AI assistant
AUSGOLD LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2026
Apr 13, 2026
64457_rns_2026-04-13_d893c325-9c9f-496b-938c-214c2a42b77f.pdf
Regulatory Filings
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX Release
14 April 2026
==> picture [126 x 85] intentionally omitted <==
Outstanding High-Grade Results Confirm Significant Growth Potential at Katanning Gold Project
Results of up to 41.25g/t Au support potential to grow reserves and extend mineralisation at depth
Highlights:
-
Significant intercepts returned from a further 77 reverse circulation (RC) and diamond drill-holes targeting opportunities for grade uplift within the Central Zone of the Katanning Gold Project:
-
11m @ 7.88g/t from 99m including 2m @ 41.25g/t from 100m in BSRC2022
-
21m @ 3.27g/t from 105m including 14m @ 4.69g/t from 110m in BSRC1978
-
11.5m @ 2.07g/t from 150m including 5.3m @ 4.12g/t from 150m in BSDD053
-
Wide zones of mineralisation encountered in areas of Inferred Resources[1] beneath the current DFS Update pit design and outside the current Ore Reserve[1] , highlighting strong potential for reserve growth and mine life extension, including:
-
20m @ 1.41g/t from 192m including 3m @ 2.94g/t from 192m and 6m @ 2.34g/t from 203m in BSRC2024
-
13m @ 1.02g/t from 242m including 2m @ 2.60g/t from 246m and 2m @ 2.30g/t from 253m in BSRC1976
-
10m @ 1.27g/t from 258m including 2m @ 3.68g/t from 258m in BSRC2024
-
Broad, high-grade intercepts returned from in-fill drilling at the Jinkas and White Dam lodes within the first two years of planned mine life, increasing confidence in grade continuity in the initial phases of the DFS Update mine plan:
-
12m @ 5.55g/t from 37m including 9m @ 7.26g/t from 39m in BSRC1961
-
15m @ 1.98g/t from 16m including 9m @ 3.06g/t from 21m in BSRC1962
-
4m @ 6.37g/t from 37m including 3m @ 8.34g/t from 37m in BSRC1991
-
Extensional drilling beneath the current Mineral Resource Estimate[1] along the White Dam–Jackson trends intersected significant mineralisation, reinforcing down-plunge growth potential, including:
-
9m @ 2.64g/t from 165m in BSRC1935
-
12m @ 1.51g/t from 200m including 2m @ 5.39g/t from 200m in BSRC1936
1 For further details, including JORC 2012 and ASX Listing Rule disclosures, refer to ASX announcement of 16 December 2025. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information contained in that announcement and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in that announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
ABN 67 140 164 496 Level 1, 307 Murray Street, Perth WA 6000
1
T: 08 9220 9890 F: 08 9220 9820 E: [email protected] W: www.ausgoldlimited.com
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
-
46,717m (328 holes) of 54,000m completed to date, with the Company currently awaiting approximately 15,349m of results.
-
Drilling along the White Dam-Jackson trend is in progress to follow up recent promising results.
-
Drilling completed at Nanicup Bridge to underpin a maiden satellite Resource.
Ausgold Limited (ASX: AUC) ( Ausgold or Company ) is pleased to report assay results from extensional and in-fill drilling within the Central Zone at its 100%-owned Katanning Gold Project ( KGP ) in WA, part of the current 54,000m reverse circulation ( RC ) and diamond drilling ( DD ) campaign.
The drilling campaign is targeting resource growth at the KGP, supporting potential for future reserve conversion, improving confidence in early mine life areas, as well as targeting new discoveries across the Company’s 3,000km[2 ] of regional tenure in the south-west of Western Australia.
Management Comments
Commenting on the drilling results, Ausgold Executive Chairman, John Dorward, said:
“The ongoing drilling campaign continues to deliver exceptional results across multiple fronts at the Katanning Gold Project. The consistency of high-grade results from both in-fill and extensional drilling continues to strengthen the Katanning growth story. With extensions of the mineralisation confirmed beneath the DFS Update pits and outside current reserves, we see a clear opportunity to grow the production base and extend mine life, while simultaneously optimising the early years of production. With regional drilling at Nanicup Bridge now complete, we are looking forward to reporting results from this exciting satellite project along with the balance of results from the KGP.”
Katanning Gold Project
The KGP lies within a major mineralised structural corridor, with exploration to date outlining a 15km trend hosting multi-lode gold mineralisation across three key Resource zones (Figure 1):
-
Northern Zone : Datatine deposit.
-
Central Zone : Jinkas-White Dam, Jackson and Olympia deposits.
-
Southern Zone : Dingo and Lukin deposits.
Drilling Results
RC drilling results reported in this announcement comprise 75 holes for 9,941m completed across the Central Zone, predominantly targeting the Jinkas-White Dam deposits, with the remainder of drilling completed into the footwall Jackson deposit (Figure 2). Two DD holes for 298m were drilled into the Jinkas-White Dam deposits for the purpose of collecting additional metallurgical testwork samples.
A total of 23 RC in-fill holes for 3,522m were drilled primarily into the Jinkas-White Dam deposit, with the purpose of converting Inferred Resources to Indicated status beneath the DFS pits, supporting potential
2
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
for future reserve growth, and targeting areas of the resource with the potential to enhance grade and improve local estimation confidence. Significant intercepts from this drilling include:
-
11m @ 7.88g/t from 99m including 2m @ 41.25g/t from 100m in BSRC2022
-
21m @ 3.27g/t from 105m including 14m @ 4.69g/t from 110m in BSRC1978
-
20m @ 1.41g/t from 192m including 3m @ 2.94g/t from 192m and 6m @ 2.34g/t from 203m in BSRC2024 (Figure 3)
-
11.5m @ 2.07g/t from 150m including 5.3m @ 4.12g/t from 150m in BSDD053
-
17m @ 0.85g/t from 104m including 3m @ 2.18g/t from 116m in BSRC1977
-
5.0m @ 2.89g/t from 232m in BSRC2022
-
13m @ 1.02g/t from 242m including 2.0m @ 2.60g/t from 246m and 2.0m @ 2.30g/t from 253m in BSRC1976
-
10m @ 1.27g/t from 258m including 2m @ 3.68g/t from 258m in BSRC2024
These results increase confidence in the potential for Resource-to-Reserve conversion in the primary Jinkas Pit, as well as potential to increase grade across the greater Jinkas-White Dam deposit.
A total of 38 in-fill RC and diamond drill holes for 2,407m were drilled into the Jinkas-White Dam deposit for the purpose of upgrading the first two years of the mine plan to measured classification, supporting early production confidence. Significant intercepts from this drilling include:
-
12m @ 5.55g/t from 37m including 9m @ 7.26g/t from 39m in BSRC1961 (Figure 4)
-
1m @ 76.00g/t from 18m in BSRC2021
-
15m @ 1.98g/t from 16m including 9m @ 3.06g/t from 21m in BSRC1962 (Figure 4)
-
4m @ 6.37g/t from 37m including 3m @ 8.34g/t from 37m in BSRC1991
-
11m @ 1.80g/t from 4m including 6m @ 2.95g/t from 6m in BSRC1998
-
7m @ 2.59g/t from 64m including 3m @ 5.64g/t from 66m in BSRC1979
-
3m @ 3.04g/t from 6m in BSRC1980
These results highlight consistent, high-grade mineralisation within the early years of the mine plan and support the upgrade to measured classification, providing increased confidence in early production and cash flow.
Grade reconciliation from in-fill drilling provides strong support for the existing geological and grade models, with most results either in line with or exceeding expectations, reinforcing confidence in the Mineral Resource Estimate.
3
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
A total of 16 RC holes for 4,310m were drilled to test mineralisation beyond the current 2.44Moz Mineral Resource[2] envelope, successfully extending mineralisation across all major Central Zone deposits and delivering the following significant results:
-
9m @ 2.64g/t from 165m in BSRC1935 (White Dam-Jackson) (Figure 5)
-
12m @ 1.51g/t from 200m including 2m @ 5.39g/t from 200m in BSRC1936 (White Dam-Jackson)
-
3m @ 2.95g/t from 119m in BSRC1973 (White Dam-Jackson)
-
7.0m @ 1.09g/t from 148m in BSRC2006 (Jinkas)
-
11.0m @ 0.70g/t from 183m in BSRC2016 (Jinkas)
-
8m @ 0.89g/t from 222m in BSRC2016 (Jinkas)
The results from the White Dam-Jackson lodes are particularly exciting, as the results indicate the emergence of a down-plunge repetition of the White Dam lode over a 620m strike length beneath the existing Resource (Figure 6).
The White Dam-Jackson lodes remain shallowly tested compared to the Jinkas lodes, with RC drilling continuing along the White Dam-Jackson Trend.
Further Work
-
Initial RC drilling to extend the primary Jinkas lode down-plunge is complete, with assays pending. EIS-supported diamond drilling to test further down-plunge extensions, including modelled EM plate targets, is scheduled to commence imminently (Figure 7).
-
Further down-dip opportunities at Jinkas have been identified with RC drilling scheduled to commence in late April (Figure 7).
-
Diamond drilling at Datatine, targeting in-fill and potential extensions of high-grade mineralisation, is complete, with core to be dispatched for analysis late April.
-
Drilling at Jackson and White Dam is currently in progress, with programs designed to follow up on promising results beneath the current Resource reported in this announcement (Figure 5-6).
-
RC drilling at Nanicup Bridge is complete, with assays pending from Resource-focused drilling aimed at expanding the Company’s growth beyond the KGP.
-
RC drilling at early-stage regional targets Moulyinning and Kulin is scheduled to commence in late April.
2 For further details, including JORC 2012 and ASX Listing Rule disclosures, refer to ASX announcement of 16 December 2025. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information contained in that announcement and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in that announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. See Appendix 1 for a breakdown of Mineral Resource Estimate and Ore Reserve categories.
4
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [379 x 635] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1 – Plan map of the Katanning Gold Project with the Resource Block Model, $A4,500 pit outline, an inset (Figure 2) of area of drilling results and current granted tenements
5
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [464 x 672] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2 – Geological map of the Central Zone displaying new drilling relative to the DFS (including end of year 2) and A$4,500 pit outlines, with location of cross-sections labelled
6
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [426 x 319] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3 – Cross-section A-A’ across the Jinkas-White Dam Lodes with Resource Drilling and Pits
==> picture [426 x 318] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4 – Cross-section B-B’ across the Jinkas Lodes with Resource Drilling and End of Year 2 Pit
7
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [511 x 382] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5 –Cross-section C-C’ across the White Dam-Jackson Lodes with Resource Drilling and Pit
8
==> picture [76 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [758 x 234] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6 – White Dam trend long-section looking WSW displaying gram-metre contours (0.3g/t Au cut-off), pierce points of existing drilling, DHEM plates, pit optimisation (A$4,500 Resource constraint) and zones of ongoing drilling
9
==> picture [76 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [758 x 234] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 7 – Jinkas trend long-section looking WSW displaying gram-metre contours (0.3g/t Au cut-off), pierce points of existing drilling, DHEM plates, pit optimisation (A$4,500 Resource constraint) and zones of ongoing Jinkas Resource extension drilling.
10
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
Table 1 – Significant intercepts
| Hole Id | From | To | Interval (m) |
Grade g/t Au |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSDD052 | 96.32 | 98.93 | 2.61 | 1.18 |
| BSDD052 | 103 | 104 | 1 | 0.4 |
| BSDD052 | 107.45 | 110.4 | 2.95 | 0.3 |
| BSDD052 | 112.71 | 114.05 | 1.34 | 0.6 |
| BSDD053 | 42 | 51 | 9 | 0.86 |
| including | 43.52 | 44.92 | 1.4 | 1.12 |
| and | 49 | 50 | 1 | 3.29 |
| BSDD053 | 54 | 57 | 3 | 2.28 |
| BSDD053 | 150 | 161.51 | 11.51 | 2.07 |
| including | 150 | 155.28 | 5.28 | 4.12 |
| BSRC1929 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0.33 |
| BSRC1929 | 22 | 29 | 7 | 0.51 |
| including | 23 | 24 | 1 | 1.06 |
| and | 26 | 27 | 1 | 1.15 |
| BSRC1929 | 32 | 33 | 1 | 0.51 |
| BSRC1929 | 46 | 47 | 1 | 0.37 |
| BSRC1929 | 60 | 64 | 4 | 0.4 |
| BSRC1929 | 76 | 77 | 1 | 0.83 |
| BSRC1929 | 80 | 81 | 1 | 0.46 |
| BSRC1929 | 92 | 93 | 1 | 0.35 |
| BSRC1929 | 97 | 99 | 2 | 0.33 |
| BSRC1930 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 0.75 |
| BSRC1930 | 41 | 42 | 1 | 3.9 |
| BSRC1930 | 51 | 53 | 2 | 0.34 |
| BSRC1930 | 58 | 59 | 1 | 0.34 |
| BSRC1930 | 86 | 87 | 1 | 0.41 |
| BSRC1930 | 103 | 105 | 2 | 0.65 |
| BSRC1930 | 108 | 109 | 1 | 0.43 |
| BSRC1930 | 111 | 112 | 1 | 0.31 |
| BSRC1931 | 109 | 112 | 3 | 0.56 |
| BSRC1931 | 120 | 121 | 1 | 0.33 |
| BSRC1931 | 126 | 127 | 1 | 0.37 |
| BSRC1931 | 138 | 141 | 3 | 1.28 |
| including | 138 | 139 | 1 | 3.49 |
| BSRC1931 | 164 | 165 | 1 | 0.64 |
| BSRC1931 | 187 | 192 | 5 | 0.53 |
| including | 190 | 191 | 1 | 1.17 |
| BSRC1934 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 0.31 |
| BSRC1934 | 23 | 24 | 1 | 0.3 |
| BSRC1934 | 27 | 28 | 1 | 0.9 |
| BSRC1934 | 38 | 39 | 1 | 0.61 |
| BSRC1934 | 46 | 47 | 1 | 0.44 |
| BSRC1934 | 54 | 55 | 1 | 0.32 |
| BSRC1934 | 71 | 77 | 6 | 0.51 |
| BSRC1934 | 185 | 186 | 1 | 0.34 |
| BSRC1934 | 198 | 205 | 7 | 1.44 |
| including | 199 | 203 | 4 | 2.3 |
| BSRC1935 | 0 | 18 | 18 | 0.92 |
| including | 8 | 18 | 10 | 1.41 |
| BSRC1935 | 154 | 155 | 1 | 1.37 |
| BSRC1935 | 161 | 162 | 1 | 0.34 |
| BSRC1935 | 165 | 174 | 9 | 2.64 |
| BSRC1935 | 177 | 178 | 1 | 0.63 |
| BSRC1935 | 185 | 186 | 1 | 0.31 |
| BSRC1935 | 198 | 199 | 1 | 0.46 |
| BSRC1935 | 251 | 252 | 1 | 0.45 |
| BSRC1936 | 151 | 152 | 1 | 1.78 |
| BSRC1936 | 170 | 175 | 5 | 0.38 |
11
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole Id | From | To | Interval (m) |
Grade g/t Au |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSRC1936 | 184 | 185 | 1 | 0.33 |
| BSRC1936 | 200 | 212 | 12 | 1.51 |
| including | 200 | 202 | 2 | 5.39 |
| and | 205 | 206 | 1 | 5.86 |
| BSRC1936 | 227 | 228 | 1 | 0.33 |
| BSRC1936 | 238 | 240 | 2 | 1.11 |
| including | 239 | 240 | 1 | 1.4 |
| BSRC1937 | 136 | 142 | 6 | 0.65 |
| including | 136 | 137 | 1 | 1.64 |
| BSRC1937 | 160 | 163 | 3 | 0.45 |
| BSRC1937 | 169 | 171 | 2 | 0.59 |
| BSRC1937 | 207 | 208 | 1 | 0.58 |
| BSRC1938 | 245 | 246 | 1 | 1.36 |
| BSRC1938 | 263 | 264 | 1 | 0.42 |
| BSRC1938 | 273 | 279 | 6 | 0.66 |
| including | 277 | 278 | 1 | 2.63 |
| BSRC1938 | 285 | 287 | 2 | 0.57 |
| BSRC1938 | 295 | 296 | 1 | 0.77 |
| BSRC1938 | 316 | 317 | 1 | 0.44 |
| BSRC1938 | 375 | 376 | 1 | 0.34 |
| BSRC1938 | 381 | 386 | 5 | 0.67 |
| including | 381 | 382 | 1 | 2.22 |
| BSRC1939 | 376 | 377 | 1 | 0.55 |
| BSRC1939 | 389 | 390 | 1 | 0.47 |
| BSRC1940 | 302 | 303 | 1 | 0.42 |
| BSRC1940 | 306 | 307 | 1 | 0.6 |
| BSRC1940 | 310 | 311 | 1 | 0.42 |
| BSRC1940 | 324 | 326 | 2 | 1.58 |
| BSRC1940 | 342 | 343 | 1 | 1.72 |
| BSRC1940 | 346 | 347 | 1 | 0.37 |
| BSRC1940 | 355 | 356 | 1 | 0.49 |
| BSRC1940 | 375 | 376 | 1 | 0.4 |
| BSRC1940 | 382 | 386 | 4 | 0.9 |
| including | 384 | 386 | 2 | 1.43 |
| BSRC1940 | 395 | 396 | 1 | 0.57 |
| BSRC1940 | 399 | 400 | 1 | 0.38 |
| BSRC1959 | 52 | 55 | 3 | 0.44 |
| BSRC1959 | 60 | 74 | 14 | 0.33 |
| BSRC1960 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0.45 |
| BSRC1961 | 13 | 14 | 1 | 0.88 |
| BSRC1961 | 19 | 23 | 4 | 0.37 |
| BSRC1961 | 28 | 29 | 1 | 0.77 |
| BSRC1961 | 37 | 49 | 12 | 5.55 |
| including | 39 | 48 | 9 | 7.26 |
| BSRC1961 | 189 | 191 | 2 | 1.61 |
| including | 189 | 190 | 1 | 2.27 |
| BSRC1961 | 199 | 203 | 4 | 1.46 |
| including | 200 | 203 | 3 | 1.73 |
| BSRC1961 | 207 | 216 | 9 | 0.55 |
| BSRC1962 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 0.65 |
| BSRC1962 | 16 | 31 | 15 | 1.98 |
| including | 21 | 30 | 9 | 3.06 |
| BSRC1963 | 11 | 13 | 2 | 0.5 |
| BSRC1963 | 47 | 48 | 1 | 0.72 |
| BSRC1963 | 62 | 63 | 1 | 0.53 |
| BSRC1964 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 3.01 |
| BSRC1964 | 13 | 14 | 1 | 0.58 |
| BSRC1964 | 28 | 29 | 1 | 0.37 |
| BSRC1964 | 31 | 32 | 1 | 0.33 |
| BSRC1964 | 37 | 38 | 1 | 0.33 |
12
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole Id | From | To | Interval (m) |
Grade g/t Au |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSRC1964 | 48 | 53 | 5 | 1.15 |
| including | 49 | 52 | 3 | 1.64 |
| BSRC1964 | 56 | 57 | 1 | 1.45 |
| BSRC1965 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 0.84 |
| BSRC1965 | 23 | 24 | 1 | 0.31 |
| BSRC1967 | 42 | 43 | 1 | 0.7 |
| BSRC1967 | 53 | 56 | 3 | 0.78 |
| including | 55 | 56 | 1 | 1.24 |
| BSRC1967 | 169 | 170 | 1 | 0.33 |
| BSRC1967 | 180 | 187 | 7 | 0.66 |
| including | 183 | 184 | 1 | 1.42 |
| and | 186 | 187 | 1 | 1.54 |
| BSRC1967 | 190 | 193 | 3 | 0.6 |
| BSRC1968 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 0.49 |
| BSRC1968 | 14 | 17 | 3 | 0.41 |
| BSRC1970 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0.4 |
| BSRC1970 | 20 | 24 | 4 | 0.47 |
| BSRC1971 | 126 | 128 | 2 | 0.94 |
| including | 127 | 128 | 1 | 1.49 |
| BSRC1971 | 136 | 137 | 1 | 0.53 |
| BSRC1971 | 143 | 144 | 1 | 0.63 |
| BSRC1971 | 152 | 156 | 4 | 1.41 |
| including | 153 | 154 | 1 | 3.37 |
| BSRC1971 | 241 | 243 | 2 | 0.41 |
| BSRC1971 | 246 | 247 | 1 | 0.53 |
| BSRC1972 | 129 | 131 | 2 | 1.22 |
| including | 129 | 130 | 1 | 2.1 |
| BSRC1972 | 153 | 156 | 3 | 2.07 |
| including | 155 | 156 | 1 | 5.49 |
| BSRC1972 | 160 | 167 | 7 | 0.67 |
| including | 162 | 163 | 1 | 1.71 |
| BSRC1972 | 178 | 179 | 1 | 0.35 |
| BSRC1972 | 185 | 186 | 1 | 0.33 |
| BSRC1972 | 227 | 228 | 1 | 0.5 |
| BSRC1973 | 115 | 116 | 1 | 0.46 |
| BSRC1973 | 119 | 122 | 3 | 2.95 |
| BSRC1973 | 144 | 146 | 2 | 0.39 |
| BSRC1973 | 149 | 150 | 1 | 0.7 |
| BSRC1973 | 153 | 155 | 2 | 0.42 |
| BSRC1973 | 175 | 176 | 1 | 0.34 |
| BSRC1973 | 179 | 180 | 1 | 0.63 |
| BSRC1973 | 187 | 188 | 1 | 1.21 |
| BSRC1973 | 194 | 199 | 5 | 0.51 |
| including | 198 | 199 | 1 | 1.15 |
| BSRC1973 | 202 | 204 | 2 | 3.21 |
| including | 202 | 203 | 1 | 5.83 |
| BSRC1973 | 212 | 213 | 1 | 0.39 |
| BSRC1974 | 35 | 36 | 1 | 0.32 |
| BSRC1976 | 45 | 49 | 4 | 0.31 |
| BSRC1976 | 83 | 84 | 1 | 0.46 |
| BSRC1976 | 103 | 104 | 1 | 0.31 |
| BSRC1976 | 130 | 131 | 1 | 0.57 |
| BSRC1976 | 134 | 135 | 1 | 0.54 |
| BSRC1976 | 139 | 140 | 1 | 0.31 |
| BSRC1976 | 144 | 147 | 3 | 0.31 |
| BSRC1976 | 150 | 151 | 1 | 0.39 |
| BSRC1976 | 162 | 169 | 7 | 0.71 |
| including | 165 | 169 | 4 | 1.02 |
| BSRC1976 | 175 | 178 | 3 | 1.05 |
| BSRC1976 | 211 | 213 | 2 | 0.33 |
13
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole Id | From | To | Interval (m) |
Grade g/t Au |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSRC1976 | 226 | 227 | 1 | 0.74 |
| BSRC1976 | 237 | 238 | 1 | 0.41 |
| BSRC1976 | 242 | 255 | 13 | 1.02 |
| including | 246 | 248 | 2 | 2.6 |
| and | 253 | 255 | 2 | 2.3 |
| BSRC1976 | 263 | 266 | 3 | 0.67 |
| BSRC1977 | 18 | 19 | 1 | 0.31 |
| BSRC1977 | 59 | 64 | 5 | 0.46 |
| including | 62 | 63 | 1 | 1.11 |
| BSRC1977 | 68 | 76 | 8 | 0.34 |
| BSRC1977 | 81 | 83 | 2 | 0.45 |
| BSRC1977 | 92 | 93 | 1 | 0.69 |
| BSRC1977 | 96 | 98 | 2 | 1.75 |
| including | 97 | 98 | 1 | 2.68 |
| BSRC1977 | 104 | 121 | 17 | 0.85 |
| including | 104 | 105 | 1 | 1.04 |
| and | 110 | 111 | 1 | 2.39 |
| and | 116 | 119 | 3 | 2.18 |
| BSRC1977 | 127 | 133 | 6 | 0.69 |
| including | 128 | 130 | 2 | 1.33 |
| BSRC1977 | 139 | 144 | 5 | 0.56 |
| including | 143 | 144 | 1 | 1.06 |
| BSRC1978 | 28 | 29 | 1 | 2.18 |
| BSRC1978 | 46 | 48 | 2 | 0.35 |
| BSRC1978 | 62 | 66 | 4 | 0.41 |
| BSRC1978 | 105 | 126 | 21 | 3.27 |
| including | 110 | 124 | 14 | 4.69 |
| BSRC1978 | 142 | 143 | 1 | 0.57 |
| BSRC1978 | 209 | 210 | 1 | 0.45 |
| BSRC1978 | 218 | 220 | 2 | 0.38 |
| BSRC1978 | 223 | 229 | 6 | 0.37 |
| BSRC1979 | 27 | 28 | 1 | 0.5 |
| BSRC1979 | 32 | 33 | 1 | 0.36 |
| BSRC1979 | 38 | 39 | 1 | 0.64 |
| BSRC1979 | 41 | 42 | 1 | 0.31 |
| BSRC1979 | 46 | 51 | 5 | 0.44 |
| BSRC1979 | 54 | 55 | 1 | 0.45 |
| BSRC1979 | 64 | 71 | 7 | 2.59 |
| including | 66 | 69 | 3 | 5.64 |
| BSRC1980 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 3.04 |
| including | 7 | 9 | 2 | 4.33 |
| BSRC1981 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0.42 |
| BSRC1981 | 43 | 44 | 1 | 0.89 |
| BSRC1982 | 17 | 20 | 3 | 0.38 |
| BSRC1982 | 28 | 30 | 2 | 0.46 |
| BSRC1982 | 38 | 39 | 1 | 0.3 |
| BSRC1982 | 42 | 43 | 1 | 0.66 |
| BSRC1983 | 19 | 20 | 1 | 0.59 |
| BSRC1985 | 19 | 20 | 1 | 0.5 |
| BSRC1985 | 49 | 50 | 1 | 0.74 |
| BSRC1985 | 109 | 111 | 2 | 0.74 |
| including | 110 | 111 | 1 | 1.1 |
| BSRC1986 | 13 | 17 | 4 | 1.16 |
| including | 14 | 17 | 3 | 1.38 |
| BSRC1987 | 38 | 43 | 5 | 1.2 |
| including | 38 | 42 | 4 | 1.33 |
| BSRC1987 | 46 | 48 | 2 | 0.53 |
| BSRC1987 | 52 | 53 | 1 | 0.94 |
| BSRC1988 | 14 | 15 | 1 | 0.58 |
| BSRC1988 | 18 | 23 | 5 | 1.1 |
14
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole Id | From | To | Interval (m) |
Grade g/t Au |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| including | 18 | 19 | 1 | 1.13 |
| and | 22 | 23 | 1 | 3.08 |
| BSRC1989 | 17 | 18 | 1 | 0.61 |
| BSRC1989 | 25 | 36 | 11 | 0.45 |
| including | 25 | 26 | 1 | 1.71 |
| BSRC1990 | 26 | 33 | 7 | 1.2 |
| including | 26 | 28 | 2 | 2.13 |
| and | 31 | 32 | 1 | 2.52 |
| BSRC1990 | 42 | 43 | 1 | 0.38 |
| BSRC1991 | 37 | 41 | 4 | 6.37 |
| including | 37 | 40 | 3 | 8.34 |
| BSRC1991 | 49 | 51 | 2 | 0.36 |
| BSRC1992 | 45 | 54 | 9 | 0.57 |
| including | 45 | 46 | 1 | 2.96 |
| BSRC1994 | 36 | 38 | 2 | 0.73 |
| including | 36 | 37 | 1 | 1.03 |
| BSRC1994 | 45 | 47 | 2 | 0.76 |
| BSRC1995 | 29 | 39 | 10 | 0.55 |
| including | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2.41 |
| BSRC1996 | 45 | 48 | 3 | 0.5 |
| BSRC1996 | 51 | 52 | 1 | 0.43 |
| BSRC1997 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 0.69 |
| BSRC1998 | 4 | 15 | 11 | 1.8 |
| including | 6 | 12 | 6 | 2.95 |
| and | 12 | 13 | 1 | 1.16 |
| BSRC1998 | 19 | 20 | 1 | 0.84 |
| BSRC1999 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.51 |
| BSRC1999 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 0.45 |
| BSRC1999 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 1.16 |
| BSRC2000 | 6 | 12 | 6 | 0.79 |
| including | 7 | 8 | 1 | 1.22 |
| and | 10 | 11 | 1 | 1.14 |
| BSRC2000 | 15 | 21 | 6 | 1.04 |
| including | 15 | 18 | 3 | 1.74 |
| BSRC2001 | 27 | 29 | 2 | 0.66 |
| BSRC2001 | 40 | 46 | 6 | 0.54 |
| including | 44 | 45 | 1 | 1.44 |
| BSRC2001 | 131 | 132 | 1 | 0.96 |
| BSRC2001 | 136 | 137 | 1 | 0.52 |
| BSRC2001 | 141 | 142 | 1 | 0.86 |
| BSRC2002 | 113 | 116 | 3 | 0.47 |
| BSRC2002 | 120 | 122 | 2 | 0.71 |
| BSRC2005 | 136 | 137 | 1 | 0.39 |
| BSRC2005 | 142 | 143 | 1 | 0.42 |
| BSRC2006 | 139 | 140 | 1 | 0.36 |
| BSRC2006 | 148 | 155 | 7 | 1.09 |
| including | 148 | 151 | 3 | 2.24 |
| and | 149 | 150 | 1 | 1.13 |
| BSRC2007 | 75 | 76 | 1 | 0.32 |
| BSRC2007 | 103 | 104 | 1 | 0.4 |
| BSRC2007 | 131 | 132 | 1 | 0.51 |
| BSRC2007 | 141 | 142 | 1 | 0.53 |
| BSRC2007 | 149 | 151 | 2 | 0.84 |
| BSRC2008 | 80 | 81 | 1 | 0.34 |
| BSRC2008 | 106 | 107 | 1 | 0.35 |
| BSRC2009 | 113 | 114 | 1 | 0.7 |
| BSRC2009 | 119 | 120 | 1 | 0.43 |
| BSRC2009 | 126 | 129 | 3 | 0.79 |
| including | 128 | 129 | 1 | 1.09 |
| BSRC2009 | 142 | 144 | 2 | 0.55 |
15
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole Id | From | To | Interval (m) |
Grade g/t Au |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSRC2009 | 153 | 154 | 1 | 0.56 |
| BSRC2010 | 19 | 20 | 1 | 0.4 |
| BSRC2010 | 32 | 33 | 1 | 0.38 |
| BSRC2011 | 24 | 25 | 1 | 0.31 |
| BSRC2011 | 33 | 34 | 1 | 1.14 |
| BSRC2011 | 37 | 41 | 4 | 0.65 |
| BSRC2011 | 37 | 38 | 1 | 1.04 |
| BSRC2012 | 46 | 52 | 6 | 0.5 |
| BSRC2012 | 58 | 59 | 1 | 0.48 |
| BSRC2013 | 50 | 54 | 4 | 0.41 |
| BSRC2014 | 151 | 152 | 1 | 0.53 |
| BSRC2015 | 27 | 35 | 8 | 0.34 |
| BSRC2015 | 99 | 100 | 1 | 0.34 |
| BSRC2015 | 107 | 110 | 3 | 0.87 |
| BSRC2016 | 161 | 162 | 1 | 0.67 |
| BSRC2016 | 174 | 175 | 1 | 0.32 |
| BSRC2016 | 183 | 194 | 11 | 0.7 |
| including | 186 | 187 | 1 | 1.45 |
| and | 190 | 191 | 1 | 1.34 |
| and | 193 | 194 | 1 | 2.41 |
| BSRC2016 | 200 | 204 | 4 | 0.72 |
| including | 200 | 201 | 1 | 1.03 |
| and | 203 | 204 | 1 | 1.53 |
| BSRC2016 | 210 | 212 | 2 | 0.39 |
| BSRC2016 | 222 | 230 | 8 | 0.89 |
| including | 223 | 224 | 1 | 2.57 |
| and | 228 | 229 | 1 | 1.1 |
| BSRC2016 | 247 | 249 | 2 | 0.43 |
| BSRC2021 | 18 | 19 | 1 | 76 |
| BSRC2022 | 63 | 64 | 1 | 0.3 |
| BSRC2022 | 80 | 81 | 1 | 0.81 |
| BSRC2022 | 90 | 91 | 1 | 0.97 |
| BSRC2022 | 94 | 95 | 1 | 0.99 |
| BSRC2022 | 99 | 110 | 11 | 7.88 |
| including | 100 | 102 | 2 | 41.25 |
| BSRC2022 | 115 | 120 | 5 | 1.01 |
| including | 116 | 120 | 4 | 1.03 |
| BSRC2022 | 134 | 138 | 4 | 1.37 |
| including | 134 | 136 | 2 | 2.38 |
| BSRC2022 | 141 | 144 | 3 | 2.66 |
| including | 142 | 143 | 1 | 7.18 |
| BSRC2022 | 149 | 150 | 1 | 0.38 |
| BSRC2022 | 153 | 156 | 3 | 0.78 |
| including | 154 | 155 | 1 | 1.49 |
| BSRC2022 | 163 | 164 | 1 | 0.56 |
| BSRC2022 | 170 | 178 | 8 | 0.99 |
| including | 175 | 178 | 3 | 2.06 |
| BSRC2022 | 222 | 224 | 2 | 0.61 |
| BSRC2022 | 232 | 237 | 5 | 2.89 |
| BSRC2022 | 240 | 248 | 8 | 0.63 |
| including | 245 | 246 | 1 | 1.32 |
| BSRC2023 | 165 | 166 | 1 | 0.4 |
| BSRC2023 | 171 | 173 | 2 | 0.35 |
| BSRC2023 | 183 | 186 | 3 | 0.76 |
| including | 184 | 185 | 1 | 1.06 |
| BSRC2023 | 196 | 197 | 1 | 0.48 |
| BSRC2023 | 200 | 202 | 2 | 0.84 |
| BSRC2023 | 205 | 223 | 18 | 0.65 |
| including | 208 | 212 | 4 | 1.11 |
| and | 214 | 215 | 1 | 1.07 |
16
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole Id | From | To | Interval (m) |
Grade g/t Au |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| and | 217 | 218 | 1 | 1.13 |
| and | 219 | 220 | 1 | 1.07 |
| BSRC2023 | 226 | 231 | 5 | 0.67 |
| including | 226 | 227 | 1 | 2.05 |
| BSRC2023 | 234 | 236 | 2 | 0.62 |
| BSRC2023 | 285 | 286 | 1 | 6.4 |
| BSRC2023 | 294 | 296 | 2 | 0.69 |
| BSRC2024 | 136 | 144 | 8 | 0.33 |
| BSRC2024 | 161 | 167 | 6 | 1.07 |
| including | 161 | 163 | 2 | 2.18 |
| BSRC2024 | 174 | 183 | 9 | 0.95 |
| including | 176 | 180 | 4 | 1.63 |
| BSRC2024 | 186 | 187 | 1 | 0.31 |
| BSRC2024 | 192 | 212 | 20 | 1.41 |
| including | 192 | 195 | 3 | 2.94 |
| and | 203 | 209 | 6 | 2.34 |
| BSRC2024 | 258 | 268 | 10 | 1.27 |
| including | 258 | 260 | 2 | 3.68 |
| and | 267 | 268 | 1 | 2.75 |
| BSRC2024 | 273 | 278 | 5 | 0.43 |
| BSRC2031 | 284 | 288 | 4 | 0.36 |
| BSRC2031 | 291 | 292 | 1 | 1.14 |
| BSRC2031 | 313 | 314 | 1 | 0.46 |
| BSRC2032 | 170 | 171 | 1 | 0.52 |
| BSRC2032 | 181 | 182 | 1 | 0.43 |
| BSRC2032 | 188 | 193 | 5 | 0.5 |
| BSRC2032 | 204 | 212 | 8 | 0.72 |
| including | 209 | 211 | 2 | 1.35 |
| BSRC2032 | 215 | 227 | 12 | 0.82 |
| including | 219 | 221 | 2 | 3.11 |
| BSRC2032 | 230 | 231 | 1 | 0.57 |
| BSRC2032 | 254 | 255 | 1 | 0.61 |
| BSRC2032 | 310 | 311 | 1 | 0.43 |
| BSRC2032 | 318 | 323 | 5 | 0.8 |
| including | 319 | 320 | 1 | 1.66 |
| BSRC2046 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0.42 |
| BSRC2046 | 61 | 66 | 5 | 1.74 |
| including | 62 | 63 | 1 | 5.82 |
| BSRC2046 | 69 | 70 | 1 | 0.35 |
| BSRC2047 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 0.97 |
| including | 10 | 11 | 1 | 3.57 |
| BSRC2048 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0.45 |
Notes to Table 1 .
For RC drill assay results the intervals reported are thickness-weighted averages (i.e. XXm grading XX grams per tonne gold content). Reported intervals are calculated using ≥ 0.3g/t Au cut-off grade and using a ≤ 2m minimum internal dilution. All ‘included’ intervals are calculated using >1.0g/t Au cutoff and using a ≤ 2m minimum internal dilution.
17
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
Table 2 – Collar Locations
| Hole Id | Total Depth(m) |
MGA East |
MGA North |
RL (m) | Azimuth | Dip | Tenement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSDD052 | 126.81 | 584398 | 6288307 | 386 | 245 | -71 | M70/211 |
| BSDD053 | 170.76 | 584413 | 6288104 | 370 | 250 | -60 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1929 | 108 | 583515 | 6289396 | 342 | 0 | -90 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1930 | 120 | 583527 | 6289446 | 344 | 248 | -72 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1931 | 234 | 583780 | 6289402 | 352 | 247 | -67 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1934 | 228 | 584173 | 6288834 | 353 | 242 | -79 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1935 | 253 | 583456 | 6289935 | 354 | 0 | -90 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1936 | 253 | 583504 | 6289855 | 354 | 244 | -88 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1937 | 252 | 583578 | 6289780 | 354 | 243 | -60 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1938 | 402 | 584417 | 6289181 | 350 | 243 | -60 | E70/2928 |
| BSRC1939 | 426 | 584462 | 6289203 | 349 | 244 | -67 | E70/2928 |
| BSRC1940 | 426 | 584458 | 6289201 | 349 | 240 | -66 | E70/2928 |
| BSRC1959 | 102 | 584146 | 6288261 | 363 | 243 | -85 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1960 | 18 | 584021 | 6288286 | 356 | 244 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1961 | 216 | 584157 | 6288647 | 356 | 63 | -82 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1962 | 39 | 584143 | 6288645 | 355 | 0 | -90 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1963 | 90 | 584174 | 6288699 | 354 | 62 | -75 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1964 | 69 | 584172 | 6288697 | 354 | 0 | -90 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1965 | 39 | 584137 | 6288680 | 354 | 244 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1966 | 33 | 584125 | 6288715 | 352 | 244 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1967 | 213 | 584172 | 6288737 | 352 | 242 | -86 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1968 | 27 | 584106 | 6288750 | 351 | 245 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1969 | 21 | 584079 | 6288785 | 350 | 245 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1970 | 30 | 584097 | 6288791 | 350 | 245 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1971 | 258 | 583741 | 6289550 | 355 | 247 | -64 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1972 | 252 | 583706 | 6289621 | 356 | 247 | -64 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1973 | 240 | 583620 | 6289689 | 355 | 250 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1974 | 48 | 584213 | 6288496 | 365 | 247 | -51 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1975 | 24 | 584180 | 6288479 | 363 | 0 | -90 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1976 | 276 | 584324 | 6288548 | 367 | 72 | -73 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1977 | 156 | 584321 | 6288546 | 367 | 95 | -83 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1978 | 264 | 584302 | 6288585 | 363 | 78 | -81 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1979 | 75 | 584241 | 6288589 | 360 | 247 | -62 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1980 | 24 | 584173 | 6288553 | 359 | 244 | -49 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1981 | 57 | 584136 | 6288810 | 351 | 245 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1982 | 54 | 584118 | 6288845 | 352 | 244 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1983 | 36 | 583954 | 6289084 | 353 | 243 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1984 | 39 | 583923 | 6289160 | 352 | 244 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1985 | 120 | 584046 | 6289130 | 352 | 0 | -90 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1986 | 48 | 584224 | 6287849 | 363 | 247 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1987 | 72 | 584274 | 6287876 | 364 | 246 | -49 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1988 | 39 | 584243 | 6287815 | 365 | 245 | -51 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1989 | 57 | 584255 | 6287821 | 365 | 244 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1990 | 57 | 584267 | 6287827 | 365 | 243 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1991 | 69 | 584289 | 6287839 | 365 | 247 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1992 | 66 | 584302 | 6287844 | 365 | 247 | -68 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1993 | 39 | 584259 | 6287777 | 366 | 244 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1994 | 57 | 584293 | 6287796 | 367 | 245 | -61 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1995 | 48 | 584284 | 6287745 | 368 | 244 | -59 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1996 | 63 | 584325 | 6287765 | 368 | 245 | -60 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1997 | 18 | 584476 | 6287675 | 369 | 246 | -58 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1998 | 30 | 584510 | 6287692 | 368 | 254 | -79 | M70/211 |
| BSRC1999 | 21 | 584503 | 6287644 | 370 | 247 | -59 | M70/211 |
| BSRC2000 | 30 | 584528 | 6287659 | 368 | 0 | -90 | M70/211 |
| BSRC2001 | 156 | 584595 | 6287651 | 370 | 247 | -51 | M70/211 |
| BSRC2002 | 165 | 584804 | 6287580 | 374 | 247 | -73 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2005 | 174 | 584948 | 6287405 | 381 | 245 | -65 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2006 | 174 | 584965 | 6287339 | 386 | 246 | -62 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2007 | 162 | 584943 | 6287243 | 391 | 248 | -75 | M70/488 |
18
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole Id | Total Depth(m) |
MGA East |
MGA North |
RL (m) | Azimuth | Dip | Tenement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSRC2008 | 138 | 584946 | 6287068 | 393 | 246 | -68 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2009 | 162 | 585000 | 6287094 | 394 | 248 | -74 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2010 | 66 | 584991 | 6286651 | 377 | 63 | -52 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2011 | 51 | 584612 | 6287523 | 375 | 245 | -59 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2012 | 60 | 584556 | 6287173 | 384 | 0 | -90 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2013 | 69 | 584410 | 6287522 | 375 | 248 | -61 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2014 | 162 | 585026 | 6286996 | 392 | 246 | -68 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2015 | 114 | 584619 | 6287454 | 379 | 241 | -61 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2016 | 276 | 584599 | 6288326 | 368 | 247 | -60 | M70/211 |
| BSRC2021 | 33 | 584185 | 6288558 | 360 | 248 | -65 | M70/211 |
| BSRC2022 | 264 | 584381 | 6288638 | 363 | 257 | -87 | M70/211 |
| BSRC2023 | 318 | 584415 | 6288815 | 361 | 246 | -70 | E70/2928 |
| BSRC2024 | 294 | 584418 | 6288724 | 363 | 245 | -66 | M70/211 |
| BSRC2031 | 366 | 584412 | 6289056 | 356 | 244 | -74 | E70/2928 |
| BSRC2032 | 336 | 584329 | 6289058 | 355 | 244 | -66 | E70/2928 |
| BSRC2046 | 81 | 584504 | 6287392 | 382 | 252 | -78 | M70/488 |
| BSRC2047 | 42 | 584080 | 6287781 | 362 | 245 | -60 | E70/2928 |
| BSRC2048 | 42 | 583978 | 6288087 | 353 | 0 | -90 | M70/211 |
19
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
The Board of Directors of Ausgold Limited approved this announcement for release to the ASX.
For further information please visit Ausgold’s website or contact:
| John Dorward | Nicholas Read |
|---|---|
| Executive Chairman, Ausgold Limited | Read Corporate |
| T: +61 (08) 9220 9890 | T: +61 (08) 9388 1474 |
| E: [email protected] | E: [email protected] |
Competent Person’s Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to exploration drill results is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation compiled by Mr Graham Conner, who is an employee of Ausgold Limited and a Member of The Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Conner takes responsibility for the integrity of the exploration results published herein, including sampling, assaying, QA/QC and the preparation of geological interpretations. Mr Conner has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activities being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person under The Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code, 2012 edition). The Competent Person consents to the inclusion of such information in this report in the form and context in which it appears.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Announcement includes “forward-looking statements” as that term within the meaning of securities laws of applicable jurisdictions. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are in some cases beyond Ausgold Limited’s control. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, all statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this presentation, including, without limitation, those regarding Ausgold Limited’s future expectations. Readers can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “risk,” “should,” “will” or “would” and other similar expressions. Risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause Ausgold Limited’s actual results, performance, production or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements (and from past results, performance or achievements). These factors include, but are not limited to, the failure to complete and commission the mine facilities, processing plant and related infrastructure in the time frame and within estimated costs currently planned; variations in global demand and price for coal and base metal materials; fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar, and the Australian dollar; the failure of Ausgold Limited’s suppliers, service providers and partners to fulfil their obligations under construction, supply and other agreements; unforeseen geological, physical or meteorological conditions, natural disasters or cyclones; changes in the regulatory environment, industrial disputes, labour shortages, political and other factors; the inability to obtain additional financing, if required, on commercially suitable terms; and global and regional economic conditions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The information concerning possible production in this announcement is not intended to be a forecast. They are internally generated goals set by the board of directors of Ausgold Limited. The ability of the company to achieve any targets will be largely determined by the company’s ability to secure adequate funding, implement mining plans, resolve logistical issues associated with mining and enter into any necessary off take arrangements with reputable third parties. Although Ausgold Limited believes that its expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements.
20
==> picture [75 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
Appendix 1: Mineral Resource Estimate and Ore Reserve[3]
December 2025 Mineral Resource Estimate
| RESOURCE CATEGORY | TONNES (MT) | GRADE (G/T AU) |
CONTAINED GOLD (OZ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MEASURED | 41.6 | 1.14 | 1,531,000 |
| INDICATED | 21.2 | 1.02 | 693,000 |
| INFERRED | 5.9 | 1.16 | 219,000 |
| TOTAL RESOURCE | 68.6 | 1.11 | 2,443,000 |
December 2025 Ore Reserve
| ORE RESERVE | CATEGORY | ORE (MT) | GRADE (G/T) | CONTAINED GOLD (KOZ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROVED | 29.1 | 1.14 | 1,070.0 | |
| CENTRAL ZONE | PROBABLE | 5.4 | 0.96 | 168.7 |
| SUB-TOTAL | 32.3 | 1.12 | 1,238.7 | |
| PROVED | 1.2 | 0.97 | 36.5 | |
| SOUTH ZONE | PROBABLE | 1.7 | 1.01 | 54.6 |
| SUB-TOTAL | 2.9 | 0.99 | 91.0 | |
| TOTAL | 37.4 | 1.11 | 1,329.7 |
3 For further details refer to ASX Announcement dated 16 December 2025. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information contained in that announcement and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in that announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
21
Appendix 2: Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling techniques |
• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1m samples from which 3kg was pulverised to produce a 30g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
The reverse circulation (RC) drilling program referred to in this announcement consists of75RC holes for 9,941m. The diamond (DD) drilling program referred to in this announcement consists of2DD holes for297.57m. RC Samples from RC drilling were collected in one metre intervals in mineralised zones with a 1/8 split for assay, split by a cyclone-mounted cone splitter, bagged in pre-numbered calico bags and the remainder retained in large plastic bags. Selected non-mineralised zones were spear sampled over 1m intervals and composited to a 3m sample. Composite spear sampling is only applied in known non-mineralised intervals and is not used within mineralised zones. Field duplicates (additional split from RC) are inserted into the sequence at a rate of 1 in 20 samples. Field certified reference materials and blanks are inserted into the sequence of assay samples at a rate of 1 in 25. Each RC metre sampled weighed approximately 2 to 3 kilograms. Samples were sorted, dried, crushed to 10mm then pulverised to -75µm. Gold was analysed from a 50g charge and using fire assay (Au AA26). DD Samples from DD drilling were nominally collected at 1m intervals, however, where appropriate the geologist adjusted these intervals to match geological intervals. HQ diamond drill core was split using a diamond bladed saw with one quarter being submitted for analysis. QAQC samples consisting of standards and blanks were inserted into the sequence of assay samples at a rate of 1 in 25. |
22
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Each sample weighed approximately 1 to 3 kilograms. Samples were sorted, dried, crushed to 10mm then pulverised to -75µm. Gold was analysed from a 50g charge and usingfire assay (Au AA26). |
||
| Drilling techniques |
• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open- hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
RC RC drilling was conducted using a truck mounted 660 Schramm reverse circulation rig, using a 139-143mm diameter bit. DD Diamond drilling was conducted using a track mounted Sandvik DR800 rig using HQ drill sizes (standard tubes). Drill core was orientated at least every 3-6m using an Axis Mining Champ orientation tool (CHAMPORITM). |
| Drill sample recovery |
• Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
RC A semi-quantitative estimate of sample recovery is done for each sample. Drill sample recovery approximates to 100% in all mineralised zones. Samples were collected dry. Variation from this is recorded in the drill log. The cyclone-mounted cone splitter is cleaned thoroughly between rod changes. The cyclone is cleaned every 30m, or between rod changes when sample is wet. In addition, the cyclone is generally cleaned at the base of transported cover and the base of completed oxidation, and after each hole to minimise cross- hole contamination. The relationship between sample recovery and grade and whether bias has been introduced has not been investigated at this stage. DD A quantitative measure of sample recovery was done for each run of core. Recoveries were generally excellent (>95%), with reduced recovery in the initial near-surface material (unmineralised). Given the consistently excellent recoveries, the relationship between sample recovery and grade and whether bias has been introduced has not been investigated at this stage. |
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging isqualitative orquantitative in |
All holes in the current program have been geologically logged to a high level of detail to support the definition of geological domains appropriate to support Mineral Resource Estimation and exploration work. Geologists logging drilling have been trained how to log to a high level of detail through their university studies as well as by Supervising Geologists experienced in the geology of the region, including high metamorphic terranes. |
23
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
For RC drilling representative rock chips from every metre were collected in chip trays and logged by the geologist at the drill site. For DD drilling, core was collected in core trays and logged by the geologist at a core yard proximal to the drill site. Lithology, weathering (oxidation state), veining, mineralisation, alteration and structures (diamond only) are recorded in detail using standard digital logging sheets and defined look up tables to ensure that all data is collected consistently. Reference cards aided the logging of sulphides, which along with the experience of logging geologists, ensures sulphide estimates are reliable and reproduceable. Logging data is entered using tablet computers. All data is validated by the logging geologist before being entered in an acQuire database. All chip trays and core trays are photographed using a SLR camera and images recorded using the cloud- based system. |
|
| Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
RC All 1m samples are cone split at the drill rig. All 3m composites collected are speared through the bulk sample for each metre within the large plastic bags and composited into pre-numbered calico bag through the known non-mineralised intervals. These composite samples are recorded in the sample log for each hole. All samples have the aim of being drilled dry, where samples are moist or wet due to ground conditions the rig geologist will record in the sample log for each hole. Field duplicates (additional split from RC) are inserted into the sequence at a rate of 1 in 20 samples. Field certified reference materials and blanks are inserted into the sequence of assay samples at a rate of 1 in 25. DD |
24
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Samples were nominally collected at 1m intervals, however, where appropriate the geologist adjusted these intervals to match geological intervals. HQ diamond drill core was split using a diamond bladed saw with one quarter being submitted for analysis. QAQC samples consisting of standards and blanks were inserted into the sequence of assay samples at a rate of 1 in 25. |
||
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
Analysis for gold was undertaken by ALS by fire assay (Au AA26), considered to be a to be a ‘total assay technique’. Field quality control procedures adopted comprised of entering a sequence of matrix matched commercially certified reference materials (CRM’s), and blanks into the sample run at a frequency of approximately 1 in 25 samples for RC drilling. Field duplicates were collected every 1 in 20 samples for RC drilling. For diamond drilling, samples were nominally collected at 1m intervals, however, where appropriate the geologist adjusted these intervals to match geological intervals. HQ diamond drill core was split using a diamond bladed saw with one quarter being submitted for analysis. QAQC samples consisting of standards and blanks were inserted into the sequence of assay samples at a rate of 1 in 25. Gold CRM’s were sourced from Geostats Pty Ltd and are used to check accuracy and bias of the analytical method. Gold certified values range between 0.38g/t and 2.33g/t. Blank material was sourced from Geostats Pty Ltd and should be below detection limits. Standard reference materials are used to check accuracy and bias of the analytical method. The results were similar to the standard concentration for the specific standard. QAQC samples were monitored on a batch‐by‐batch basis. An assay batch is accepted if the blank samples are within the acceptable limits (5 times the lower detection limit) and the standards are within the + 3SD (standard deviations). One failed standard can cause rejection if the results around the failed standard are not in the normal grade range. A batch is also re‐assayed when assay results from two or more standards are outside the acceptable limits. The inserted blank materials did not show any consistent issues with sample contamination. Review of CRM’s and blanks suggest an acceptable level of accuracy (lack of bias) is established. The performance of field duplicates in RC samples is generally reasonable and the variations are related to the style of mineralisation. |
25
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Internal laboratory checks are conducted including insertion of CRM’S, blanks and conducting lab duplicates. Review of the internal laboratory QA/QC checks suggests the laboratory is performing within acceptable limits. |
||
| Verification of sampling and assaying |
• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
High standard QAQC procedures are in place therefore repeatability issues from a QAQC point of view are not considered to be significant. Significant and/or unexpected intersections were reviewed by alternate company personnel through review of geological logging data, physical examination of remaining samples and review of digital geological interpretations. All assay data was accepted into the database as supplied by the laboratory. Data importation into the database is documented through standard operating procedures and is guided by acQuire import validations to prevent incorrect data capture/importation. Geological determination data is directly captured in the database through a validation-controlled interface using Toughbook computers and acQuire database import validations. Primary data is stored in its source electronic form. Assay data is retained in both the original certificate (.pdf) form and the text files received from the laboratory. Data entry, validation and storage are discussed in the section on database integrity below. Diamond drill holes BSDD052 and BSDD053 were completed as twins of previously drilled RC holes to assess sampling and assay reproducibility between drilling methods. Comparison of results indicates comparable grade tenor overall, returning grades consistent with the twinned RC holes. No adjustments to assaydata were undertaken. |
| Location of data points |
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
Drill holes are reported in MGA94 datum, UTM zone 50 coordinates. Elevation values are in AHD. Drill hole collars (and drilling foresight/backsight pegs) were set out and picked up by Ausgold personnel using a differential GPS; which provided +/- 100 millimetre accuracy. An end of hole gyroscopic drill hole survey was completed by the drilling contractors using an Axis Mining Champ Gyro tool. The gyro measured the first shot at 0m followed by every 30m down-hole. The data was examined and validated onsite by the supervising geologist. Any surveys that were spurious were re-taken. Validated surveys are entered into the acQuire data base. |
26
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Data spacing and distribution |
• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
Drilling was conducted on variable spacings. The drilling was largely on a nominal 20-40m hole spacing and 40-80m line spacing. Data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation. No compositing has been applied to mineralised intervals. |
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
Drilling typically angled, (nominally -60 towards 244° with minor variations) tested the east dipping lodes (20 – 35°) and gneissic foliation as to minimise bias. Surface conditions in the drill area mean variations of the nominal drill orientation were used in order to gain access. BSRC1929, 1935, 1961-1964, 1975-1978, 1985, 2000, 2012 and 2048 were drilled sub-vertically or steeply (>73°) to the northeast. The relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have minor sampling bias and is not considered material for the sub- vertical to vertical holes. BSRC2010 (angled at 52° to the northeast) is oblique to the lode geometry. Accordingly, reported downhole intercepts are not necessarilytrue widths and mayoverstate true thickness byapproximately2× . |
| Sample security |
• The measures taken to ensure sample security. | All drill samples are systematically numbered and placed in pre-printed (numbered) calico bags and placed into numbered polyweave bags which were tied securely and marked with flagging. Assay samples were stored at a dispatch area and dispatched weekly. Samples were shipped via a local logistics company directly to labs in Perth. The sample dispatches were accompanied by supporting documentation signed by the geologist and showing the sample submission number, analysis suite and number of samples. The chain of custody is maintained by the labs once the samples are received on site and a full audit is conducted. Assay results are emailed to the responsible geology administrators in Perth and are loaded into the acQuire database through an automatedprocess. QAQC on import is completed before the results are finalised. |
| Audits or reviews |
• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
Before the commencement of this drilling program, the sampling process was fully reviewed and documented as a standard company process. There were some minor operational and technical adjustments identified to improve validation of collected data, interpretation of data and management of QAQC practices. These improvements have been updated into standard operating procedures(manual). |
27
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
• Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
Reported results are all from 100% owned Ausgold Exploration Pty Ltd Tenements (wholly owned subsidiary of Ausgold Limited) – E70/2928, M70/211 and M70/488. The land is used primarily for grazing and cropping. The tenements are in good standing, and all work is conducted under specific approvals from the Department of Mines, Petroleum and Exploration (DMPE). Apart from reserved areas, rights to surface land use are held under freehold titles, held by Ausgold. Written consent under section 18(3) for Jinkas Hill dated 24 January 2018 was granted by Honourable Ben Wyatt MLA to disturb and remove the registered Aboriginal Heritage Site 5353 known as “Jinkas Hill” which is located on the eastern side of the Jinkas Pit. |
| Exploration done by other parties |
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
Gold mineralisation was discovered by Otter Exploration NL in 1979 at Jinkas Hill, Dyliabing, Lone Tree and White Dam after following up stream sediment anomalies. Between 1984 and 1988 Otter and related companies evaluated the region with several other explorers including South-West Gold Mines and Minasco Resources Pty Ltd. In 1987, Glengarry Mining NL purchased the project and in 1990 entered into a joint venture with Uranerz who agreed on minimum payments over three years to earn 50% interest. Uranerz withdrew from the project in 1991 after a decision by their parent company in Germany to cease Australian operations. International Mineral Resources NL (IMR) purchased the mining leases and the Grants Patch treatment plant from Glengarry Mining NL in 1995 and commenced mining at the Jinkas deposit in December 1995. Ausgold understands the mine was closed in 1997 after producing approximately 20,000 oz of gold from the Jinkas and Dingo Hill open cuts at a head grade of approximately 2.4g/t. In addition, the mine closure was brought about by a combination of the low gold price of the time (<US$400/oz) and the inability of the processing plant’s comminution circuit to process hard ore from below the base of weathering. Reports from the period indicate that the ore bodies were reasonably predictable in terms of grade and continuity and appeared to produce consistent and reproducible results from grade control (Ravensgate, 1999). Great Southern Resources Pty Ltd (GSR) purchased the mining and exploration leases from IMR in August 2000. Ausgold entered into a joint venture with GSR in August 2010, and the mineral titles were transferred to Ausgold in entirety in August 2011. |
28
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
The project includes three main deposit areas named Northern Zone, Central Zone and Southern Zone. Each of these areas are subdivided into a set of mineralised lodes. The majority of the project area is overlain by residual clays with outcrop mostly limited to remnants of lateritic duricrust on topographic highs. Gold mineralisation is hosted by medium to coarse-grained mafic gneisses which dip at around 20° to 45° towards grid east (68°) in Southern and Central Zone and around 30° to 45° towards the WSW in Northern Zone. These units represent Archaean greenstones metamorphosed to granulite facies. The mineralised gneissic units are interlayered with barren quartz-monzonite sills up to approximately 120 metres thick and are cross-cut by several Proterozoic dolerite dykes that post-date mineralisation and granulite metamorphism. Gold predominantly occurs as free gold associated with disseminated pyrrhotite and magnetite, lesser pyrite and chalcopyrite. |
| Drill hole Information |
• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collaro elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevationabove sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the holeo down hole length and interception deptho hole length.• If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
Plans showing location of drill holes and location of significant results and interpreted trends are provided in the Figures of the report. Details of drill holes including new significant drill results are provided in tables of the report. |
29
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Data aggregation methods |
• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
All reported assays have been arithmetically length weighted. For all drill assay results the intervals reported are thickness-weighted averages (i.e. XXm grading XX grams per tonne gold content). Reported intervals are calculated using ≥ 0.3g/t Au cut-off grade and using a ≤ 2m minimum internal dilution (unless otherwise stated). All ‘included’ intervals are calculated using >1.0g/t Au cut-off and using a ≤ 2m minimum internal dilution (unless otherwise stated). |
| Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
• These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
The geometry of any primary mineralisation at the KGP is such that it trends N-S to NNW-SSE and dips moderately (20°-45°) to the east. Given this, drilling intersects mineralisation at a high-angle and downhole intercepts approximates true widths in most cases. If down hole length varies significantly from known true width then appropriate notes are provided. |
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Refer to Figures. |
| Balanced reporting |
• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
See Table 1. All intervals above the stated reporting cut-off are included; no selective reporting has occurred. |
30
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Other substantive exploration data |
• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
At this stage there is no substantive exploration data from the recent drilling that is meaningful and material to report. |
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
Further RC drilling is planned within the KGP including to test the continuity of the White Dam-Jackson and Jinkas-White Dam lodes (Central Zone) and Datatine (Northern Zone) – see announcement for detail on drilling awaiting assays and upcoming drilling. |
31