customers profit

1,2
customers profit

1,2
EMEA Services 1,529.2 182.3 1,477.7 169.0
Global Solutions 393.4 35.6 453.9 16.4
Revenue/Operating profit from segments

1,2
1,922.6 217.9 1,931.6 185.4
Research and development expenditure credits (RDEC) 29.3 30.0
Underlying operating profit

2
247.2 215.4
Operating profit margin from segments

2
11.3% 9.6%

1

The measure of profit presented to the Chief Operating Decision Maker is Operating profit from segments, stated before specific adjusting items

and research and development expenditure credits. The specific adjusting items are detailed in note 4.

2

Definitions of the Group’s ‘Alternative performance measures’ can be found on page 220.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

3. Segmental analysis (continued)

162

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

No measure of segmental assets and liabilities is reported as this information is not regularly provided to the Chief Operating

Decision Maker. Transactions between segments are included within the operating profit and revenue of each segment

as appropriate.

Reconciliation of segmental results to total profit/(loss)

All figures in £ million Note FY26 FY25
Underlying operating profit from segments

1,2
217.9 185.4
Research and development expenditure credits (RDEC) 29.3 30.0
Underlying operating profit

2
247.2 215.4
Specific adjusting items operating loss 4 (77.4) (305.9)
Operating profit/(loss) 169.8 (90.5)
Net finance expense 7 (15.2) (15.8)
Gain on business divestment 12 0.5
Profit/(loss) before tax 155.1 (106.3)
Taxation expense 9 (47.6) (79.4)
Profit/(loss) for the year 107.5 (185.7)

1

The measure of profit presented to the Chief Operating Decision Maker is Operating profit from segments, stated before specific adjusting items

and research and development expenditure credits. The specific adjusting items are detailed in note 4.

2

Definitions of the Group’s ‘Alternative performance measures’ can be found on page 220.

Non-current assets* by geographic location

Rest of
All figures in £ million UK US Australia Germany world Total
As at year ended 31 March 2026 483.1 340.6 36.4 63.9 6.9 930.9
As at year ended 31 March 2025 508.3 392.1 39.8 65.8 11.0 1,017.0

*

Excluding deferred tax, financial instruments, equity accounted investments and net pension asset.

Depreciation and amortisation by business segment – excluding specific adjusting items

For the year ended 31 March 2026

EMEA Global
All figures in £ million Services Solutions Total
Underlying depreciation and impairment of property, plant and equipment 69.7 6.9 76.6
Underlying amortisation and impairment of purchased or internally developed intangible assets 19.6 0.3 19.9
89.3 7.2 96.5

For the year ended 31 March 2025

EMEA Global
All figures in £ million Services Solutions Total
Underlying depreciation and impairment of property, plant and equipment 63.1 7.5 70.6
Underlying amortisation and impairment of purchased or internally developed intangible assets 7.5 8.2 15.7
70.6 15.7 86.3

163

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

4. Specific adjusting items

In the income statement, the Group presents specific adjusting items separately. In the judgement of the Directors, for

the reader to obtain a proper understanding of the financial information, specific adjusting items need to be disclosed

separately because of their size and nature. Further explanation of this rationale is provided in note 35 (Accounting Policies).

Underlying measures of performance exclude specific adjusting items. The following specific adjusting items have been

(charged)/credited in the consolidated income statement:

All figures in £ million Note FY26 FY25
One-off period of digital investment (23.6) (20.8)
Restructuring costs and associated impacts (30.2) (64.5)
Acquisition and disposal related costs (14.9)
Loss on sale of property (36.6)
Specific adjusting items loss before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (53.8) (136.8)
Impairment of property (0.5) (1.0)
Impairment of goodwill 13 (143.9)
Amortisation of intangible assets arising from acquisitions (23.1) (24.2)
Specific adjusting items operating loss (77.4) (305.9)
Defined benefit pension scheme net finance income 27 2.4 1.0
Gain on business divestment 12 0.5
Specific adjusting items loss before tax (74.5) (304.9)
Tax impact of the above specific adjusting items 9 13.5 17.2
Derecognition of US deferred tax asset 9 (45.0)
Total specific adjusting items loss after tax (61.0) (332.7)

Reconciliation of underlying profit for the year to total profit/(loss) for the year

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25
Underlying profit after tax 168.5 147.0
Total specific adjusting items loss after tax (61.0) (332.7)
Total profit/(loss) for the year 107.5 (185.7)

The total impact of specific adjusting items (which are excluded from underlying performance due to their distorting nature)

on operating profit was a cost of £77.4m (FY25: cost of £305.9m). The improved position reflects that FY25 included the

goodwill impairment charge of £143.9m relating to the US Sector and acquisition, disposal and integration costs of £14.9m

associated with integrating the Avantus and Air Affairs acquisitions into their respective sectors, while this year there are

no charges against these line items.

In FY26 the non-recurring cost of the discrete digital investment programme is £23.6m (FY25: £20.8m). We continue to

roll out this project to modernise the IT infrastructure to support our future growth ambitions. The non-recurring costs

are reported as specific adjusting items in the P&L, with ongoing recurring operating costs (such as licence costs and

overheads) remaining within underlying operating costs. This year is expected to be the final year of digital investment.

Restructuring costs and other impacts were £30.2m (FY25: £64.5m). This includes the costs of efficiency activity in UK and

Australia operations which is nearing completion, as well as the further non-cash charges in the US. The majority of these

costs were reported within the first half of FY26 and were a consequence of continued refinement of the market-facing

strategy and ongoing restructuring of the US Sector against challenging market conditions.

Also included within specific adjusting items are net finance income from pensions of £2.4m (FY25: £1.0m), amortisation

of acquisition intangibles of £23.1m (FY25: £24.2m) and the £0.5m gain on disposal of the Federal IT business in the US,

which completed during the first half of the year.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

164

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

5. Analysis of employee costs and numbers

The largest component of operating expenses is employee costs. The year-end and average monthly number of persons

employed by the Group, including Executive Directors, analysed by business segment, were:

As at 31 March Monthly average
2026 2025 FY26 FY25
Number Number Number Number
EMEA Services 6,213 6,903 6,448 6,955
Global Solutions 1,165 1,500 1,274 1,575
Total employees 7,378 8,403 7,722 8,530

The aggregate payroll costs of these persons were as follows:

All figures in £ million Note FY26 FY25
Wages and salaries 533.9 569.4
Social security costs 60.1 54.5
Other pension costs 70.7 73.4
Share-based payments costs 29 11.5 9.8
Total employee costs 676.2 707.1

6. Key management personnel

The key management personnel of the Group during the year to 31 March 2026 comprise the Board of Directors and the

QinetiQ Leadership Team. Their remuneration and benefits are summarised below:

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25
Short-term employee remuneration including benefits 8.4 6.9
Post-employment benefits 0.1 0.1
Share-based payments costs 3.3 3.3
Total 11.8 10.3

Short-term employee remuneration and benefits include salary, bonus and benefits. Post-employment benefits relate to

pension amounts.

The highest paid director is the Group Chief Executive Officer, details of whose remuneration are provided on page 129 of the

Directors’ Remuneration Report.

165

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

7. Finance income and expense

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| All figures in £ million | FY26 | FY25 |
| Bank interest receivable | 5.2 | 6.6 |
| Finance income before specific adjusting items | 5.2 | 6.6 |
| Amortisation of deferred financing costs | (1.2) | (1.4) |
| Bank interest and commitment fees | (16.2) | (17.8) |
| Lease expense | (5.4) | (4.2) |
| Finance expense | (22.8) | (23.4) |
| Underlying net finance expense | (17.6) | (16.8) |
| Specific adjusting item: defined benefit pension scheme net finance income | 2.4 | 1.0 |
| Net finance expense | (15.2) | (15.8) |

8. Profit/(loss) before tax

The following auditors’ remuneration has been charged in arriving at profit/(loss) before tax:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| All figures in £ million | FY26 | FY25 |
| Fees payable to the auditors and its associates: | | |
| Audit of the Group’s annual accounts | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Audit of the accounts of subsidiaries of the Company | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Total audit fees | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Audit-related assurance services (Interim financial statements) | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Other assurance services | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Total non-audit fees | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Total auditors’ remuneration | 2.1 | 2.1 |

The following items have also been charged in arriving at profit/(loss) before tax:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| All figures in £ million | FY26 | FY25 |
| Cost of inventories expensed – underlying | 43.5 | 53.8 |
| Cost of inventories wrien down – specific adjusting item (restructuring costs and associated impacts) | – | 18.5 |
| Owned assets: depreciation | 59.7 | 57.2 |
| Leased assets: depreciation | 11.6 | 10.9 |
| Foreign exchange (gain)/loss | (0.6) | 0.4 |
| Research and development expenditure – customer funded contracts | 330.6 | 332.9 |
| Research and development expenditure – Group funded | 10.6 | 12.0 |

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

166

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

9. Taxation charge

| | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | FY26 | | | FY25 | | |
| | | Specific | | | Specific | |
| | | adjusting | | | adjusting | |
| All figures in £ million | Underlying | items | Total | Underlying | Items | Total |
| Analysis of charge | | | | | | |
| Current UK tax expense/(income) | 65.1 | (6.2) | 58.9 | 51.0 | (6.2) | 44.8 |
| Current UK tax in respect of prior years | 0.9 | (2.5) | (1.6) | 2.2 | – | 2.2 |
| Overseas corporation tax | | | | | | |
| Current year | 0.2 | – | 0.2 | 3.5 | (0.9) | 2.6 |
| In respect of prior years | (2.0) | – | (2.0) | 1.0 | – | 1.0 |
| Current tax expense/(income) | 64.2 | (8.7) | 55.5 | 57.7 | (7.1) | 50.6 |
| Deferred tax (income)/expense | (5.5) | (4.8) | (10.3) | (5.0) | 5.3 | 0.3 |
| Deferred tax impact of derecognition of prior year | | | | | | |
| US deferred tax asset | – | – | – | – | 29.6 | 29.6 |
| Deferred tax in respect of prior years | 2.4 | – | 2.4 | (1.1) | – | (1.1) |
| Deferred tax (income)/expense | (3.1) | (4.8) | (7.9) | (6.1) | 34.9 | 28.8 |
| Taxation expense/(income) | 61.1 | (13.5) | 47.6 | 51.6 | 27.8 | 79.4 |
| Factors affecting tax expense in the year | | | | | | |
| Principal factors reducing the Group’s current year tax charge | | | | | | |
| below the UK statutory rate are explained below: | | | | | | |
| Profit/(loss) before tax | 229.6 | (74.5) | 155.1 | 198.6 | (304.9) | (106.3) |
| Tax on profit/(loss) before tax at 25%

(FY25: 25%) | 57.4 | (18.6) | 38.8 | 49.7 | (76.2) | (26.5) |
| Effect of: | | | | | | |
| Expenses not deductible for tax purposes and | | | | | | |
| non-taxable items | – | – | – | 0.8 | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Derecognition of US deferred tax asset | 2.4 | 4.6 | 7.0 | – | 45.0 | 45.0 |
| Non-deductible US goodwill impairment | – | – | – | – | 36.0 | 36.0 |
| Non-recognition of deductible restructuring impacts | – | 4.6 | 4.6 | – | 13.1 | 13.1 |
| Non-deductible loss on sale of property | – | – | – | – | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Tax in respect of prior years | 1.3 | (2.5) | (1.2) | 2.0 | – | 2.0 |
| Different tax rates in overseas jurisdictions | – | (1.6) | (1.6) | (0.9) | (0.4) | (1.3) |
| Taxation expense/(income) | 61.1 | (13.5) | 47.6 | 51.6 | 27.8 | 79.4 |
| Effective tax rate | 26.6% | | 30.7% | 26.0% | | (74.7)% |

The total tax charge was £47.6m (FY25: £79.4m). The underlying tax charge was £61.1m (FY25: £51.6m), on a higher underlying

profit before tax, with an underlying effective tax rate of 26.6% for the year ended 31 March 2026 (FY25: 26.0%). The

underlying effective tax rate is above the UK statutory rate of 25% (FY25: 25%), primarily as a result of unrecognised tax

deductions and prior year adjustments to returns.

Tax on specific adjusting items

The total specific adjusting items tax credit was £13.5m (FY25 charge: £27.8m). The tax credit arises primarily due to the

deductible restructuring and digital investment costs, amortisation of acquired intangibles and offset by a prior year

adjustment to the non-deductible loss on sale of Cody Technology Park.

Amounts recognised directly in equity

Current and deferred tax not recognised in net profit or loss or other comprehensive income but directly credited to equity

was £0.7m (FY25: £0.8m).

167

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

9. Taxation charge (continued)

Factors affecting future tax charges

The underlying effective tax rate is expected to remain marginally above the UK statutory rate, subject to the impact of any

tax legislation changes and the geographic mix of profits. The Group has engaged with advisers to assess any potential

impact on the tax charge by the UK’s enactment of the OECD’s Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two). The Group

performed an assessment of the potential exposure to Pillar Two income taxes based on current period data. The Group

believes it qualifies for one of the transitional safe harbours provided in the rules in all territories in which it operates. The

Group has not accrued a Pillar Two top-up tax charge for FY26. The Group has applied the temporary exemption issued by

the International Accounting Standards Board from the accounting for deferred taxes under IAS 12 and neither recognises

nor discloses information about deferred taxes related to Pillar Two income taxes. The Group does not expect a material

quantitative impact from Pillar Two legislation; however, there are expected to be significant compliance obligations.

Tax risk management and tax cash

For details of the Group’s approach to tax risk management and discussion of tax cash flows in the year, see ‘Additional

Financial Information’.

10. Earnings/(loss) per share

Basic earnings/(loss) per share

(EPS) is calculated by dividing the profit aributable to equity shareholders by the weighted

average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year. The weighted average number of shares used excludes those

shares bought by the Group and held as own shares (see note 28). For diluted earnings (but not losses

) per share the

weighted average number of shares in issue is adjusted to assume conversion of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares

arising from unvested share-based awards including share options.

Weighted average and diluted number of shares

FY26 FY25
Weighted average number of shares Million 535.4 563.4
Effect of dilutive securities Million 7.9 7.4
Diluted number of shares Million 543.3 570.8

Underlying basic earnings per share figures are presented below, in addition to the basic and diluted earnings per share,

because the Directors consider this gives a more relevant indication of underlying business performance and reflects the

adjustments to basic earnings per share for the impact of specific adjusting items (see note 4) and tax thereon.

Underlying EPS

FY26 FY25
Profit/(loss) aributable to the owners of the Company £ million 107.5 (185.7)
Remove loss after tax in respect of specific adjusting items £ million 61.0 332.7
Underlying profit after taxation £ million 168.5 147.0
Weighted average number of shares Million 535.4 563.4
Underlying basic EPS Pence 31.5 26.1
Diluted number of shares Million 543.3 570.8
Underlying diluted EPS Pence 31.0 25.8

Basic and diluted EPS

FY26 FY25
Proft/(loss) aributable to the owners of the Company £ million 107.5 (185.7)
Weighted average number of shares Million 535.4 563.4
Basic EPS Pence 20.1 (33.0)
Diluted number of shares Million 543.3 563.4
Diluted EPS Pence 19.8 (33.0)

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

168

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

11. Dividends

An analysis of the dividends paid and proposed in respect of the years ended 31 March 2026 and 31 March 2025 is

provided below:

Pence Date paid/
per share £m payable
Interim 2026 3.00 15.9 Feb 2026*
Final 2026 (proposed) 8.00 40.7 Aug 2026
Total for the year ended 31 March 2026 11.00 56.6
Interim 2025 2.80 15.7 Feb 2025
Final 2025 6.05 32.8 Aug 2025*
Total for the year ended 31 March 2025 8.85 48.5

*

Total cash paid in the year to 31 March 2026 was £48.7m (FY25: £47.9m).

The proposed final dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2026 will be paid on 20 August 2026. The ex-dividend date

is 23 July 2026 and the record date is 24 July 2026.

12. Business divestment

The gain on business divestment of £0.5m (FY25: £nil) relates to the disposal of the non-core Federal IT Services business,

as part of the US restructuring programme, in the first half of the year. Proceeds received in the period, net of transaction

related costs of £2.5m, were £17.9m. The carrying value of the business was £17.4m. All consideration received was in cash

and there is no deferred or contingent consideration.

13. Goodwill

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 31 March | 31 March |
| All figures in £ million | 2026 | 2025 |
| Cost | | |
| At 1 April | 541.0 | 551.7 |
| Disposals | (22.3) | – |
| Foreign exchange | (7.4) | (10.7) |
| At 31 March | 511.3 | 541.0 |
| Accumulated impairment | | |
| At 1 April | (291.2) | (150.3) |
| Disposals | 12.9 | – |
| Impairment charge | – | (143.9) |
| Foreign exchange | 3.9 | 3.0 |
| At 31 March | (274.4) | (291.2) |
| Net book value at 31 March | 236.9 | 249.8 |

Goodwill analysed by cash-generating unit (CGU)

Goodwill is allocated across five cash-generating units within the EMEA Services segment and two CGUs within the Global

Solutions segment. During the year, the Group determined that the Australia CGU is more appropriately defined at the

Sector level. This avoids the need to allocate goodwill on an increasingly arbitrary basis and represents the lowest level

at which business performance is now monitored by management. This followed the completion of the Air Affairs post-

acquisition integration activities and the cash inflows no longer being independently generated.

169

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

13. Goodwill (continued)

The full list of CGUs that have goodwill allocated to them is as follows:

31 March 31 March
All figures in £ million Primary reporting segments 2026 2025
US Sector Global Solutions 167.5 181.1
Target Systems Global Solutions 24.0 24.0
Naimuri EMEA Services 14.8 14.8
Inzpire EMEA Services 11.7 11.7
Australia Sector (previously QinetiQ Australia PTY and Air Affairs Australia) EMEA Services 8.4 7.8
QinetiQ Training & Simulation EMEA Services 7.8 7.8
Germany EMEA Services 2.7 2.6
Net book value at 31 March 236.9 249.8

Goodwill is aributable to the excess of consideration over the fair value of net assets acquired and includes expected

synergies, future growth prospects and employee knowledge, expertise and security clearances. The Group tests each

CGU for impairment annually, or more frequently if there are indications that goodwill might be impaired. Impairment testing

is dependent on management’s estimates and judgements, particularly as they relate to the forecasting of future cash

flows, the discount rates selected and expected long-term growth rates.

During the prior year an impairment charge was recognised in respect of the combined US Sector CGU. Given that this reset

the amount of headroom to nil, the headroom remains tight and downward revisions to the key assumptions (which would be

reasonably possible) could result in a further impairment. There are no likely variations in the key assumptions used for any

of the other CGUs which would lead to an impairment being recognised.

Key assumptions

Cash flows

The value in use and fair value less costs to dispose calculations use discounted future cash flows based on financial plans

approved by the Board covering a five-year period (aligned with the Group’s Integrated Strategic Plan process and the

longer-term viability assessment period). These are ‘boom-up’ forecasts based on detailed analysis by contract for the

revenue under contract and by opportunity for the pipeline, or with growth rates assumed based on market benchmarks.

Pipeline opportunities are categorised as ‘base case’ and ‘high case’ by management and only ‘base case’ opportunities are

included in the financial plans used for the value in use calculations.

Cash flows beyond these periods are extrapolated based on the last year of the plans, with a terminal growth-rate

assumption applied. While the Group will likely be impacted by climate change in the future to an extent, the impacts on

future cash flows used in the value in use calculations are not considered to be material.

Terminal growth rates and discount rates

The specific plans for each of the CGUs have been extrapolated using the terminal growth rates as detailed in the following

table. Growth rates are based on management’s estimates which take into consideration the long-term nature of the

industry in which the CGUs operate and external forecasts as to the likely growth of the industry in the longer term. The

discount rates used are calculated based on the weighted average cost of capital of a portfolio of comparable companies,

adjusted for risks specific to the market characteristics of each CGU, and converted to a pre-tax basis where relevant. This

is considered an appropriate estimate of a market participant discount rate.

QinetiQ
All figures % Target Australia QinetiQ Training &
31 March 2026: (2025) US Sector* Systems Inzpire Sector Germany Simulation Naimuri
Terminal growth rate 2.5 (2.3) 2.3 (2.3) 2.3 (2.3) 2.5 (2.4) 2.0 (2.1) 2.3 (2.3) 2.3 (2.3)
Discount rate* 9.5 (9.4) 11.9 (12.2) 11.7 (12.1) 12.4 (13.8) 10.3 (9.4) 11.8 (12.2) 11.7 (12.1)

*

All discount rates stated are on a pre-tax basis, except for the US which is on a post-tax basis per the fair value less costs to dispose calculation.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

13. Goodwill (continued)

170

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

Sensitivity analysis shows that the value of the terminal year cash flow, the discount rate and the terminal growth rates have

a significant impact on the value of the discounted cash flows. Sensitivities are provided below for each of the CGUs.

Results of impairment testing by CGU

US Sector

The carrying value of the goodwill for the US Sector CGU as at 31 March 2026 was £167.5m (2025: £181.1m). The recoverable

amount of this CGU as at 31 March 2026 is based on a fair value less costs to dispose calculation which is derived from the

latest cash flow projections. This beer reflects the transaction structure and tax treatment of the historical acquisitions

and hence gives a higher value than the equivalent value in use calculation. The calculation uses the assumptions noted

above and is higher than the carrying value of the net operating assets (of £395.0m). Our US operations have had a more

stable year and successfully completed a major restructuring programme.

The key assumption underpinning the recoverable amount is the revenue growth applied over the period of the calculation

which is required to achieve the terminal year cash flows. The growth is based on market growth rates for the high growth

segments in which the business operates, as well as reflecting the expectation of securing a number of key contract

renewals and significant pipeline opportunities. In the event that assumed contract renewals and significant pipeline

opportunities are not secured in line with the plan, this will result in a future significant impairment charge. A 400 basis

point reduction in the compound annual revenue growth rate or a 100 basis point reduction in operating margins over

the plan period, which are considered reasonably possible changes, would reduce the recoverable amount and result in

an impairment of £47.9m and £30.6m respectively. A decrease in the terminal growth rate of 0.5% would not result in an

impairment however an increase in the discount rate of 1%, which is considered a reasonably possible change, would cause

an impairment of £28.5m.

14. Other intangible assets

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | Acquired intangibles | | | Other | |
| | Customer | Other | Development | internally | |
| All figures in £ million | relationships | acquired | costs | generated

1 | Total |
| Cost | | | | | |
| At 1 April 2025 | 297.9 | 90.9 | 61.9 | 75.3 | 526.0 |
| Reclassifications from PPE | – | – | 5.8 | 0.5 | 6.3 |
| Reclassifications between categories | – | – | 4.2 | (4.2) | – |
| Additions – internally developed

2 | – | – | 1.7 | 4.5 | 6.2 |
| Additions – purchased

2 | – | – | – | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Disposals | – | – | (3.6) | (9.7) | (13.3) |
| Disposal divestments | (15.3) | – | – | – | (15.3) |
| Foreign exchange | (3.2) | (0.4) | – | – | (3.6) |
| At 31 March 2026 | 279.4 | 90.5 | 70.0 | 73.1 | 513.0 |
| Accumulated amortisation and impairment | | | | | |
| At 1 April 2025 | (96.6) | (69.8) | (33.6) | (32.1) | (232.1) |
| Amortisation charge for year | (18.1) | (5.1) | (11.1) | (2.6) | (36.9) |
| Disposals | – | – | 1.2 | 4.0 | 5.2 |
| Disposal divestments | 6.4 | – | – | – | 6.4 |
| Impairment | – | – | – | (6.1) | (6.1) |
| Foreign exchange | (0.3) | – | 0.2 | – | (0.1) |
| At 31 March 2026 | (108.6) | (74.9) | (43.3) | (36.8) | (263.6) |
| Net book value at 31 March 2026 | 170.8 | 15.6 | 26.7 | 36.3 | 249.4 |

1

Includes Assets In Course Of Construction of closing net book value of £36.4m as at 31 March 2026 (2025: £31.7m).

2

Additions per the table above are different to the capital expenditure included in the cash flow statement due to the relative timing of cash

payments compared to the recognition of balance sheet assets.

171

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

14. Other intangible assets (continued)

‘Other acquired’ consists primarily of intellectual property and existing technology arising on past acquisition of

businesses. Significant individual assets from past acquisitions include: customer relationships associated with US

Avantus, US C5ISR, Germany and QinetiQ Training & Simulation Limited (NBV: £142.8m; £7.4m; £14.7m; £1.8m respectively)

with remaining amortisation periods of approximately 13 years, 4 years, 7 years and 5 years respectively, and acquired

technology associated with US Avantus, US C5ISR, Germany and QinetiQ Training & Simulation Limited (£0.7m; £6.3m; £2.5m;

£1.0m respectively) all with remaining amortisation periods of approximately five years.

Acquired intangibles Other
Customer Other Development internally
All figures in £ million relationships acquired costs generated Total
Cost
At 1 April 2024 303.8 92.6 51.1 80.4 527.9
Reclassifications from PPE 8.1 0.6 8.7
Reclassifications between categories 0.1 (0.1)
Additions – internally developed* 2.5 9.0 11.5
Additions – purchased* 1.2 0.4 1.6
Disposals (0.7) (14.3) (15.0)
Foreign exchange (5.9) (1.7) (0.4) (0.7) (8.7)
At 31 March 2025 297.9 90.9 61.9 75.3 526.0
Accumulated amortisation and impairment
At 1 April 2024 (79.6) (65.6) (24.1) (36.8) (206.1)
Amortisation charge for year (18.6) (5.6) (6.2) (5.5) (35.9)
Disposals 0.6 10.2 10.8
Impairment (4.0) (4.0)
Foreign exchange 1.6 1.4 0.1 3.1
At 31 March 2025 (96.6) (69.8) (33.6) (32.1) (232.1)
Net book value at 31 March 2025 201.3 21.1 28.3 43.2 293.9

*

Additions per the table above are different to the capital expenditure included in the cash flow statement due to the relative timing of cash

payments compared to the recognition of balance sheet assets.

15. Property, plant and equipment

| | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | Owned assets | | | | Right-of-use assets | | | |
| | | Plant, | Computers | | | Plant, | Computers | |
| | Land and | machinery | and office | Assets under | Land and | machinery | and office | |
| All figures in £ million | buildings | and vehicles | equipment | construction | buildings | and vehicles | equipment | Total |
| Cost | | | | | | | | |
| At 1 April 2025 | 169.9 | 345.2 | 155.7 | 129.4 | 99.9 | 5.7 | 0.4 | 906.2 |
| Reclassifications to intangibles | – | 0.8 | – | (7.1) | – | – | – | (6.3) |
| Reclassifications between categories | 37.5 | 13.2 | 5.4 | (56.1) | – | – | – | – |
| Additions – purchased* | 0.3 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 47.9 | 13.2 | 0.4 | – | 68.5 |
| Disposals | (7.7) | (18.7) | (11.0) | (4.4) | (8.2) | – | – | (50.0) |
| Business divestment | – | – | – | – | (5.5) | – | – | (5.5) |
| Foreign exchange | (0.1) | 3.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | (0.1) | 0.1 | – | 3.7 |
| At 31 March 2026 | 199.9 | 348.9 | 151.7 | 110.2 | 99.3 | 6.2 | 0.4 | 916.6 |
| Accumulated depreciation and | | | | | | | | |
| impairment | | | | | | | | |
| At 1 April 2025 | (91.3) | (202.1) | (94.9) | – | (40.7) | (3.5) | (0.4) | (432.9) |
| Charge | (13.3) | (23.4) | (23.0) | – | (11.0) | (0.6) | – | (71.3) |
| Disposals | 7.1 | 15.4 | 9.7 | – | 4.1 | – | – | 36.3 |
| Business divestment | – | – | – | – | 2.0 | – | – | 2.0 |
| Impairment | (3.3) | (2.0) | – | – | (0.5) | – | – | (5.8) |
| Foreign exchange | 0.1 | (0.5) | – | – | – | 0.1 | – | (0.3) |
| At 31 March 2026 | (100.7) | (212.6) | (108.2) | – | (46.1) | (4.0) | (0.4) | (472.0) |
| Net book value at 31 March 2026 | 99.2 | 136.3 | 43.5 | 110.2 | 53.2 | 2.2 | – | 444.6 |

*

Additions per the table above are different to the capital expenditure included in the cash flow statement due to the relative timing of cash

payments compared to the recognition of balance sheet assets.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

15. Property, plant and equipment (continued)

172

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

During the prior year a £36.6m loss was recognised on the sale and leaseback of Cody Technology Park; this was included

within operating costs as a specific adjusting item (see note 4). While the Group will likely be impacted by climate change in

the future to an extent, the impact on the carrying value of property, plant and equipment is not considered to be material.

Owned assets Right-of-use assets
Plant, Computers Plant, Computers
Land and machinery and office Assets under Land and machinery and office
All figures in £ million buildings and vehicles equipment construction buildings and vehicles equipment Total
Cost
At 1 April 2024 375.7 324.4 140.9 142.3 92.4 3.4 0.4 1,079.5
Reclassifications to intangibles (0.9) (7.8) (8.7)
Reclassifications/transfers 29.7 23.7 15.4 (68.8)
Additions – purchased* 5.9 24.8 5.6 67.5 23.9 2.3 130.0
Disposals (240.6) (25.0) (4.7) (3.6) (14.5) (288.4)
Foreign exchange (0.8) (2.7) (0.6) (0.2) (1.9) (6.2)
At 31 March 2025 169.9 345.2 155.7 129.4 99.9 5.7 0.4 906.2
Accumulated depreciation and
impairment
At 1 April 2024 (227.0) (194.3) (78.4) (44.4) (3.2) (0.4) (547.7)
Charge (13.7) (22.7) (20.8) (10.6) (0.3) (68.1)
Disposals 149.3 16.5 4.0 14.5 184.3
Impairment (2.5) (1.0) (3.5)
Foreign exchange 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.8 2.1
At 31 March 2025 (91.3) (202.1) (94.9) (40.7) (3.5) (0.4) (432.9)
Net book value at 31 March 2025 78.6 143.1 60.8 129.4 59.2 2.2 473.3

*

Additions per the table above are different to the capital expenditure included in the cash flow statement due to the relative timing of cash

payments compared to the recognition of balance sheet assets.

16. Equity accounted investments

31 March 2026 31 March 2025
Joint Joint
Ventures’ Group net Ventures’ Group net
financial share of Joint financial share of Joint
All figures in £ million position Ventures position Ventures
Non-current assets 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.5
Current assets 2.5 2.1 3.4 2.4
3.0 2.5 4.3 2.9
Current liabilities (0.3) (0.2) (0.3) (0.1)
Non-current liabilities (1.6) (1.2) (1.5) (0.7)
(1.9) (1.4) (1.8) (0.8)
Net assets of joint ventures 1.1 1.1 2.5 2.1

The loss from the Group’s share of joint ventures for the year ended 31 March 2026 was £1.0m (FY25: profit of £0.3m).

173

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

17. Deferred tax

For the year ended 31 March 2026

Deferred tax asset

Carried
Short-term forward
timing interest Lease
All figures in £ million differences expense liabilities Tax losses Total
At 1 April 2025 12.1 2.1 8.8 4.8 27.8
Credited/(charged) to income statement (2.7) 2.3 (0.9) 4.7 3.4
Credited to other comprehensive income
Credited to equity 0.2 0.2
Foreign exchange 0.5 0.2 0.5 1.2
Gross deferred tax asset at 31 March 2026 10.1 4.6 7.9 10.0 32.6
Less: liability available for offset (14.4)
Net deferred tax asset at 31 March 2026 18.2

Deferred tax liability

Owned
property,
Pension plant & Right-of-use Acquisition
All figures in £ million surplus equipment assets intangibles Total
At 1 April 2025 (14.6) (82.8) (7.8) (12.9) (118.1)
Credited/(charged) to income statement (0.7) 1.0 1.6 2.6 4.5
Charged to other comprehensive income (2.6) (2.6)
Foreign exchange (0.4) (0.4)
Gross deferred tax liability at 31 March 2026 (17.9) (81.8) (6.2) (10.7) (116.6)
Less: asset available for offset 14.4
Net deferred tax liability at 31 March 2026 (102.2)

Deferred tax has been calculated at the rate at which the timing difference is expected to reverse using enacted future

statutory rates. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax

assets and liabilities and where the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority.

At 31 March 2026 the Group had unused tax losses and carried forward interest expenses of £383.1m (2025: £305.3m) which

are available for offset against future taxable profits.

During FY25, with our US operations performing below expectations, the change in the Administration and the change in

US Sector CEO, re-alignment of strategy and required restructuring, there was a material impact on the future projections

of the US business. As a result, in FY25 the Group derecognised the deferred tax assets previously recognised in respect

of net operating losses in FY25. There is continued derecognition in FY26 due to the uncertainty over future taxable profits

for the US business. No deferred tax asset is recognised in respect of £236.8m (2025: £183.8m) of US net operating losses

and £86.2m (2025: £85.9m) of US excess interest. There is also no deferred tax asset recognised in respect of £9.5m

(2025: £8.8m) of UK capital losses due to uncertainty over the timing and extent of their utilisation. Full recognition of the

US and UK losses would increase the deferred tax asset by £92.4m. Of the £236.8m (2025: £183.8m) of US net operating

losses, £30.3m (2025: £31.1m) are time-limited of which £21.4m will expire in 2035 and £8.9m in 2036.

Deferred tax assets in respect of losses and excess interest are recognised on the balance sheet of £14.6m (2025: £6.9m),

being £3.6m in respect of £15.7m of Canadian net operating losses and excess interest, £7.2m in respect of £22.3m of German

trade losses and excess interest, and £3.8m in respect of £12.7m of Australian trade losses and excess interest.

The Group made overseas losses in the year ended 31 March 2026 and recognition of deferred tax assets is dependent on

future forecast taxable profits. The Group has reviewed the latest forecasts for these businesses which incorporate the

unsystematic risks of operating in the defence business. In the period beyond the five-year forecast we have reviewed the

terminal period profits and, based on these and our expectations for these businesses, we believe it is probable the losses,

with the exception of the US and UK, will be fully utilised over the next 3–10 years. A 10% change in the forecast profits would

alter the utilisation period by 2 years.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

17. Deferred tax (continued)

174

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

There are no material temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries or interests in joint ventures for

which deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised.

For the year ended 31 March 2025

Deferred tax asset

Carried
Short-term forward
timing interest Lease Tax
All figures in £ million differences expense liabilities losses Total
At 1 April 2024 20.1 1.0 8.9 35.9 65.9
Credited to income statement (8.8) 1.1 (30.7) (38.4)
Charged to other comprehensive income 1.8 1.8
Foreign exchange (1.0) (0.1) (0.4) (1.5)
Gross deferred tax asset at 31 March 2025 12.1 2.1 8.8 4.8 27.8
Less: liability available for offset (17.1)
Net deferred tax asset at 31 March 2025 10.7

Deferred tax liability

Owned
property,
Pension plant & Right-of-use Acquisition
All figures in £ million surplus equipment assets intangibles Total
At 1 April 2024 (9.6) (80.4) (7.6) (26.0) (123.6)
Charged to income statement (0.6) (2.4) 12.6 9.6
Credited to other comprehensive income (4.4) (4.4)
Foreign exchange (0.2) 0.5 0.3
Gross deferred tax liability at 31 March 2025 (14.6) (82.8) (7.8) (12.9) (118.1)
Less: asset available for offset 17.1
Net deferred tax liability at 31 March 2025 (101.0)

18. Current tax

31 March 31 March
All figures in £ million 2026 2025
Current tax receivable 0.4 1.6
Current tax payable (13.4) (3.6)
Net current tax payable (13.0) (2.0)

19. Inventories

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | 31 March | 31 March |
| All figures in £ million | 2026 | 2025 |
| Raw materials | 28.1 | 28.7 |
| Work in progress | 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Finished goods | 38.5 | 33.3 |
| Total inventories | 73.7 | 70.7 |

175

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

20. Trade and other receivables

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | 31 March | 31 March |
| All figures in £ million | 2026 | 2025 |
| Trade receivables | 143.3 | 148.9 |
| Contract assets | 178.2 | 154.5 |
| Other receivables | 44.2 | 48.1 |
| Prepayments | 29.2 | 36.9 |
| Total trade and other receivables | 394.9 | 388.4 |

Trade and other receivables includes assets that are realised as part of the business’s normal operating cycle, including

amounts of £12.1m (2025: £nil) that are not expected to be realised within 12 months of the year end. Credit risk is limited as

a result of the high percentage of revenue derived from UK and US government agencies. Accordingly, the Directors believe

that no credit provision in excess of the allowance for doubtful debts is required. As at 31 March 2026 the Group carried a loss

allowance in respect of expected credit risk of £1.6m (2025: £1.4m).

Contract assets decreased during the year due to the timing of invoicing. Contract assets represents unbilled amounts

recoverable under customer contracts (refer to accounting policies, note 35).

Ageing of receivables and associated loss allowance for expected credit risk

As at 31 March 2026

Up to 30 days 30-120 days >120 days
Current past due past due past due Total
Gross carrying amount – trade receivables (£m) 126.1 11.1 4.7 3.0 144.9
Gross carrying amount – contract assets (£m) 178.2 178.2
Expected loss rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 53.3% 0.5%
Loss allowance (£m) 1.6 1.6

As at 31 March 2025

Up to 30 days 30-120 days >120 days
Current past due past due past due Total
Gross carrying amount – trade receivables (£m) 120.1 23.1 2.4 4.7 150.3
Gross carrying amount – contract assets (£m) 154.5 154.5
Expected loss rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 29.8% 0.5%
Loss allowance (£m) 1.4 1.4

Movements in the provision for expected credit loss

FY26 FY25
Trade Contract Trade Contract
All figures in £ million receivables assets receivables assets
At 1 April 1.4 1.7
Increase in loss allowance recognised in income statement 0.3 0.2
Unutilised amount reversed through income statement (0.1) (0.1)
Utilised (receivables wrien off) (0.4)
At 31 March 1.6 1.4

The maximum exposure to credit risk in relation to trade and other receivables at the reporting date is the fair value of trade

and other receivables. The Group does not hold any collateral as security.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

176

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

21. Trade and other payables

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | 31 March | 31 March |
| All figures in £ million | 2026 | 2025 |
| Trade payables | 184.2 | 152.1 |
| Other tax and social security | 54.6 | 56.7 |
| Contract liabilities | 158.3 | 207.0 |
| Accrued expenses and other payables | 188.5 | 181.7 |
| Total current trade and other payables | 585.6 | 597.5 |
| Contract liabilities | 5.6 | 6.4 |
| Other payables | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| Total non-current trade and other payables | 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Total trade and other payables | 595.2 | 605.9 |

Trade payables include £59.4m (2025: £38.0m) of goods received not invoiced accruals where invoices had not been

processed as at the year end. Contract liabilities, which are influenced by the timing of revenue recognition and invoicing on

contracts, were broadly consistent with the prior year.

22. Provisions

For the year ended 31 March 2026

All figures in £ million Property Other Total
At 1 April 2025 24.8 34.9 59.7
Created in year 0.6 15.9 16.5
Released in year (0.1) (1.6) (1.7)
Utilised in year (2.4) (21.5) (23.9)
Foreign exchange 0.1 0.1
At 31 March 2026 22.9 27.8 50.7
Current liability 20.1 14.0 34.1
Non-current liability 2.8 13.8 16.6
At 31 March 2026 22.9 27.8 50.7

For the year ended 31 March 2025

All figures in £ million Property Other Total
At 1 April 2024 2.5 17.0 19.5
Created in year 24.3 21.7 46.0
Released in year (1.2) (1.2)
Utilised in year (2.0) (2.5) (4.5)
Foreign exchange (0.1) (0.1)
At 31 March 2025 24.8 34.9 59.7
Current liability 23.0 33.2 56.2
Non-current liability 1.8 1.7 3.5
At 31 March 2025 24.8 34.9 59.7

Property provisions relate to obligations relating to the sale and leaseback transaction, dilapidations and under-utilised

properties. The under-utilised property provision is affected by the timing of when properties can be sub-let and the

proportion of space that can be sub-let. Other provisions includes £10.7m (2025: £12.1m) in respect of a civil liability for the

Pendine incident. There is an equivalent balance in Other Receivables for an insurance recoverable. There is uncertainty

around the timing of the utilisation of this balance although this will not impact cash or the P&L. Other provisions also

includes £8.4m (31 March 2025: £14.3m) relating to the group-wide restructuring programme, the cost of which is included

as a specific adjusting item. The remaining balance consists of liabilities relating to legal, regulatory and other maers,

the magnitude and timing of utilisation of which are determined by a variety of factors.

177

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

23. Net debt

| | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | 31 March 2026 | | | 31 March 2025 | | |
| All figures in £ million | Assets | Liabilities | Net | Assets | Liabilities | Net |
| Current financial assets/(liabilities) | | | | | | |
| Deferred financing costs | 1.2 | – | 1.2 | 1.3 | – | 1.3 |
| Lease liabilities | – | (12.4) | (12.4) | – | (13.3) | (13.3) |
| Derivative financial instruments | 2.1 | (1.1) | 1.0 | 3.6 | (1.8) | 1.8 |
| Total current financial assets/(liabilities) | 3.3 | (13.5) | (10.2) | 4.9 | (15.1) | (10.2) |
| Non-current assets/(liabilities) | | | | | | |
| Deferred financing costs | 0.3 | – | 0.3 | 1.0 | – | 1.0 |
| Borrowings – Term loan | – | (333.6) | (333.6) | – | (335.0) | (335.0) |
| Lease liabilities | – | (76.7) | (76.7) | – | (80.6) | (80.6) |
| Derivative financial instruments | 2.0 | (0.1) | 1.9 | 2.0 | (1.0) | 1.0 |
| Total non-current financial assets/(liabilities) | 2.3 | (410.4) | (408.1) | 3.0 | (416.6) | (413.6) |
| Total financial assets/(liabilities) | 5.6 | (423.9) | (418.3) | 7.9 | (431.7) | (423.8) |
| Cash | 91.8 | – | 91.8 | 120.2 | – | 120.2 |
| Cash equivalents | 167.4 | – | 167.4 | 170.4 | – | 170.4 |
| Total cash and cash equivalents | 259.2 | – | 259.2 | 290.6 | – | 290.6 |
| Total net debt as defined by the Group | | | (159.1) | | | (133.2) |

At 31 March 2026 the Group held £0.6m (2025: £0.7m) of cash which is restricted in its use. The term loan was issued at

floating rates as Tranche A £273.3m and Tranche B USD 79.6m. A proportion of Tranche A has been converted to fixed rate

using interest rate swaps. Further analysis of the terms and maturity dates for financial liabilities are set out in note 26.

24. Cash flows from operations

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| All figures in £ million | FY26 | FY25 |
| Profit/(loss) after tax for the year | 107.5 | (185.7) |
| Adjustments for: | | |
| Taxation expense | 47.6 | 79.4 |
| Net finance expense | 15.2 | 15.8 |
| Impairment of goodwill | – | 143.9 |
| Gain on business divestment | (0.5) | – |
| Loss on sale of property | – | 36.6 |
| Loss on disposal of plant and equipment | 8.4 | 4.6 |
| Loss on disposal of intangibles | 7.7 | 4.2 |
| Impairment of property | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Amortisation of purchased or internally developed intangible assets | 19.9 | 15.7 |
| Amortisation of intangible assets arising from acquisitions | 23.1 | 24.2 |
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment | 76.6 | 70.6 |
| Share of post-tax loss/(profit) of equity accounted entities | 1.0 | (0.3) |
| Share-based payments charge | 11.5 | 9.8 |
| Retirement benefit contributions in excess of income statement expense | (2.4) | (2.3) |
| Net movement in provisions | (9.0) | 19.4 |
| | 307.1 | 236.9 |
| (Increase)/decrease in inventories | (3.2) | 16.5 |
| (Increase)/decrease in receivables | (4.9) | 56.3 |
| Decrease in payables | (7.4) | (23.0) |
| Changes in working capital | (15.5) | 49.8 |
| Net cash inflow from operations | 291.6 | 286.7 |

The working capital movements in the cash flow statement do not agree directly to the balance sheet due to impact of

foreign exchange movements, accrued interest and the timing of capex payments.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

24. Cash flows from operations (continued)

178

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

Reconciliation of net cash flow from operations to underlying net cash flow from operations

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25
Net cash flow from operations 291.6 286.7
Specific adjusting items*:
Add back specific adjusting item: digital investment 23.6 20.8
Add back specific adjusting item: restructuring costs 24.8 3.4
Add back specific adjusting item: sale and leaseback obligations 1.0
Add back specific adjusting item: acquisition and disposal related items 2.2 5.3
Total specific adjusting items 51.6 29.5
Underlying net cash flow from operations* 343.2 316.2

Reconciliation of net cash flow from operations to free cash flow

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25^
Net cash flow from operations 291.6 286.7
Less: tax and net interest payments (59.8) (65.4)
Less: net purchases of intangible assets and property plant and equipment (72.5) (108.4)
Free cash flow* 159.3 112.9

Underlying cash conversion ratio

FY26 FY25
Underlying EBITDA* – £ million 343.7 301.7
Underlying net cash flow from operations* – £ million 343.2 316.2
Underlying cash conversion ratio* – % 100% 105%

*

Definitions of the Group’s ‘Alternative performance measures’ can be found on page 220.

^

The free cash flow definition has been revised to include the cash flow impact of specific adjusting items within operating profit as this is

considered to be a more appropriate reflection of the Group’s cash generation prior to shareholder return. The prior year comparative has been

restated accordingly.

25. Leases

Group as a lessor

The Group receives rental income on certain properties. Primarily these are properties partially occupied by Group

companies, with vacant space sub-let to third-party tenants. There was £0.3m (FY25: £0.7m) of sublease income which

related to right-of-use assets. The Group had contracted with tenants for the following future minimum lease payments:

31 March 31 March
All figures in £ million 2026 2025
Within one year 1.1 1.0
In the second to fifth years inclusive 2.6 2.3
Greater than five years 0.5 0.4
Total future minimum lease payments 4.2 3.7

Group as a lessee

Amounts recognised in the balance sheet

The balance sheet shows the following amounts relating to leases:

Right-of-use assets (included within Property, Plant & Equipment – see note 15)

31 March 31 March
All figures in £ million 2026 2025
Land and buildings 53.2 59.2
Plant, machinery and vehicles 2.2 2.2
Total right-of-use assets net book value 55.4 61.4

179

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

25. Leases (continued)

Lease liabilities (included within Net debt – see note 23)

31 March 31 March
All figures in £ million 2026 2025
Current 12.4 13.3
Non-current 76.7 80.6
Total lease liabilities 89.1 93.9

Additions to the right-of-use assets during FY26 were £13.6m (FY25: £26.2m). The total cash outflow for leases in FY26 was

£18.0m (FY25: £15.0m). The Group had no expense relating to variable lease payments not included in the measurement of

lease liabilities.

Amounts recognised in the consolidated income statement

The consolidated income statement includes the following amounts relating to leases:

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25
Depreciation charge
Land and buildings 11.0 10.6
Plant, machinery and vehicles 0.6 0.3
Total depreciation charge (see note 15) 11.6 10.9
Interest expense (included in finance cost – see note 7) 5.4 4.2
Expense relating to short-term leases (included in operating costs) 0.8 0.8
Expense relating to low value leases (included in operating costs) 0.3 0.4
Total lease expense charged to profit before tax 18.1 16.3

Principal leases are negotiated for a term of approximately 10 years.

26. Financial risk management

The Group’s international operations expose it to financial risks that include the effects of changes in foreign exchange

rates, interest rates, credit risks and liquidity risks.

Treasury and risk management policies, which are set by the Board, specify guidelines on financial risks and the use of

financial instruments to manage risk. The instruments and techniques used to manage exposures include foreign currency

and interest rate swap derivatives. Group treasury monitors financial risks and compliance with risk management policies

during the year. There have been no changes in any risk management policies during the year or since the year end. For

details of the Group’s Treasury policy and management of financial instruments see ‘Additional Financial Information’ on

page 218.

The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities in the Group will be able to continue as going concerns while

maximising the return to stakeholders through the optimisation of the debt and equity balance. The capital structure of

the Group consists of debt, cash and cash equivalents and equity aributable to equity holders of the parent, comprising

issued capital, reserves and retained earnings as disclosed in the consolidated statement of changes in equity. The Group

has a revolving credit facility and floating rate term loan with its relationship banks with a requirement for the half yearly

testing period that the ratio of Net Debt to EBITDA will not exceed 3.5:1 and the ratio of EBITDA to net finance charges will not

be less than 4:1. The Group complied with both covenants during the year. As at 31 March 2026, the ratio of Net Debt to EBITDA

was 0.5:1 and the ratio of EBITDA to net finance charges was 22:1. The revolving credit facility is undrawn at the year end and

matures in 2029. The floating rate term loan is repayable in 2027.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

26. Financial risk management (continued)

180

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

A) Fair values of financial instruments

The table below analyses financial instruments carried at fair value, by valuation method. The different levels have been

defined as follows:

Level 1

– measured using quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2

– measured using inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability,

either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). Level 2 derivatives comprise forward foreign exchange

contracts which have been fair valued using forward exchange rates that are quoted in an active market; and interest rate

swaps which have been fair valued using interest rates that are quoted in an active market

Level 3

– measured using inputs for the assets or liability that are not based on observable market data (i.e. unobservable inputs)

The following table presents the Group’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value through the P&L as at

31 March 2026:

All figures in £ million Note Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets
Current derivative financial instruments 23 2.1 2.1
Cash equivalents 167.4 167.4
Non-current derivative financial instruments 23 2.0 2.0
Liabilities
Current derivative financial instruments 23 (1.1) (1.1)
Non-current derivative financial instruments 23 (0.1) (0.1)
Total 170.3 170.3

The following table presents the Group’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value through the P&L as at

31 March 2025:

All figures in £ million Note Level 1 Level 2* Level 3 Total*
Assets
Current derivative financial instruments 3.6 3.6
Cash equivalents 170.4 170.4
Non-current derivative financial instruments 2.0 2.0
Liabilities
Current derivative financial instruments (1.8) (1.8)
Non-current derivative financial instruments (1.0) (1.0)
Total 173.2 173.2

*

Restated to include cash equivalent balances which relate to money market fund investments which are held at fair value through the profit and

loss account.

181

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

26. Financial risk management (continued)

For cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables and bank and current borrowings, the fair value of the financial

instruments approximate to their carrying value as a result of the short maturity periods of these financial instruments. For

trade and other receivables, allowances are made within the carrying value for credit risk. For other financial instruments,

the fair value is based on market value, where available. Where market values are not available, the fair values have been

calculated by discounting cash flows to net present value using prevailing market-based interest rates translated at the

year-end rates. There have been no transfers between levels.

All financial assets and liabilities had a fair value that is identical to book value at 31 March 2026 and 31 March 2025, other

than lease liabilities where the book value is not reflective of changes in interest rates. Detailed analysis is provided in the

following tables:

As at 31 March 2026

Financial Financial Financial
assets at fair assets at liabilities at Derivatives Total carrying
value profit amortised amortised used as value and
All figures in £ million Note and loss cost cost hedges Other fair value
Financial assets
Non-current
Derivative financial instruments 23 2.0 2.0
Deferred financing costs 23 0.3 0.3
Current
Trade receivables and similar items 154.0 154.0
Derivative financial instruments 23 2.1 2.1
Deferred financing costs 23 1.2 1.2
Cash and cash equivalents 23 167.4 91.8 259.2
Total financial assets 167.4 247.3 4.1 418.8
Financial liabilities
Non-current
Bank borrowings 23 (333.6) (333.6)
Derivative financial instruments 23 (0.1) (0.1)
Lease liabilities 23 (76.7) (76.7)
Current
Trade payables and similar items (347.4) (347.4)
Derivative financial instruments 23 (1.1) (1.1)
Lease liabilities 23 (12.4) (12.4)
Total financial liabilities (681.0) (1.2) (89.1) (771.3)
Total 167.4 247.3 (681.0) 2.9 (89.1) (352.5)

182

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

26. Financial risk management (continued)

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

As at 31 March 2025

Financial Financial Financial
assets at fair assets at liabilities at Derivatives Total carrying
value profit amortised amortised used as value and fair
All figures in £ million Note and loss cost cost hedges Other value
Financial assets
Non-current
Derivative financial instruments 23 2.0 2.0
Deferred financing costs 23 1.0 1.0
Current
Trade receivables and similar items 161.0 161.0
Derivative financial instruments 23 3.6 3.6
Deferred financing costs 23 1.3 1.3
Cash and cash equivalents* 23 170.4 120.2 290.6
Total financial assets 170.4 283.5 5.6 459.5
Financial liabilities
Non-current
Bank borrowings 23 (335.0) (335.0)
Derivative financial instruments 23 (1.0) (1.0)
Lease liabilities 23 (80.6) (80.6)
Current
Trade payables and similar items (302.5) (302.5)
Derivative financial instruments 23 (1.8) (1.8)
Lease liabilities 23 (13.3) (13.3)
Total financial liabilities (637.5) (2.8) (93.9) (734.2)
Total 170.4 283.5 (637.5) 2.8 (93.9) (274.7)

*

Restated in respect of cash balances which are not held at fair value through the profit and loss account.

B) Interest rate risk

The Group’s objective is to manage its exposure to interest rate fluctuations on borrowings through varying the proportion

of fixed rate debt relative to floating rate debt with debt-related derivative financial instruments, including interest rate and

cross-currency swaps.

The Group operates an interest rate policy designed to optimise interest costs and to reduce volatility in reported earnings.

The Group’s current policy requires rates to be fixed for 30–80% of the level of borrowings, which is achieved primarily

through fixed-rate borrowings or debt-related derivative financial instruments. Where there are significant changes

in the level and/or structure of debt, the policy permits borrowings to be 100% fixed, with regular Board reviews of the

appropriateness of this fixed percentage.

At 31 March 2026, the Group had 81% (2025: 80%) of fixed rate debt and 19% (2025: 20%) of floating rate debt based on gross

debt of £333.6m (2025: £335.0m) after including the impact of debt-related derivative financial assets

(interest rate swaps).

The table below shows the debt-related derivative financial assets as fixed rate and the gross debt as floating rate.

Financial assets/(liabilities)

As at 31 March 2026

Financial assets Financial liabilities
Fixed or Non-interest Fixed or Non-interest
All figures in £ million capped Floating bearing capped Floating bearing
Sterling 3.3 192.3 0.8 (58.9) (273.3) (1.2)
US dollar 44.6 (21.0) (60.3)
Euro 6.9 (1.5)
Australian dollar 7.6 (7.7)
Other 7.8
Total 3.3 259.2 0.8 (89.1) (333.6) (1.2)

183

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

26. Financial risk management (continued)

As at 31 March 2025

Financial assets Financial liabilities
Fixed or Non-interest Fixed or Non-interest
All figures in £ million capped Floating bearing capped Floating bearing
Sterling 4.2 226.9 1.4 (63.8) (273.3) (2.6)
US dollar 45.2 (19.5) (61.7)
Euro 3.0 (1.8)
Australian dollar 13.2 (8.8)
Other 2.3 (0.2)
Total 4.2 290.6 1.4 (94.1) (335.0) (2.6)

Floating rate financial assets aract interest based on the relevant reference rate. Floating rate financial liabilities bear

interest at the relevant reference rate. Trade and other receivables/payables and deferred finance costs are excluded from

this analysis.

For the fixed or capped rate financial assets and liabilities, the average interest rates (including the relevant marginal cost of

borrowing) and the average period for which the rates are fixed are:

31 March 2026 31 March 2025
Weighted Weighted
Fixed or average Weighted Fixed or average Weighted
capped interest rate average years capped interest rate average years
£m % to maturity £m % to maturity
Financial assets:
Sterling 3.3 3.5 1.5 4.2 3.5 2.4
Financial liabilities:
Sterling (58.9) 7.0 7.6 (63.8) 7.0 8.0
US dollar (21.0) 5.3 4.2 (19.5) 5.1 5.1
Euro (1.5) 2.6 4.3 (1.8) 2.6 4.7
Australian dollar (7.7) 4.8 4.1 (8.8) 4.7 4.4
Other 5.3 0.7 (0.2) 4.6 1.9
Total financial liabilities (89.1) 6.5 6.7 (94.1) 6.3 7.0

Sterling assets consist of debt-related derivative financial instruments. Sterling liabilities consist primarily of finance leases

with the weighted average interest rate reflecting the internal rate of return of those leases.

Interest rate risk management

The revolving credit facility (note 26E) is floating rate and undrawn as at 31 March 2026.

As at 31 March 2026, the majority of the Group’s floating rate bank borrowings were fixed through interest rate swaps which

swap the Sterling floating rate interest payable into fixed rate Sterling. The notional principal amount of the outstanding

interest rate swap contracts as at 31 March 2026 is £270m (2025: £310m). The swaps have the economic effect of converting

floating rate borrowings into fixed rate borrowings and are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

C) Currency risk

Transactional currency exposure

The Group is exposed to foreign currency risks arising from sales or purchases by businesses in currencies other than their

functional currency. It is Group policy that when such a sale or purchase is certain, the net foreign exchange exposure

is hedged using forward foreign exchange contracts. Hedge accounting documentation and effectiveness testing are

undertaken for all the Group’s transactional hedge contracts.

The currency and notional amount of the designated hedging instruments match the currency and principal amounts of the

transactions being hedged, therefore the hedging instruments and hedged items have values which will generally move in

opposite directions because of the same hedged risk. As the critical terms of the hedging instruments match those of the

hedged items, an economic relationship can be demonstrated on an ongoing basis.

184

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

26. Financial risk management (continued)

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

The hedge ratio is 1:1 on the basis that the notional amount of the designated hedging instruments matches the principal

amount of the foreign currency sales/purchases designated as the hedged items. The Group does not designate groups of

items with offseing risk positions as hedged items.

The Group considers the potential sources of hedge ineffectiveness to be:

ɰ

Valuation adjustments for credit risk made to derivative hedging instruments at each hedge effectiveness

measurement date;

ɰ

Changes to the timing and amount of transactions; and

ɰ

Non-occurrence of the designated hedged items.

Ineffectiveness due to foreign currency basis was highly immaterial.

The table below shows the Group’s currency exposures (based on functional currency of the operating company), being

exposures on currency transactions that give rise to net currency gains and losses recognised in the income statement.

Such exposures comprise the monetary assets and liabilities of the Group that are not denominated in the functional

currency of the operating company involved.

Net foreign currency monetary assets/(liabilities)
All figures in £ millions US$ Euro A$ Other Total
31 March 2026 – Sterling 9.0 (0.5) 2.1 2.8 13.4
31 March 2025 – Sterling 14.4 (2.3) 2.8 7.6 22.5

The amounts shown in the table take into account the effect of the forward contracts entered into to manage these

currency exposures. The Group enters into forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the currency exposures that arise

on sales and purchases denominated in foreign currencies, as the transaction occurs. The principal contract amounts

of the outstanding forward currency contracts as at 31 March 2026 against Sterling are net US dollars bought of £5.3m

(USD 7.4m), net Euros sold of £113.6m (EUR 128.3m), net Canadian dollars sold of £8.0m (CAD 15.6m), net Swiss Francs bought

of £46.9m (CHF 44.9m) and net Australian dollars sold of £39.5m (AUD 83.4m).

Translational currency exposure

The Group has significant investments in overseas operations, particularly in the US. As a result, the Sterling value of the

Group’s balance sheet can be affected by movement in exchange rates. The Group does not hedge against translational

currency exposure to overseas net assets.

D) Financial credit risk

The Group is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to financial instruments,

but does not currently expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations. Credit risk is mitigated by a Board-approved

policy of only selecting counterparties with a strong investment grade long-term credit rating for cash deposits and

seing a utilisation credit limit based on the credit rating. The cash and cash equivalents of the Group are invested in

non-speculative financial instruments which are usually highly liquid, such as short-term deposits. Therefore, the Group

believes it has reduced its exposure to counterparty credit risk through this process.

The cash and cash equivalents balance is subject to review for impairment, and due to the high credit ratings of the

counterparties set out below, no impairment has been recognised within the year:

31 March 31 March
Counterparty credit rating 2026 2025
AAA to AA- 88% 78%
A+ to A- 12% 22%
BBB+ to BBB-

The Group uses three-year cumulative default rate metrics to determine the estimated credit-rated losses on our financial

instruments. Based on the expected default rates, the financial instruments have an immaterial risk of credit impairment.

In the normal course of business the Group operates notional cash pooling systems and master neing agreements for

derivatives, where a legal right of set-off applies.

185

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

26. Financial risk management (continued)

The maximum credit-risk exposure in the event of other parties failing to perform their obligations under financial assets,

excluding trade and other receivables, totals £263.2m (2025: £296.2m). This balance includes cash and cash equivalents

and derivative financial assets. The cash and cash equivalents of £259.2m at 31 March 2026 (2025: £290.6m) represents the

maximum credit exposure on these assets. The cash and cash equivalents were held with different financial institutions

which were rated single A or beer. Cash equivalents comprise £167.4m (2025: £170.4m) invested in AAA-rated money market

funds. The Group’s assessment is that credit risk is limited as a result of the high percentage of revenue derived from UK and

US government agencies. Therefore the provision for expected credit losses is immaterial in respect of receivables from

these customers.

E) Liquidity risk

Borrowing facilities

As at 31 March 2026 the Group had a revolving credit facility (RCF) of £290.0m (2025: £290.0m

) and a floating rate term

loan of £333.6m (2025: £335.0m). The RCF, which is unutilised, will mature on 22 April 2029. The term loan will mature on

27 September 2027. Total available funds, comprising the RCF, term loan and the Group’s freely available cash and cash

equivalents, are shown in the table below:

Interest rate:
Reference Total Drawn Undrawn
rate* plus £m £m £m
As at 31 March 2026
Commied facilities – RCF 0.58% 290.0 290.0
Commied facilities – term loan 1.00% 333.6 333.6
Freely available cash and cash equivalents 258.6
Available funds 31 March 2026 548.6
As at 31 March 2025
Commied facilities – RCF 0.60% 290.0 290.0
Commied facilities – term loan 1.00% 335.0 335.0
Freely available cash and cash equivalents 289.9
Available funds 31 March 2025 579.9

*

Reference rate refers to SONIA for GBP and SOFR for USD.

Gross contractual cash flows for borrowings and other financial liabilities

The following are the undiscounted contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including interest payments. The cash flows

associated with derivatives that are cash flow hedges are expected to have an impact on profit or loss in the periods shown.

The £333.6m term loan is repayable on 27 September 2027, with interest periods set to three months. The loan bears interest at

a variable margin over the relevant reference rate of between 1.00% and 2.50% dependent on the ratio of Net Debt to EBITDA.

As at 31 March 2026

Contractual 1 year More than
All figures in £ million Book value cash flows or less 1–2 years 2–5 years 5 years
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Term loan (333.6) (357.9) (15.2) (342.7)
Revolving credit facility
Trade payables and similar items (347.4) (347.4) (347.4)
Leases (89.1) (110.6) (17.5) (16.3) (52.0) (24.8)
Derivative financial liabilities
Forward foreign currency contracts – cash flow hedges (1.2) (1.2) (1.1) (0.1)
Interest rate swaps
Total (771.3) (817.1) (381.2) (359.1) (52.0) (24.8)

186

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

26. Financial risk management (continued)

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

As at 31 March 2025

Contractual 1 year More than
All figures in £ million Book value cash flows or less 1–2 years 2–5 years 5 years
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Term loan (335.0) (375.8) (15.7) (15.7) (344.4)
Revolving credit facility
Trade payables and similar items (302.5) (302.5) (302.5)
Leases (93.9) (120.0) (18.7) (18.1) (39.6) (43.6)
Derivative financial liabilities
Forward foreign currency contracts – cash flow hedges (2.6) (2.6) (1.8) (0.6) (0.2)
Interest rate swaps (0.2) (0.2) (0.1) (0.1)
Total (734.2) (801.1) (338.7) (34.5) (384.3) (43.6)

F) Derivative financial instruments

The Group has the following derivative financial instruments on the balance sheet, reported within the ‘Other financial

assets’ line items.

31 March 2026 31 March 2025
Liability Liability
All figures in £ million Asset gains losses Net Asset gains losses Net
Forward foreign currency contracts – cash flow hedges 0.8 (1.2) (0.4) 1.4 (2.6) (1.2)
Interest rate swaps 3.3 3.3 4.2 (0.2) 4.0
Derivative assets/(liabilities) at the end of the year 4.1 (1.2) 2.9 5.6 (2.8) 2.8

The maturity of these derivative financial instruments is as follows:

31 March 2026 31 March 2025
Liability Liability
All figures in £ million Asset gains losses Net Asset gains losses Net
Expected to be recognised:
In one year or less 2.1 (1.1) 1.0 3.6 (1.8) 1.8
Between one and two years 1.5 (0.1) 1.4 1.3 (0.7) 0.6
More than two years 0.5 0.5 0.7 (0.3) 0.4
Derivative assets/(liabilities) at the end of the year 4.1 (1.2) 2.9 5.6 (2.8) 2.8

The effects of these derivatives on the Group’s financial position and performance are as follows:

31 March 2026 31 March 2025
Cash flow Interest rate Cash flow Interest rate
All figures in £ million hedges swaps Total hedges swaps Total
Notional amount (gross) 368.4 270.0 638.4 515.8 310.0 825.8
Carrying value (current and non-current assets
and (liabilities)) (0.4) 3.3 2.9 (1.2) 4.0 2.8
Maturity date 2026-2029 2026-2027 2026-2029 2025-2028 2025-2027 2025-2028
Hedge ratio 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments
in the year 0.8 (0.7) 0.1 (0.2) (4.5) (4.7)
Change in value of hedged item used to determine
hedge effectiveness 0.8 (0.7) 0.1 (0.2) (4.5) (4.7)
Weighted average hedged rate for the year* 1.33% 3.5% 1.29% 3.5%

*

The weighted average hedged rate for the year for cash flow hedges is based on GBP:USD, being the most significant currency pair. The Group also

has cash flow hedges relating to a number of other currency pairs aligned to its global operations.

187

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

26. Financial risk management (continued)

G) Maturity of financial liabilities

The contractual maturity of the Group’s financial liabilities is shown below:

As at 31 March 2026

Trade Bank
payables and borrowings Derivative
similar items and loan financial Lease
All figures in £ million payables notes instruments liabilities Total
Due in one year or less 347.4 1.1 12.4 365.3
Due in more than one year but not more than two years 0.1 11.9 11.9
Due in more than two years but not more than five years 333.6 43.3 376.6
Due in five years or more 21.5 21.5
Total 347.4 333.6 1.2 89.1 771.3

As at 31 March 2025

Trade Bank
payables and borrowings Derivative
similar items and loan financial Lease
All figures in £ million payables notes instruments liabilities Total
Due in one year or less 302.5 1.8 13.3 317.6
Due in more than one year but not more than two years 0.7 13.5 14.2
Due in more than two years but not more than five years 335.0 0.3 41.3 376.6
Due in five years or more 25.8 25.8
Total 302.5 335.0 2.8 93.9 734.2

H) Sensitivity analysis

The Group’s sensitivity to changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates on financial assets and liabilities as at

31 March 2026 is set out in the following table. The impact of a weakening in Sterling on the Group’s financial assets and

liabilities would be more than offset in equity and income by its impact on the Group’s overseas net assets and earnings

respectively. Sensitivity on Group’s assets other than financial assets and liabilities is not included in this analysis.

As at 31 March 2026

1% decrease 10% weakening
in interest rates in Sterling
Profit Profit
All figures in £ million Equity* before tax Equity before tax
Sterling 0.8
US dollar 0.2 0.3 0.9
Other (0.2) 0.4
1% increase 10% strengthening
in interest rates in Sterling
Profit Profit
All figures in £ million Equity* before tax Equity before tax
Sterling (0.8)
US dollar (0.2) (0.1) 0.2
Other 0.2 (0.3)

*

This relates to the impact on items charged directly to equity and excludes the impact on profit/loss for the year flowing into equity.

188

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

26. Financial risk management (continued)

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

As at 31 March 2025

1% decrease 10% weakening
in interest rates in Sterling
Profit Profit
All figures in £ million Equity* before tax Equity before tax
Sterling 0.5
US dollar 0.2 (4.0) 0.9
Other (0.2) 0.7
1% increase 10% strengthening
in interest rates in Sterling
Profit Profit
All figures in £ million Equity* before tax Equity before tax
Sterling (0.5)
US dollar (0.2) 3.2 0.1
Other 0.2 (0.4)

*

This relates to the impact on items charged directly to equity and excludes the impact on profit/loss for the year flowing into equity.

The amounts generated from the sensitivity analysis are forward-looking estimates of market risk assuming that certain

market conditions occur. Actual results in the future may differ materially from those projected as a result of developments

in global financial markets that may cause fluctuations in interest and exchange rates to vary from the hypothetical

amounts disclosed in the previous tables, which should not, therefore, be considered to be a projection of likely future

events and losses.

The estimated changes for interest rate movements are based on an instantaneous decrease or increase of 1%

(100 basis points) in the specific rate of interest applicable to each class of financial instruments from the levels effective

at 31 March 2026, with all other variables remaining constant. The estimated changes for foreign exchange rates are based

on an instantaneous 10% weakening or strengthening in Sterling against all other currencies from the levels applicable at

31 March 2026, with all other variables remaining constant. Such analysis is for illustrative purposes only – in practice market

rates rarely change in isolation. The impact of transactional risk on the Group’s monetary assets/liabilities that are not held

in the functional currency of the entity holding those assets/liabilities is minimal.

27. Post-retirement benefits

Defined contribution plans

The Group operates a number of defined contribution pension arrangements, the largest of which is in the UK and provided

by the Mercer Master Trust. A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the Group and employees pay

fixed contributions to a third-party financial provider. The Group has no legal or constructive obligations to pay further

contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits relating to employee service

in the current and prior periods. The contributions are recognised as an employee benefit expense when they are due.

The expense incurred during the year was £70.7m (FY25: £73.4m). Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the

extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is available.

Defined benefit pension plan

In the UK the Group operates the QinetiQ Pension Scheme (‘the Scheme’) for approximately 10% of its UK employees.

The Scheme closed to future accrual on 31 October 2013 and there is no ongoing service cost. After this date, defined active

benefit members transferred to a defined contribution section of the Scheme. The Scheme is a final salary plan, which

provides benefits to members in the form of a guaranteed level of pension payable for life.

The level of benefits provided depends on the members’ length of service and their final pensionable earnings at closure

to future accrual. In the Scheme, pensions in payment are generally updated in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

The benefit payments are made from Trustee-administered funds.

189

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

27. Post-retirement benefits (continued)

Plan assets held in trusts are governed by UK regulations as is the nature of the relationship between the Group and the

Trustees and their composition. Responsibility for the governance of the Scheme – including investment decisions and

contribution schedules – lies with the Scheme Trustee with consultation with the Company as needed. Dalriada, one of

the largest professional trustee firms in the UK, act as Professional Corporate Sole Trustee (PCST) for the Scheme. Being

governed by a PCST is well suited to an ever-changing and highly regulated pension landscape.

The asset recognised in the balance sheet in respect of the defined benefit pension plan is the fair value of plan assets

less the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period. The defined benefit obligation is

calculated bi-annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method. Future cash flows of the Scheme

which are subject to inflation are calculated using a CPI inflation assumption for the majority of the cash flows, with a

small proportion of cash flows linked to RPI. IAS 19 requires the inflation assumptions to be market-based assumptions,

as opposed to being based on economic forecasts.

The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated, inflated future cash

outflows using interest rates of high quality corporate bonds that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the

related pension obligation.

Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or

credited to equity in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise.

Triennial funding valuation

The most recent completed full actuarial valuation of the Scheme was undertaken as at 30 June 2023 and resulted in an

actuarially assessed surplus of £11.4m (relative to the technical provisions, i.e. the level of assets agreed by the Trustee

and the Company as being appropriate to meet member benefits, assuming the Scheme continues as a going concern).

The next triennial valuation will be performed as at 30 June 2026. Under the new schedule of contributions agreed at the

conclusion of the recent triennial valuation, and reflecting the Scheme being in surplus, there are no employer contributions

required. Separately to the schedule of contributions the Company does have a cash commitment to the Scheme in respect

of an asset-backed funding arrangement established in 2012; see QinetiQ Pension Funding Partnership below.

QinetiQ’s Pension Funding Partnership (PFP) structure

On 26 March 2012 QinetiQ established the QinetiQ PFP Limited Partnership (‘the Partnership’) with the Scheme. Under

this arrangement, properties to the capitalised value of £32.3m were transferred to the Partnership. The transfers were

effected through a 20-year sale and leaseback agreement. The Scheme’s interest in the Partnership entitles it to annual

distributions from 2012. The annual distribution in the year to 31 March 2027 will be £3.7m, which will increase thereafter,

indexed by reference to CPI, until 2032.

The Partnership is controlled by QinetiQ and its results are consolidated by the Group. Under IAS 19, the interest held by

the Scheme in the Partnership does not qualify as a plan asset for the purposes of the Group’s consolidated financial

statements and is, therefore, not included within the fair value of plan assets. As a result, the Group’s consolidated financial

statements are unchanged by the Partnership. In addition, the value of the property transferred to the Partnership and

leased back to QinetiQ remains on the balance sheet. QinetiQ retains the operational flexibility to substitute properties of

equivalent value within the Partnership and has the option to sele outstanding amounts due under the interest before

2032 if it so chooses.

Other UK schemes

In the UK the Group has a small number of employees for whom benefits are secured through the Prudential Platinum

Scheme (‘the PPS’). The PPS scheme is always fully funded and has a very small surplus at year end. QinetiQ also

offers employees access to a Group Self Invested Personal Pension Plan, but no Company contributions are paid to

this arrangement.

190

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

27. Post-retirement benefits (continued)

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

Defined benefit pension plan (‘Scheme’) net pension asset

The Scheme is in a net asset position with the market value of assets in excess of the present value of Scheme liabilities.

These have the values set out below as at 31 March of each year end.

31 March 31 March
All figures in £ million 2026 2025
Total market value of assets – see table below for analysis by category of asset 1,208.0 1,176.7
Present value of Scheme liabilities (1,153.6) (1,137.3)
Net pension asset before deferred tax 54.4 39.4
Deferred tax liability (17.9) (14.6)
Net pension asset after deferred tax 36.5 24.8

The balance sheet net pension asset is a snapshot view which can be significantly influenced by short-term market factors.

The calculation of the net asset depends on factors which are beyond the control of the Group – principally the value of the

various categories of assets in which the Scheme has invested and long-term interest rates and inflation rates used to value

the Scheme’s liabilities. This is particularly pertinent at times when markets are volatile. Sensitivities and risks are described

on page 193.

The key driver for the increase in the net pension asset since 31 March 2025 was a net actuarial gain on the net pension asset.

Total net income/(expense) recognised in the income statement

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25
Net finance income 2.4 1.0
Administrative expenses (1.2) (1.2)
Total net income/(expense) recognised in the income statement (excluding tax) 1.2 (0.2)

Movement in the net pension asset

The movement in the net pension asset (before deferred tax) is set out below:

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25
Opening net pension asset 39.4 18.4
Net finance income 2.4 1.0
Net actuarial gain and asset re-measurement gain/(loss) 10.2 17.7
Administrative expenses (1.2) (1.2)
Contributions by the employer 3.6 3.5
Closing net pension asset 54.4 39.4

191

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

27. Post-retirement benefits (continued)

Fair value of Scheme assets by type of asset

The fair value of the Scheme’s assets, which are not intended to be realised in the short term and may be subject to

significant changes before they are realised, were:

31 March 2026 31 March 2025*
Not quoted Not quoted
in an active in an active
All figures in £ million Quoted market Total Quoted market Total
Equities 7.5 7.5 11.2 11.2
Liability driven investment 223.3 223.3 351.1 351.1
Asset backed security investments 118.4 118.4 75.0 75.0
Alternative bonds

1
185.4 185.4 228.1 228.1
Corporate bonds

2
135.7 73.1 208.8 98.6 98.6
Cash and cash equivalents 9.8 9.8 46.1 46.1
Equity derivative financial instruments (0.9) (0.9)
Corporate credit derivative financial instruments

3
(1.0) (1.0) 1.8 1.8
Other derivatives (forward FX contracts)

4
(1.4) (1.4) 10.0 10.0
Insurance buy-in policies 457.2 457.2 450.7 450.7
Borrowings

5
(95.0) (95.0)
Total market value of assets 484.8 723.2 1,208.0 483.1 693.6 1,176.7

*

The comparative cash and cash equivalents balance has been presented as quoted, to reflect the observable nature of its fair value.

1

Primarily private market debt investments.

2

Includes unlisted corporate bonds with commercial property held as security.

3

The fair value of corporate credit derivative financial instruments is recognised as a liability of £1.0m. This is in respect of various credit default

swap financial instruments held by the Scheme. These instruments provide the Scheme with significantly greater exposure to corporate bonds.

The notional value of the credit default swap contracts was £229.6m as at 31 March 2026. The economic exposure (notional exposure +MTM)

was £228.6m as at 31 March 2026.

4

The fair value of other derivative financial instruments is recognised as a liability of £1.4m. This is in respect of various foreign exchange contracts

held by the Scheme. The exposure to foreign exchange risk is significantly greater than the £10.0m marked to market value of the forward

contracts. The notional value of these financial instruments was £114.5m as at 31 March 2026, with a total economic exposure value of £113.1m.

5

The £95m loan as at 31 March 2025 (originally arranged in September 2023 to facilitate an increase in liquidity to support increased levels of

hedging) was repaid during the year.

The Scheme’s assets do not include any of the Group’s own transferable financial instruments, property occupied by the

Group or other assets used by the Group.

The insurance policies obtained by the pension scheme can only be used to pay or fund employee benefits under the

Company’s defined benefit plan. They are not available to the Company’s own creditors and cannot be paid to another

entity. These are the requirements of IAS 19 paragraph 7 and hence the Company’s determination is that the insurance

policies are qualifying insurance policies and require classification as a plan asset. The policies were issued by insurers that

are not a related party.

Per the Scheme rules the Company has an unconditional right to a refund of any surplus, assuming gradual selement of

all liabilities over time. Such surplus may arise on cessation of the Scheme in the context of IFRIC 14 paragraphs 11(b) and 12

and therefore the full net pension asset can be recognised on the Group’s balance sheet and the Group’s minimum funding

commitments to the Scheme do not give rise to an additional balance sheet liability.

Changes to the fair value of Scheme assets

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25
Opening fair value of Scheme assets 1,176.7 1,316.2
Interest income on Scheme assets 65.9 62.0
Re-measurement gain/(loss) on Scheme assets 21.2 (149.0)
Contributions by the employer 3.6 3.5
Net benefits paid out and transfers (58.2) (54.8)
Administrative expenses (1.2) (1.2)
Closing fair value of Scheme assets 1,208.0 1,176.7

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

27. Post-retirement benefits (continued)

192

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

Changes to the present value of Scheme liabilities

The present value of the Scheme’s liabilities, which are derived from cash flow projections over long periods, and thus

inherently uncertain, were:

All figures in £ million FY26 FY25
Opening present value of Scheme liabilities (1,137.3) (1,297.8)
Interest cost (63.5) (61.0)
Actuarial gain/(loss) on Scheme liabilities based on:
Change in demographic assumptions (4.5) 17.4
Change in financial assumptions 2.4 149.6
Experience losses (8.9) (0.3)
Net benefits paid out and transfers 58.2 54.8
Closing present value of Scheme liabilities (1,153.6) (1,137.3)

Assumptions

The major assumptions used in the IAS 19 valuation of the Scheme’s liabilities were:

31 March 2026 31 March 2025
Insured Uninsured Insured Uninsured
All figures in £ million members members members members
Discount rate applied to Scheme liabilities 5.85% 6.15% 5.70% 5.75%
CPI inflation assumption 2.80% 2.80% 2.45% 2.50%
Net rate (discount rate less inflation) 3.05% 3.35% 3.25% 3.25%
Assumed life expectancies in years:
At 60 for males currently aged 40 n/a 28.2 n/a 27.8
At 60 for females currently aged 40 n/a 30.5 n/a 30.3
At 60 for males currently aged 60 n/a 26.9 n/a 26.5
At 60 for females currently aged 60 n/a 29.2 n/a 28.9
At 65 for males currently aged 65 22.6 n/a 22.1 n/a
At 65 for females currently aged 65 24.9 n/a 24.6 n/a

The assumptions used by the actuary are the best estimates chosen from a range of possible actuarial assumptions

which, because of the timescale covered, may not necessarily be borne out in practice. It is important to note that these

assumptions are long term and, in the case of the discount rate and the inflation rate, are measured by reference to external

market indicators.

The discount rate is based on observable yields on corporate bonds but there is no direct, observable market rate for CPI.

A ‘market approach’ to deriving CPI involves adjusting a market-based RPI rate downward by an ‘inflation risk premium’ and

an RPI-CPI adjustment factor (determined from relevant market yield curves). This market

-based approach is required by

IAS 19 and results in a CPI inflation rate in excess of the Bank of England long-term target and also in excess of a consensus

view of CPI (based on surveys of economists). However, adopting an economic consensus approach to seing CPI inflation

is not acceptable under accounting standards.

The mortality assumptions for both the current and prior year were based on the SAPS Normal S3 ‘All Lives’ base tables,

with various scaling factors based on sex and status. Allowance was made for improvements in mortality in line with

CMI_2025 core projections (31 March 2025: CMI_2023 projections) and a long-term rate of improvement of 1.0% per

annum (31 March 2025: 1.0%).

The funding of the Scheme is based on long-term trends and assumptions relating to market growth, as advised by qualified

actuaries and investment advisors. The Scheme ‘duration’, calculated using discounted future cash flows, is an indicator

of the weighted average time until benefits are paid and is approximately 14 years for non-insured liabilities and 9 years for

insured liabilities.

193

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

27. Post-retirement benefits (continued)

The sensitivity of the Scheme liabilities to each of the key assumptions is shown in the following table.

Sensitivity analysis of the principal assumptions

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | Indicative impact on | Indicative impact on | Indicative impact on |
| Assumption | Scheme assets | Scheme liabilities | net pension asset |
| Decrease discount rate by 0.25% | Increase by £10.6m | Increase by £34.5m | Decrease by £23.9m |
| Increase rate of inflation by 0.25% | Increase by £9.7m | Increase by £32.7m | Decrease by £23.0m |
| Increase life expectancy by one year | Increase by £14.0m | Increase by £24.8m | Decrease by £10.8m |

The impact of movements in Scheme liabilities will, to an extent, be offset by movements in the value of Scheme assets as

the Scheme has assets invested in a Liability Driven Investment Portfolio. As at 31 March 2026 this portfolio hedged against

approximately 100% of the interest rate risk and also approximately 100% of the inflation rate risk, as measured on the

actuarial funding valuation basis.

The above sensitivity analyses are based on a change in an assumption while holding all other assumptions constant.

In practice, this is unlikely to occur, and changes in some of the assumptions may be correlated. When calculating the

sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation to significant actuarial assumptions the same method (projected unit credit

method) has been applied as when calculating the pension liability recognised within the statement of financial position.

The methods and types of assumption did not change.

In addition to the sensitivity of the liability side of the net pension asset (which will impact the value of the net pension

asset) the net pension asset is also exposed to significant variation due to changes in the fair value of Scheme assets.

A specific sensitivity on assets has not been included in the above table but any change in valuation of assets flows straight

through to the value of the net pension asset, e.g. if equities fall by £10m then the net pension asset reduces by £10m. The

values of unquoted assets assume that an available buyer is willing to purchase those assets at that value. For the Group’s

portfolio of assets, the unquoted alternative bonds of £185.4m, the unquoted corporate bonds of £73.1m and the unquoted

equities of £7.5m are the assets with most uncertainty as to valuation as at 31 March 2026.

The accounting assumptions noted are used to calculate the year-end net pension asset in accordance with the relevant

accounting standard, IAS 19 (revised) Employee Benefits. Changes in these assumptions have no impact on the Group’s

cash payments into the Scheme. The payments into the Scheme are reassessed after every triennial valuation. The triennial

valuations are calculated on a funding basis and use a different set of assumptions, as agreed with the pension Trustees.

The key assumption that varies between the two methods of valuation is the discount rate. The funding basis valuation uses

the risk-free rate from UK gilts as the base for calculating the discount rate, while the IAS 19 accounting basis valuation uses

corporate bond yields as the base.

Risks

Through its defined benefit pension plan, the Group is exposed to a number of risks, the most significant of which are

detailed below:

Volatility in Results under IAS 19 can change dramatically depending on market conditions. The present value of
market conditions Scheme liabilities is linked to yields on corporate bonds, while many of the assets of the Scheme are invested in
various forms of assets subject to fluctuating valuations. Changing markets in conjunction with discount rate
volatility will lead to volatility in the net pension asset on the Group’s balance sheet and in other comprehensive
income. To a lesser extent this will also lead to volatility in the IAS 19 pension net finance income in the Group’s
income statement.
Choice of accounting The calculation of the present value of Scheme liabilities involves projecting future cash flows from the Scheme
assumptions many years into the future. This means that the assumptions used can have a material impact on the balance sheet
position and profit and loss charge. In practice future experience within the Scheme may not be in line with the
assumptions adopted. For example, members could live longer than foreseen or inflation could be higher or lower
than allowed for in the calculation of the liabilities.

In June 2023, in Virgin Media Limited v NTL Pension Trustees II Limited, the UK High Court ruled that specific historical

amendments to contracted-out defined benefit schemes in the period from 6 April 1997 to 5 April 2016 were invalid as they

lacked a confirmation under section 37 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 from the scheme’s actuary. Following a review of

the equivalent documentation by the Scheme’s lawyers, we consider that there is no need for any further investigation at

this stage and that the probability of a significant financial impact is remote.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

194

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

28. Share capital and other reserves

Shares alloed, called up and fully paid:

| | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | Ordinary shares of 1p each | | Special Share of £1 | | | |
| | (equity) | | (non-equity) | | Total | |
| | £ | Number | £ | Number | £ | Number |
| As at 1 April 2025 | 5,535,305 | 553,530,455 | 1 | 1 | 5,535,306 | 553,530,456 |
| Cancellation of shares | (287,731) | (28,773,138) | – | – | (287,731) | (28,773,138) |
| At 31 March 2026 | 5,247,574 | 524,757,317 | 1 | 1 | 5,247,575 | 524,757,318 |

During the year, the Group continued its share buyback programme. £134.6m was completed in cash in FY26 (FY25: £102.9m),

which is shown in the table above as the 28,773,138 cancelled shares (FY25: 20,865,436).

Ordinary shares of 1p each Special Share of £1
(equity) (non-equity) Total
£ Number £ Number £ Number
As at 1 April 2024 5,743,959 574,395,891 1 1 5,743,960 574,395,892
Cancellation of shares (208,654) (20,865,436) (208,654) (20,865,436)
At 31 March 2025 5,535,305 553,530,455 1 1 5,535,306 553,530,456

Except as noted below all shares in issue at 31 March 2026 rank pari-passu in all respects.

Rights aaching to the Special Share

QinetiQ carries out activities which are important to UK defence and security interests. To protect these interests in

the context of the ongoing commercial relationship between the MOD and QinetiQ, and to promote and reinforce the

Compliance Principles, the MOD holds a Special Share in QinetiQ. QinetiQ obtained MOD consent to changes in its Special

Shareholder rights, which were approved by shareholders at the 2012 AGM. The changes to the Special Share were disclosed

in the 2012 Annual Report. Subsequent to the changes approved at the 2012 AGM the Special Share confers certain rights on

the holder:

a)

To require the Group to implement and maintain the Compliance System (as defined in the Articles of Association) so as

to make at all times effective its and each member of QinetiQ Controlled Group’s application of the Compliance Principles,

in a manner acceptable to the Special Shareholder;

b)

To refer maers to the Board for its consideration in relation to the application of the Compliance Principles;

c)

To require the Board to obtain Special Shareholder’s consent:

i)

If at any time when the chairman is not a British citizen, it is proposed to appoint any person to the office of chief

executive, who is not a British citizen; and

ii)

If at any time when the chief executive is not a British citizen, it is proposed to appoint any person to the office of

chairman, who is not a British citizen;

d)

To require the Board to take action to rectify any omission in the application of the Compliance Principles, if the

Special Shareholder is of the opinion that such steps are necessary to protect the defence or security interests of

the United Kingdom; and

e)

To demand a poll at any of QinetiQ’s meetings (even though it may have no voting rights except those specifically set out

in the Articles).

The Special Shareholder has an option to purchase defined Strategic Assets of the Group in certain circumstances. The

Special Shareholder has, inter alia, the right to purchase any Strategic Assets which the Group wishes to sell. Strategic

Assets are normally testing and research facilities (see note 30 for further details).

The Special Share may only be issued to, held by and transferred to HM Government (or as it directs). At any time the Special

Shareholder may require QinetiQ to redeem the Special Share at par. If QinetiQ is wound up the Special Shareholder will be

entitled to be repaid the capital paid up on the Special Share before other shareholders receive any payment. The Special

Shareholder has no other right to share in the capital or profits of QinetiQ and the Special Shareholder must give consent to

a general meeting held on short notice.

195

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

28. Share capital and other reserves (continued)

The Special Share entitles the Special Shareholder to require certain persons who hold (together with any person acting

in concert with them) a material interest in QinetiQ to dispose of some or all of their ordinary shares in certain prescribed

circumstances on the grounds of national security or conflict of interest. The Directors must register any transfer of the

Special Share within seven days.

Other reserves

The translation reserve includes the cumulative foreign exchange difference arising on translation. Movements on hedging

instruments, where the hedge is effective, are recorded in the hedge reserve until the hedge ceases.

The capital redemption reserve, which was created following the redemption of preference share capital and the bonus

issue of shares, cannot be distributed.

Own shares

Own shares represent shares in the Company that are held by independent trusts and include treasury shares and

shares held by the employee share ownership plan. Included in retained earnings at 31 March 2026 are 4,315,670 shares

(2025: 3,442,435 shares).

29. Share-based payments

The Group operates a number of share-based payment plans for employees. The total share-based payment expense

in the year was £11.5m, all relating to equity-seled schemes (FY25: £9.8m, all relating to equity-seled schemes). The

share-based payment amount recognised in equity was £11.0m, reflecting an £11.5m expense recorded in the income

statement, partly offset by £0.5m relating to dividends accrued on unvested awards.

Valuation of share-based awards

Share-based awards that vest based on non-market performance conditions have been valued at the share price at grant

date and are equity-seled.

Group Share Incentive Plan (SIP)

Under the QinetiQ SIP the Group offers UK employees the opportunity of purchasing up to £150 worth of shares a month at

the prevailing market rate. The Group will make a matching share award of a third of the employee’s payment. The Group’s

matching shares may be forfeited if the employee ceases to be employed by QinetiQ within three years of the award of the

shares. There is no exercise price for these SIP awards.

FY26 FY25
Number of Number of
matching matching
shares shares
Outstanding at start of the year 707,834 753,447
Awarded during the year 44,645 256,966
Exercised during the year (51,854) (262,526)
Forfeited during the year (37,001) (40,053)
Outstanding at end of the year 663,624 707,834

SIP matching shares are equity-seled awards; those outstanding at 31 March 2026 had an average remaining life of 1.5

years (2025: 1.5 years). There is no exercise price for these SIP awards. Of the shares outstanding at the end of the year nil

were exercisable (2025: nil).

Bonus Banking Plan (BBP)

During previous years the Group granted BBP awards to certain senior executives in the UK and US.

FY26 FY25
Number of Number of
awards awards
Outstanding at start of the year 892,416
Granted during the year
Exercised during the year (833,623)
Forfeited during the year (58,793)
Outstanding at end of the year

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

29. Share-based payments (continued)

196

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

The legacy BBP was a remuneration scheme that ran until the change in remuneration policy in 2023, with the final

payment under the scheme made in 2024. The BBP operated in three-year performance cycles, with each cycle vesting

over a four-year period. Under the BBP a contribution was made by the Company into the participant’s Plan account

following the end of each Plan year. 50% of the value of a participant’s Plan account was paid out annually for three years

with 100% of the residual value paid out at the end of year four. 50% of the unpaid balance of a participant’s bonus account

was at risk of forfeiture. Refer to the 2024 Directors’ Remuneration Report for further details.

At 31 March 2026 the awards had a weighted average remaining life of nil year (2025: nil year). There is no exercise price

for these awards. The fair value of the awards at 31 March 2026 was £nil (2025: £nil) being the Group’s 30-day average

on 31 March. The weighted average share price at date of exercise was £nil (2025: £nil). Of the awards outstanding at the

end of the year nil were exercisable.

Deferred Share Plan (DSP)

During the year, the Group did not provisionally award any DSP awards as this share scheme has been replaced by the

LTIP share scheme.

FY26 FY25
Number of Number of
awards awards
Outstanding at start of the year 3,760,387 6,274,618
Granted during the year 9,795
Lapsed during the year (125,658) (502,662)
Exercised during the year (1,372,007) (2,021,364)
Outstanding at end of the year 2,262,722 3,760,387

The number of awards is dependent on the Group’s performance during the year (specifically with respect to the Group

revenue growth). This is provisionally quantified at year end based on Group performance and also the number of eligible

employees in employment as at 31 March. Actual awards are made in the following June and the final number awarded will

be slightly different to the number provisionally calculated.

Awards are then subject to a three-year vesting period and a further two-year holding period. Vesting of the awards is

contingent upon Group operating profit in the year before vesting being maintained at the level reported during the year

before award. Refer to the Directors’ Remuneration Report for further details.

At 31 March 2026 the awards had a weighted average remaining life of 0.2 years (2025: 0.6 years). There is no exercise price

for these awards. The weighted average share price at date of exercise was £5.18 (2025: £4.47). Of the awards outstanding at

the end of the year nil were exercisable.

Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

During the year the Group granted LTIP awards to replace the DSP awards.

FY26 FY25
Number of Number of
awards awards
Outstanding at start of the year 12,131,756 7,306,172
Granted during the year 4,879,515 6,519,447
Exercised during the year
Lapsed during the year (1,539,937) (1,693,863)
Outstanding at end of the year 15,471,334 12,131,756

At 31 March 2026 the awards had a weighted average remaining life of 1.3 years (2025: 2.0 years). There is no exercise price for

these awards. The weighted average fair value of grants made during the year was £4.97 (2025: £4.44). The weighted average

share price at date of exercise was nil. Of the options outstanding at the end of the year nil were exercisable.

197

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

29. Share-based payments (continued)

Restricted share plan (RSP)

RSP is a share award made to senior executives on a discretionary basis. For example, to offset a new senior executive joiner

on a loss of stock options from their previous employer and it is a fixed number of shares. During the year the Group granted

RSP awards to certain senior executives in the UK and US.

FY26 FY25
Number of Number of
awards awards
Outstanding at start of the year 474,056 797,371
Granted during the year 868,651 263,186
Exercised during the year (89,153) (488,374)
Lapsed during the year (23,813) (98,127)
Outstanding at end of the year 1,229,741 474,056

At 31 March 2026 the awards had a weighted average remaining life of 1.0 years (2025: 0.7 years). There is no exercise price for

these awards. The weighted average fair value of grants made during the year was £4.93 (2025: £4.11). The weighted average

share price at date of exercise was £4.49 (2025: £4.02). Of the options outstanding at the end of the year nil were exercisable

(2025: nil).

Annual Bonus Plan (ABP)

ABP is a share award made to senior executives. This award replaced the BBP.

FY26 FY25
Number of Number of
awards awards
Outstanding at start of the year 227,176 292,067
Granted/awarded during the year 15
Difference between actual awards in year and amount provisionally awarded in prior year (64,891)
Lapsed during the year
Exercised during the year
Provisionally awarded during the year 213,723
Outstanding at end of the year 440,914 227,176

At 31 March 2026 the awards had an average remaining life of 0.3 years (2025: 1.3 years). There is no exercise price for these

awards. The weighted average fair value of grants made during the year was £4.49 (2025: £4.49). The weighted average share

price at date of exercise was £nil (2025: £nil). Of the options outstanding at the end of the year nil were exercisable (2025: nil).

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

198

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

30. Transactions with the Ministry of Defence (MOD)

The MOD continues to own its Special Share in QinetiQ which conveys certain rights as set out in note 28. Transactions

between the Group and the MOD are disclosed as follows:

Freehold land and buildings and surplus properties

Under the terms of the Group’s acquisition of part of the business and certain assets of DERA from the MOD on 1 July 2001,

the MOD retained certain rights in respect of the freehold land and buildings transferred.

Restrictions on transfer of title

The title deeds of those properties with strategic assets (see below) include a clause that prevents their transfer without

the approval of the MOD. The MOD also has the right to purchase any strategic assets in certain circumstances.

MOD’s generic compliance regime

Adherence to the generic compliance system is monitored by the Risk & Security Commiee. Refer to the Commiee’s

report within the Corporate Governance Statement on page 110.

Strategic assets

Under the Principal Agreement with the MOD, the QinetiQ controlled Group is not permied without the wrien consent

of the MOD, to:

i)

Dispose of or destroy all or any part of a strategic asset; or

ii)

Voluntarily undertake any closure of, or cease to provide a strategic capability by means of, all or any part of

a strategic asset.

The net book value of assets identified as being strategic assets as at 31 March 2026 was £1.1m (2025: £1.3m).

Long Term Partnering Agreement

On 27 February 2003 QinetiQ Limited entered into a Long Term Partnering Agreement (LTPA) to provide test and evaluation

(T&E) facilities and training support services to the MOD. This is a 25-year contract with a total revenue value of up to £5.6bn,

dependent on the level of usage by the MOD, under which QinetiQ Limited is commied to providing T&E services with

increasing efficiencies through cost saving and innovative service delivery. Following an amendment to the LTPA contract

on 5 April 2019 this contract is no longer subject to re-pricing every five years and is now contracted at a fixed price to

31 March 2028. A £1.7bn five-year extension to the LTPA contract was signed in H1 and secures our position of partnership

with the MOD and provides a firm foundation to invest in the transformation of UK sovereign Test, Trials, Training & Evaluation

(T3E) capabilities.

Other contracts with MOD

The LTPA is the most significant contract QinetiQ has with the MOD. In total approximately 60% (FY25: 57%) of the Group’s

revenue comes directly from contracts with the MOD.

31. Contingent liabilities and assets

Subsidiary undertakings within the Group have given unsecured guarantees of £53.7m at 31 March 2026 (2025: £49.7m) in

the ordinary course of business, typically in respect of performance bonds and rental guarantees. The Company has on

occasion been required to take legal action to protect its intellectual property rights, to enforce commercial contracts or

otherwise and similarly to defend itself against proceedings brought by other parties, including in respect of environmental

and regulatory issues. Provisions are made for the expected costs associated with such maers, based on past experience

of similar items and other known factors, taking into account professional advice received, and represent management’s

best estimate of the likely outcome. The timing of utilisation of these provisions is uncertain pending the outcome of

various court proceedings, ongoing investigations and negotiations. However, no provision is made for proceedings which

have been or might be brought by other parties unless management, taking into account professional advice received,

assesses that it is more likely than not that such proceedings may be successful. Contingent liabilities associated with such

proceedings have been identified but the Directors are of the opinion that any associated claims that might be brought can

be resisted successfully and therefore the possibility of any outflow in selement is assessed as remote.

199

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

32. Capital commitments

The Group had the following capital commitments for which no provision has been made:

31 March 31 March
All figures in £ million 2026 2025
Total contracted 30.2 51.3

Capital commitments at 31 March 2026 include £26.7m (2025: £47.2m) in relation to property, plant and equipment that will

be wholly funded by a third-party customer under long-term contract arrangements. These primarily relate to investments

under the LTPA contract.

33. Related parties

During the year ended 31 March 2026 there were sales to joint ventures of nil (FY25: £0.2m). At the year-end there were

outstanding receivables from joint ventures of nil (31 March 2025: £0.2m). Details of the remuneration of Directors and

Key management personnel are included within Note 6 and the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

34. Subsidiaries and other related undertakings

In accordance with section 409 of the Companies Act 2006, a full list of subsidiaries and other related undertakings

as at 31 March 2026 is detailed below. Unless stated otherwise, the Group’s holding comprises ordinary shares which

are held indirectly by QinetiQ Group plc, with the exception of QinetiQ Group Holdings Limited which is held directly by

QinetiQ Group plc.

Name of company Country of incorporation Registered office
Subsidiaries

1,6
QinetiQ Training Australia Pty Ltd * Australia Tower 4, Level 10, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne,
VIC 3008, Australia
Air Affairs (Australia) Pty Ltd Australia Tower 4, Level 10, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne,
VIC 3008, Australia
Air Affairs Aviation Pty Ltd Australia Tower 4, Level 10, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne,
VIC 3008, Australia
Air Target Services Pty Ltd Australia Tower 4, Level 10, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne,
VIC 3008, Australia
Astra Aerospace Pty Ltd Australia Tower 4, Level 10, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne,
VIC 3008, Australia
Avantus Federal LLC USA 10440 Furnace Road Lorton, VA 22079
Avantus Federal Services LLC USA 10440 Furnace Road Lorton, VA 22079
Avantus National Security Solutions LLC USA 10440 Furnace Road Lorton, VA 22079
E3 Federal Solutions PR LLC USA 10440 Furnace Road Lorton, VA 22079
Far Ridgeline Engagements LLC USA 10440 Furnace Road Lorton, VA 22079
Foster-Miller Inc.

2
USA 358 2nd Ave, Waltham, Massachuses, MA 02451-1104, USA
Hirose Holdings Pty Ltd Australia Tower 4, Level 10, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne,
VIC 3008, Australia
Inzpire Group Limited England & Wales C/O FRP Advisory Trading Limited Kings Orchard, 1 Queen Street,
Bristol, BS2 0HQ
Inzpire Holdings Limited England & Wales C/O FRP Advisory Trading Limited Kings Orchard, 1 Queen Street,
Bristol, BS2 0HQ
Inzpire Limited England & Wales Landmark House West Unit 1b, Alpha Court, Kingsley Road,
Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 3TA
Lucid Perspectives LLC USA 10440 Furnace Road Lorton, VA 22079
Naimuri Limited England & Wales Farnborough

3
Occam’s Razor Technologies LLC USA 10440 Furnace Road Lorton, VA 22079
Operational Intelligence LLC USA 10440 Furnace Road Lorton, VA 22079
Qinetic Limited England & Wales Farnborough

3

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

34. Subsidiaries and other related undertakings (continued)

200

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| Name of company | Country of incorporation | Registered office |
| QinetiQ Australia Pty Ltd | Australia | Tower 4, Level 10, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne, |
| | | VIC 3008, Australia |
| QinetiQ Estates Limited | England & Wales | Farnborough

3 |
| QinetiQ GmbH | Germany | Flughafenstraße 65, 41066, Mönchengladbach, Germany |
| QinetiQ GP Limited | Scotland | 50 Lothian Road, Festival Square, Edinburgh, EH3 9WJ, Scotland |
| QinetiQ Group Canada Inc.

2 | Canada | 5300 Commerce Court West, 199 Bay Street, Toronto, |
| | | ON M5L 1A9, Canada |
| QinetiQ Group Holdings Limited | England & Wales | Farnborough

3 |
| QinetiQ Holdings Limited | England & Wales | Farnborough

3 |
| QinetiQ Inc.

2 | USA | 10440 Furnace Road Lorton, VA 22079 |
| QinetiQ Insurance PCC Limited | Guernsey | Mill Court, La Charroterie, St Peter Port, GY1 4ET, Guernsey |
| QinetiQ Limited | England & Wales | Farnborough

3 |
| QinetiQ Novare Pty Ltd | Australia | Tower 4, Level 10, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne, |
| | | VIC 3008, Australia |
| QinetiQ Overseas Holdings Limited | England & Wales | Farnborough

3 |
| QinetiQ Overseas Trading Limited | England & Wales | Farnborough

3 |
| QinetiQ Pension Scheme Trustee Limited | England & Wales | Farnborough

3 |
| QinetiQ PFP Limited Partnership

4 | Scotland | 50 Lothian Road, Festival Square, Edinburgh, EH3 9WJ, Scotland |
| QinetiQ Philippines Company, Inc. | Philippines | 22nd Floor Corporate Centre, 139 Valero Street, Salcedo Village, |
| | | Makati City, Philippines |
| QinetiQ Pty Ltd | Australia | Tower 4, Level 10, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3008, |
| | | Australia |
| QinetiQ Services Holdings Pty Ltd | Australia | Tower 4, Level 10, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3008, |
| | | Australia |
| QinetiQ Solutions Sdn. Bhd. | Malaysia | Suite 6.01, 6th Floor, Plaza See Hoy Chan, Jalan Raja Chulan |
| | | 50200, Kuala Lumpur, W.P. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
| QinetiQ Target Services Limited | England & Wales | Farnborough

3 |
| QinetiQ Target Systems Limited | England & Wales | Farnborough

3 |
| QinetiQ Training and Simulation Limited | England & Wales | Farnborough

3 |
| QinetiQ US Holdings, Inc. | USA | 5885 Trinity Parkway, Suite 130, Centreville, |
| | | Virginia 20120-1969, USA |
| RubiKon Group Pty Limited | Australia | Level 33, 101 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia |
| TSG International LLC | USA | 358 2nd Ave, Waltham, Massachuses MA 02451-1104, USA |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| Name of company | Country of incorporation | Registered office |
| Joint ventures

6 | | |
| Avantus CTA, LLC

5 | USA | 10440 Furnace Road Lorton, VA 22079 |
| Federal Mission Solutions, LLC

5 | USA | 58 W Main Street, Suite B, Luray, VA 22835, USA |
| Houbara Defence & Security LLC

5,6 | United Arab Emirates | Unit 3, Zone 4, Tawazun Industrial Park, Abu Dhabi, |
| | | United Arab Emirates, PO Box 128220 |
| QinetiQ Dar Massader QDM Limited

5,6 | Saudi Arabia | Al Nakhla Tower, 3026-Prince Saud Bin Mohamed Bin Muqin Road, |
| | | PO Box 2985, Riyadh 13321, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia |
| Quick Services LLC

5 | USA | 409 Chicago Drive Suite 103 in Fayeeville, NC 28306 |

*

Aerospace Training Services Pty Ltd was renamed QinetiQ Training Australia Pty Ltd on 30 April 2025.

1

As at 31 March 2026 the Group owned 100% of the ordinary shares of all subsidiary undertakings.

2

The class of shares is ‘common share’.

3

Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 OLX.

4

Limited partnership. The partners are all wholly-owned Group companies.

5

As at 31 March 2026 the Group owned 90% of Avantus CTA, LLC, 49% of Federal Mission Solutions, LLC, 49% of Houbara Defence & Security LLC,

49% of QinetiQ Dar Massader QDM Limited, and 49% of Quick Services LLC.

6

The financial year end of each undertaking is 31 March other than Houbara Defence & Security LLC (31 December) and QinetiQ Dar Massader QDM

Limited (31 December).

201

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

35. Basis of preparation and material accounting policies

QinetiQ Group plc (‘the Company’) is a public limited company, which is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is

incorporated and domiciled in England, United Kingdom. The consolidated financial statements of the Group comprise

statements for the Company and its subsidiaries, together referred to as ‘the Group’.

Accounting policies

The following accounting policies have been applied consistently to all periods presented in dealing with items that are

considered material in relation to the Group’s financial statements. In the income statement, the Group presents ‘specific

adjusting items’ separately. In the judgement of the Directors, for the reader to obtain a proper understanding of business

performance, specific adjusting items need to be disclosed separately. Underlying measures of performance exclude

specific adjusting items.

Specific adjusting items

Specific adjusting items include the following:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | | | Does not reflect |
| | Distorting due to | Distorting due to | in-year operational |
| | irregular nature | fluctuating nature | performance of |
| Item | year on year | (size and sign) | continuing business |
| Amortisation of intangible assets arising from acquisitions | | |  |
| Pension net finance income | |  |  |
| Gains/losses on disposal of businesses, property and investments |  |  |  |
| Transaction, integration and on-off remuneration costs in respect of business | | | |
| acquisitions and disposals |  | |  |
| Impairment of property and goodwill |  | | |
| One-off period of digital investment |  |  |  |
| Costs and other impacts of group-wide restructuring programmes |  |  | |
| The tax impact of the above |  |  |  |
| Other significant non-recurring tax and RDEC movements |  |  |  |

The financial impact of each item is reported in note 4 to these financial statements.

These ‘specific adjusting items’ are of a ‘non-operational’ nature and do not include all significant, irregular items that are of

an operational nature, for example contract risk provisions and gains/losses on disposal of plant and equipment.

Basis of preparation

The Group’s financial statements, approved by the Directors, have been prepared on a going concern basis as discussed

in the Strategic Report on page 71 in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards and with the

requirements of the Companies Act 2006 as applicable to companies reporting under those standards. The Company has

elected to prepare its parent company financial statements in accordance with UK GAAP (FRS 101); these are presented on

page 212. The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for certain financial

assets and liabilities (such as derivative financial instruments) measures at fair value. The Group’s reporting currency is

Sterling and unless otherwise stated the financial statements are rounded to the nearest £100,000.

Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiary undertakings

to 31 March 2026. The purchase method of accounting has been adopted. Those subsidiary undertakings acquired or

disposed of in the period are included in the consolidated income statement from the date control is obtained to the date

that control is lost (usually on acquisition and disposal respectively). An investor controls an investee when it is exposed,

or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through

its power over the investee. This is the IFRS 10 definition of ‘control’.

The Group comprises certain entities that are operated within the terms of a Special Security Arrangement (‘SSA’). Details

of the SSA and QinetiQ’s management of US subsidiaries are set out in the Corporate Governance section of this Annual

Report (on page 94). IFRS 10 is the accounting standard applicable in respect of consolidation of entities. This does not

specifically deal with SSAs. However, having considered the terms of the SSA, the Directors consider that the Group meets

the requirements of IFRS 10 in respect of control over such affected entities and, therefore, consolidates these entities in

the consolidated accounts. The impact of this specific judgement is full consolidation as opposed to treatment as a 100%

associated undertaking.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

35. Basis of preparation and material accounting policies

(continued)

202

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

An associate is an undertaking over which the Group

exercises significant influence, usually from 20–50% of the

equity voting rights, in respect of financial and operating

policy. A joint venture is an undertaking over which the

Group exercises joint control. Joint ventures are accounted

for using the equity method from the date of acquisition

to the date of disposal. The Group’s investments in joint

ventures are held at cost including goodwill on acquisition

and any post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share

of the net assets of the joint venture less any impairment

to the recoverable amount. Where a joint venture has net

liabilities, full provision is made for the Group’s share of

liabilities where there is a constructive or legal obligation

to provide additional funding to the joint venture.

The financial statements of subsidiaries, joint ventures

and associates are adjusted where necessary to ensure

compliance with Group accounting policies.

Consideration of climate change

In preparing the financial statements, the Board has

considered the impact to the Company and its activities

of climate change, particularly those risks highlighted

on page 63 in line with the recommendations by the Task

Force for Climate-related Disclosures (TCFD). The Board

recognises its responsibilities for oversight of climate-

related risks and opportunities. The QinetiQ Leadership

Team support the Board through the implementation of

a strategic led approach to monitor, assess and address

climate transition risks and opportunities, which includes

refining our capability to quantify, forecast and model

financial statement impacts due to climate change.

Specific aspects of the financial statements that could

potentially be impacted by climate change are the carrying

value and useful economic lives of tangible assets and

goodwill, future capability development and the financial

performance of customer contracts.

While the Group will likely be impacted by climate change

in the future, the impacts on the financial statements as

at 31 March 2026 are not considered to be material.

Recent accounting developments

Developments adopted by the Group for the year ended 31 March 2026

with no material impact on the Group’s financial statements

The following standards, interpretations and amendments

to existing standards became effective on 1 January 2025

and have not had a material impact on the Group:

ɰ

Amendments to IAS 21 Lack of Exchangeability,

effective from 1 January 2025.

IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements

(effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027)

IFRS 18 will replace IAS 1 Presentation of financial

statements, introducing new requirements that will help

to achieve comparability of the financial performance of

similar entities and provide more relevant information and

transparency to users. Even though IFRS 18 will not impact

the recognition or measurement of items in the financial

statements, its impacts on presentation and disclosure

are expected to be pervasive, in particular those related

to the statement of financial performance and providing

management-defined performance measures within the

financial statements.

We are currently assessing the detailed implications of

applying the new standard on the group’s consolidated

financial statements.

The group will apply the new standard from its mandatory

effective date of 1 January 2027. Retrospective application

is required, and so the comparative information for the

financial year ending 31 March 2027 will be restated in

accordance with IFRS 18.

Developments expected in future periods of which are not expected to

have a material impact on the Group’s financial statements

The following other standards, interpretations and

amendments to existing standards have been issued but

were not mandatory for accounting periods beginning on

1 April 2025. These either have been, or are expected to

be endorsed by, the UK Endorsement Board and are not

expected to have a material impact on the Group:

ɰ

Amendments to the Classification and Measurement

of Financial Instruments – amendments to IFRS 9

and IFRS 7, effective from 1 January 2026;

ɰ

Annual improvements 2024, effective from

1 January 2026; and

ɰ

Contracts Referencing Nature-dependent

Electricity – amendment to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7,

effective from January 2026.

Material accounting policies

Revenue from contracts with customers

The Group recognises revenue primarily from the following

major sources:

ɰ

Through combining world-leading expertise with

unique facilities to provide technical assurance, test

and evaluation and training services underpinned by

long-term contracts; and

ɰ

Through delivering innovative solutions and products

to meet customer requirements by undertaking

contract-funded research and development,

developing intellectual property and by internal

funding with potential for new revenue streams.

203

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

35. Basis of preparation and material accounting policies

(continued)

Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified

in a contract with a customer and excludes amounts

collected on behalf of third parties. The Group recognises

revenue when it transfers control of a product or service to

a customer. The Group’s revenue contracts are accounted

for under IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers

taking into account the requirement to distinguish between

the various performance obligations within a contract

and treating these separately. The Group’s methodology

applies IFRS 15 on a contract-by-contract basis which

includes considerations for contract modifications, variable

consideration, the determination of distinct performance

obligations, determination of agency and principal

relationships and licences.

Service contracts

The Group’s long-term service contracts are generally

‘test and evaluation’ or advice-based contracts where

control of the service is transferred over a period of time

as the Group performs. At contract inception the Group

undertakes an assessment to determine how many distinct

performance obligations exist within a contract. As part of

the assessment the Group obtains an understanding of the

overall deliverable to the customer through discussions

with business units and project leads. Each individual

deliverable in the contract is then assessed to determine if

it is an input into the overall deliverable, and therefore part

of a single performance obligation, or if it is a stand-alone

separable deliverable with its own transaction price and

therefore a distinct performance obligation in its own right.

Each distinct performance obligation identified within a

contract is accounted for separately.

Certain service contracts have a similar paern of transfer

of control to the customer where each year is effectively

the same from a performance obligation perspective. The

Group has applied the series guidance as permied within

the Standard to these contracts and accounts for these

as a series of distinct service performance obligations

satisfied annually over the contract term.

The transaction price for a contract is determined at contract

inception based on a fixed-margin applied to the total

forecast costs to complete the deliverable. Some long-term

contracts include an excess profit clause which is a variable

consideration factor that could impact the transaction price.

Excess profits are estimated at contract inception and at the

end of each reporting period to ensure that the transaction

price is not under or over stated. Any required adjustment will

be made against the transaction price in the period in which

it occurred. The Group does not offer any right of return or

refunds which could impact transaction price at inception.

Certain contracts aract bonuses and/or penalties

which are variable and will have an impact on transaction

price at contract inception. The Group assesses variable

consideration in relation to bonuses and penalties at

contract inception using the most-likely method and this

forms part of the transaction price and recognised over time

as costs are incurred. The Group only includes bonuses and

penalties into the transaction price to the extent that it is

highly probable that a significant reversal of revenue will not

occur in future periods. Historical evidence and experience

show that even where a reduction has been required, that

reduction has been immaterial to the Group.

The transaction price is allocated between each distinct

performance obligation identified in a contract based

on the stand-alone selling price of each performance

obligation. Each performance obligation will be costed and

the transaction price will be cost plus margin. This amount

would be the stand-alone selling price of each performance

obligation if contracted with a customer separately.

Long-term service contracts allow for modifications to the

original order. If a contract modification is determined to

be distinct and the price of the contract increases by an

amount of consideration that reflects the entity’s stand-

alone selling prices for the additional promised goods

or services, the Group accounts for this as a separate

contract. If a contract modification is not distinct, the

Group accounts for this as if it were part of the existing

contract. A cumulative catch-up adjustment to revenue is

then recognised to disclose the effect that the contract

modification has on the transaction price and the Group’s

measure of progress towards complete satisfaction of the

performance obligation.

Long-term service contracts also sometimes allow for

extensions to the original order. A contract extension is

determined to include either additional goods or services or

no additional goods or service. If a contract extension with

additional goods or services is determined to be distinct

and the price of the contract increases by an amount of

consideration that reflects the entity’s stand-alone selling

prices for the additional promised goods or services, the Group

accounts for this as a separate performance obligation.

If a contract extension with additional goods or services is

not distinct, the Group accounts for this as if it were part of

the existing contract. A cumulative catch-up adjustment to

revenue is then recognised to disclose the effect that the

contract extension has on the transaction price and the

Group’s measure of progress towards complete satisfaction

of the performance obligation.

When the outcome of a distinct performance obligation

in delivering services can be reliably estimated, revenue

associated with the performance obligation is recognised

over time using the input method. The input method

recognises revenue over time on the basis of costs incurred

to date to the satisfaction of a performance obligation

relative to the total forecast costs to complete the

performance obligation.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

35. Basis of preparation and material accounting policies

(continued)

204

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

The Group has determined the input method to be

appropriate as it best depicts the Group’s performance

in transferring control of the service to the customer as it

incurs costs on a particular contract.

No profit is recognised on contracts until the outcome of the

contract can be reliably estimated. When it is probable that

total contract costs will exceed total contract revenue, the

expected loss is recognised immediately as an expense.

Goods sold

The Group recognises revenue on the sale of products at

a point in time once control has been transferred to the

customer. Control is generally transferred to customers

on delivery of products or when the customer has the

significant risks and rewards of ownership of the product.

Payment is typically due within 30 days of invoice (within the

UK) and customers typically do not have a right of return or

refund. The transaction price for sale of products is agreed

at contract inception. When the Group develops a bespoke

product for a customer with no alternative use to the Group,

revenue is recognised over time using the input method.

Licence revenue

Licence revenue is aributed to either ‘right to use’ or

‘right to access’ licences. ‘Right to use’ licence revenue is

recognised at a point in time when the Group sells a licence

to a customer and does not undertake significant further

activities or involvement in developing the licence after

the sale. ‘Right to access’ licence revenue is recognised

over time when the Group maintains a significant level of

involvement in developing and enhancing the licence after

the sale. The level of involvement goes beyond general

support, bug-fixing and upgrades which generally only

maintain the current operating level. The transaction price

for intellectual property is agreed at contract inception.

The Group does not offer any right of return or refunds

which could impact transaction price at inception.

The Group recognises licence revenue through the supply

of a range of security, messaging and connectivity software

products. A licence fee is paid for each computer that

uses the software and the customer can also purchase

a support service contract for a fixed period. The sale of

these types of licences is recognised at a point in time as a

distinct performance obligation because the Group does not

undertake any further activities in developing the licence after

the sale. The support service contract is recognised over time

as a separate performance obligation as this is an optional

extra and is not integral to the functionality of the licence.

The support service contract offers general support and

maintenance of the licence to the customer over a fixed period.

Contract assets

Contract assets represent revenue recognised in excess of

amounts invoiced. Revenue is recognised on service contracts

by using a ‘percentage complete’ method, applying the

proportion of contract costs incurred for work performed to

date relative to the estimated total contract cost, after making

suitable allowances for technical and other risks related to

performance milestones yet to be achieved, and applying

that proportion to total contract price. Payment for service

contracts are not always due from the customer until certain

milestones have been reached and, therefore, a contract

asset is recognised over the period in which the services are

performed representing the Group’s right to consideration for

services performed to date, to the extent that the customer

has not yet been invoiced for those services.

Contract liabilities

The Group, on occasion, bills customers in advance of

performing certain types of work which results in the Group

recognising contract liabilities. Once the work has been

performed these amounts will be reduced and recognised

as revenue. For sale of goods, revenue is recognised in the

income statement when control of the goods has been

transferred to the customer; being at the point when the

goods are delivered. Any transaction price received by the

Group before that point is recognised as a contract liability.

Principal-agent arrangements

The Group enters into certain arrangements which involve

a consortium of service providers. The Group acts as a

‘Prime’ contractor in certain contracts with customers and

utilises sub-contractors to undertake the work. Under these

contracts the Group is considered to be primarily responsible

for fulfilling the service to the customer. The Group performs a

technical assessment of the work before it is delivered to the

customer and is responsible for quality and performance of

the sub-contractor. As such the Group is considered to be the

principal to the arrangement with the customer and includes

sub-contractor costs within revenue. However, where the

Group is merely acting as an agent of a sub-contractor then no

revenue is recognised in respect of sub-contractor costs.

All consortium arrangements are assessed by the Group to

determine if it is the principal or agent.

Contract bidding costs

The Group recognises the ‘incremental costs of obtaining a

contract’ with a customer as an asset if the Group expects

to recover those costs. The ‘incremental costs of obtaining

a contract’ are those costs that the Group incurs to obtain

a contract with a customer that it would not have incurred if

the contract had not been won. Costs to obtain a contract

that would have been incurred regardless of whether the

contract was won or lost shall be recognised as an expense

when incurred, unless those costs are explicitly chargeable

to the customer.

205

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

35. Basis of preparation and material accounting policies

(continued)

Segmental information

Segmental information is presented according to the

Group’s internal management reporting structure and the

markets in which it operates. Segmental results represent

the contribution of the different segments to the profit

of the Group. Corporate expenses are allocated to the

corresponding segments. Unallocated items mainly comprise

Research and Development Expenditure Credits (RDEC) and

specific adjusting items. Specific adjusting items are referred

to in note 4. Segmental assets and liabilities information is not

regularly provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker.

Research and development expenditure

Research and development (R&D) costs incurred in respect

of specific contracts placed by customers are recognised

within operating costs and revenue is recognised in

respect of the R&D services performed. Internally funded

development expenditure is capitalised in the balance sheet

where there is a clearly defined project, the expenditures

are separately identifiable, the project is technically and

commercially feasible, all costs are recoverable by future

revenue and the resources are commied to complete

the project. Such capitalised costs are amortised over the

forecast period of sales resulting from the development. All

other R&D costs are expensed to the income statement in

the period in which they are incurred. If the research phase

cannot be clearly distinguished from the development phase,

the respective project-related costs are treated as if they

were incurred in the research phase only and expensed.

Borrowings and financing

The Group has a term loan and access to a revolving credit

facility with its relationship banks. Borrowings are initially

recognised at fair value. Borrowings are subsequently

measured at amortised cost. Any difference between the

proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption

amount is recognised in profit or loss over the period of the

borrowings using the effective interest method.

Borrowings are removed from the balance sheet when the

obligation specified in the contract is discharged, cancelled

or expired. The difference between the carrying amount of a

financial liability that has been extinguished or transferred

to another party and the consideration paid, including

any non-cash assets transferred or liabilities assumed, is

recognised in profit or loss as other income or finance costs.

Borrowings are classified as non-current liabilities where

the Group has an unconditional right to defer selement of

the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting period.

Fees paid on the establishment of loan facilities are recognised

as transaction costs of the loan to the extent that it is probable

that some or all of the facility will be drawn down. In this case,

the fee is deferred until the draw-down occurs. The Group

pays in advance finance costs in relation to the multi-currency

facility which are recognised as a deferred finance cost

asset and amortised over the period of the facility, where it

is probable that some or all of the facility will be drawn down.

Costs of leers of credit are also charged to finance expense.

Exchange differences on financial assets and liabilities and

the income or expense from interest hedging instruments

that are recognised in the income statement are included

within finance income and finance expense. Financing also

includes the net finance income or expense in respect of

defined benefit pension schemes.

Taxation

The income tax expense or credit for the period is the tax

payable on the current period’s taxable income, based

on the applicable income tax rate for each jurisdiction,

adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities

aributable to temporary differences and to unused tax

losses. The current income tax charge is calculated on the

basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at

the end of the reporting period in the countries where the

Company and its subsidiaries and associates operate and

generate taxable income.

Management periodically evaluates positions taken in

tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable

tax regulation is subject to interpretation and considers

whether it is probable that a taxation authority will accept

an uncertain tax treatment. The Group measures its tax

balances either based on the most likely amount or the

expected value, depending on which method provides a

beer prediction of the resolution of the uncertainty.

Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability

method, on temporary differences arising between the tax

bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in

the consolidated financial statements. However, deferred

tax liabilities are not recognised if they arise from the initial

recognition of goodwill.

Deferred income tax is also not accounted for if it arises

from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction

other than a business combination that, at the time of the

transaction, affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or

loss. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and

laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by

the end of the reporting period and are expected to apply

when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the

deferred income tax liability is seled.

Deferred tax assets are recognised only if it is probable that

future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those

temporary differences and losses.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

35. Basis of preparation and material accounting policies

(continued)

206

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

Deferred tax assets are derecognised when that probability

assessment changes. Deferred tax liabilities and assets

are not recognised for temporary differences between

the carrying amount and tax bases of investments in

foreign operations where the Company is able to control

the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and

it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the

foreseeable future.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where there is

a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and

liabilities and where the deferred tax balances relate to the

same taxation authority. Current tax assets and tax liabilities

are offset where the entity has a legally enforceable right to

offset and intends either to sele on a net basis or to realise

the asset and sele the liability simultaneously.

The Group has applied the temporary exemption issued

by the International Accounting Standards Board from the

accounting for deferred taxes under IAS 12 and neither

recognises nor discloses information about deferred taxes

related to OECD’s Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules

(Pillar Two) income taxes.

Current and deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss,

except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in

other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this

case, the tax is also recognised in other comprehensive

income or directly in equity, respectively.

Research and Development Expenditure Credits (RDEC) are

recognised within other operating income.

Goodwill

Goodwill on acquisitions of subsidiaries is included in non-

current assets. Goodwill on acquisitions of joint ventures

is included in the carrying value of equity accounted

investments. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and

carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Gains

and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying

amount of goodwill related to the entity sold.

Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets arising from business combinations

are recognised at fair value and are amortised over their

expected useful lives, typically between 1 and 16 years.

Internally generated intangible assets are recorded at

cost, including labour, directly aributable costs and any

third-party expenses.

The ‘multi-period excess earnings’ method and the ‘relief-

from-royalty’ method are both used for fair valuing intangible

assets arising from acquisitions. The multi-period excess

earnings method considers the present value of net cash

flows expected to be generated by customer relationships,

by excluding any cash flows related to contributory assets.

The relief-from-royalty method considers the discounted

estimated royalty payments that are expected to be avoided

as a result of the patents or trademarks being owned.

Purchased intangible assets are recognised at cost less

amortisation. Intangible assets are amortised over their

respective useful lives on a straight-line basis as follows:

Intellectual property rights 2–10 years
Customer relationships 1–16 years
Development costs 1–5 years
Other 1–14 years

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less

depreciation. Freehold land is not depreciated. Other

tangible non-current assets are depreciated on

a straight-line basis over their useful economic lives

to their estimated residual value as follows:

Freehold buildings 20–25 years
Leasehold land and buildings Shorter of useful
economic life and the
period of the lease
Plant and machinery 3–15 years
Motor vehicles 3–5 years
Aircraft (vehicles) 10–20 years
Computers 3–5 years
Office equipment 5–10 years

Assets under construction are included in property, plant

and equipment on the basis of expenditure incurred at the

balance sheet date. In the case of assets constructed by the

Group, the value includes the cost of own work completed,

including directly aributable costs and interest. The useful

lives, depreciation methods and residual values applied to

property, plant and equipment are reviewed annually and,

if appropriate, adjusted accordingly.

Impairment of goodwill and tangible, intangible and held

for sale assets

At each reporting date the Group assesses whether there is

an indication that an asset may be impaired. If the carrying

amount of any asset exceeds its recoverable amount an

impairment loss is recognised immediately in the income

statement. In addition, goodwill is tested for impairment

annually irrespective of any indication of impairment. If the

carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, the

respective asset or the assets in the cash-generating unit

(CGU) are wrien down to their recoverable amounts. The

recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is the higher of its

fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. The value in

use is the present value of the future cash flows expected

to be derived from an asset or CGU calculated using an

appropriate pre-tax discount rate. Impairment losses are

expensed to the income statement.

207

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

35. Basis of preparation and material accounting policies

(continued)

Leases

Leases – as a lessor

Lease income from operating leases where the Group is a

lessor is recognised in income on a straight-line basis over the

lease term (note 25). Initial direct costs incurred in obtaining

an operating lease are added to the carrying amount of the

underlying asset and recognised as expense over the lease

term on the same basis as lease income. The respective leased

assets are included in the balance sheet based on their nature.

Leases – as a lessee

The Group leases various offices, aircraft, equipment and

vehicles. Rental contracts are typically made for fixed

periods of 6 months to 25 years, but may have extension

options as described below.

Contracts may contain both lease and non-lease

components. The Group allocates the consideration in the

contract to the lease and non-lease components based

on their relative stand-alone process. Lease terms are

negotiated on an individual basis and contain a wide range

of different terms and conditions. The lease agreements do

not impose any covenants other than the security interests

in the leases assets that are held by the lessor. Leased

assets may not be used as security for borrowing purposes.

Leases are recognised as a right-of-use asset and

corresponding liability at the date at which the leased asset

is available for use by the Group.

Assets and liabilities arising from a lease are initially

measured on a present value basis. Lease liabilities include

the net present value of the following lease payments:

ɰ

Fixed payments (including in-substance fixed

payments), less any lease incentives receivable;

ɰ

Variable lease payments based on an index or a rate,

initially measured using the index or rate as at the

commencement date;

ɰ

Amounts expected to be payable by the Group under

residual value guarantees;

ɰ

The exercise price of a purchase option if the Group is

reasonably certain to exercise that option; and

ɰ

Payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the

lease term reflects the Group exercising that option.

Lease payments to be made under reasonably certain

options are also included in the measurement of the liability.

The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate

implicit in the lease. If the rate cannot be readily determined,

which is generally the case for leases in the Group, the

lessee’s incremental borrowing rate is used, being the

rate the individual lessee would have to pay to borrow the

funds necessary to obtain an asset of similar value to the

right-of-use asset in a similar economic environment with

similar terms, security and conditions. To determine the

incremental borrowing rate, the Group:

ɰ

Where possible, uses recent third-party financing

received by the individual lessee as a starting point,

adjusted to reflect changes in financing conditions

since third party financing was received;

ɰ

Uses a build-up approach that starts with a risk-free

interest rate adjusted for credit risk for leases held by

QinetiQ Plc, which does not have recent third-party

financing; and

ɰ

Makes adjustments specific to the lease, for example

to term, country, currency and security.

The exposure by the Group to potential future increases in

variable lease payments based on an index or rate, which are

not included in the lease liability until they take effect, is not

considered material. When adjustments to lease payments

based on an index or rate take effect, the lease liability is

reassessed and adjusted against the right-of-use asset. Lease

payments are allocated between principal and finance cost.

The finance cost is charged to profit or loss over the lease

period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on

the remaining balance of the liability for each period.

Right-of-use assets are measured at cost comprising

the following:

ɰ

The amount of the initial measurement of lease liability;

ɰ

Any lease payments made at or before the

commencement date less any lease incentives received;

ɰ

Any initial direct costs; and

ɰ

Restoration costs.

Right-of-use assets are generally depreciated over the

shorter of the asset’s useful life and lease term on a straight-

line basis. If the Group is reasonably certain to exercise

a purchase option, the right-of-use asset is depreciated

over the underlying asset’s useful life. The Group does not

revalue its land and buildings that are presented within

property, plant and equipment and has chosen to do the

same for right-of-use buildings by the Group. Payments

associated with short-term leases of offices, equipment and

vehicles and all leases of low-value assets are recognised

on a straight-line basis as an expense in profit or loss. Short-

term leases are leases with a lease term of 12 months or less.

Low-value assets comprise lease assets under £5,000.

Lease extension and termination options

Extension and termination options are included in a number of

property and equipment leases across the Group. These are

used to maximise operational flexibility in terms of managing

the assets used in the Group’s operations. The majority of

extension and termination options held are exercisable only

by the Group and not by the respective lessor.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

35. Basis of preparation and material accounting policies

(continued)

208

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

Judgements in determining the lease term

In determining the lease term, management considers all

facts and circumstances that create an economic incentive

to exercise an extension option or not exercise a termination

option. Extension options (or periods after termination

options) are only included in the lease term if the lease is

reasonably certain to be extended (or not terminated).

For leases of offices and equipment, the following factors

are normally the most relevant:

ɰ

If there are significant penalties to terminate (or

extend), the Group is typically reasonably certain to

end (or not to terminate).

ɰ

If any leasehold improvements are expected to have

a significant remaining value, the Group is typically

reasonably certain to extend (or not terminate).

Otherwise, the Group considers other factors including

historical lease durations and the costs and business

disruptions required to replace the leased asset.

Most extension options in office and vehicles leases

have not been included in the lease liability, because the

Group could replace the assets without significant cost or

business disruption.

As at 31 March 2026 no (undiscounted) potential future

cash outflows have been included in the lease liability for

extension or termination.

The lease term is reassessed if an option is actually

exercised (or not exercised) or the Group becomes

obliged to exercise (or not exercise) it. The assessment of

reasonable certainty is only revised if a significant event of

significant change in circumstance occurs, which affects

this assessment, and that is within the control of the

lessee. During the current financial year, the financial effect

of revising lease terms to reflect the effect of exercising

extension or termination options was nil (FY25: nil) in

recognised lease liabilities and right-of-use assets.

Inventories

Inventory and work-in-progress are stated at the lower

of cost and net realisable value, using the first-in-first-

out cost formula. Work-in-progress and manufactured

finished goods are valued at production cost. Production

cost includes direct production costs and an appropriate

proportion of production overheads. A provision is

established when the net realisable value of any inventory

item is lower than its cost. A ‘market comparison’ technique

is used to fair value inventories acquired through a business

combination. The fair value is determined based on the

estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business

less the estimated costs of completion and sale, and a

reasonable profit margin based on the effort required to

complete and sell the inventories.

Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables are measured at amortised

cost less any impairment losses. Amounts recoverable

on contracts are included in trade and other receivables

and represent revenue recognised in excess of amounts

invoiced. Other receivables will also include insurance

recoveries where we are virtually certain of recovery.

Impairment of trade and other receivables

The Group applies the simplified approach when using the

expected credit loss (ECL) impairment model for trade and

other receivables. Under the simplified approach the Group

always measures the loss allowance at an amount equal to

the lifetime expected credit losses for trade receivables.

The Group measures the expected credit losses of trade

and other receivables in a way that reflects a probability-

weighted amount that is determined by evaluating a range of

possible outcomes, the time value of money and supportable

information that is readily available at each reporting date

about past events, current condition and forecasts of future

economic conditions. The ECLs are updated each reporting

period to reflect changes in credit risk since initial recognition.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank and

short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily

convertible into a known amount of cash and which are

subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. The

Group holds various short-maturity money market funds

(see note 23) across numerous financial institutions which

meet the IAS 7 criteria to be classified as cash equivalents.

In the cash flow statement overdraft balances are included

in cash and equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents includes

an element that is restricted in use (note 23).

Current and non-current liabilities

Current liabilities include amounts due within the normal

operating cycle of the Group. Deferred income, or ‘contract

liabilities’, is included in trade and other payables and

represents amounts invoiced in excess of revenue

recognised. Interest-bearing current and non-current

liabilities are initially recognised at fair value and then

stated at amortised cost with any difference between the

cost and redemption value being recognised in the income

statement over the period of the borrowings on an effective

interest rate basis. Costs associated with the arrangement

of bank facilities or the issue of loans are held net of

the associated liability presented in the balance sheet.

Capitalised issue costs are released over the estimated

life of the facility or instrument to which they relate using

the effective interest rate method. If it becomes clear

that the facility or instrument will be redeemed early,

the amortisation of the issue costs will be accelerated.

209

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

35. Basis of preparation and material accounting policies

(continued)

Provisions

A provision is recognised in the balance sheet when the Group

has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a

past event which can be reliably estimated, and it is probable

that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to sele

the obligation. Where appropriate, provisions are determined

by discounting the expected cash flows at an appropriate

discount rate reflecting the level of risk and the time value of

money. Where an exposure is highly likely to be covered by

insurance an offseing receivable is recorded.

Financial instruments

Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on

the Group’s balance sheet when the Group becomes a party

to the contractual provisions of the instrument at the trade

date. The derecognition of a financial instrument takes

place when the Group no longer controls the contractual

right that comprises the financial instrument, when

the instrument expires, or when the instrument is sold,

terminated or exercised.

Financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets are classified on the Group’s balance sheet

as subsequently measured at amortised cost, fair value

through other comprehensive income or fair value through

profit or loss. This classification is made on the basis of

both the Group’s business model for managing the financial

assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the

financial asset.

Financial liabilities are classified on the Group’s balance

sheet as subsequently measured at amortised cost except

for financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss.

The Group may at initial recognition irrevocably designate

a financial liability as measured at fair value through profit

or loss if a contract contains one or more embedded

derivatives and the host is not an asset within the scope of

IFRS 9, or when doing so results in more relevant information.

Derivative financial instruments

Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised

and thereafter held at fair value, being the market value

for quoted instruments or valuation based on models and

discounted cash flow calculations for unlisted instruments.

Fair value hedging

The Group’s activities expose it primarily to the financial risks of

changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.

The Group uses foreign exchange contracts and interest rate

swap contracts to hedge these exposures. The use of financial

derivatives is governed by the Group’s Treasury Policies as

approved by the Board of Directors, which provides wrien

principles on the use of derivatives. The Group does not use

derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge

accounting. These are categorised as ‘fair value through

profit or loss’ and are stated at fair value, with any resultant

gain or loss recognised in the income statement.

The Group designates certain hedging instruments in

respect of foreign currency risk as cash flow hedges. At the

inception of the hedge relationship, the Group documents

the relationship between the hedging instrument and the

hedged item, along with its risk management objectives

and strategy for undertaking various hedging transactions.

The Group also documents, both at hedge inception and on

an ongoing basis, whether the hedging instrument that is

used in a hedging relationship is highly effective in offseing

changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item.

For the Group’s cash flow hedges of highly probable

forecast transactions in foreign currencies, the hedge

ratio is 100%, subject to a £100k de Minimis threshold. If

the underlying exposure changes over time, either due

to commercial factors or timing differences, the hedging

instruments will be rebalanced to ensure that the hedge

ratio of 100% is maintained.

Cash flow hedging

Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as a

cash flow hedge that are regarded as highly effective are

recognised in equity. The ineffective portion is recognised

immediately in the income statement. Where a hedged item

results in an asset or a liability, gains and losses previously

recognised in equity are included in the cost of the asset or

liability. Gains and losses previously recognised in equity

are removed and recognised in the income statement at the

same time as the hedged transaction.

Foreign currencies

Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded using

the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction.

Monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are

translated at period-end rates. Any resulting exchange

differences are taken to the income statement. Gains and

losses on designated forward foreign exchange hedging

contracts are matched against the foreign exchange

movements on the underlying transaction.

The individual financial statements of each Group company

are presented in its functional currency. On consolidation,

assets and liabilities of overseas subsidiaries, associated

undertakings and joint ventures, including any related

goodwill, are translated to Sterling at the rate of exchange

at the balance sheet date. The results and cash flows of

overseas subsidiaries, associated undertakings and

joint ventures are translated to Sterling using the

average rates of exchange during the period. Exchange

adjustments arising from the re-translation of the opening

net investment and the results for the period to the

period-end rate are taken directly to equity and reported

in the statement of comprehensive income.

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

35. Basis of preparation and material accounting policies

(continued)

210

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

Post-retirement benefits

The Group provides both defined contribution and defined

benefit pension arrangements. The liabilities of the Group

arising from defined benefit obligations are determined using

the projected unit credit method. Valuations for accounting

purposes are carried out bi-annually. Actuarial advice is

provided by external consultants. For the funded defined

benefit plans, the excess or deficit of the fair value of plan

assets less the present value of the defined benefit obligation

are recognised as an asset or a liability respectively.

Per the Scheme rules the Company has an unconditional

right to a refund of any surplus that may arise on cessation

of the Scheme in the context of IFRIC 14 paragraphs 11(b)

and 12 and, therefore, the full net pension asset can be

recognised on the Group’s balance sheet and the Group’s

minimum funding commitments to the Scheme do not give

rise to an additional balance sheet liability.

For defined benefit plans the cost charged to the income

statement consists of administrative expenses and the net

interest income. There is no service cost due to the fact the

plans are closed to future accrual. The net interest income

is reported within finance income and the administration

cost element is charged as a component of operating costs

in the income statement. Actuarial gains and losses and

re-measurement gains and losses are recognised

immediately in full through the statement of comprehensive

income. Contributions to defined contribution plans are

charged to the income statement as incurred.

Share-based payments

The Group operates share-based payment arrangements

with employees. The fair value of equity-seled awards

for share-based payments is determined on grant and

expensed straight line over the period from grant to

end of the service period. The charges for equity-seled

share-based payments are updated annually for

non-market-based vesting conditions.

Share-buybacks

Where any member of the Group purchases the Company’s

own equity instruments, including pursuant to a share

buy-back programme, the consideration paid, together

with any directly aributable incremental transaction

costs (net of related income tax effects), is recognised as

a deduction from equity aributable to the shareholders of

the Group and presented within treasury shares until such

shares are cancelled or reissued.

Where treasury shares are subsequently cancelled, the

cost of the shares is transferred from treasury shares to the

appropriate reserves within equity. Where treasury shares

are subsequently reissued, any consideration received, net

of any directly aributable incremental transaction costs

and related income tax effects, is recognised within equity

aributable to the shareholders of the Group.

Investments in debt and equity securities

Investments held by the Group are classified as either

a current asset or as a non-current asset. These are

investments in debt and equity instruments that are

classified as at fair value through other comprehensive

income. When these investments are derecognised, the

cumulative gain or loss previously recognised directly in

equity is recognised in the income statement.

The fair value of quoted financial instruments is their bid

price at the balance sheet date. The fair value of unquoted

equity investments is based on the price of the most recent

investment by the Group or a third party, if available, or

derived from the present value of forecast future cash flows.

Share capital

Ordinary share capital of the Company is recorded as the

proceeds received. Company shares held by the employee

benefit trusts are held at the consideration paid. They are

classified as own shares within equity. Any gain or loss on

the purchase, sale or issue of Company shares is recorded

in equity.

211

Notes to the Consolidated

Financial Statements

36. Critical accounting estimates

and judgments in applying

accounting policies

Critical accounting estimates

The following commentary is intended to highlight key

sources of estimation uncertainty that have a significant

risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the financial

statements in the next financial year.

Carrying value of goodwill relating to the US Sector CGU

The Group tests annually whether goodwill has suffered any

impairment. This process relies on the use of estimates of

the future profitability and cash flows of its cash-generating

units which may differ from the actual results delivered. In

addition, the Group reviews whether identified intangible

assets have suffered any impairment. Further details on the

sensitivity of the carrying value of goodwill to changes in the

key assumptions are set out in note 13.

Estimation of the Group’s defined benefit pension

net surplus

The Group’s defined benefit pension obligations (and hence

the net surplus) are based on key assumptions, including

discount rates, mortality and inflation. Management

exercises its best judgement, in consultation with actuarial

advisors, in selecting the values for these assumptions that

are the most appropriate to the Group. Small changes in

these assumptions at the balance sheet date, individually or

collectively, may result in significant changes in the size of

the net surplus/deficit. Further details of these assumptions

and the sensitivity of the net pension surplus to changes in

these assumptions are set out in note 27.

In addition to the sensitivity of the liability side of the net

pension surplus (which will impact the value of the net

pension surplus) the net pension surplus is also exposed

to significant variation due to changes in the fair value of

Scheme assets. A specific sensitivity on assets has not

been included in note 27 but any change in valuation of

assets flows straight through to the value of the net pension

surplus, e.g. if equities fall by £10m then the net pension

surplus reduces by £10m. The values of unquoted assets

assume that an available buyer is willing to purchase those

assets at that value. For the Group’s portfolio of assets,

the unquoted alternative bonds of £185.4m, the unquoted

corporate bonds of £73.1m and the unquoted equities of

£7.5m are the assets with most uncertainty as to valuation

as at 31 March 2026.

Estimates of costs to complete on long-term contracts

The Group has a large number of contracts which span

multiple years and are accounted for on a percentage of

completion basis in accordance with IFRS 15. Long-term

contract accounting requires a number of estimates to

be made, particularly in calculating the forecast costs

to complete the contract. These forecast costs will be

impacted by various factors including numerous risks

that could crystallise in the future (with a range of cost

outcomes), particularly on contracts of a developmental

nature. Across the Group’s portfolio of long-term contracts

there is a risk that the actual ouurn of these contracts

could be different than assumed in the year-end contract

forecasts, impacting both revenue and operating profit.

For firm price contracts the impact of actual costs being

higher or lower than estimated costs would generally

impact the contract profitability and the timing of revenue

recognition. Costs could increase or decrease based on

the level of inflation and the outcome of assumed risk and

identified savings positions. As an example, an increase

in total forecast costs to complete of 1% in one of the

Group’s most significant contracts, would reduce profit by

approximately £1m to £2m per annum, on average over the

remaining contract duration. Depending on the timing of

such cost increases there would be an adjustment to the

timing of revenue recognition, which would have no impact

on total contract revenue but could impact an individual

year’s revenue by £2m to £3m. In many cases fixed price

contracts include inflation uplift clauses, such that inflation

of costs would create additional contract value

and revenue, thus resulting in increased profit.

Critical accounting judgements

Specific, material judgements made by the Directors in

applying the Group’s accounting policies are set out below:

Basis of consolidation

The Group comprises certain entities that are operated

within the terms of a Special Security Arrangement

(‘SSA’). Details of the SSA and QinetiQ’s management of

US subsidiaries are set out in the Corporate Governance

section of this Annual Report. IFRS 10 is the accounting

standard applicable in respect of consolidation of entities.

This does not specifically deal with SSAs. However, having

considered the terms of the SSA, the Directors consider

that the Group meets the requirements of IFRS 10 in respect

of control over such affected entities and, therefore,

consolidates these entities in the consolidated accounts.

The impact of this specific judgement is full consolidation

as opposed to treatment as a 100% associated undertaking.

Treatment as a 100% associated undertaking would reduce

Group revenue by a material amount (c.£300m per annum)

but would have no impact on reported profit, which would

include an equivalent amount of profit reported within

Other Income as ‘Share of profits of joint ventures’.

All figures in £ million

Note

31 March

2026

31 March

2025

Non-current assets

Investments in subsidiary undertakings

2

551.6

540.1

551.6

540.1

Current liabilities

Creditors: amounts falling due within one year

3

(127.3)

(107.8)

Net current liabilities

(127.3)

(107.8)

Total assets less current liabilities

424.3

432.3

Net assets

424.3

432.3

Equity

Share capital

4

5.2

5.5

Capital redemption reserve

41.3

41.0

Share premium

147.6

147.6

Retained earnings

230.2

238.2

Total equity

424.3

432.3

The profit for the year ended 31 March 2026 was £176.6m (FY25: profit of £146.9m).

The financial statements of QinetiQ Group plc (company number 4586941) on pages 212 to 215 were approved by the Board of

Directors and authorised for issue on 21 May 2026 and signed on its behalf by:

Steve Wadey

Martin Cooper

Group Chief Executive Officer

Group Chief Financial Officer

Company balance sheet

As at 31 March

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

212

STRATEGIC REPORT

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GOVERNANCE

All figures in £ million

Share

capital

Capital

redemption

reserve

Share

premium

Retained

earnings

Total

equity

At 1 April 2025

5.5

41.0

147.6

238.2

432.3

Profit for the year

176.6

176.6

Purchase of own shares

(0.3)

0.3

(146.9)

(146.9)

Dividend paid

(48.7)

(48.7)

Share-based payments

11.0

11.0

At 31 March 2026

5.2

41.3

147.6

230.2

424.3

At 1 April 2024

5.7

40.8

147.6

205.2

399.3

Profit for the year

146.9

146.9

Purchase of own shares

(0.2)

0.2

(74.9)

(74.9)

Dividend paid

(47.9)

(47.9)

Share-based payments

8.9

8.9

At 31 March 2025

5.5

41.0

147.6

238.2

432.3

The capital redemption reserve is not distributable and was created following redemption of preference share capital.

Company statement of changes in equity

For the year ended 31 March

213

1. Accounting policies

The Company is a public limited company and is incorporated and domiciled in Farnborough, United Kingdom.

The accounting policies below have been applied consistently in dealing with items which are considered material in relation

to the Company’s financial statements.

Basis of preparation

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under the historical cost convention and in

accordance with applicable UK Accounting Standards. As permied by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, a separate

profit and loss account dealing with the results of the Company has not been presented.

These financial statements were prepared in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101 Reduced Disclosure

Framework. In preparing these financial statements, the Company is in accordance with International Accounting Standards

in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and the International Financial Reporting Standards adopted

pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the EU but makes amendments where necessary in order to comply

with Companies Act 2006 and has set out below where advantage of the FRS 101 disclosure exemptions has been taken.

ɰ

A cash flow statement and related notes

ɰ

Disclosures in respect of capital management

ɰ

The effects of new but not yet effective IFRSs

ɰ

Disclosures in respect of the compensation of key management personnel

ɰ

IAS 24 in respect of related party transactions entered into between two or more members of a group

ɰ

IFRS 2 Share Based Payments in respect of Group-seled share-based payments

ɰ

Certain disclosures required by IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement and the disclosures required by IFRS 7

Investments

In the Company’s financial statements, investments in subsidiary undertakings are stated at cost less any impairment in value.

Share-based payments

The cost of share-based payments in respect of employees of Group subsidiaries is charged to those subsidiary

undertakings. In the Company financial statements the recoverable from subsidiaries is credited directly to equity as

a capital contribution. The fair value of equity-seled awards for share-based payments is determined on grant and

expensed in subsidiary undertakings (and credited to equity in the Company) on a straight-line basis over the period from

grant to the date of earliest unconditional exercise. The charges for equity-seled share-based payments are updated

annually for non-market-based vesting conditions. Further details of the Group’s share-based payment charge are

disclosed in note 29 to the Group financial statements.

Current liabilities

Current liabilities include amounts due within the normal operating cycle of the Company. Costs associated with the

arrangement of bank facilities or the issue of loans are held net of the associated liability presented in the balance sheet.

Share capital

Ordinary share capital of the Company is recorded as the proceeds received. Company shares held by the employee benefit

trusts are held at the consideration paid. They are classified as own shares within equity. Any gain or loss on the purchase,

sale or issue of Company shares is recorded in equity.

2. Investments in subsidiary undertakings

All figures in £ million

31 March

2026

31 March

2025

Subsidiary undertaking – 100% of ordinary share capital of QinetiQ Group Holdings Limited

424.3

424.3

Capital contributions arising from share-based payments to employees of subsidiaries

113.7

102.2

Capital contributions arising from share-seled liabilities

13.6

13.6

Total investment in subsidiary undertakings

551.6

540.1

The increase in investments in subsidiary undertakings in FY26 mainly relates to equity-seled schemes during the year.

A list of all subsidiary undertakings of QinetiQ Group plc is disclosed in note 34 to the Group financial statements.

Notes to the Company Financial Statements

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

214

STRATEGIC REPORT

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GOVERNANCE

3. Creditors: amounts falling due within one year

All figures in £ million

31 March

2026

31 March

2025

Amounts owed to Group undertakings

127.3

107.8

Creditors: amounts falling due within one year

127.3

107.8

Amounts owed to Group undertakings are unsecured, repayable on demand and bear no interest, with the exception of a

£39.7m intercompany loan which bears interest at a margin of 1.44% over SONIA.

4. Share capital

The Company’s share capital is disclosed in note 28 to the Group financial statements.

5. Share-based payments

The Company’s share-based payment arrangements are set out in note 29 to the Group financial statements.

6. Parent company guarantees

The Company has provided guarantees to various customers of subsidiaries to the value of £21.0m as at 31 March 2026

(2025: £21.0m) in the ordinary course of business. The Company has also provided a guarantee of £333.6m as at 31 March 2026

(2025: £332.7m) in respect of the term loan.

7. Other information

Directors’ emoluments, excluding Company pension contributions for the year to 31 March 2026, were £4.9m (FY25: £4.1m).

These emoluments were all in relation to services provided on behalf of the QinetiQ Group with no amount specifically

relating to their work for the Company. Details of the Directors’ emoluments, share schemes and entitlements under money

purchase pension schemes are disclosed on page 118 in the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

The remuneration of the Company’s auditors for the year to 31 March 2026 was £0.6m (FY25: £0.6m), which was for audit of

the Group financial statements and Company financial statements and audit-related assurance services. No other services

were provided by the auditors to the Company.

The monthly average number of employees for the year to 31 March 2026 was nil (FY25: nil).

Notes to the Company

Financial Statements

215

Additional

information

217

Five-year financial summary

218

Additional financial information

219

Glossary

220

Alternative performance

measures (APMs)

221

Shareholder information

224

Company information and advisers

Highly skilled scientists at QinetiQ’s

Farnborough site delivering specialist

engineering biology capability.

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

216

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FY26

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY22

2

EMEA Services

£m

1,529.2

1,477.7

1,417.4

1,179.3

1,059.2

Global Solutions

£m

393.4

453.9

494.7

401.4

261.2

Revenue

£m

1,922.6

1,931.6

1,912.1

1,580.7

1,320.4

EMEA Services

£m

182.3

169.0

163.4

137.1

135.6

Global Solutions

£m

35.6

16.4

51.8

41.8

1.8

Operating profit from segments

1

£m

217.9

185.4

215.2

178.9

137.4

Operating profit margin from segments

1

%

11.3

9.6

11.3

11.3

10.4

Statutory operating profit/(loss)

£m

169.8

(90.5)

192.5

172.8

123.7

Underlying operating profit

1

£m

247.2

215.4

242.4

196.3

143.6

Underlying profit before tax

1

£m

229.6

198.6

227.0

189.7

142.2

Profit/(loss) before tax

£m

155.1

(106.3)

182.7

192.0

125.9

Profit/(loss) aributable to owners of the Company

£m

107.5

(185.7)

139.6

154.4

90.0

Underlying basic EPS

1

Pence

31.5

26.1

29.4

26.5

20.6

Basic EPS

Pence

20.1

(33.0)

24.2

26.8

15.7

Diluted EPS

Pence

19.8

(33.0)

23.8

26.5

15.5

Dividend per share

Pence

11.00

8.85

8.25

7.7

7.3

Underlying net cash flow from operations

1

£m

343.2

316.2

320.2

270.1

220.7

Net (debt)/cash

1

£m

(159.1)

(133.2)

(151.2)

(206.9)

225.1

Average number of employees

7,722

8,530

8,459

7,443

6,911

Orders excluding LTPA amendments and extensions

£m

1,864.0

1,954.8

1,740.4

1,724.1

1,226.6

1

Underlying measures are stated before specific adjusting items. Definitions of underlying measures of performance are provided on

page 220. Underlying financial measures are presented because the Board believes these provide a beer representation of the Group’s

long-term performance trend. For details of specific adjusting items refer to note 4 and note 35 of the financial statements.

2

FY22 was restated in FY23 due to a change in accounting policy for Research and Development Expenditure Credits (RDEC).

Five-year financial summary

217

Additional

financial information

Foreign exchange

The principal exchange rates affecting the Group were the Sterling to

US Dollar exchange rate and the Sterling to Australian Dollar rate.

12 months

to 31 March

2026

12 months

to 31 March

2025

£/US$ – opening

1.29

1.26

£/US$ – average

1.34

1.28

£/US$ – closing

1.32

1.29

£/A$ – opening

2.07

1.94

£/A$ – average

2.03

1.96

£/A$ – closing

1.92

2.07

Treasury policy

The Treasury policy is approved by the Audit Commiee. There is

a structured approach to financial risk management, mitigating

exposures to currency, liquidity, counterparty and credit risks as

outlined in note 26. The policy allows the use of financial instruments

to manage and hedge business operational risks that arise on

movements in financial, credit or money markets. There is strict

control on the use of financial instruments. Speculative trading in

financial instruments is not permied.

ɰ

Currency risk – The Group’s income and expenditure is largely seled

in the functional currency of the relevant entity. Where cash flows are

denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the

relevant trading entity, the policy is to hedge all material transaction

exposure at the point of commitment to the underlying transaction.

Uncommied future transactions are not routinely hedged. Where

the timing of cash flows differ from the original expectation, currency

swaps will be used to realign the hedge maturity. The maximum

permied hedge period is five years. Translation exposures arising

from the consolidation of overseas subsidiaries in foreign currencies

are not hedged.

ɰ

Interest rate risk – The Group’s funding is largely in floating rate debt

and subject to the adverse effects of changes in interest rates.

The Group has a policy to fix no less than 30% and no more than

80% of the debt and spread the risk of fluctuations in interest rates.

Options and similar open-ended instruments are not permied to

manage interest rate exposures.

ɰ

Financial credit and liquidity risk – Liquidity risk is managed to ensure

funds are available to meet business needs and maximise return

subject to counterparty and credit risks. Investments are permied

with institutions on an Approved Counterparty list and must not

exceed the counterparty credit limit. Investments must be held in

the currency of the reporting entity except currency deposits or

borrowings specifically placed to hedge assets or liabilities with

related hedge documentation. Group funding is established to

meet the Group’s medium and long-term financing requirements.

Facilities are agreed with a number of financial institutions such that

no single institution exerts undue influence on the Group. At the year

end the Group had an undrawn revolving credit facility of £290m,with

an with an accordion option to increase the facility size to £400m,

maturing on 22 April 2029 and a term loan of £333.6m maturing on

27 September 2027.

ɰ

The policies manage and control treasury risk in alignment with the

Group strategy.

Tax risk management

QinetiQ’s tax strategy, as published on its corporate website, is to

ensure compliance with all relevant tax legislation, wherever we do

business, while managing our effective tax rates and tax cash flows.

Tax is managed in alignment with our corporate responsibility strategy

in that we strive to be responsible in all our business dealings with a

zero-tolerance of tax evasion. These principles are applied in

a consistent and transparent manner in pursuing the tax strategy

and in all dealings with tax authorities around the world.

ɰ

Tax planning – QinetiQ manages both effective tax rate (ETR) and

cash tax in line with the Board-endorsed tax strategy. External advice

and consultation are sought on potential changes in tax legislation

in the UK, the US and elsewhere as necessary, enabling the Group

to plan for and mitigate potential changes. QinetiQ does not make

use of ‘off-shore’ entities or tax structures to focus taxable profits

in jurisdictions that legislate for low tax rates. QinetiQ has a low risk

appetite for tax planning.

ɰ

Relationships with tax authorities – QinetiQ is commied to building

constructive working relationships with tax authorities based on a

policy of full disclosure in order to remove uncertainty in its business

transactions and allow the authorities to review possible risks. In the

UK, QinetiQ seeks to be open and transparent in its engagement with

the tax authorities by sharing with HMRC the methodologies adopted

in its tax returns.

ɰ

Transfer pricing – QinetiQ does not have a significant level of

cross-border activity but this will increase as it pursues its policy of

expanding around the globe. Where there is cross-border activity,

controls are in place to ensure pricing reflects ‘arm’s length’ principles

in compliance with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines and the laws

of the relevant jurisdictions. The Group does not, therefore, have a

significant exposure to transfer pricing legislation. QinetiQ submits

its ‘Country by Country’ report to the UK tax authorities in line with

the OECD rules providing insight for tax authorities into its global

tax affairs.

ɰ

Governance – The Board has approved the strategy. The Audit

Commiee oversees the tax affairs and risks through periodic

reviews. The governance framework is used to manage tax risks,

establish controls and monitor their effectiveness. The Group

Director of Tax is responsible for ensuring that appropriate policies,

processes and systems are in place and that the tax team has the

required skills and support to implement this approach.

QinetiQ’s corporate tax contribution – QinetiQ is liable to pay tax in

its home countries. Changes in tax legislation in these countries

would impact the level of tax paid on profits generated by the Group.

A significant majority of the Group’s profit before tax is generated in

the UK where the majority of the Group’s business is undertaken and

employees are based. Total corporation tax payments in the year to

31 March 2026 were £44.4m (FY25: £48.6m).

The differential between the taxation expense and the tax paid in

the year relates primarily to the impact of deferred tax movements,

whereby the income statement bears tax charges and credits (e.g. on

fixed assets or losses) but for which there is no corporation tax paid

or recovered in the year. Together, these result in the cash paid being

£3.2m less than the total expense charged to the income statement.

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

218

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Glossary

ABP

Annual Bonus Plan

ADS

Aerospace, Defence and Security

AEIS

All Employee Incentive Scheme

AGM

Annual General Meeting

AUKUS

A tri-lateral security agreement between

Australia, United Kingdom and the United States

BBP

Bonus Banking Plan

C5ISTAR

Command, Control, Computers,

Communications, Cyber, Intelligence,

Surveillance and Reconnaissance

CCASCOE

Climate Change and Security Centre

of Excellence

CEO

Chief Executive Officer

CFO

Chief Financial Officer

CGU

Cash Generating Unit

CMI

Continuous Mortality Investigation

COO

Chief Operating Officer

CPI

Consumer Price Index

CR

Corporate Responsibility

CSDDD

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive

CSRD

Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive

CTAP

Climate Transition Action Plan

DSEI

Defence and Security Equipment International

DSP

Deferred Share Plan

DSTL

UK Defence Science and

Technology Laboratories

EAP

Employee Assistance Programmes

EBITDA

Earnings before interest, tax,

depreciation and amortisation

ECL

Expected credit loss

EDP

Engineering Delivery Partner

eLoran

Enhanced Long-Range Navigation

EMEA

Europe, Middle East and Australasia

EPS

Earnings per share

ESG

Environmental, Social, Governance

FCA

Financial Conduct Authority

FRC

Financial Reporting Council

FTSE

The UK Main Market Stock Exchange

FY

Financial year (ending 31 March)

GC100

The Association of General Counsel

and Company Secretaries

GEV

Global Employee Voice

GHG

Greenhouse Gas

HMRC

His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

HVO

Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil

IAS

International Accounting Standards

ICRS

Institute of Corporate Responsibility

and Sustainability

IFRIC

International Financial Reporting

Interpretations Commiee

IFRS

International Financial Reporting Standards

ISP

Integrated Strategy-to-perform Plan

ISSB

International Sustainability Standards Board

JATTS

Joint Adversarial Training and Testing Services

JOSCAR

Joint Supply Chain Accreditation Register

KPI

Key Performance Indicator

LDEW

Laser Directed Energy Weapons

LPA

Long-term Performance Award

LTI

Lost time incident

LTPA

Long Term Partnering Agreement –

25-year contract established in 2003 to manage

the UK MOD’s Test and Evaluation ranges

M&A

Mergers and Acquisitions

MOD

UK Ministry of Defence

NATO

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation

OECD

Organisation for Economic Co-operation

and Development

PPS

Prudential Platinum Scheme

PTSD

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

PV

Photovoltaic

QLC

QinetiQ Leadership Community

QLT

QinetiQ Leadership Team

QTS

QinetiQ Target Systems

QVRN

QinetiQ Veterans and Reservists Network

R&D

Research and Development

RCP

Representative Concentration Pathways

RDEC

Research and Development Expenditure Credit

ROCE

Return on Capital Employed

RSP

Restricted Share Plan

SBTi

Science Based Targets initiative

SCO

Strategic Capabilities Office

SDA

Space Development Agency

SECR

Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting

SID

Senior Independent Director

SIP

Share Incentive Plan

SME

Small to Medium Sized Enterprises

SOFR

Secured Overnight Financing Rate

SONIA

Sterling Overnight Index Average

SQEP

Suitably Qualified and Experienced Personnel

SSA

Special Security Agreement

SSSI

Site of Special Scientific Interest

STEM

Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths

T3E

Test, Trials, Training & Evaluation

T&E

Test and Evaluation

TARS

Tethered Aerostat Radar System

TCFD

Taskforce on Climate-related

Financial Disclosures

The Code

2024 UK Corporate Governance Code

Guidelines of the Financial Reporting

Council to address the principal aspects

of corporate governance in the UK

TISC

Transparency in Supply Chains

TNFD

Taskforce on Nature-related

Financial Disclosures

TRIR

Total Recordable Incident Rate

TSR

Total shareholder return

UAS

Unmanned Aerial System

UK GAAP

UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice

UKLR

UK Listing Rules govern how companies list

securities on the London Stock Exchange

UK SRS

UK Sustainability Reporting Standards

219

The Group uses various non-statutory measures of performance, or APMs. Such APMs are used by management internally

to monitor and manage the Group’s performance and also allow the reader to obtain a proper understanding of performance

(in conjunction with statutory financial measures of performance). The APMs used by QinetiQ are set out below:

Measure

Explanation

Note

Organic growth

The level of year-on-year growth, expressed as a percentage, calculated at constant

prior year foreign exchange rates, adjusting for business acquisitions and disposals

to reflect equivalent composition of the Group

Note 2

Underlying operating profit

Operating profit as adjusted to exclude ‘specific adjusting items’

Note 3

Underlying operating margin

Underlying operating profit expressed as a percentage of revenue

Note 3

Underlying operating profit

from operating segments

Total operating profit from segments which excludes specific adjusting items

and research and development expenditure credits (RDEC)

Note 3

Underlying operating margin

from operating segments

Operating profit from segments expressed as a percentage of revenue

Note 3

Underlying net finance

income/expense

Net finance income/expense as adjusted to exclude ‘specific adjusting items’

Note 7

Underlying profit

before/after tax

Profit before/after tax as adjusted to exclude ‘specific adjusting items’

Note 4

Underlying effective

tax rate

The tax charge for the year excluding the tax impact of ‘specific adjusting items’

expressed as a percentage of underlying profit before tax

Note 9

Underlying basic

and diluted EPS

Basic and diluted earnings per share as adjusted to exclude ‘specific adjusting items’

Note 10

Orders

The level of new orders (and amendments to existing orders) booked in the year

N/A

Backlog, funded backlog

or order book

The expected future value of revenue from contractually commied and funded

customer orders

N/A

Book-to-bill ratio

Ratio of funded orders received in the year to revenue for the year, adjusted to exclude

revenue from the 25-year LTPA contract due to significant size and timing differences

of LTPA order and revenue recognition which distort the ratio calculation

N/A

Underlying net cash flow

from operations

Net cash flow from operations before cash flows of specific adjusting items

Note 24

Underlying operating

cash conversion or

cash conversion ratio

The ratio of underlying net cash from operations to underlying EBITDA

Note 24

Free cash flow

Net cash flow from operations, including exceptional operating cash flows,

less net tax and interest payments less purchases of intangible assets and property,

plant and equipment plus proceeds from disposals of plant and equipment

Note 24

Net debt

Net debt as defined by the Group combines cash and cash equivalents with

borrowings and other financial assets and liabilities, primarily deferred financing

costs, derivative financial instruments and lease liabilities.

Note 23

Return on capital employed

Calculated as: Underlying EBITA/(average capital employed less net pension asset),

where average capital employed is defined as shareholders equity plus net debt

CFO Review

Specific adjusting items

Amortisation of intangible assets arising from acquisitions; impairment of property

and goodwill; gains/losses on disposal of property, investments and businesses;

net pension finance income; transaction and integration costs in respect of business

acquisitions and disposals; costs and associated impacts of group-wide restructuring

programmes, digital investment; tax impact of the preceding items and significant

non-recurring tax and RDEC movements

Note 4

Alternative performance

measures (APMs)

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

220

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Shareholder

information

Registrar: Equiniti Limited

www.shareview.co.uk

Tel:

0371 384 2021

Shareholding enquiries

The Company’s registrar is Equiniti. Enquiries regarding

your shareholding, including the following administrative

maers, should be addressed to Equiniti:

ɰ

Change of personal details such as change of name

or address

ɰ

Lost share certificates

ɰ

Dividend payment enquiries

ɰ

Direct dividend payments. You can have your dividends

paid directly into a UK bank or building society account

by completing a dividend mandate form. The associated

dividend confirmation will still be sent to your registered

address. If you live outside the UK, Equiniti offers a global

payments service which is available in certain countries

and could enable you to receive your dividends direct

into your bank account in your local currency

Contact details for registrar

By post:

Equiniti, Highdown House, Yeoman Way, Worthing,

BN99 6DA

By telephone:

+44 0371 384 2021*

By email:

You can send an email enquiry securely from

Equiniti’s website, at help.shareview.co.uk

Online:

Equiniti’s website at help.shareview.co.uk (Shareview)

includes answers to frequently asked questions and

provides key forms for download. Shareview also offers

online access to your shareholding where you can manage

your account, register for electronic communications,

see details of balance movements and complete certain

amendments online, such as changes to dividend mandate

instructions. You can register at www.shareview.co.uk,

click on ‘Register’ and follow the steps.

*

Lines are open 8.30am to 5.30pm (UK time), Monday to Friday

(excluding public holidays in England and Wales).

Electronic communications

The Company will now only make documentation and

communication available electronically via the Company’s

website, unless direct requests have been made otherwise.

In addition, communications electronically, via the wider

use of electronic communications, enables fast receipt of

documents, reduces the Company’s printing, paper and

postal costs and reduces the Company’s environmental

impact. Shareholders can register for electronic

communications at www.shareview.co.uk and may

also cast their vote for the 2026 Annual General Meeting

online quickly and easily using the Shareview service

by visiting www.shareview.co.uk

Donating shares to charity – ShareGift

Small parcels of shares, which may be uneconomic to

sell on their own, can be donated to ShareGift, the share

donation charity (registered charity no. 1052686).

ShareGift transfers these holdings into their name,

aggregates them, and uses the proceeds to support

a wide range of UK charities based on donor suggestion.

If you would like further details about ShareGift, please visit

www.sharegift.org, email [email protected] or telephone

them on 020 7930 3737.

221

Shareholder

information

Share price

Details of current and historical share prices can be found on the Company’s website at www.qinetiq.com/investors

Analysis of share register at 31 March 2026

By type of holder

Total number

of holdings

Percentage

of holders

Total number

of shares

Percentage

issued Capital

Individual

5,000

87.55%

4,382,456

0.84%

Institutions and others

711

12.45%

520,374,861

99.16%

Total

5,711

100.00%

524,757,317

100%

By size of holding

1–500

3,846

67.34%

703,341

0.13%

501–1,000

418

7.32%

331,544

0.06%

1,001–2,500

515

9.02%

900,451

0.17%

2,501–5,000

283

4.96%

1,017,944

0.19%

5,001–10,000

152

2.66%

1,101,885

0.21%

10,001–100,000

244

4.27%

8,734,598

1.67%

Over 100,000

253

4.43%

511,967,554

97.57%

Total

5,711

100.00%

524,757,317

100%

Share fraud reporting:

www.fca.org.uk/consumers/report-scam

FCA Consumer Helpline:

0800 111 6768

Beware of share fraud

Fraudsters use persuasive and high-pressure tactics to lure

investors into scams. They may offer to sell shares that turn

out to be worthless or non-existent, or to buy shares at an

inflated price in return for an upfront payment. While high

profits are promised, if you buy or sell shares in this way

you will probably lose your money.

How to avoid share fraud

1.

Keep in mind that firms authorised by the FCA are

unlikely to contact you out of the blue with an offer

to buy or sell shares.

2.

Do not get into a conversation, note the name of the

person and firm contacting you and then end the call.

3.

Check the Financial Services Register from

www.fca.org.uk to see if the person and firm

contacting you is authorised by the FCA.

4.

Beware of fraudsters claiming to be from an

authorised firm, copying its website or giving

you false contact details.

5.

Use the firm’s contact details listed on the Register

if you want to call it back.

6.

Call the FCA on 0800 111 6768 if the firm does not have

contact details on the Register or you are told they are

out of date.

7.

Search the list of unauthorised firms to avoid at

www.fca.org.uk/consumers/protect-yourself-scams

8.

Consider that if you buy or sell shares from an

unauthorised firm you will not have access to the

Financial Ombudsman Service or Financial Services

Compensation Scheme.

9.

Think about geing independent financial and

professional advice before you hand over any money.

10. Remember: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Report a scam

If you are approached by fraudsters please tell

the FCA using the share fraud reporting form at

www.fca.org.uk/consumers/report-scam where you

can find out more about investment scams. You can

also call the FCA Consumer Helpline on 0800 111 6768.

If you have already paid money to share fraudsters

you should contact Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040.

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

222

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Shareholder

information

Key dates

For a list of upcoming key dates, please visit:

www.qinetiq.com/en/investors

Cautionary statement

All statements other than statements of historical

fact included in this Annual Report, including, without

limitation, those regarding the financial condition, results,

operations and businesses of QinetiQ and its strategy,

plans and objectives and the markets and economies

in which it operates, are forward-looking statements.

Such forward-looking statements, which reflect

management’s assumptions made on the basis of

information available to it at this time, involve known and

unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors

which could cause the actual results, performance or

achievements of QinetiQ or the markets and economies

in which QinetiQ operates to be materially different from

future results, performance or achievements expressed or

implied by such forward-looking statements. Nothing in

this Annual Report should be regarded as a profit forecast.

This Annual Report is intended to provide information to

shareholders and is not designed to be relied upon by any

other party. The Company and its Directors accept no

liability to any other person other than under English law.

223

Company information

and advisers

Registered office

Cody Technology Park

Ively Road

Farnborough

Hampshire

GU14 0LX

England

Tel: +44 (0) 1252 392000

Company Registration

Number: 4586941

Independent auditors

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Savannah House

3 Ocean Way

Ocean Village

Southampton

SO14 3TJ

Registrar

Equiniti Limited

Highdown House

Yeoman Way

Worthing

BN99 3HH

Corporate brokers

Barclays

1 Churchill Place

London

EC14 5HP

Deutsche Bank Numis

45 Gresham St

London

EC2V 7BF

Principal legal adviser

Ashurst LLP

London Fruit and Wool Exchange

1 Duval Square

London

E1 6PW

QinetiQ Group plc

Annual Report and Accounts 2026

224

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Printed by a CarbonNeutral® company with an

Environmental Management System certified to ISO 14001.

This document is printed on Accent Recycled paper using

forest-based material in this report which is recycled.

Designed and produced by

Friend

.

friendstudio.com

100% of the inks used are HP Indigo ElectroInk which

complies with RoHS legislation and meets the chemical

requirements of the Nordic Ecolabel (Nordic Swan) for

printing companies, and 100% of any waste associated with

this production has been recycled or diverted from landfill.

QinetiQ Group plc

Cody Technology Park

Ively Road

Farnborough

Hampshire

GU14 0LX

Tel: +44 (0) 1252 392000

www.QinetiQ.com

Company Registration Number: 4586941