AI assistant
MATSA RESOURCES LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2016
Nov 23, 2016
65296_rns_2016-11-23_f6ef18ae-a795-43e5-8950-53e3e90ad4ab.pdf
Regulatory Filings
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [595 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [132 x 117] intentionally omitted <==
LIMITED ABN 48 106 732 487
ASX Announcement
24[th] November 2016
Significant Copper Intercept at Chang 1 Paisali Base Metals Project Thailand
Highlights
-
A significant copper intercept of 22m @ 0.4% Cu from 106m within a broader intercept of 48m @ 0.29% Cu from 104m (16SCDD007) at Chang1
-
This intercept confirms the potential for economic copper mineralisation associated with an altered diorite intrusion underlying a large (~1.8km x 1.2km) soil copper anomaly
CORPORATE SUMMARY
Executive Chairman
Paul Poli
Director
Frank Sibbel
Director & Company Secretary
-
Copper mineralisation is in the form of disseminated chalcopyrite and covellite in association with magnetite and lesser pyrite
-
An initial diamond drill programme comprising 6 diamond holes was completed recently with assays for a further 2 drill holes awaited
-
Further diamond drilling is planned for early 2017 once detailed infill ground magnetic surveys have been completed
Andrew Chapman
Shares on Issue
144.70 million
Unlisted Options
6.90 million @ $0.25 - $0.30
Top 20 shareholders
Hold 54.78%
Share Price on 23 November 2016
22.5 cents
Market Capitalisation
$32.56 million
Head Office: Suite 11, 139 Newcastle Street, Perth Western Australia 6000 Tel : +61 8 9230 3555 Fax: +61 8 9227 0370 Bangkok Office: Unit 1808, Pacific Place 2, 142 Sukhumvit Road, Klongtoey, Bangkok 10110 Tel : +66 0 2653 0258 Fax : +66 0 2653 0258 [email protected] www.matsa.com.au
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited (“Matsa” or “the Company” ASX: MAT) is pleased to provide an update on its Paisali base metals project where a 6 hole diamond drilling programme for a total of 1,060m has now been completed. Drilling was carried out to test several targets associated with a large (1.8km x 1.2km) soil copper geochemical anomaly. The soil copper anomaly which overlies a complex magnetic feature is interpreted to reflect the presence of an altered and copper mineralised diorite intrusion. (Refer MAT announcements to the ASX dated 26[th] April 2016, 29[th] April 2016, 29[th] July 2016, 26[th] August 2016, and 31[st] October 2016).
Diamond Drilling
A total of 6 diamond drill holes have been completed for 1,060 metres (Figure 1).
(A description of diamond drilling procedures and sampling and assay protocols is included in Appendix 1. Drill hole collars are summarised in Appendix 2.)
Assay Results
Assay results for drill holes 16SCDD005 and 16SCDD007 have been received (Table 1) and include the following highly anomalous copper intercept in drillhole 16SCDD007:
22m @ 0.4% Cu from 106m within a broader intercept of:
48m @ 0.29% Cu
This intercept is located in close proximity to peak soil copper values in the large soil geochemical anomaly (Figure 1). Hole 16SCDD005 which is also located close to peak soil anomaly returned an intersection of 17.7m at 0.22%Cu from 94.3m.
The intercept in hole 16SCDD007 confirms the potential for economic copper mineralisation associated with an altered diorite intrusion underlying a large (~1.8km x 1.2km) soil copper anomaly. There are mines currently operating at these grades in South America.
==> picture [382 x 260] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Chang 1 Prospect Diamond Drill Holes on soil copper image
Page 2
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
Copper mineralisation was observed in diamond drill core to be associated with sheared and hydrothermally brecciated diorite with accompanying chalcopyrite, covellite, magnetite and lesser pyrite as well as quartz and carbonate veining. Silica and K-feldspar alteration with associated carbonate and biotite is also present. Higher grade copper mineralisation is interpreted to be controlled by faults which have had the effect of focusing mineralised hydrothermal fluids. The distribution of copper in soils appears to reflect these mineralised structures.
The associated complex magnetic anomaly underlying the anomalous soil geochemistry appears to be reflecting strongly developed magnetite alteration in the underlying intrusion. The presence of intense magnetite alteration can be a characteristic of intrusion related hydrothermal mineralisation styles, including skarns and iron oxide copper gold (IOCG) systems. Samples have been submitted for petrographic analysis in order to shed more light on the likely mineralisation style.
Further infill soil sampling and ground magnetics with the aim of identifying and better defining important structural features is planned before further drilling takes place.
A summary of intercepts >0.1% Cu are shown in Table 1. Assays for 16SCDD006 and 16SCDD008 are pending. Assays for holes 16SCDD003 and 16SCDD004 were reported in ASX release of 31[st] October 2016.
| Hole ID | from | to | m | %Cu | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16SCDD005 | 24 | 112 | 88 | 0.12 | |
| including | 24 | 58 | 34 | 0.12 | |
| and | 62 | 65.4 | 3.4 | 0.11 | |
| and | 67.9 | 72 | 4.1 | 0.13 | |
| and | 84 | 88 | 4 | 0.14 | |
| and | 94.3 | 112 | 17.7 | 0.22 | |
| 16SCDD007 | 88 | 96 | 8 | 0.14 | |
| 104 | 152 | 48 | 0.29 | ||
| including | 106 | 128 | 22 | 0.40 | |
| 156 | 158 | 2 | 0.14 | ||
| 160 | 166 | 6 | 0.12 |
Table 1: Chang 1 Prospect Drill Holes 16SCDD005 and 16SCDD007 Assay intercepts >0.1% Cu
Matsa’s Executive Chairman, Paul Poli noted, “I am greatly encouraged by this excellent result which confirms the high prospectivity of this area for new copper deposits and provides strong motivation for the Company to proceed with its aggressive exploration programs in Thailand”.
For further information please contact:
Paul Poli Executive Chairman
Phone +61 8 9230 3555 Fax +61 8 9227 0370 Email [email protected] Web www.matsa.com.au
Page 3
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
Competent Person Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration results, is based on information compiled by David Fielding, who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. David Fielding is a full time employee of Matsa Resources Limited. David Fielding has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and the type of ore deposit under consideration and the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. David Fielding consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Page 4
==> picture [633 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
Appendix 1: JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling | Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or | Diamond drill core Chang 1, Siam 1 (Thailand). Core is split with | ||
| techniques | specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate | diamond saw ensuring representivity and sampled based on intervals of | ||
| to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma | 2m where visible mineralisation is noted. Occassionally at geological | |||
| sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should | discretion, sampling to a geological boundary rather than a 2m interval is | |||
| not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | conducted. Core is 1/2 cut providing approximately a | 4kg sample for | ||
| Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity | assaying. | |||
| and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems | ||||
| used. | ||||
| Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the | ||||
| Public Report. | ||||
| In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be | ||||
| relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 | ||||
| m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge | ||||
| for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, | ||||
| such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling | ||||
| problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg | ||||
| submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | ||||
| Drilling | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air | Triple tube diamond drilling at Chang 1. Core oriented using Camteq | ||
| techniques | blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple | camera. | ||
| or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other | ||||
| _type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). _ | ||||
| Drill sample | Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries | Diamond drilling core is measured and recorded as a | percentage of | |
| recovery | and results assessed. | drilled metres with visual check of lost core intervals. | ||
| Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure | ||||
| representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential |
Mineralisation in the form of disseminated sulphides, unlikely to be biased significantly by minor core loss. |
|||
| loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | ||||
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and | Diamond core Chang 1 and Siam 1. Geology, orientation, structure, | ||
| Page 5 |
==> picture [633 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate | magnetic susceptibility, photography, selected samples are submitted for | ||
| Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical | petrographic analysis. The level of detail is sufficient to provide a robust | ||
| studies. | geological model of mineralisation. | ||
| Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or | Logging is typically qualitative to semi-quantitative in nature. | ||
| costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length andpercentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
Core is logged over 100% of its length. | ||
| Sub- | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core | Diamond Core Chang1 and Siam 1, core is split in half with half marked | |
| sampling | taken. | up and left in tray and half submitted for assay. | |
| techniques | If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and | ||
| and sample preparation |
whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. |
Every 10thsample is ¼ cut with the second quarter assayed as a duplicate check of representivity. |
|
| Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to | |||
| maximise representivity of samples. | |||
| Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in | |||
| situ material collected, including for instance results for field | |||
| duplicate/second-half sampling. | |||
| Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material | |||
| being sampled. | |||
| Quality of | The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and | Quality of core at Chang 1 and Siam 1 is assessed on inspection of | |
| assay data | laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered | Laboratory QA QC data. | |
| and laboratory tests |
partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their |
Samples are digested by Aqua regia and analysed using ICP-ES. The laboratory conducts and reports lab duplicates and standards. No bias is noted. |
|
| derivation, etc. | |||
| Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, | |||
| duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels | |||
| of accuracy (ie lack of bias) andprecision have been established. | |||
| Verification | The verification of significant intersections by either independent or | Data is maintained in Datashed which is a database system which is | |
| of sampling | alternative company personnel. | maintained inhouse. | |
| and | The use of twinned holes. | ||
| assaying | Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
Logging data is entered in the field to minimize transcription errors, assay data are loaded electronically. |
|
| Location of | Accuracy andquality of surveys used to locate drill holes(collar and | All drill holes are set upbyhandheld GPS to 3m accuracy. Diamond drill | |
| Page 6 |
==> picture [633 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| data points | down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations | holes may be resurveyed on completion using a hired DGPS system. |
| used in Mineral Resource estimation. | ||
| Specification of the grid system used. | Drilling in Thailand is located using the Indian Thailand 1975 dataum | |
| Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | zone 47. | |
| Data spacing | Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. |
Reconnaissance drilling only, not attempting to establish continuity. |
| and | Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the | |
| distribution | degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral | |
| Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and | ||
| classifications applied. | ||
| Whether sample compositing has been applied. | ||
| Orientation | Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of | Orientation of strike is not confirmed at this stage but inferred to be N or |
| of data in | possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering | NNW with drilling generally E or W striking. |
| relation to geological |
the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation |
No potential bias has been recognised. |
| structure | of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a | |
| sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. | ||
| Sample | The measures taken to ensure sample security. | All core is locked in Matsa’s storage facility. |
| security | ||
| Audits or | The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | No audits carried out. |
| reviews |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including | All exploration at Chang 1 has taken place on a granted SPL. | |
| tenement | agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint | ||
| and land | ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, | ||
| tenure status | historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental | ||
| settings. | |||
| The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any | |||
| known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | |||
| Exploration | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by otherparties. | Regional aeromagnetic coverage has been ofgreat assistance in | |
| Page 7 |
==> picture [633 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| done by | selection of targets for more detailed exploration. | ||
| other parties | |||
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | Matsa is exploring for intrusion related hydrothermal mineralisation | |
| because of the strong association with magnetics. | |||
| Drill hole | A summary of all information material to the understanding of the | Drillhole information is included in the body of report as well as Appendix | |
| Information | exploration results including a tabulation of the following information | 2. | |
| for all Material drill holes: | |||
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar |
|||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in |
|||
| metres) of the drill hole collar | |||
o dip and azimuth of the hole |
|||
o down hole length and interception depth |
|||
o hole length. |
|||
| If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the | |||
| information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from | |||
| the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly | |||
| explain why this is the case. | |||
| Data | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, | Intercepts at Chang 1 are quoted on the basis of simple weighted | |
| aggregation | maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high | averages. | |
| methods | grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. | ||
| Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade | |||
| results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used | |||
| for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of | |||
| such aggregations should be shown in detail. | |||
| The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values | |||
| should be clearly stated. | |||
| Relationship | These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of | All intercepts quoted are explicitly downhole depths and not true widths. | |
| between | Exploration Results. | ||
| mineralisatio | If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole | ||
| n widths and | angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
||
| intercept | If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there | ||
| lengths | should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true | ||
| _width not known’). _ | |||
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of | Appropriate diagrams are included in the body of the report | |
| intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being | |||
| Page 8 |
==> picture [633 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of | ||
| drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Balanced | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not | All grade above 0.1%Cu reported. |
| reporting | practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades | |
| and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of | ||
| Exploration Results. | ||
| Other | Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported | Driling was based on results from broad soil sampling and ground |
| substantive | including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical | magnetics. There is no outcrop in the area. |
| exploration | survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and | |
| data | method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, | |
| groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential | ||
| deleterious or contaminating substances. | ||
| Further work | The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral |
Infill soil sampling and ground magnetics. |
| extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). | ||
| Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, | ||
| including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, | ||
| provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
==> picture [604 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
Page 9
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
Appendix 2: Chang 1 Diamond Drilling, Collar Locations and survey information
| Hole | East | North | RL | Azimuth | Dip | Depth (m) |
| 16SCDD003 | 87150 | 742600 | 77 | 270 | -60 | 249.5 |
| 16SCDD004 | 87220 | 742600 | 77 | 90 | -60 | 200.1 |
| 16SCDD005 | 87935 | 742600 | 78 | 270 | -60 | 130 |
| 16SCDD006 | 87980 | 742800 | 78 | 225 | -60 | 186.2 |
| 16SCDD007 | 87533 | 742803 | 77 | 90 | -60 | 168.7 |
| 16SCDD008 | 87032 | 743202 | 71 | 270 | -60 | 125.7 |
Page 10