AI assistant
CULLEN RESOURCES LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2014
Jun 16, 2014
64724_rns_2014-06-16_31edb795-b01c-49d2-a2cb-99865fa75191.pdf
Regulatory Filings
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [476 x 71] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [433 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ABN 46 006 045 790
www.cullenresources.com.au ASX Symbol: CUL 17 June 2014
----- End of picture text -----
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
KILLALOE JOINT VENTURE
KILLALOE JV– EL63/1018, 1199 and PLs 63/1331-1333,1672: Matsa Resources Limited 80%; Cullen 20% free carried interest to Decision to Mine.
Please find herewith a copy of an announcement made by the Manager of the Joint Venture, Matsa Resources Limited (ASX: MAT, 16 June 2014) in relation to drilling at the Killaoe Project.
Matsa’s announcement contains the full extent of information provided to Cullen at this time and in the format provided.
.
REGISTERED OFFICE : Unit 4, 7 Hardy Street, South Perth WA 6151 Telephone : 089 474 5511; FAX : 089 474 5588
Contact : Dr Chris Ringrose, Managing Director; email: [email protected]
==> picture [595 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [132 x 116] intentionally omitted <==
LIMITED ABN 48 106 732 487
ASX Announcement
16 June 2014
Significant Nickel Sulphides at Killaloe JV Project
Highlights
==> picture [11 x 14] intentionally omitted <==
- 14.65m of komatiite hosted nickel rich disseminated and semi-massive sulphides intersected between 78.7m and 93.35m, in diamond drillhole 14KLDH01 which is currently in progress at Killaloe.
==> picture [11 x 14] intentionally omitted <==
- Additional narrow nickel rich semi-massive sulphides (0.2m at 137.5m and 0.05m at 145m) intersected in underlying metabasalt.
==> picture [11 x 15] intentionally omitted <==
- Mineralised intercepts to date include:
==> picture [11 x 15] intentionally omitted <==
-
93.15 – 93.35m Semi-massive pyrrhotite and possible pentlandite with spot hand held XRF values to 3.15% Ni at base of komatiite sequence,
-
137.5 – 137.7m Vein hosted semi massive pyrrhotite and possible pentlandite with spot handheld XRF values to 1.75% Ni ,
-
78.7 – 93.15m Disseminated pyrrhotite and possible pentlandite with spot handheld XRF assays on core between 0.04% Ni and 0.6% Ni .
-
Based on preliminary inspection, Ni mineralisation occurs as sulphides, (most probably pentlandite) which occur together with disseminated and semi-massive pyrrhotite in ultramafic volcanics (komatiite).
-
The drillhole is currently in progress at a depth of 150m with down hole EM to commence as soon as possible to define targets for further drilling.
CORPORATE SUMMARY
Executive Chairman
Paul Poli
Direc tor
Frank Sibbel
Director & Company Secretary
Andrew Chapman
Shares on Issue
144.15 million
Unlisted Options
8.3 million @ $0.31 - $0.43
Top 20 shareholders
Hold 48%
Share Price on 13 June 2014
29.5 cents
Market Capitalisation
$42.53 million
- Symons Hill Project Update : site preparation completed. Drilling of RC pre-collars to commence this week in preparation for diamond drilling.
Head Office: Suite 11, 139 Newcastle Street, Perth Western Australia 6000 Tel : +61 8 9230 3555 Fax: +61 8 9227 0370 Bangkok Office: Unit 1808, Pacific Place 2, 142 Sukhumvit Road, Klongtoey, Bangkok 10110 Tel : +66 0 2653 0258 Fax : +66 0 2653 0258 [email protected] www.matsa.com.au
==> picture [596 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
Matsa is very pleased to report preliminary spot handheld XRF assays of nickel sulphide mineralisation intersected in diamond drillhole 14KLDH01. The programme was designed to test a high priority ground EM conductor underlying the Hanging Wall Gossan prospect at Killaloe.
It should be noted that spot handheld XRF assays test only a very small part of the core. Full laboratory assays will be reported when they become available. While Matsa is extremely encouraged by these preliminary assays, further work is required to determine the significance of this discovery.
==> picture [357 x 443] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Killaloe JV Project and Location of Hanging Wall Gossan prospect and diamond hole 14KLDH01
Killaloe Project (Matsa Resources 80%, Cullen Resources 20%)
The Killaloe project comprises tenements as summarised in Figure 1 and is a joint venture between Matsa 80% and Cullen Resources Limited 20%. Exploration under the joint venture is managed by Matsa.
Diamond drillhole 14KLDH01 was designed to test a conductor identified by a ground EM survey over the Hanging Wall Gossan prospect (Figure 1). The conductor was identified by surveys carried out in 2013 (21 ground EM traverses for a total of 16.7 line kilometres) as announced in Matsa’s report to the ASX dated 29[th] October 2013.
Page 2
==> picture [596 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
Diamond Drillhole 14KLDH01 Preliminary results
Diamond drillhole 14KLDH01 parameters are as follows:
==> picture [11 x 15] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [11 x 15] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [11 x 15] intentionally omitted <==
-
Location, 395140mE, 6460305mN, 302mRL (MGA51);
-
Orientated towards 055 degrees (ENE) at a dip angle of -60 degrees; and
-
In progress, current depth 150m.
A 0.2m lens of semi-massive sulphide mineralisation was intersected below a 14.5m thick zone of disseminated sulphides at contact between komatiite lavas and underlying basalts. Further zones of semi massive sulphides of 0.2m and 0.05m respectively were intersected in the underlying basalt.
Spot handheld XRF Assays for Ni, Cu and Cr at selected points along core are tabulated in Appendix 1. A description of handheld XRF methodology is presented in Appendix 2.
Preliminary spot handheld XRF results over selected intervals on diamond drill core are summarised below:
-
78.7 – 93.15m 1% – 3% disseminated sulphides in Komatiite. Spot handheld XRF values to 0.6% Ni. 93.15 – 93.35m 30% – 40% semi-massive sulphides in sheared komatiite (Figure 2). Mineralisation is located close to the contact between komatiite and underlying metabasalt. Spot handheld XRF results to 3.15% Ni.
-
93.35 – 94.4m ~1% fine grained sulphides (possibly pyrrhotite and pentlandite) in metabasalt. 94.4 – 94.8m ~5% disseminated sulphides (pyrrhotite and possible pentlandite) in sheared metabasalt.
-
137.5m – 137.7m Semi massive sulphide vein including Ni sulphides (probably pentlandite) in metabasalt with spot handheld XRF value to 1.75% Ni.
-
145.20m –145.25m Semi massive sulphide vein including Ni sulphides (probably pentlandite) in metabasalt with spot handheld XRF value to 0.6% Ni.
Page 3
==> picture [596 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [377 x 281] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Semi Massive pyrrhotite pentlandite (XRF to 3.15% Ni), KLDH01 93.15 - 93.35m
==> picture [375 x 281] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Semi Massive pyrrhotite pentlandite (XRF to 1.75% Ni), KLDH01 137.5 – 137.7m
Planned Activities
Downhole EM (DHEM) surveying is planned immediately upon completion of diamond drillhole KLDH01 in order to map out the extents of massive sulphide mineralisation away from the current drillhole.
Further drilling is proposed to targets defined by downhole EM surveys.
Page 4
==> picture [596 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [377 x 386] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Executive Chairman Paul Poli and supervising geologist Mark Csar at diamond hole drill site
For further Information please contact:
Paul Poli Executive Chairman
Phone +61 8 9230 3555 Fax +61 8 9227 0370 Email [email protected] Web www.matsa.com.au
Exploration results
The information in this report that relates to Exploration results, is based on information compiled by David Fielding, who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. David Fielding is a full time employee of Matsa Resources Limited. David Fielding has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and the type of ore deposit under consideration and the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. David Fielding consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Page 5
==> picture [596 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
Appendix 1: Handheld XRF Assays for Cr, Cu and Ni at selected points on Core
| Reading | Depth | Mode | Elapsed Time 1 |
Elapsed Time 2 |
Elapsed Time 3 |
Elapsed Time Total |
Cr_ppm | Cu_ppm | Ni_ppm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 78.2 | Soil | 81.49 | 80.9 | 86.89 | 249.28 | 1757 | 70 | 5599 | Disseminated Sulphide |
| 2 | 81.7 | Soil | 80.01 | 79.77 | 87.47 | 247.25 | 1683 | 12 | 1043 | Disseminated Sulphide |
| 13 | 85.1 | Soil | 80.52 | 80.29 | 87.64 | 248.45 | 1809 | 14 | 837 | Disseminated Sulphide |
| 14 | 86.1 | Soil | 81.14 | 80.96 | 87.95 | 250.04 | 1669 | 14 | 682 | Disseminated Sulphide |
| 15 | 87.1 | Soil | 81.64 | 81.38 | 87.48 | 250.5 | 4368 | 16 | 1167 | Disseminated Sulphide |
| 16 | 88.1 | Soil | 80.84 | 80.69 | 87.82 | 249.34 | 3301 | 3.5 | 550 | Disseminated Sulphide |
| 17 | 89.1 | Soil | 80.93 | 80.71 | 87.86 | 249.5 | 3317 | 17 | 806 | Disseminated Sulphide |
| 18 | 90.1 | Soil | 80.97 | 80.78 | 87.87 | 249.62 | 4133 | 26 | 762 | Disseminated Sulphide |
| 19 | 91.1 | Soil | 80.79 | 80.63 | 88.04 | 249.46 | 2344 | 7.6 | 422 | Disseminated Sulphide |
| 3 | 93.15- 93.35 |
Soil | 84.79 | 83.9 | 85.6 | 254.29 | 1102 | 1047 | 22303 | 20cm semi massive sulphide vein |
| 7 | 93.15- 93.37 |
Soil | 85.02 | 84.02 | 85.29 | 254.34 | 932 | 429 | 22591 | |
| 8 | 93.15- 93.38 |
Soil | 85.13 | 84.13 | 85.28 | 254.54 | 499 | 209 | 23645 | |
| 9 | 93.15- 93.39 |
Soil | 85.11 | 84.04 | 85.41 | 254.56 | 528 | 458 | 31519 | |
| 10 | 93.15- 93.40 |
Soil | 85.32 | 84.29 | 85.54 | 255.15 | 344 | 655 | 28903 | |
| 6 | 93.15- 93.36 |
Soil | 84.2 | 83.46 | 86.31 | 253.97 | 1508 | 22 | 5092 | |
| 11 | 137.5 | Soil | 85.12 | 83.94 | 84.8 | 253.86 | 6 | 10 | 17547 | 20cm semi massive sulphide vein |
| 12 | 145.2 | Soil | 84.82 | 83.64 | 84.77 | 253.23 | 141 | 55 | 6212 | 5cm semi massive sulphide vein |
Page 6
==> picture [833 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
Appendix 2 - Matsa Resources Limited - Killaloe JV Project
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling | Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, | XRF Analysis on HQ core using a handheld Olympus Innovx |
|
| techniques | or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools | Delta Premium (DP4000C model) XRF analyser. | |
| appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down | Measurements were taken on surface of the core and depth | ||
| hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These | intervals recorded. |
||
| examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of | Cutting and sampling of core still to be carried out. | ||
| sampling. | |||
| Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample | |||
| representivity and the appropriate calibration of any | |||
| measurement tools or systems used. | |||
| Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material | |||
| to the Public Report. | |||
| In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this | |||
| would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was | |||
| used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to | |||
| produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more | |||
| explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse | |||
| gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual | |||
| commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) | |||
| may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | |||
| Drilling | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, | Core drilling carried out by Frontline drilling using a track- | |
| techniques | rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core | mounted Desco 7000 diamond drill rig. Mud rotary bit used | |
| diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- | from surface down to the weathered zone and changed to triple | ||
| sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by | tube HQ from fresh rock to end of hole. Core is oriented using |
||
| what method, etc). | Reflex ACT II RD digital core orientation tool. | ||
| Drill sample | Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample | Core is currently logged and recovery will be measured. | |
| recovery | recoveries and results assessed. | ||
| Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure | |||
| Page 7 |
==> picture [833 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| representative nature of the samples. | |||
| Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and | |||
| grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to | |||
| preferential loss/gainof fine/coarse material. | |||
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and | Geologic and geotechnical logging carried out on the core. | |
| geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate | Logging recorded as qualitative description of colour, | ||
| Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical | lithological type, grain size, structures, minerals and alteration. | ||
| studies. | All cores are photograpped using a digital camera. | ||
| Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or | |||
| costean, channel, etc) photography. | |||
| The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections | |||
| _logged. _ | |||
| Sub- | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all | Cores to be sawn and quarter core splits to be sampled and | |
| sampling | core taken. | submitted to the lab. Sampling intervals still to be determined. | |
| techniques | If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and | ||
| and sample preparation |
whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. |
||
| Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages | |||
| to maximise representivity of samples. | |||
| Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative | |||
| of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for | |||
| field duplicate/second-half sampling. | |||
| Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the | |||
| material being sampled. | |||
| Quality of | The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and | Olympus Innovx Delta Premium (DP4000C model) handheld | |
| assay data | laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is | XRF analyser. | |
| and laboratory tests |
considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. |
Reading times employed was 90 sec/beam for a total of 270 sec using Soil Mode. Handheld XRF QAQC includes duplicates, standards and blanks. |
|
| Page 8 |
==> picture [833 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, | |||
| blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether | |||
| acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision | |||
| have been established. | |||
| Verification | The verification of significant intersections by either | Not carried out because laboratory QA QC procedures are | |
| of sampling | independent or alternative company personnel. | regarded as sufficient for surface samples. | |
| and | The use of twinned holes. | Data entry carried out by field personnel thus minimizing | |
| assaying | Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
transcription or other errors. Trial plots in field and rigorous database procedures ensure that field and assay data are |
|
| Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | merged accurately. | ||
| Location of | Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar | Drill collars are surveyed by modern hand held GPS units with |
|
| data points | and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other | accuracy of 5m which is sufficient accuracy for the purpose of | |
| locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. | compiling and interpreting results. | ||
| Specification of the grid system used. | Topographic control 2-5m accuracy using published maps or | ||
| Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | Shuttle Radar data is sufficient to evaluate topographic effects | ||
| on assay distribution. | |||
| Data | Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | Not known at this stage. | |
| spacing and | Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to | ||
| distribution | establish the degree of geological and grade continuity | ||
| appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve | |||
| estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. | |||
| _Whether sample compositing has been applied. _ | |||
| Orientation | Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased | Diamond drill hole is oriented at -60oand due SW targeting a | |
| of data in | sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is | modelled EM conductor. | |
| relation to | known, considering the deposit type. | More information on the mineralized intersection upon | |
| geological structure |
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and |
completion of geological and geotechnical logging. | |
| reported if material. | |||
| Sample | The measures taken to ensure sample security. | Sampling intervals to be marked up on core accompanied by | |
| security | separate printed cutting interval sheet. Core trays to be | ||
| Page 9 |
==> picture [833 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| secured with steel straps on a pallet for transport to the core | ||
| cutting contractor. Samples to the laboratory will be placed in | ||
| calico bags then onto green bags. The green bags will be | ||
| sealed with cable ties for transport to the laboratory. | ||
| Audits or | The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques | N/A |
| reviews | and data. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | Type, reference name/number, location and ownership | Cullen Exploration owns the tenements and Matsa has farmed | |
| tenement | including agreements or material issues with third parties such | in to the Killaloe Project and has earned 80% interest in the | |
| and land | as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title | project after spending $500,000 in exploration costs. | |
| tenure status |
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along |
The project consists of 2 ELs and 4 Prospecting licenses. The Project is Located on Vacant Crown Land. The project is located within Native Title Claim No. 99/002 by |
|
| with any known impediments to obtaining a license to operate | the Ngadju people. | ||
| in the area. | A heritage agreement has been signed and exploration is | ||
| carried out within the terms of that agreement. | |||
| At the time of writing these licenses expire between 14thJune | |||
| 2013 and 8thJuly 2017. | |||
| Exploration | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | Significant past work has been carried out by other parties for | |
| done by | both Ni and Au exploration including, surface geochemical | ||
| other parties | sampling, ground electromagnetic surveys, RAB, AC, RC and DD drilling. |
||
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | The target is gold in shear controlled mineralization close to a | |
| splay of the Zuleika Shear within a distinctive corridor of mafic | |||
| volcanic, ultramafic and metasediments. | |||
| AnothertargetisKambalda styleNi hostedinultramaficrocks | |||
| Page 10 |
==> picture [833 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| within the project. | |||
| Drill hole | A summary of all information material to the understanding of | Co ordinates and other attributes of diamond drillholes are | |
| Information | the exploration results including a tabulation of the following | included in Appendix 2. | |
| information for all Material drill holes: | |||
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar |
|||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level |
|||
| in metres) of the drill hole collar | |||
o dip and azimuth of the hole |
|||
o down hole length and interception depth |
|||
o hole length. |
|||
| If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that | |||
| the information is not Material and this exclusion does not | |||
| detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent | |||
| _Person should clearly explain why this is the case. _ | |||
| Data | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging | Downhole assay values will be reported when it becomes | |
| aggregation | techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg | available. | |
| methods | cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material | ||
| and should be stated. | |||
| Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high | |||
| grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the | |||
| procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and | |||
| some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown | |||
| in detail. | |||
| The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent | |||
| _values should be clearly stated. _ | |||
| Relationship | These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of |
All intercepts reported are measured in down hole metres. |
|
| between | Exploration Results. | ||
| mineralisatio | If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill | ||
| n widths and | hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
||
| intercept lengths |
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
||
| Page 11 |
==> picture [833 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Matsa Resources Limited
----- End of picture text -----
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of | Suitable summary plans have been included in the body of the |
| intercepts should be included for any significant discovery | report. | |
| being reported These should include, but not be limited to a | ||
| plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional | ||
| _views. _ | ||
| Balanced | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is | Not required at this stage. |
| reporting | not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high | |
| grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading | ||
| _reporting of Exploration Results. _ | ||
| Other | Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be | Previous RC drill hole (KLC21) at this target intersected trace |
| substantive | reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; | Ni sulphides (3m @ 0.49% Ni from 88m – includes 1m @ |
| exploration data |
geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock |
0.65% Ni and 1m @ 0.52% Ni from 99m). No DHTEM were employed to test for off-hole conductors after this hole was drilled. |
| characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating | ||
| _substances. _ | ||
| Further work | The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for |
Down hole TEM (DHTEM) is planned after the completion of |
| lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out | the hole. | |
| drilling). | Further DD drilling to define continuity of nickel sulphide | |
| Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, | mineralization within the komatiite host rock pending results of | |
| including the main geological interpretations and future drilling | the DHTEM. | |
| _areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. _ |
==> picture [604 x 72] intentionally omitted <==
Page 12