AI assistant
abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund — Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2018
Sep 21, 2018
32236_rns_2018-09-21_5cdb3bd1-bf75-4ed4-bbd3-3b64b6bd73ce.zip
Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
CORRESP 1 filename1.htm
VIA EDGAR
Ms. Anu Dubey
Division of Investment Management
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549
Re: Aberdeen Total Dynamic Dividend Fund Preliminary Proxy Statement filed on Schedule 14A on September 7, 2018, SEC Accession No. 0001104659-18-055837
Dear Ms. Dubey:
This letter responds to comments on the above-referenced Preliminary Proxy Statement (the First Preliminary Proxy Statement) that the staff (the Staff) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC or the Commission) provided in a telephone conversation with Jennifer Rogers and Robert Hepp of Aberdeen Asset Management Inc. and Steven Messer of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP on September 14, 2018. The Preliminary Proxy Statement pertains to an annual meeting of shareholders of the Aberdeen Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (the Registrant). Although we believe that the disclosure in the First Preliminary Proxy Statement is acceptable and consistent with industry norms for proxy disclosure, in an effort to afford more time for shareholder consideration of the proposals, the language has been revised to address the Staffs comments and is being submitted concurrently with this letter (the Second Preliminary Proxy Statement).
For your convenience, the substance of the Staffs comments has been restated below. The Registrants responses to each comment are set out immediately under the restated comment. Defined terms, unless otherwise defined herein, have the meanings given them in the First Preliminary Proxy Statement.
Comment No. 1 : In connection with your response to these comments, please file another preliminary proxy statement.
Response : The Registrant is filing the Second Preliminary Proxy Statement via EDGAR contemporaneously with the submission of these responses to the Staffs comments on the First Preliminary Proxy Statement.
Comment No. 2 : On page 2 of the First Preliminary Proxy Statement, please include disclosure clarifying what a plurality of the shares entitled to vote means.
Response : Disclosure has been added to address this comment.
Comment No. 3 : Page 3 of the First Preliminary Proxy Statement states that Saba is nominating its dissident nominee who is unfamiliar with the fund. Please either provide the factual basis for the assertion that Sabas nominee is unfamiliar with the fund or remove that language.
SEQ.=1,FOLIO='',FILE='C:\JMS\109431\18-27122-2\task9060879\27122-2-bg.htm',USER='109431',CD='Sep 22 02:43 2018'
Response : The language has been removed.
Comment No. 4 : Page 3 of the First Preliminary Proxy Statement states that Saba is seeking approval of its self-interested proposal to declassify the Board so that all Trustees are elected annually Please either remove the self-interested descriptor of the declassification proposal or provide specific evidence that the declassification proposal will benefit Saba in a way that it will not benefit other shareholders.
Response : The language has been modified, consistent with the tenor of your comment.
Comment No. 5 : Page 3 of the First Preliminary Proxy Statement provides as follows: In contrast, the Board believes that the activist hedge fund nominee will seek to advance the short-term goals of the activist hedge fund that nominated him rather than the long-term goals of Fund shareholders. Please either delete or revise this sentence or provide the factual basis for the Boards belief.
Response : The sentence has been revised.
Comment No. 6 : On page 3 of the First Preliminary Proxy Statement, please revise the sentence beginning with the phrase To further its own agenda to clarify that this characterization is an opinion of the Board or the Fund.
Response : The sentence has been revised.
Comment No. 7 : Please remove the word handpicked as a descriptor for Sabas candidate on page 3 of the First Preliminary Proxy Statement, or, alternatively, provide a distinction between Sabas candidate and the Boards candidate supporting the use of the word handpicked for Sabas candidate while omitting the same term in describing the Boards candidate, who is also presumably handpicked.
Response : The word has been removed.
Comment No. 8 : Please provide the factual foundation for the following sentence on page 4 of the First Preliminary Proxy Statement, or, alternatively, remove the sentence: Saba, through its hedge funds, invests in closed-end funds and has a history of attempting to cash in on one-time or short-term gains by causing the closed-end funds to conduct debilitating tender offers, open end fund conversions or other liquidity events.
Response: The disclosure has been revised. In support, we refer the Staff to the following, in each case indicating a settlement agreement with Saba requiring a tender offer: (1) Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund; and (2) Clough Global Opportunities Fund.
Comment No. 9 : Please remove the following sentence from page 4 of the First Preliminary Proxy Statement, or, alternatively, characterize it as an opinion: Saba does this to benefit its
2
SEQ.=1,FOLIO='2',FILE='C:\JMS\109431\18-27122-2\task9060879\27122-2-bg.htm',USER='109431',CD='Sep 22 02:43 2018'
own hedge funds and to be paid higher fees, and not to benefit the shareholders of the closed-end funds it attacks.
Response : The sentence has been characterized as an opinion.
Comment No. 10 : Please remove the word debilitating in the first sentence of the final paragraph on page 4 of the First Preliminary Proxy Statement .
Response : The word has been removed.
Comment No. 11 : Please remove the word forced in the final sentence of the final paragraph on page 4 of the First Preliminary Proxy Statement .
Response : The language has been removed.
In connection with the Staffs review of the Second Preliminary Proxy Statement, the Registrant acknowledges that, with respect to filings made by the Registrant with the Commission and reviewed by the Staff:
(a) the Registrant is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings;
(b) Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments in the filings reviewed by the Staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and
(c) the Registrant may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
Should you have any questions concerning the above, please call the undersigned at ( 215) 405-5757.
| Very truly yours, |
|---|
| /s/ Jennifer M. Rogers |
| Jennifer M. Rogers |
| cc: |
| Rose F. DiMartino, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP |
| Elliot J. Gluck, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP |
| Steven P. Messer, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP |
3
SEQ.=1,FOLIO='3',FILE='C:\JMS\109431\18-27122-2\task9060879\27122-2-bg.htm',USER='109431',CD='Sep 22 02:43 2018'